| |
Main
Date: 29 Aug 2007 10:58:40
From: Hell and High Water
Subject: KRYLION opinions?
|
I currently have Michelin Carbon tires.
I've had very good luck with these tires, but I understand they are no
longer made.
Looking at the Michelin KRYLION tires.
How would these compare?
Any opinions about them?
Also, what is a comparable tire (ride and wear) in other brands.
Thanks so much for any suggestions.
-Bob
|
|
| |
Date: 29 Aug 2007 11:46:07
From: Smokey
Subject: Re: KRYLION opinions?
|
On Aug 29, 10:58 am, Hell and High Water <tifoso...@OVEcomcast.net >
wrote:
> I currently have Michelin Carbon tires.
>
> I've had very good luck with these tires, but I understand they are no
> longer made.
>
> Looking at the Michelin KRYLION tires.
>
> How would these compare?
>
> Any opinions about them?
>
> Also, what is a comparable tire (ride and wear) in other brands.
>
> Thanks so much for any suggestions.
>
> -Bob
There are some reviews of the Krylion Carbon here:
http://www.roadbikereview.com/cat/wheels/tires-clincher/michelin/PRD_367054_2489crx.aspx
Smokey
|
| |
Date: 29 Aug 2007 17:26:49
From: Antti Salonen
Subject: Re: KRYLION opinions?
|
In rec.bicycles.tech Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@ovecomcast.net > wrote:
> I currently have Michelin Carbon tires.
>
> I've had very good luck with these tires, but I understand they are no
> longer made.
>
> Looking at the Michelin KRYLION tires. How would these compare?
It is exactly the same tyre with a new name and a new colour option.
And it's definitely of the best training tyres out there. I feel that
the Continental GP 4000 is comparable in terms of rolling resistance and
longevity, but the Michelin probably has better traction on wet tarmac
due to its carbon black rubber compound.
If your roads are good, Michelin Pro2 Race is also perfectly good for
every-day riding. The rolling resistance is a bit lower, puncture
resistance still good, but you don't get the sime kind of mileage from
it compared to Krylion.
Antti
|
| | |
Date: 30 Aug 2007 08:31:15
From: Michael Warner
Subject: Re: KRYLION opinions?
|
On 29 Aug 2007 17:26:49 GMT, Antti Salonen wrote:
> And it's definitely of the best training tyres out there. I feel that
> the Continental GP 4000 is comparable in terms of rolling resistance and
> longevity, but the Michelin probably has better traction on wet tarmac
> due to its carbon black rubber compound.
IWHT the carbon black gave it better longevity, not grip in the wet.
Everyone I know who's tried the GP4000 says they're great in the wet,
but cut up and wear out very quickly.
|
| |
Date: 29 Aug 2007 17:13:44
From: sally
Subject: Re: KRYLION opinions?
|
Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net > wrote in
news:MPG.213f53a8548cca4989b14@news.giganews.com:
> I currently have Michelin Carbon tires.
>
> I've had very good luck with these tires, but I understand they are no
> longer made.
>
> Looking at the Michelin KRYLION tires.
Isn't this just the new name for the Michelin Carbon tires?
|
| | |
Date: 29 Aug 2007 22:49:40
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: KRYLION opinions?
|
> Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net> wrote
>> I currently have Michelin Carbon tires.
>> I've had very good luck with these tires, but I understand they are no
>> longer made.
>> Looking at the Michelin KRYLION tires.
sally wrote:
> Isn't this just the new name for the Michelin Carbon tires?
yes, with new color options. 'best value' Michelin in our opinion.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
|
