| |
Main
Date: 30 Nov 2006 23:37:49
From: nash
Subject: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
What kind of bike uses this tire. I was browsing biketiresdirect and saw
them
Road bike with MTB tires, hilarious
http://www.biketiresdirect.com/productdetail.asp?p=KETK9&tnum=4430495&c=5903892&ref=pd
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 01:32:38
From: Werehatrack
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:37:49 GMT, "nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net >
wrote:
>What kind of bike uses this tire. I was browsing biketiresdirect and saw
>them
>Road bike with MTB tires, hilarious
>
>http://www.biketiresdirect.com/productdetail.asp?p=KETK9&tnum=4430495&c=5903892&ref=pd
It's actually a well-disguised form of 700c tire.
It's used on a beast known as a "29er", oddly enough.
It appears that I'll have one on Monday.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 02:55:51
From: nash
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
> It's actually a well-disguised form of 700c tire.
>
> It's used on a beast known as a "29er", oddly enough.
>
> It appears that I'll have one on Monday.
> --
Why would you want one. Does it go faster, better for taller people? 'ur
you will not know until Monday?
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 19:05:54
From: Werehatrack
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:55:51 GMT, "nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net >
wrote:
>> It's actually a well-disguised form of 700c tire.
>>
>> It's used on a beast known as a "29er", oddly enough.
>>
>> It appears that I'll have one on Monday.
>> --
>
>Why would you want one.
Curiosity, and the opportunity to get one cheap.
>Does it go faster, better for taller people? 'ur
>you will not know until Monday?
"Faster"? How would an objective comparison be made that didn't have
multiple variables not subject to independent analysis? Sorry, in my
estimation, this question is meaningless in a generalized context. As
for "better", that's entirely subjective; YMMV, therefore no
generalized answer is accurate. Even "for taller people" may be
meaningless without additional context, and not particularly general
within the subject group.
All I will be able to state once I have it and have ridden it is
whether the 29er will prove to be a useful and worthwhile addition to
the fleet, or if I'll do a quick rehab and sell it to someone who
wants what it offers...whatever they may think those attributes are
for them.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 20:02:07
From: nash
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
lol
Do not go radical on a simple question.
Anybody might say that if it puts you higher off the ground maybe you got it
because you were tall.
The 29ers are a smoother ride as told by another poster who knows Not
everything is subjective.
I am just trying to finesse what the spectacle is about this new bike. Why
was it made in the first place? like Maybe I would like it because I am
tall and my new bike spins out at top gear.
So I do not think it is a stupid Q. Sorry if you think so.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 05:49:55
From: Blair Maynard
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
It is a common misconception that 29ers put a rider higher. It is
completely false. Height of the rider is dictated by the bottom bracket,
which is a function of the design of the bike. Since the BB is not on top
of the wheels, it needs to be no higher on a 29er than a 26er.
What the 29er wheel does do is put the relative mass of the rider lower in
relation to the centers of the wheels. This arguably makes it harder to go
OTB. This depends on whether you are rotating on the contact patch or the
center of the front axle. IMHO the location of the OTB rotation point is
usually somewhere inbetween the contact patch and the center of the front
wheel -- if the bike is still moving forward the center of rotation is
closer to the contact patch, if the front wheel is stopped, you are rotating
on the center of the front wheel. One warning -- if you do OTB on a 29er,
you land hard, at least that is my experience.
"nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net > wrote in message
news:3T%bh.399628$1T2.305324@pd7urf2no...
> lol
> Do not go radical on a simple question.
> Anybody might say that if it puts you higher off the ground maybe you got
> it because you were tall.
> The 29ers are a smoother ride as told by another poster who knows Not
> everything is subjective.
> I am just trying to finesse what the spectacle is about this new bike.
> Why was it made in the first place? like Maybe I would like it because I
> am tall and my new bike spins out at top gear.
> So I do not think it is a stupid Q. Sorry if you think so.
>
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 04:51:22
From: Mike Jacoubowsky
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
>> It's actually a well-disguised form of 700c tire.
>>
>> It's used on a beast known as a "29er", oddly enough.
>>
>> It appears that I'll have one on Monday.
>> --
>
> Why would you want one. Does it go faster, better for taller people? 'ur
> you will not know until Monday?
Smoother ride over bumps, 'cuz the larger wheel doesn't sink in like the
smaller wheels do. Many feel there's a much greater feel of momentum, which
keeps them going (and upright). Generally not quite as nimble as a
smaller-wheeled mountain bike, but that could be good or bad (and the
manufacturers are dialing in geometry to minimize the handling differences).
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
"nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net > wrote in message
news:XQMbh.404685$R63.71050@pd7urf1no...
>> It's actually a well-disguised form of 700c tire.
>>
>> It's used on a beast known as a "29er", oddly enough.
>>
>> It appears that I'll have one on Monday.
>> --
>
> Why would you want one. Does it go faster, better for taller people? 'ur
> you will not know until Monday?
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Nov 2006 18:00:41
From: DougC
Subject: Re: 29 by 2.1 tire
|
nash wrote:
> What kind of bike uses this tire. I was browsing biketiresdirect and saw
> them
> Road bike with MTB tires, hilarious
>
> http://www.biketiresdirect.com/productdetail.asp?p=KETK9&tnum=4430495&c=5903892&ref=pd
>
>
There's MTB's now that run 29" wheels, have you heard?
Here's a few-
http://www.trails-edge.com/retail/bikeparts/frames-mtb29er.htm
~
|
|
