| |
Main
Date: 26 Oct 2007 08:40:27
From: Claire
Subject: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
I head west in the morning, east for the return, so I don't get to see
the sun rise or set in all its glory. But yesterday morning, as the
sun was coming up, it threw pink and gold light on Mt. Baker, which
was sparkling with new snow. Often you can't even see Mt. Baker from
the lake, but yesterday morning it was like an incandescent gem, an
enormous piece of glowing rose quartz set on the black velvet horizon.
I asked my co-worker if he saw it. He says he was too buried in the
morning paper on the bus to notice.
Warm Regards,
Claire
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 21:29:59
From:
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Poor Bill and Tom! They're so afraid they might not get their nookie
that they're totally pussywhipped, and therefore think they have to
pander to women. What a couple of losers! While I can readily
understand why they're afraid they might get cut off, the sad thing is
how they don't even realize that they ONLY need to pander to their
Significant Others in order to get laid (maybe). You don't NEED to
pander to Claire, guys. She's not going to service you! It's all
right; you can be honest and tell Claire what a dumb bitch she is! It
might even do her some good to hear the truth. Go ahead, give it a
try!
|
| | |
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:14:47
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
In article <1193632199.283427.113140@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com >,
folson@innercite.com wrote:
> Poor Bill and Tom! They're so afraid they might not get their nookie
> that they're totally pussywhipped, and therefore think they have to
> pander to women. What a couple of losers! While I can readily
> understand why they're afraid they might get cut off, the sad thing is
> how they don't even realize that they ONLY need to pander to their
> Significant Others in order to get laid (maybe). You don't NEED to
> pander to Claire, guys. She's not going to service you! It's all
> right; you can be honest and tell Claire what a dumb bitch she is! It
> might even do her some good to hear the truth. Go ahead, give it a
> try!
Wow. I don't think I've ever activated my killfile after reading a
single post before.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook.
Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Nov 2007 16:12:08
From: Dane Buson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> folson@innercite.com wrote:
>
<snipped folson drivel >
>
> Wow. I don't think I've ever activated my killfile after reading a
> single post before.
What, you don't have him in the killfile still from the last time he
spewed forth here? You must have been on a rb.* hiatus.
--
Dane Buson - sigdane@unixbigots.org
"It ain't those parts of the Bible that I can't understand
that bother me, it's the parts that I do understand."
-Mark Twain
|
| | | |
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:31:25
From: catzz66
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>
>
> Wow. I don't think I've ever activated my killfile after reading a
> single post before.
>
In this case, it was an easy decision.
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Oct 2007 23:40:35
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <1193632199.283427.113140@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> folson@innercite.com wrote:
>
>> Poor Bill and Tom! They're so afraid they might not get their nookie
>> that they're totally pussywhipped, and therefore think they have to
>> pander to women. What a couple of losers! While I can readily
>> understand why they're afraid they might get cut off, the sad thing
>> is how they don't even realize that they ONLY need to pander to their
>> Significant Others in order to get laid (maybe). You don't NEED to
>> pander to Claire, guys. She's not going to service you! It's all
>> right; you can be honest and tell Claire what a dumb bitch she is!
>> It might even do her some good to hear the truth. Go ahead, give it
>> a try!
>
> Wow. I don't think I've ever activated my killfile after reading a
> single post before.
"folson" only seems to show up to whine about Claire's posts. Quick
analysis: he's a woman-hating dweeb.
BS (just a little)
|
| | |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 22:32:41
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
folson@innercite.com wrote:
> Poor Bill and Tom! They're so afraid they might not get their nookie
> that they're totally pussywhipped, and therefore think they have to
> pander to women. What a couple of losers! While I can readily
> understand why they're afraid they might get cut off, the sad thing is
> how they don't even realize that they ONLY need to pander to their
> Significant Others in order to get laid (maybe). You don't NEED to
> pander to Claire, guys. She's not going to service you! It's all
> right; you can be honest and tell Claire what a dumb bitch she is! It
> might even do her some good to hear the truth. Go ahead, give it a
> try!
NO ISSUES THERE, FOLKS! LOL
|
| |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 20:10:15
From:
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
People already suspect that women are nothing but a bunch of frigging
airheads without Claire removing any doubt. If she had half a brain,
she'd do her gender a favor and just shut the fuck up.
|
| | |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 22:11:25
From: Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
folson@innercite.com wrote:
> People already suspect that women are nothing but a bunch of frigging
> airheads without Claire removing any doubt. If she had half a brain,
> she'd do her gender a favor and just shut the fuck up.
>
Have you met Ed Dolan? You two should get along well.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
When did ignorance of biology become a "family value"?
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 21:09:47
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Tom Sherman wrote:
> folson@innercite.com wrote:
>> People already suspect that women are nothing but a bunch of frigging
>> airheads without Claire removing any doubt. If she had half a brain,
>> she'd do her gender a favor and just shut the fuck up.
>>
> Have you met Ed Dolan? You two should get along well.
Even Ed can create a proper user name! (IIRC, that is.)
LOL
|
| |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 18:18:51
From: Brian Huntley
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
On Oct 28, 7:38 pm, fol...@innercite.com wrote:
> "I love your posts."
>
> I don't. They're stupid chick shit.
Get back on the bus and do your Jumble.
|
| | |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 18:43:24
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
Brian Huntley wrote:
> On Oct 28, 7:38 pm, fol...@innercite.com wrote:
>> "I love your posts."
>>
>> I don't. They're stupid chick shit.
>
> Get back on the bus and do your Jumble.
LOL
|
| |
Date: 28 Oct 2007 17:38:32
From:
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
"I love your posts."
I don't. They're stupid chick shit.
|
| | |
Date: 29 Oct 2007 20:21:22
From: John Thompson
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
On 2007-10-29, folson@innercite.com <folson@innercite.com > wrote:
> "I love your posts."
>
> I don't. They're stupid chick shit.
So don't read them. Or haven't you figured out what a "killfile" is yet?
Sheesh...
--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
|
| |
Date: 27 Oct 2007 12:51:48
From: It's Chris
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
I love your posts. :-3) >
- -
Compliments of:
"Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"
If you want to E-mail me use:
ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net
My website:
http://geocities.com/czcorner
|
| |
Date: 26 Oct 2007 20:45:01
From: Patrick Lamb
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:40:27 -0700, Claire <cpetersky@yahoo.com >
wrote:
>I head west in the morning, east for the return, so I don't get to see
>the sun rise or set in all its glory. But yesterday morning, as the
>sun was coming up, it threw pink and gold light on Mt. Baker, which
>was sparkling with new snow. Often you can't even see Mt. Baker from
>the lake, but yesterday morning it was like an incandescent gem, an
>enormous piece of glowing rose quartz set on the black velvet horizon.
>
>I asked my co-worker if he saw it. He says he was too buried in the
>morning paper on the bus to notice.
I noticed something like a second dawn this morning, something I'd
never have noticed driving. There was a dark cloud bank in the east,
with a gap overhead, then more scattered clouds west of my route. The
western clouds were colored like dawn some 20 minutes after official
sunrise.
That's one of the reasons I like cycling.
Pat
Email address works as is.
|
| |
Date: 26 Oct 2007 16:40:29
From: Hud
Subject: Re: Mt. Baker in the morning
|
"Claire" <cpetersky@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1193413227.567187.80410@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>I head west in the morning, east for the return, so I don't get to see
> the sun rise or set in all its glory. But yesterday morning, as the
> sun was coming up, it threw pink and gold light on Mt. Baker, which
> was sparkling with new snow. Often you can't even see Mt. Baker from
> the lake, but yesterday morning it was like an incandescent gem, an
> enormous piece of glowing rose quartz set on the black velvet horizon.
>
> I asked my co-worker if he saw it. He says he was too buried in the
> morning paper on the bus to notice.
>
> Warm Regards,
>
> Claire
Sounds like a great place to cycle. We don't have scenery like that here in
central Ohio. I ride on country roads lined with corn fields and woods.
I'll ride by a home every mile or so when I'm way out in the country. Once
I was startled when an albino peacock flew across the road in front of me.
I watched him fly to the backyard of a farmhouse where he was probably a
pet.
|
|
