| |
Main
Date: 22 Apr 2007 14:10:34
From: Claire Petersky
Subject: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
See: http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
--
Warm Regards,
Claire Petersky
http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky
|
|
| |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 05:08:14
From:
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"I have no problem with Claire's posts, but if they bother you why
not just killfile them?"
Primarily because I'm just trying to help her. Her husband obviously
has not the balls to tell her to shut the f**k up, and she needs to
learn that not all men are that way.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 20:28:28
From: John Thompson
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On 2007-04-26, bcrowell@excite.com <bcrowell@excite.com > wrote:
> "I have no problem with Claire's posts, but if they bother you why
> not just killfile them?"
> Primarily because I'm just trying to help her. Her husband obviously
> has not the balls to tell her to shut the f**k up, and she needs to
> learn that not all men are that way.
Yes, I'm sure that must be it. How selfless of you.
--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
|
| | |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 09:35:51
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> "I have no problem with Claire's posts, but if they bother you why
> not just killfile them?"
>
> Primarily because I'm just trying to help her. Her husband obviously
> has not the balls to tell her to shut the f**k up, and she needs to
> learn that not all men are that way.
Gee, that was charming. No wonder you hate women -- they obviously can't
stand you (and for good reason).
Yech.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 06:34:42
From: Bill
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> "I have no problem with Claire's posts, but if they bother you why
> not just killfile them?"
>
> Primarily because I'm just trying to help her. Her husband obviously
> has not the balls to tell her to shut the f**k up, and she needs to
> learn that not all men are that way.
>
You guys should get a room, padded.
Claire's posts are often a break from the silly arguments on here.
Look in the mirror, people.
Bill Baka
|
| |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 05:02:36
From:
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
I agree with Ozark. I find Claire's posts to usually be fatuous and
irritating. I don't care how long she has been a member of the group;
if she has nothing important to say, she should just remain quiet.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 09:39:27
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> I agree with Ozark. I find Claire's posts to usually be fatuous and
> irritating. I don't care how long she has been a member of the group;
> if she has nothing important to say, she should just remain quiet.
I'm trying to recall anything you've contributed other than political screed
and Claire-bashing. If her stuff doesn't interest you, don't read it. If
she really annoys you (after all, she's a woman and you obviously hate them)
(and vice versa), then plonk her.
Problem solved, off you go...
Yech
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Apr 2007 18:03:24
From: nash
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me > wrote in message
news:4630d5c9$0$17136$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
>> I agree with Ozark. I find Claire's posts to usually be fatuous and
>> irritating. I don't care how long she has been a member of the group;
>> if she has nothing important to say, she should just remain quiet.
>
> I'm trying to recall anything you've contributed other than political
> screed and Claire-bashing. If her stuff doesn't interest you, don't read
> it. If she really annoys you (after all, she's a woman and you obviously
> hate them) (and vice versa), then plonk her.
>
> Problem solved, off you go...
>
> Yech
hate politics is still good publicity.
Where you cycling to next Claire?
|
| |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 10:46:43
From:
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
I agree with Ozark. I find Claire and her trivial, nonsensical,
solipstictical posts to be rather irritating, and I don't care how
long she has been a member of the group. That's simply all the more
reason why, if she has nothing important to say, she should just keep
quiet.
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 19:43:38
From: John Thompson
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On 2007-04-24, bcrowell@excite.com <bcrowell@excite.com > wrote:
> I agree with Ozark. I find Claire and her trivial, nonsensical,
> solipstictical posts to be rather irritating, and I don't care how
> long she has been a member of the group. That's simply all the more
> reason why, if she has nothing important to say, she should just keep
> quiet.
I have no problem with Claire's posts, but if they bother you why not
just killfile them?
--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 20:26:30
From: Roger Zoul
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
:: I agree with Ozark. I find Claire and her trivial, nonsensical,
:: solipstictical posts to be rather irritating,
Then you're rather stupid to keep reading them.
and I don't care how
:: long she has been a member of the group. That's simply all the more
:: reason why, if she has nothing important to say, she should just keep
:: quiet.
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 13:13:05
From: DI
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
<bcrowell@excite.com > wrote in message
news:1177436803.566552.129040@r30g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>I agree with Ozark. I find Claire and her trivial, nonsensical,
> solipstictical posts to be rather irritating, and I don't care how
> long she has been a member of the group. That's simply all the more
> reason why, if she has nothing important to say, she should just keep
> quiet.
>
OK, who's holding the gun to this guy's head and making him read every post?
But, in regard to the OP, I guess I'll have to ask "who's David Byrne?"
|
| | | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 16:13:33
From: Pork Torpedo
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"DI" <di9999@cox.net > wrote in message
news:RMrXh.158597$g24.22217@newsfe12.phx...
> But, in regard to the OP, I guess I'll have to ask "who's David Byrne?"
Remember the "Talking Heads"? He was the lead singer.
|
| | | | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 18:39:24
From: DI
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"Pork Torpedo" <porktorpedo@charter.net > wrote in message
news:iawXh.1697$OR3.799@newsfe04.lga...
>
> "DI" <di9999@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:RMrXh.158597$g24.22217@newsfe12.phx...
>
>> But, in regard to the OP, I guess I'll have to ask "who's David Byrne?"
>
> Remember the "Talking Heads"? He was the lead singer.
>
No, never heard of them or him.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 18:11:20
From: Pork Torpedo
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"DI" <di9999@cox.net > wrote in message
news:LywXh.260908$7g3.122473@newsfe14.phx...
> No, never heard of them or him.
Too bad, they were very good.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talking_Heads
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 15:39:35
From: Ozark Bicycle
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On Apr 22, 5:05 pm, "Rich Clark" <rdclark2S...@TRAPcomcast.net > wrote:
> "Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1177278478.885363.189290@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 1:36 pm, rdclark <rdcla...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Ozark Bicycle
>
> >> <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote:
> >> > On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
> >> > Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
> >> > bike that was grabbed?
>
> >> So you're like, what, just a nasty, bitter old man or something?
> >> Sounds like.
>
> > Tell ya what, putz: when you're finished hanging out at alt.battlestar-
> > galactica, alt.tv.firefly, alt.tv.buffy-v-slayer, etc., you can come
> > back and explain why it's post-worthy. Deal?
>
> Right after you get done explaining why people who've been making
> substantial positive contributions to this newsgroup long before you ever
> started pissing in the drinking water owe you an explanation for anything.
>
Fire up yer TiVo, you don't wanna miss any TV!
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 09:17:41
From: Pat
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
Dude, your posts are so weird. You don't post anything positive or
worthwhile.
Pat in TX
|
| | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 19:10:17
From: Rich Clark
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com > wrote in message
news:1177281575.704359.220000@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 22, 5:05 pm, "Rich Clark" <rdclark2S...@TRAPcomcast.net> wrote:
>> "Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1177278478.885363.189290@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 22, 1:36 pm, rdclark <rdcla...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Ozark Bicycle
>>
>> >> <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>>
>> >> > Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
>> >> > bike that was grabbed?
>>
>> >> So you're like, what, just a nasty, bitter old man or something?
>> >> Sounds like.
>>
>> > Tell ya what, putz: when you're finished hanging out at alt.battlestar-
>> > galactica, alt.tv.firefly, alt.tv.buffy-v-slayer, etc., you can come
>> > back and explain why it's post-worthy. Deal?
>>
>> Right after you get done explaining why people who've been making
>> substantial positive contributions to this newsgroup long before you ever
>> started pissing in the drinking water owe you an explanation for
>> anything.
>>
>
> Fire up yer TiVo, you don't wanna miss any TV!
I get entertainment watching and discussing fantasy TV shows. You get
entertainment trying to make people feel bad. And you think *I* should be
embarrassed.
Gotcha.
*plonk*
R
>
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 14:47:58
From: Ozark Bicycle
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On Apr 22, 1:36 pm, rdclark <rdcla...@comcast.net > wrote:
> On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Ozark Bicycle
>
> <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
> > Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
> > bike that was grabbed?
>
> So you're like, what, just a nasty, bitter old man or something?
> Sounds like.
>
Tell ya what, putz: when you're finished hanging out at alt.battlestar-
galactica, alt.tv.firefly, alt.tv.buffy-v-slayer, etc., you can come
back and explain why it's post-worthy. Deal?
|
| | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 18:05:11
From: Rich Clark
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com > wrote in message
news:1177278478.885363.189290@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 22, 1:36 pm, rdclark <rdcla...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Ozark Bicycle
>>
>> <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote:
>> > On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>>
>> > Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
>> > bike that was grabbed?
>>
>> So you're like, what, just a nasty, bitter old man or something?
>> Sounds like.
>>
>
> Tell ya what, putz: when you're finished hanging out at alt.battlestar-
> galactica, alt.tv.firefly, alt.tv.buffy-v-slayer, etc., you can come
> back and explain why it's post-worthy. Deal?
Right after you get done explaining why people who've been making
substantial positive contributions to this newsgroup long before you ever
started pissing in the drinking water owe you an explanation for anything.
R
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 12:18:51
From:
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
Claire, you really need to get a life.
|
| | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 16:27:55
From: Rich Clark
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
<bcrowell@excite.com > wrote in message
news:1177269531.464931.303660@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Claire, you really need to get a life.
You wish you had a life like Claire's.
R
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 11:55:55
From: Tom Keats
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
In article <u1KWh.24157$PL.21636@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Claire Petersky" <cpetersky@mouse-potato.com > writes:
> See: http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
Just goes to show, nobody's immune to
the bane of bike theft.
cheers,
Tom
--
Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 12:28:37
From: Roger Zoul
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
Tom Keats wrote:
:: "Claire Petersky" <cpetersky@mouse-potato.com > writes:
::: See: http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
::
:: Just goes to show, nobody's immune to
:: the bane of bike theft.
Also, the more you ride about on one, the more you're likely to find it
coming up missing.
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 11:36:49
From: rdclark
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Ozark Bicycle
<bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com > wrote:
> On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
> wrote:
>
> > See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
> Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
> bike that was grabbed?
So you're like, what, just a nasty, bitter old man or something?
Sounds like.
R
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 11:11:27
From: Ozark Bicycle
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com >
wrote:
> "Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1177258864.865661.262570@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
> > wrote:
> >> See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
> > Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
> > bike that was grabbed?
>
> David Byrne still has cool hair, that's enough for me.
>
> Ok, ok, if that's not enough for you, he's a well-known guy in another
> field, who has been pretty active in supporting bicycling causes where he
> lives. I think that helps bicycling in general, so it's too bad that his
> bike was stolen.
>
And he's probably better able to buy a replacement without feeling the
pinch than many a Joe Schmoe.
|
| |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 09:21:04
From: Ozark Bicycle
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com >
wrote:
> See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
bike that was grabbed?
|
| | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 08:24:45
From: dgk
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
On 22 Apr 2007 09:21:04 -0700, Ozark Bicycle
<bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com > wrote:
>On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
>wrote:
>> See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>>
>
>
>Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
>bike that was grabbed?
Well, for me, Byrne is in my city talking with the guy who is doing
the most to help NYC bikers. Those of us who live in the big city have
to deal with having our bikes stolen. Any publicity that helps focus
on that little problem is important.
I'm thinking of buying a nicer bike for commuting, but I have to limit
the expense to $300 to $400 because more than that I really don't want
to have to replace. That sucks.
We need indoor bike parking. We need a law that we can bring our bikes
into commerical buildings. Right now, my work building bans bikes, so
I have to leave it outside. I could bring it right to my office
otherwise.
I've also saw a few Talking Heads shows back in the late 1970s. They
were great. So here's a post that mentions a band that I like and an
issue of importance to biking.
Thanks for posting it Claire. And thanks for your other posts as well.
You always brighten up my day.
Dave
|
| | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 16:52:19
From: Roger Zoul
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
Ozark Bicycle wrote:
:: Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
:: bike that was grabbed?
Gee, why is this post-worhty? Are you jealous that you're not known and
respected by others?
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 17:35:59
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
Roger Zoul wrote:
> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>>> Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
>>> bike that was grabbed?
> Gee, why is this post-worhty? Are you jealous that you're not known
> and respected by others?
I knew Joe Schmoe. Joe schmoe was a friend of mine. Ozark...is no Joe
Schmoe.
Bill "/still/ a slow day" S.
|
| | |
Date: 22 Apr 2007 17:31:16
From: Claire Petersky
Subject: Re: David Byrne's bike stolen
|
"Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com > wrote in message
news:1177258864.865661.262570@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 22, 9:10 am, "Claire Petersky" <cpeter...@mouse-potato.com>
> wrote:
>> See:http://tinyurl.com/297vyq
>
> Gee, why is this post-worthy? Would you post if it were Joe Schmoe's
> bike that was grabbed?
David Byrne still has cool hair, that's enough for me.
Ok, ok, if that's not enough for you, he's a well-known guy in another
field, who has been pretty active in supporting bicycling causes where he
lives. I think that helps bicycling in general, so it's too bad that his
bike was stolen.
--
Warm Regards,
Claire Petersky
http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky
|
|
