| |
Main
Date: 06 Nov 2007 04:17:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
with stalking. It is all down and no up.
Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
to.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 16:45:27
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 7, 12:54 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1194379693.673715.73970@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Nov 6, 4:17 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have
> >> some
> >> pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure
> >> connected
> >> with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> > In another post you contended that it was envy that was my driving
> > force .. contradicting yourself again??? The conundrum continues.
>
> The point was that there is no pleasure in being a stalker just as there is
> no pleasure in being envious. They are both vices which give no pleasure. I
> would pick a vice that gives some pleasure. Getting drunk is not a bad
> choice, although it will make your feet go numb and your head hurt. But at
> least it does give some pleasure, however brief.
Your conclusion does not strictly follow form the premise. Non
sequitor is one of your all time favorite logiclal fallacies, is it
not? must have There is no possible way for you to determine whether
or not I enjoy what I do, so you are not in a position to make such
pronouncements with any degree of certainty. .
> >> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
> >> someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
> >> for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by
> >> the
> >> time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up.
> >> They
> >> are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>
> > I will repeat yet again since you so thick headed that multiple
> > repetitions are necessary ... 61 is hardly pushing 70
>
> You are far older than you think. Like me, you already have one foot in the
> grave. Don't believe me? Just have a look at any teenager.
> [...]
Diversion duly noted. At 61, I am obviously closer to 70 than to
being a teenager. On the other hand, your calling attention to this
fact does not make your statement that I am pushing 70 any closer to
being true than it was when first uttered (written). Then again, you
often make many thoughtless statements that can be easily proven to be
fallacious opinions at best.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 21:13:08
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1194482727.222653.181680@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 7, 12:54 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1194379693.673715.73970@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Nov 6, 4:17 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices
>> >> have
>> >> some
>> >> pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure
>> >> connected
>> >> with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>>
>> > In another post you contended that it was envy that was my driving
>> > force .. contradicting yourself again??? The conundrum continues.
>>
>> The point was that there is no pleasure in being a stalker just as there
>> is
>> no pleasure in being envious. They are both vices which give no pleasure.
>> I
>> would pick a vice that gives some pleasure. Getting drunk is not a bad
>> choice, although it will make your feet go numb and your head hurt. But
>> at
>> least it does give some pleasure, however brief.
>
> Your conclusion does not strictly follow form the premise. Non
> sequitor is one of your all time favorite logiclal fallacies, is it
> not? must have There is no possible way for you to determine whether
> or not I enjoy what I do, so you are not in a position to make such
> pronouncements with any degree of certainty.
I advise you to take up drinking to the point of falling down drunk. You
will be a far, far happier person when you are rolling around on the ground
as drunk as a skunk.
>> >> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine
>> >> allowing
>> >> someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched
>> >> condition
>> >> for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up
>> >> by
>> >> the
>> >> time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow
>> >> up.
>> >> They
>> >> are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>>
>> > I will repeat yet again since you so thick headed that multiple
>> > repetitions are necessary ... 61 is hardly pushing 70
>>
>> You are far older than you think. Like me, you already have one foot in
>> the
>> grave. Don't believe me? Just have a look at any teenager.
>> [...]
>
> Diversion duly noted. At 61, I am obviously closer to 70 than to
> being a teenager. On the other hand, your calling attention to this
> fact does not make your statement that I am pushing 70 any closer to
> being true than it was when first uttered (written). Then again, you
> often make many thoughtless statements that can be easily proven to be
> fallacious opinions at best.
You are old - period! Try to act your age why don't you?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 16:33:28
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 6, 10:53 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net > wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:27:36 -0800, JimmyMac <jimmyma...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Nov 6, 9:48 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
> >> >pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
> >> >with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> >> >Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
> >> >someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
> >> >for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
> >> >time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
> >> >are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>
> >> >I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
> >> >with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
> >> >That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
> >> >blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
> >> >Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
>
> >> >A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
> >> >to.
>
> >> Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the newsgroups
> >> who say anything original.
>
> >Not only are you pitifully myopic, but you are also rather short on
> >retention. Ed Dolan in his own words ... "I have never had an
> >original idea in my entire life and I never will."
>
> Thanks for proving my point, by simply regurgitating what someone else
> said. That's what stalkers do. They don't have a life of their own....
Mike, you are as perceptive as the average tree stump in your blessed
wilderness. Thanks for proving my point that you stand guilty of
mental myopia as charged. Now, listen and learn. Regurgitation and
quotation are not synonyms. Even Conan the Librarian Dolan knows
that. Dolan's monotonous, incessantly repetition qualifies as
regurgitation. I countered your assertion regarding originality by
employing Ed's own words in rebuttal. What was intended by the
purposeful quotation and what it connoted apparently escaped your poor
powers of perception. You consider yourself and Dolan of superior
intellect do you. I'm having difficult ascertaining which one of you
two is the bigger dunderhead.
> >> Everyone else is simply derivative --
> >> reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they can --
>
> >A word if caution Mike. Incessant patting yourself on the back can
> >lead to a repetitive stress injury. Briliance??? Again, Ed Dolan in
> >his own words ... "I am convinced that no one with any intelligence
> >would be caught dead on these freaking cycling newsgroups."
>
> >> Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can only pity
> >> them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve into chaos and
> >> entropy.
>
> >Care to put your theory to the test? Again, Ed in his own words ...
> >"My messages almost never have anything to do with any topic that is
> >appropriate to any newsgroup."
>
> >> All they can do will be to mercifully close the doors on this
> >> steaming pile and try to forget it.
>
> >You and Ed will be forgotten from the moment of your departure. Most
> >of the piles that are steaming here were defecated by you two. Again,
> >Ed Dolan in his own words ... "ARBR is known far and wide for being
> >the stupidest newsgroup ever to infest Usenet. I have seen to that."
>
> >> >Regards,
>
> >> >Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> >aka
> >> >Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> >> --
> >> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> >> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> >> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> >> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>
> >>http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
>
> --
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
| | |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 21:24:01
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1194482008.939820.143800@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Mike, you are as perceptive as the average tree stump in your blessed
> wilderness. Thanks for proving my point that you stand guilty of
> mental myopia as charged. Now, listen and learn. Regurgitation and
> quotation are not synonyms. Even Conan the Librarian Dolan knows
> that. Dolan's monotonous, incessantly repetition qualifies as
> regurgitation. I countered your assertion regarding originality by
> employing Ed's own words in rebuttal. What was intended by the
> purposeful quotation and what it connoted apparently escaped your poor
> powers of perception. You consider yourself and Dolan of superior
> intellect do you. I'm having difficult ascertaining which one of you
> two is the bigger dunderhead.
Jim McNamara is the biggest dunderhead who has ever existed on these cycling
newsgroups. Even old Slugger, a complete idiot, had more sense than Jim.
Jim simply does not know how to read anyone. He proves this every time he
posts a message. Moreover, he can never grasp the essential point of a
message, whether it be serious or not. It forever eludes him. This is why
all his messages sink into the ether unnoticed by all except himself.
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 21:53:15
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 6, 4:17 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
> pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
> with stalking. It is all down and no up.
In another post you contended that it was envy that was my driving
force .. contradicting yourself again??? The conundrum continues.
> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
> someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
> for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
> time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
> are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
I will repeat yet again since you so thick headed that multiple
repetitions are necessary ... 61 is harly pushing 70
> I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
> with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
> That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
> blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
> Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
>
> A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
> to.
NOPE ... what you are is ... a TROLL!!!
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 00:54:30
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1194379693.673715.73970@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 6, 4:17 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have
>> some
>> pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure
>> connected
>> with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> In another post you contended that it was envy that was my driving
> force .. contradicting yourself again??? The conundrum continues.
The point was that there is no pleasure in being a stalker just as there is
no pleasure in being envious. They are both vices which give no pleasure. I
would pick a vice that gives some pleasure. Getting drunk is not a bad
choice, although it will make your feet go numb and your head hurt. But at
least it does give some pleasure, however brief.
>> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
>> someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
>> for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by
>> the
>> time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up.
>> They
>> are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>
> I will repeat yet again since you so thick headed that multiple
> repetitions are necessary ... 61 is hardly pushing 70
You are far older than you think. Like me, you already have one foot in the
grave. Don't believe me? Just have a look at any teenager.
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 14:39:39
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 6, 2:31 pm, Tim McNamara <tim...@bitstream.net > wrote:
> Mike Vandeman wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices
> >> have some pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no
> >> pleasure connected with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> >> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine
> >> allowing someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly
> >> wretched condition for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing
> >> 70. I was all grown up by the time I was out of my teens, but
> >> apparently stalkers just never grow up. They are arrested in a
> >> permanent juvenility.
>
> >> I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get
> >> reacquainted with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and
> >> wailing on Usenet. That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the
> >> bitter end. He is like a blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held
> >> him in such contempt. Even Tom Sherman, the most mild mannered of
> >> men, could not stand him for long.
>
> Clearly Ed should be taking his own advice.
>
> >> A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet
> >> gives rise to.
>
> > Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the
> > newsgroups who say anything original. Everyone else is simply
> > derivative -- reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they
> > can -- Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can
> > only pity them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve
> > into chaos and entropy. All they can do will be to mercifully close
> > the doors on this steaming pile and try to forget it.
>
> Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman: birds of a feather by their own admission.
> That's as much as I need to know.
>
> Unless Jim McNamara is my uncle Jim, which is unlikely since he's 77
> years old and doesn't own a computer, I am no relation.
Tim, forgot to add that Ed doesn't take advice ... he only gives it. -
Jim
|
| |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 14:37:51
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 6, 2:31 pm, Tim McNamara <tim...@bitstream.net > wrote:
> Mike Vandeman wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices
> >> have some pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no
> >> pleasure connected with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> >> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine
> >> allowing someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly
> >> wretched condition for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing
> >> 70. I was all grown up by the time I was out of my teens, but
> >> apparently stalkers just never grow up. They are arrested in a
> >> permanent juvenility.
>
> >> I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get
> >> reacquainted with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and
> >> wailing on Usenet. That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the
> >> bitter end. He is like a blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held
> >> him in such contempt. Even Tom Sherman, the most mild mannered of
> >> men, could not stand him for long.
>
> Clearly Ed should be taking his own advice.
>
> >> A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet
> >> gives rise to.
>
> > Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the
> > newsgroups who say anything original. Everyone else is simply
> > derivative -- reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they
> > can -- Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can
> > only pity them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve
> > into chaos and entropy. All they can do will be to mercifully close
> > the doors on this steaming pile and try to forget it.
>
> Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman: birds of a feather by their own admission.
> That's as much as I need to know.
>
> Unless Jim McNamara is my uncle Jim, which is unlikely since he's 77
> years old and doesn't own a computer, I am no relation.
Tim ... Jim here. I'm 61 and have a PC, so I'm obviously not your
uncle. I quite agree. Ed and Mike are birds of a feather and a
mutual admiration society stroking each others egos since no one else
will do it for them. How pitiful.
|
| |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 12:27:36
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Nov 6, 9:48 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net > wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
> >pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
> >with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
> >Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
> >someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
> >for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
> >time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
> >are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>
> >I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
> >with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
> >That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
> >blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
> >Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
>
> >A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
> >to.
>
> Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the newsgroups
> who say anything original.
Not only are you pitifully myopic, but you are also rather short on
retention. Ed Dolan in his own words ... "I have never had an
original idea in my entire life and I never will."
> Everyone else is simply derivative --
> reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they can --
A word if caution Mike. Incessant patting yourself on the back can
lead to a repetitive stress injury. Briliance??? Again, Ed Dolan in
his own words ... "I am convinced that no one with any intelligence
would be caught dead on these freaking cycling newsgroups."
> Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can only pity
> them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve into chaos and
> entropy.
Care to put your theory to the test? Again, Ed in his own words ...
"My messages almost never have anything to do with any topic that is
appropriate to any newsgroup."
> All they can do will be to mercifully close the doors on this
> steaming pile and try to forget it.
You and Ed will be forgotten from the moment of your departure. Most
of the piles that are steaming here were defecated by you two. Again,
Ed Dolan in his own words ... "ARBR is known far and wide for being
the stupidest newsgroup ever to infest Usenet. I have seen to that."
> >Regards,
>
> >Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >aka
> >Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> --
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
| | |
Date: 07 Nov 2007 04:53:25
From: Mike Vandeman
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:27:36 -0800, JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com >
wrote:
>On Nov 6, 9:48 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
>> >pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
>> >with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>>
>> >Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
>> >someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
>> >for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
>> >time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
>> >are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>>
>> >I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
>> >with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
>> >That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
>> >blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
>> >Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
>>
>> >A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
>> >to.
>>
>> Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the newsgroups
>> who say anything original.
>
>Not only are you pitifully myopic, but you are also rather short on
>retention. Ed Dolan in his own words ... "I have never had an
>original idea in my entire life and I never will."
Thanks for proving my point, by simply regurgitating what someone else
said. That's what stalkers do. They don't have a life of their own....
>> Everyone else is simply derivative --
>> reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they can --
>
>A word if caution Mike. Incessant patting yourself on the back can
>lead to a repetitive stress injury. Briliance??? Again, Ed Dolan in
>his own words ... "I am convinced that no one with any intelligence
>would be caught dead on these freaking cycling newsgroups."
>
>> Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can only pity
>> them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve into chaos and
>> entropy.
>
>Care to put your theory to the test? Again, Ed in his own words ...
>"My messages almost never have anything to do with any topic that is
>appropriate to any newsgroup."
>
>> All they can do will be to mercifully close the doors on this
>> steaming pile and try to forget it.
>
>You and Ed will be forgotten from the moment of your departure. Most
>of the piles that are steaming here were defecated by you two. Again,
>Ed Dolan in his own words ... "ARBR is known far and wide for being
>the stupidest newsgroup ever to infest Usenet. I have seen to that."
>
>> >Regards,
>>
>> >Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> >aka
>> >Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>
>> --
>> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
>> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
>> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>>
>> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>>
>> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
>
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
| |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 07:48:32
From: Mike Vandeman
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net >
wrote:
>It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices have some
>pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no pleasure connected
>with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>
>Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine allowing
>someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly wretched condition
>for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing 70. I was all grown up by the
>time I was out of my teens, but apparently stalkers just never grow up. They
>are arrested in a permanent juvenility.
>
>I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get reacquainted
>with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and wailing on Usenet.
>That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the bitter end. He is like a
>blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held him in such contempt. Even Tom
>Sherman, the most mild mannered of men, could not stand him for long.
>
>A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet gives rise
>to.
Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the newsgroups
who say anything original. Everyone else is simply derivative --
reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they can --
Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can only pity
them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve into chaos and
entropy. All they can do will be to mercifully close the doors on this
steaming pile and try to forget it.
>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>aka
>Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
| | |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 14:31:10
From: Tim McNamara
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
Mike Vandeman wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 04:17:12 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> wrote:
>
>> It can't be much fun to be a stalker like Jim McNamara. Most vices
>> have some pleasure associated with them but, like envy, there is no
>> pleasure connected with stalking. It is all down and no up.
>>
>> Truth to tell, you have to feel sorry for the poor guy. Imagine
>> allowing someone else to make your day for you. This is a truly
>> wretched condition for anyone, let alone for a man who is pushing
>> 70. I was all grown up by the time I was out of my teens, but
>> apparently stalkers just never grow up. They are arrested in a
>> permanent juvenility.
>>
>> I urge Jim McNamara to get a life. Failing that, he should get
>> reacquainted with his dog, man's best friend, and stop whining and
>> wailing on Usenet. That is all he has ever done - a stalker to the
>> bitter end. He is like a blood sucking leech! No wonder Ed Gin held
>> him in such contempt. Even Tom Sherman, the most mild mannered of
>> men, could not stand him for long.
Clearly Ed should be taking his own advice.
>> A stalker is the most pitiful of all the creatures that Usenet
>> gives rise to.
>
> Yes. I've noticed that you and I are the only people in the
> newsgroups who say anything original. Everyone else is simply
> derivative -- reacting to our brilliance in whatever pitiful way they
> can -- Johnny-come-latelies who end up with sloppy seconds. One can
> only pity them.... After we are gone, the whole mess will devolve
> into chaos and entropy. All they can do will be to mercifully close
> the doors on this steaming pile and try to forget it.
Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman: birds of a feather by their own admission.
That's as much as I need to know.
Unless Jim McNamara is my uncle Jim, which is unlikely since he's 77
years old and doesn't own a computer, I am no relation.
|
| | |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 16:04:18
From: marc
Subject: Re: Jim McNamara - the Stalker of the Cycling Newsgroups!
|
Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
>I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
>humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help?
Still?
It's been years since I read one of your posts and your still "working
on creating " ? Oh well back in the bozo bin you go!
|
|
