| |
Main
Date: 22 Oct 2006 21:38:44
From: Chris Y.F.N.W.
Subject: Who is more disruptive to a group?
|
The troll who submits an antagonizing post to a newsgroup?
Or the fools who reply to it thereby keeping the thread at the top of
the board?
(And giving the troll exactly what he/she wanted?)
- -
Compliments of:
"Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"
If you want to E-mail me use:
ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net
My website:
http://geocities.com/czcorner
|
|
| |
Date: 24 Oct 2006 11:56:05
From:
Subject: Re: Who is more disruptive to a group?
|
TOP POST WILL FOLLOW FOR ED!!!
OVER THE YEARS, WE HAVE TROLLED THOUSANDS OF TIMES ON THE USENET.
HERE IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINIONS TO US AT OUR HOMES.
SEND US WHATEVER YOU'D LIKE OR CALL US 24/7?
NOTE OUR ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS ARE PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR ALL TO
UTILIZE.
JAMES L. MACNAA
4863 W. GREGORY ST.
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60630
773 282 9874
EDWARD DOLAN
1028 4TH AVE.
WORTHINGTON, MN 56187
507 727 0306
THANK YOU,
THE JIMMY MACNAA AND ED DOLAN PARTNERSHIP
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Chris Y.F.N.W." <dedendaddy4spammers@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:25210-453C1D24-1412@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
>
> [newsgroups expanded]
>
> > The troll who submits an antagonizing post to a newsgroup?
>
> It appears you are easily antagonized. I consider all newsgroups to be
> permanently disorganized and disruptive. Actually, the concept of the group
> does not even exist since there is no loyalty to it whatsoever. Mr. Tom
> Sherman of ARBR taught me that much at least a couple of years ago when a
> criminal vandal troll showed up and destroyed the so-called group.
>
> > Or the fools who reply to it thereby keeping the thread at the top of
> > the board?
>
> They are not fools if they reply to the substance of what is being said.
>
> > (And giving the troll exactly what he/she wanted?)
>
> I NEVER care whether anyone responds to me or not. All that matters is that
> I cram my thoughts down your dense brain.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 23 Oct 2006 06:49:25
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Who is more disruptive to a group?
|
"Chris Y.F.N.W." <dedendaddy4spammers@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:25210-453C1D24-1412@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
[newsgroups expanded]
> The troll who submits an antagonizing post to a newsgroup?
It appears you are easily antagonized. I consider all newsgroups to be
permanently disorganized and disruptive. Actually, the concept of the group
does not even exist since there is no loyalty to it whatsoever. Mr. Tom
Sherman of ARBR taught me that much at least a couple of years ago when a
criminal vandal troll showed up and destroyed the so-called group.
> Or the fools who reply to it thereby keeping the thread at the top of
> the board?
They are not fools if they reply to the substance of what is being said.
> (And giving the troll exactly what he/she wanted?)
I NEVER care whether anyone responds to me or not. All that matters is that
I cram my thoughts down your dense brain.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 23 Oct 2006 03:10:12
From: Steve Gravrock
Subject: Re: Who is more disruptive to a group?
|
On 2006-10-23, Chris Y.F.N.W. <dedendaddy4spammers@webtv.net > wrote:
> The troll who submits an antagonizing post to a newsgroup?
>
> Or the fools who reply to it thereby keeping the thread at the top of
> the board?
The latter. Trolls are few in number, and I don't miss anything by
killfiling them.
|
| | |
Date: 23 Oct 2006 07:33:26
From: Werehatrack
Subject: Re: Who is more disruptive to a group?
|
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:10:12 +0000 (UTC), Steve Gravrock
<usenet@sdg.users.panix.com > wrote:
>On 2006-10-23, Chris Y.F.N.W. <dedendaddy4spammers@webtv.net> wrote:
>> The troll who submits an antagonizing post to a newsgroup?
>>
>> Or the fools who reply to it thereby keeping the thread at the top of
>> the board?
>
>The latter. Trolls are few in number, and I don't miss anything by
>killfiling them.
Agreed; from a practical standpoint, if a newbie reader sees something
inflammatory posted which receives no responses, the assumption is
generally going to be that the regular participants disdained noticing
it on purpose for lack of merit. Yes, there are exceptions to this,
and I've met a few; there are also people who believe the stuff in the
superket checkout tabloids, but their lack of clue does not impose
an obligation on anyone else to join in their mistaken beliefs or
actions.
I find, as well, that making troll kills global across all groups is
usually warranted.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
|
|
