| |
Main
Date: 21 May 2007 11:16:43
From: Hell and High Water
Subject: Fair Play question
|
Are the reasons for this ever listed?
I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.
Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_
-Bob
|
|
| |
Date: 21 May 2007 19:04:22
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Fair Play question
|
In article <MPG.20bb81e89e206097989a36@news.giganews.com >,
Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net > wrote:
> Are the reasons for this ever listed?
>
> I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.
>
>
> Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_
From Cyclingnews:
___________________
Fair Play
Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where the more
points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is scored using six
criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point for every 10 Swiss
francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a declassification is worth 100
points; a disqualification/explusion is worth 1000 points; and a positive doping
control is worth 2000 points.
___________________
http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifications07
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 22 May 2007 10:10:28
From: Hell and High Water
Subject: Re: Fair Play question
|
In article <YOURhoward-663C03.19042221052007@comcast.dca.giganews.com >,
YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com says...
> In article <MPG.20bb81e89e206097989a36@news.giganews.com>,
> Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Are the reasons for this ever listed?
> >
> > I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.
> >
> >
> > Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_
>
> From Cyclingnews:
> ___________________
> Fair Play
>
> Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where the more
> points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is scored using six
> criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point for every 10 Swiss
> francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a declassification is worth 100
> points; a disqualification/explusion is worth 1000 points; and a positive doping
> control is worth 2000 points.
> ___________________
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifications07
I know that, but I'm looking for a list of the teams specific
infractions.
Thanks.
-Bob
|
| | | |
Date: 22 May 2007 21:43:40
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Fair Play question
|
In article <MPG.20bcc3de8c334594989a41@news.giganews.com >,
Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net > wrote:
> In article <YOURhoward-663C03.19042221052007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com says...
> > In article <MPG.20bb81e89e206097989a36@news.giganews.com>,
> > Hell and High Water <tifosoREM@OVEcomcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Are the reasons for this ever listed?
> > >
> > > I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.
> > >
> > >
> > > Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_
> >
> > From Cyclingnews:
> > ___________________
> > Fair Play
> >
> > Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where
> > the more points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is
> > scored using six criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point
> > for every 10 Swiss francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a
> > declassification is worth 100 points; a disqualification/explusion is worth
> > 1000 points; and a positive doping control is worth 2000 points.
> > ___________________
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifi
> > cations07
>
>
> I know that, but I'm looking for a list of the teams specific
> infractions.
Oh, sorry - I misunderstood your "I'm wondering..."
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
|
