| |
Main
Date: 16 Jun 2007 08:45:34
From: RicodJour
Subject: Eddy on rollers
|
I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
R
|
|
| |
Date: 19 Jun 2007 09:35:20
From:
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 19, 9:39 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:21:27 +0100, Simon Brooke <s...@jasmine.org.uk> wrote:
> >in message <1182008734.189967.316...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >RicodJour ('ricodj...@worldemail.com') wrote:
>
> >> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> >Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
> >cycling.
>
> Except for the alternate universe in which he doesn't fully recover from cancer
> - over there the cover of the bike magazines say "Learn to pound the big gears
> like 5 time tour winner Jan."
>
> Ron
I know that universe. It's the same one where everyone is wondering
who will join Poulidor and Zoetmelk as a 7 time Tour winner.
|
| |
Date: 19 Jun 2007 05:35:47
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 19, 2:05 am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
>
> You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here, don't you,
> Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can tell you
> how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here without you
> snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that shouldn't
> be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes you.
You left out...
Neener, neener, neener.
I'm not sure which I prefer less - obsessive negativity directed
solely towards one retired rider, or free-floating negativity that
spews forth coating everything with miasmic effluence. Viewed through
the con-tagonist's eyes, I'd have to go with the former. At least
that way there is some chance of being happy.
R
|
| | |
Date: 19 Jun 2007 23:59:42
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182256547.143321.180490@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2:05 am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> >
> > You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here,
> > don't you,
> > Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can
> > tell you
> > how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here
> > without you
> > snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that
> > shouldn't
> > be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes
> > you.
>
> You left out...
> Neener, neener, neener.
I was trying to keep it civil, you know.
> I'm not sure which I prefer less - obsessive negativity directed
> solely towards one retired rider, or free-floating negativity that
> spews forth coating everything with miasmic effluence. Viewed through
> the con-tagonist's eyes, I'd have to go with the former. At least
> that way there is some chance of being happy.
Oh yeah, the obsession with one ex-rider deal is strange but probaby not harmful
to anyone but the obsessor (though it can be a little annoying to many other people).
The all hate, all the time way of life is unhealthy all the way around.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 19 Jun 2007 09:21:27
From: Simon Brooke
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
in message <1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour ('ricodjour@worldemail.com') wrote:
> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
cycling.
--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
'You cannot put "The Internet" into the Recycle Bin.'
|
| | |
Date: 19 Jun 2007 09:39:39
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:21:27 +0100, Simon Brooke <simon@jasmine.org.uk > wrote:
>in message <1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>RicodJour ('ricodjour@worldemail.com') wrote:
>
>> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
>Of course, everyone knows it was Lance who introduced spinning into pro
>cycling.
Except for the alternate universe in which he doesn't fully recover from cancer
- over there the cover of the bike magazines say "Learn to pound the big gears
like 5 time tour winner Jan."
Ron
|
| |
Date: 18 Jun 2007 09:38:35
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 18, 10:15 am, cyclin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 17, 4:03 pm, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:
>
> > You post something serious.
> > I post a cheeky reply.
> > You post a smart alecky comeback.
> > I take a pot shot at you.
> > You call my heritage into question.
> > I insult your sister.
> > You insult my mother.
> > I bust you one in the mouth.
> > You bust me one in the mouth.
> > Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.
>
> > It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. ;)
>
> Actually it's more like:
>
> You post something stupid.
> Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
> posting.
> You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
> included
> He posts as if he rides a bike
> You post as if you ride a bike
> You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
> intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
> Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.
Utter bullshit. I don't always post first.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
R
|
| |
Date: 18 Jun 2007 07:15:35
From:
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 4:03 pm, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Jun 17, 5:26 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article <1182086219.183839.146...@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > > > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> > > > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> > > > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> > > > easier to
> > > > stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
>
> > > Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
> > > in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
> > > I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! ;)
>
> > I have no problems whatsoever saying that, on that count, you are pretty much
> > correct. Sad but true...
>
> Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:
>
> You post something serious.
> I post a cheeky reply.
> You post a smart alecky comeback.
> I take a pot shot at you.
> You call my heritage into question.
> I insult your sister.
> You insult my mother.
> I bust you one in the mouth.
> You bust me one in the mouth.
> Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.
>
> It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. ;)
Actually it's more like:
You post something stupid.
Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
posting.
You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
included
He posts as if he rides a bike
You post as if you ride a bike
You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jun 2007 23:05:15
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182176135.405653.123590@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com >,
cyclintom@gmail.com wrote:
> Actually it's more like:
>
> You post something stupid.
> Kveck posts something else equally stupid with no bearing on your
> posting.
> You post something else unrelated but with additional stupidity
> included
> He posts as if he rides a bike
> You post as if you ride a bike
> You both want to find the other for a gay affair but are both too
> intimidated by the other's vast knowledge of cycling.
> Though it is quite plain that you both drink a great deal.
You really resent it when two people have a bit of an exchange in here, don't you,
Tommykins? You're jealous yet completely in denial of being jealous. I can tell you
how many times you've been able to interact with someone else in here without you
snarling: it's a whole number between one and negative one. Oh well, that shouldn't
be too much of a surprise. You're ugly and you're stupid and no one likes you.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 21:10:58
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 10:53 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll raise your Stella with a Taddy Porter.
>
> Hmm, I've never had one of those. There goes my LIVEDRUNK cred!
>
> But I have had a Leopard Lager in a glass bottle though. That seems to be gone.
Hie thee to a purveyor of all things hop!
http://www.merchantduvin.com/pages/5_breweries/samsmith_taddy.html
R
|
| |
Date: 18 Jun 2007 02:17:28
From: derFahrer@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
>
> Yeah, but did Eddie have his own brand of jeans? Huh? Did he? And even if he *did*
> have his own brand of jeans, did they have the special Hidden Gusset?
Chuck's hidden gusset is not large enough to hold Eddy.
He does have T-shirts though.
http://www.cafepress.com/buy/Cannibal/-/pv_design_details/pg_1/id_6666473/opt_/fpt_/c_360/
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 19:14:55
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 10:11 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "RicodJour" <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> >I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> Eddy was riding 140 rpm just warming up. Weren't you saying that wasn't
> possible?
Not me.
R
|
| |
Date: 18 Jun 2007 02:11:03
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote in message
news:1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
Eddy was riding 140 rpm just warming up. Weren't you saying that wasn't
possible?
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 18:42:32
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 9:09 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
>
> I realize my response wasn't particularly smart alecky as I'd just gotten back
> from a long ride but I'm fine with skipping straight to laffing at Laff and kasing on
> Kunich. You can have my Guiness, I'll take a Stellll-lllaaaa [1].
>
> [1] White Shadow reference, mind you.
The White Shadow grew up in my home town. So did Jim Brown.
Ultra-white and ultra-black. Like that Stevie Wonder song. Only it
didn't play out that way in real life.
I'll raise your Stella with a Taddy Porter.
R
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 19:53:18
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182130952.654921.65990@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Jun 17, 9:09 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> >
> > I realize my response wasn't particularly smart alecky as I'd just gotten
> > back from a long ride but I'm fine with skipping straight to laffing at Laff
> > and kasing on Kunich. You can have my Guiness, I'll take a Stellll-lllaaaa [1].
> >
> > [1] White Shadow reference, mind you.
>
> The White Shadow grew up in my home town. So did Jim Brown.
> Ultra-white and ultra-black. Like that Stevie Wonder song. Only it
> didn't play out that way in real life.
Say it loud, I'm black and I'm proud (the Black Randy and the Metrosquad version,
of course).
> I'll raise your Stella with a Taddy Porter.
Hmm, I've never had one of those. There goes my LIVEDRUNK cred!
But I have had a Leopard Lager in a glass bottle though. That seems to be gone.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 16:08:58
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
>
> Yeah, but did Eddie have his own brand of jeans? Huh? Did he? And even if he *did*
> have his own brand of jeans, did they have the special Hidden Gusset?
>
> http://the-isb.blogspot.com/2007/04/behold-hidden-gusset.html
I am in awe. I wonder what would happen if Jonathon Page and He Who
Is Chuck traded simultaneous roundhouse kicks to the head? Would the
Universe collapse? Entropy be reversed. I don't know, but I do know
I want those pants. And the PJs.
R
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 16:03:17
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 5:26 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> In article <1182086219.183839.146...@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> > > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> > > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> > > easier to
> > > stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
>
> > Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
> > in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
> > I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! ;)
>
> I have no problems whatsoever saying that, on that count, you are pretty much
> correct. Sad but true...
Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:
You post something serious.
I post a cheeky reply.
You post a smart alecky comeback.
I take a pot shot at you.
You call my heritage into question.
I insult your sister.
You insult my mother.
I bust you one in the mouth.
You bust me one in the mouth.
Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.
It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. ;)
R
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 18:09:40
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182121397.983459.128800@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Jun 17, 5:26 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > In article <1182086219.183839.146...@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > > > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> > > > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
> >
> > > > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> > > > easier to stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
> >
> > > Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
> > > in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
> > > I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! ;)
> >
> > I have no problems whatsoever saying that, on that count, you are pretty
> > much correct. Sad but true...
>
> Sheesh. You're new to this stuff, I guess. It goes like this:
>
> You post something serious.
> I post a cheeky reply.
> You post a smart alecky comeback.
> I take a pot shot at you.
> You call my heritage into question.
> I insult your sister.
> You insult my mother.
> I bust you one in the mouth.
> You bust me one in the mouth.
> Then we go drink Guinness and laugh at Kunich and Lafferty.
>
> It's a formula, but it works. Try to stick with the program. ;)
I realize my response wasn't particularly smart alecky as I'd just gotten back
from a long ride but I'm fine with skipping straight to laffing at Laff and kasing on
Kunich. You can have my Guiness, I'll take a Stellll-lllaaaa [1].
[1] White Shadow reference, mind you.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 09:13:34
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 11:41 am, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com >
wrote:
> On Jun 16, 10:45 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
>
> No doubting the awesomeness of Eddy, but that really isn't fast at
> all. He wouldn't even come close to winning any roller races like
> that.
He was mugging for the cameras. At full speed it was similar to a
strobe - his legs didn't look like they were moving. ;)
BTW, Eddy might be coming for your liver, too. Lie low for a while -
lights out, shades drawn, don't answer the phone.
R
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 15:41:04
From: ronaldo_jeremiah
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 16, 10:45 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com > wrote:
> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> R
No doubting the awesomeness of Eddy, but that really isn't fast at
all. He wouldn't even come close to winning any roller races like
that.
This clip is from La Course en Tete, I believe. It's worth watching
the whole thing if you ain't seen it.
-rj
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 10:17:50
From: Dan Spisak
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
You are correct. It is a scene from "La Course En Tete", a wonderful
documentary..
ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:
>On Jun 16, 10:45 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>>
>>R
>>
>>
>
>No doubting the awesomeness of Eddy, but that really isn't fast at
>all. He wouldn't even come close to winning any roller races like
>that.
>
>This clip is from La Course en Tete, I believe. It's worth watching
>the whole thing if you ain't seen it.
>
>-rj
>
>
>
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 07:26:52
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 9:54 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> RonSonic wrote:
> > Ya know all those bad Chuck Norris jokes. Well they're all really about Eddie
> > Merckx and they're all true and not the least bit funny. When you tell them
> > about Chuck, they are funny jokes.
>
> You mean He really has titanium testicles ?
Don't be daft. They're steel with silver-brazed lugs.
R
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 06:19:48
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 17, 8:44 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it easier to
> >stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
>
> Eddie looks where ever he wants.
>
> Ya know all those bad Chuck Norris jokes. Well they're all really about Eddie
> Merckx and they're all true and not the least bit funny. When you tell them
> about Chuck, they are funny jokes.
It was nice knowing you, Ron. Eddy is going to have your liver with
some Chianti and fava beans.
R
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 06:16:59
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it easier to
> stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! ;)
R
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 14:26:23
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182086219.183839.146780@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Jun 16, 10:35 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
> >
> > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> > easier to
> > stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
>
> Eddy didn't usually have many people in front of him, so he didn't get
> in the habit of having to keep his focus riveted on the guy in front.
> I'm not saying you do, but....ah, hell, yes I am! ;)
I have no problems whatsoever saying that, on that count, you are pretty much
correct. Sad but true...
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 16 Jun 2007 19:35:09
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it easier to
stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 08:44:10
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:35:09 -0700, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com >
wrote:
>In article <1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
>
> It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it easier to
>stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
Eddie looks where ever he wants.
Ya know all those bad Chuck Norris jokes. Well they're all really about Eddie
Merckx and they're all true and not the least bit funny. When you tell them
about Chuck, they are funny jokes.
Ron
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 14:37:44
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
In article <2vaa735mqvvp8rq2d15cg3odvv5a7e2egg@4ax.com >,
RonSonic <ronsonic@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:35:09 -0700, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <1182008734.189967.316940@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> > RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I hadn't seen this one. Eddy had some quick feet.
> >> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1707629775324130564
> >
> > It's interesting that he spends so much time looking down. I found it
> > easier to
> >stay in the middle of rollers when I looked ahead. But that's me.
>
> Eddie looks where ever he wants.
>
> Ya know all those bad Chuck Norris jokes. Well they're all really about Eddie
> Merckx and they're all true and not the least bit funny. When you tell them
> about Chuck, they are funny jokes.
Yeah, but did Eddie have his own brand of jeans? Huh? Did he? And even if he *did*
have his own brand of jeans, did they have the special Hidden Gusset?
http://the-isb.blogspot.com/2007/04/behold-hidden-gusset.html
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Jun 2007 15:54:22
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Eddy on rollers
|
RonSonic wrote:
> Ya know all those bad Chuck Norris jokes. Well they're all really about Eddie
> Merckx and they're all true and not the least bit funny. When you tell them
> about Chuck, they are funny jokes.
You mean He really has titanium testicles ?
|
|
