| |
Main
Date: 18 Mar 2007 16:30:41
From: RicodJour
Subject: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
were not.
The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
to ask for?
R
|
|
| |
Date: 24 Mar 2007 10:38:35
From: Don Piven
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
Sez RicodJour:
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> [...]
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
My advice to you is to watch more NASCAR.
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 19:11:09
From: dustoyevsky@mac.com
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 19, 7:24 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1174348258.808802.25990@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 19, 6:53 pm, Geraard Spergen <GSper...@spammagnet.net> wrote:
> >> RicodJour wrote:
> >> > Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> >> >> Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
> >> >> compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
> >> >> that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
>
> >> >> Speaking theoretically, of course.
>
> >> > You seem to possess some expertise in this area. Would you mind
> >> > telling me if David Cassidy's daughter shows the Right Stuff?
> >> >http://teamsugar.com/files/images/katie-cassidy.jpg
>
> >> Looks like a drag queen.
>
> >http://www.tshirtwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/katie-cass...
> > Seems to be missing the hardware to be a drag queen. Keith
> > Partridge...errr....David Cassidy must be so proud.
>
> Do you guys really find masculine looking freaky women attractive because
> they're wearing little clothing? She looks like she was just sucking on a
> meth pipe.
http://tinyurl.com/3cl8ft
_Mas_culine? Tell us more, Tommy. --D-y
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 16:50:58
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 19, 6:53 pm, Geraard Spergen <GSper...@spammagnet.net > wrote:
> RicodJour wrote:
> > Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> >> Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
> >> compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
> >> that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
>
> >> Speaking theoretically, of course.
>
> > You seem to possess some expertise in this area. Would you mind
> > telling me if David Cassidy's daughter shows the Right Stuff?
> >http://teamsugar.com/files/images/katie-cassidy.jpg
>
> Looks like a drag queen.
http://www.tshirtwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/katie-cassidy.jpg
Seems to be missing the hardware to be a drag queen. Keith
Partridge...errr....David Cassidy must be so proud.
R
|
| | |
Date: 20 Mar 2007 00:24:00
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote in message
news:1174348258.808802.25990@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 19, 6:53 pm, Geraard Spergen <GSper...@spammagnet.net> wrote:
>> RicodJour wrote:
>> > Curtis L. Russell wrote:
>> >> Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
>> >> compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
>> >> that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
>>
>> >> Speaking theoretically, of course.
>>
>> > You seem to possess some expertise in this area. Would you mind
>> > telling me if David Cassidy's daughter shows the Right Stuff?
>> >http://teamsugar.com/files/images/katie-cassidy.jpg
>>
>> Looks like a drag queen.
>
> http://www.tshirtwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/katie-cassidy.jpg
> Seems to be missing the hardware to be a drag queen. Keith
> Partridge...errr....David Cassidy must be so proud.
Do you guys really find masculine looking freaky women attractive because
they're wearing little clothing? She looks like she was just sucking on a
meth pipe.
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 13:47:48
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
Curtis L. Russell wrote:
>
> Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
> compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
> that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
>
> Speaking theoretically, of course.
You seem to possess some expertise in this area. Would you mind
telling me if David Cassidy's daughter shows the Right Stuff?
http://teamsugar.com/files/images/katie-cassidy.jpg
|
| | |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 15:53:43
From: Geraard Spergen
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
RicodJour wrote:
> Curtis L. Russell wrote:
>> Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
>> compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
>> that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
>>
>> Speaking theoretically, of course.
>
> You seem to possess some expertise in this area. Would you mind
> telling me if David Cassidy's daughter shows the Right Stuff?
> http://teamsugar.com/files/images/katie-cassidy.jpg
>
Looks like a drag queen.
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 11:55:17
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
Bob Dole wrote:
>
> Could you post some pictures of good podium practice?
Podium girls can remain on pedestals even while off the podium.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2006/apr06/athens06/DSC_6270.jpg
Notice the young man's goofy grin and the odd goings on at the lower
shirt level.
A little blurry, but she fogged up the lens.
http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/photos/races06/giro06/pezgiro06st15-podiumgirl.jpg
To help flesh out the type of girls that we need, an article on two of
them:
http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=3248
The motosport world has the right idea. There are companies that
specialize in providing the eye candy.
http://www.umbrellagirlsusa.com/Photo%20Gallery/index.php I wonder if
they have an online job application form...
R
|
| | |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 16:58:48
From: Curtis L. Russell
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 19 2007 11:55:17 -0700, "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com >
wrote:
>The motosport world has the right idea. There are companies that
>specialize in providing the eye candy.
>http://www.umbrellagirlsusa.com/Photo%20Gallery/index.php I wonder if
>they have an online job application form...
Lauren I think sufficiently established that the right midriff can
compensate greatly for the lack of short skirts. That is not to say
that the better combination is, of course, midriff AND short skirts.
Speaking theoretically, of course.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 11:17:05
From: Bob Dole
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 6:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> were not.
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
>
> R
Could you post some pictures of good podium practice?
|
| |
Date: 19 Mar 2007 07:32:39
From: yeahyeah
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 7:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> were not.
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
>
> R
No short skirts, but South America has some beautiful people...
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2007/07/lider07/lider072a/stage_2a_arcos_-_30
Too bad about those man-pris tho.
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 20:46:44
From: Richard Cheese
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
Amen.
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote in message
news:1174260641.278545.89250@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> were not.
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
>
> R
>
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 18:00:55
From: amit.ghosh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 8:24 pm, "SLAVE of THE STATE" <gwh...@ti.com > wrote:
> On 18, 4:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> > UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> > podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> > The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> > organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> > couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> > crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> > me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> > The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> > sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> > about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> > burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> > the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> > were not.
>
> > The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> > it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> > to ask for?
>
> I get your drift -- who wouldn't take every chance to see/nail a
> hottie?
>
> But victory salutes for the bunch sprint coming in after the winning
> break are very disturbing.
dumbass,
this was inevitable once teamates and leadout men started sitting up
and making victory salutes.
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 17:39:16
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 8:24 pm, "SLAVE of THE STATE" <gwh...@ti.com > wrote:
> On 18, 4:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> > UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> > podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> > The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> > organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> > couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> > crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> > me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> > The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> > sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> > about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> > burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> > the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> > were not.
>
> > The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> > it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> > to ask for?
>
> I get your drift -- who wouldn't take every chance to see/nail a
> hottie?
>
> But victory salutes for the bunch sprint coming in after the winning
> break are very disturbing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
It's the future! Everyone's a winner. Virtual victories for everyone.
Huxley says Soma for everyone makes you feel good.
Bill C
Darwinism is totally underated, especially among Podium chicks.
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 17:24:06
From: SLAVE of THE STATE
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 4:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> were not.
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
I get your drift -- who wouldn't take every chance to see/nail a
hottie?
But victory salutes for the bunch sprint coming in after the winning
break are very disturbing.
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2007 17:16:22
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Disturbing trend in cycling
|
On 18, 7:30 pm, "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> Something is definitely wrong on the podium. I'm not sure if it's a
> UCI/WADA/ASA/MICKEYMOUSE thing, or what, but the downward trend in
> podium girl attractiveness is really starting to piss me off.
>
> The Paris-Nice girls were simply not up to snuff. I think the
> organizers ran into a local ket at the last minute and grabbed a
> couple of clerks. One of them was wearing a wedding ring, fer
> crissakes! At least let's pretend they're obtainable. And don't give
> me that "a ring doesn't plug a hole" bullshit.
>
> The Tour of Catarrh (look it up) was revolting. One girl was ugly as
> sin and made no attempt to even hide her mustache! I won't even talk
> about the lack of skin. I lied - I will. This scruffy jeans (and
> burkas) thing has got to go. Rebecca Romijn may be able to pull off
> the faded, grunge jeans thing, but swimsuit models the podium girls
> were not.
>
> The recipe is really very simple so I don't know why they are screwing
> it up. Smoking hot girls and short skirts. Is that really too much
> to ask for?
>
> R
Hey, especially with the EU lawyers watching it's a PC world. Wait
until they mandate equal podium guys with podium girls. Can't
discriminate based on size, shape, sex, or ugliness.
I expect to see someone as attractive as Rush Limbaugh coming to a US
podium soon, based on a court ruling.
Bill C
|
|
