| |
Main
Date: 30 Dec 2006 22:34:54
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Does anyone know?
|
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_dougellis
Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
Thanks,
Magilla
|
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 21:03:45
From:
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
Dude,
You're in the wrong forum...there's plenty of your kind over in the
"angry white punk toilet" or even the "passive-agressive coward behind
the keyboard toilet" Please meander over and pollute some other sport
for awhile and give us a break. Have a nice day -
MagillaGorilla wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_dougellis
>
> Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
> money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
> athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>
> I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Magilla
|
| | |
Date: 01 Jan 2007 11:00:39
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
You're just a Player Hater.
Magilla
race170@aol.com wrote:
> Dude,
>
> You're in the wrong forum...there's plenty of your kind over in the
> "angry white punk toilet" or even the "passive-agressive coward behind
> the keyboard toilet" Please meander over and pollute some other sport
> for awhile and give us a break. Have a nice day -
>
>
>
>
> MagillaGorilla wrote:
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_dougellis
>>
>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>
>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Magilla
>
>
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 14:34:01
From: DA74
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
MagillaGorilla wrote:
> DA74 wrote:
>
> > MagillaGorilla wrote:
> >
> >>Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
> >>> MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
> >>>>ougellis
> >>>>
> >>>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
> >>>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
> >>>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
> >>>>
> >>>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>Magilla
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
> >>>deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
> >>>good thing.
> >>>
> >>
> >>It's not a youth development team.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>Magilla
> >
> >
> > Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
> > the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
> > usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
> > since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
> > 'alluded'.
> >
> > Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
> > he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
> > donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
> > he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
> > ass-puppet.
> >
> > What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
> > how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
> > years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > DA74
>
> The District Attorney is in.
>
> The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
> homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
> "owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
> is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
> high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
> There is no transition or stepping stone.
>
> So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
> have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.
>
> Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
> parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?
>
> This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Magilla
Point well taken. I think the probable plan is for the purple pullover
pimp to farm out his king ass- puppet or sideburn boy, if you please,
to lure other unsuspecting deep pocketed corporations or individuals
into the scheme. I personally feel the Catholic Church would be an
excellent prospect, making an ideal partner on many levels. I will
elaborate on the topic in this forum if anyone is interested, otherwise
I will present directly to team management.
Thanks in advance,
DA74
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 18:54:21
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
DA74 wrote:
> MagillaGorilla wrote:
>
>>DA74 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>MagillaGorilla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
>>>>>MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>>>>>>ougellis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>>>>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>>>>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Magilla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
>>>>>deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
>>>>>good thing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's not a youth development team.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Magilla
>>>
>>>
>>>Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
>>>the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
>>>usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
>>>since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
>>>'alluded'.
>>>
>>>Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
>>>he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
>>>donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
>>>he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
>>>ass-puppet.
>>>
>>>What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
>>>how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
>>>years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>DA74
>>
>>The District Attorney is in.
>>
>>The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
>>homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
>>"owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
>>is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
>>high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
>>There is no transition or stepping stone.
>>
>>So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
>>have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.
>>
>>Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
>>parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?
>>
>>This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>
>>Magilla
>
>
> Point well taken. I think the probable plan is for the purple pullover
> pimp to farm out his king ass- puppet or sideburn boy, if you please,
> to lure other unsuspecting deep pocketed corporations or individuals
> into the scheme. I personally feel the Catholic Church would be an
> excellent prospect, making an ideal partner on many levels. I will
> elaborate on the topic in this forum if anyone is interested, otherwise
> I will present directly to team management.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> DA74
>
Team Rectory.
I think they could bring the Catholic Church aboard if they had a
juniors men's team and they all agreed to shower together in the rectory
after training rides.
Thanks,
Magilla
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 08:50:22
From: DA74
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
MagillaGorilla wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
> > MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
> >>ougellis
> >>
> >>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
> >>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
> >>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
> >>
> >>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>Magilla
> >
> >
> > Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
> > deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
> > good thing.
> >
>
> It's not a youth development team.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Magilla
Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
'alluded'.
Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
ass-puppet.
What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.
Thanks,
DA74
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 12:41:58
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
DA74 wrote:
> MagillaGorilla wrote:
>
>>Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>>
>>>In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
>>> MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>>>>ougellis
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>>>
>>>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Magilla
>>>
>>>
>>>Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
>>>deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
>>>good thing.
>>>
>>
>>It's not a youth development team.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Magilla
>
>
> Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
> the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
> usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
> since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
> 'alluded'.
>
> Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
> he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
> donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
> he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
> ass-puppet.
>
> What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
> how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
> years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DA74
The District Attorney is in.
The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
"owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
There is no transition or stepping stone.
So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.
Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?
This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.
Thanks,
Magilla
|
| |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 06:48:08
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net >,
MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com > wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
> ougellis
>
> Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
> money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
> athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>
> I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Magilla
Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
good thing.
However, your completely random and insanely libelous innuendo is as
much fun as euthanasia day at the dog pound. Please, tell us more.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | |
Date: 31 Dec 2006 11:02:14
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Re: Does anyone know?
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <uBidnb3WZd1DsgrYUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
> MagillaGorilla <MagillaGorilla@zoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>>ougellis
>>
>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>
>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Magilla
>
>
> Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
> deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
> good thing.
>
It's not a youth development team.
Thanks,
Magilla
|
|
