| |
Main
Date: 21 May 2007 21:01:02
From: wimpyVO2
Subject: Floyd Landis is Not Guilty
|
After reading about the testimony of Dr. John Amory and Dr. Wolfram
Meier-Augenstein, there is no question that Landis is not guilty. I
don't know if Floyd is innocent, but that's not the same as Not
Guilty. The lab results are junk and aren't good enough to justify
taking away Landis' title.
The best thing USADA could do for cycling is to rule the lab results
as inconclusive. This would put pressure on WADA to tighten up lab
standards. You can't clean up doping without good labs.
|
|
| |
Date: 22 May 2007 08:04:07
From: DirtRoadie
Subject: Re: Floyd Landis is Not Guilty
|
On May 21, 10:14 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
> accused guilty.
Yup, even if they're innocent.
|
| |
Date: 22 May 2007 03:03:46
From: MMan
Subject: Re: Floyd Landis is Not Guilty
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "wimpyVO2" <wimpyVO2max@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1179806461.994752.61650@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > After reading about the testimony of Dr. John Amory and Dr. Wolfram
> > Meier-Augenstein, there is no question that Landis is not guilty. I
> > don't know if Floyd is innocent, but that's not the same as Not
> > Guilty. The lab results are junk and aren't good enough to justify
> > taking away Landis' title.
> >
> > The best thing USADA could do for cycling is to rule the lab results
> > as inconclusive. This would put pressure on WADA to tighten up lab
> > standards. You can't clean up doping without good labs.
>
> You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
> accused guilty.
I'm beginning to think LNDD stands for "Let's Not Disappoint Dick".
It's been Pound's personal go-to lab when he wants someone to test
positive on his own whim.
|
| |
Date: 22 May 2007 04:14:11
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Floyd Landis is Not Guilty
|
"wimpyVO2" <wimpyVO2max@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1179806461.994752.61650@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> After reading about the testimony of Dr. John Amory and Dr. Wolfram
> Meier-Augenstein, there is no question that Landis is not guilty. I
> don't know if Floyd is innocent, but that's not the same as Not
> Guilty. The lab results are junk and aren't good enough to justify
> taking away Landis' title.
>
> The best thing USADA could do for cycling is to rule the lab results
> as inconclusive. This would put pressure on WADA to tighten up lab
> standards. You can't clean up doping without good labs.
You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
accused guilty.
|
| | |
Date: 22 May 2007 20:09:13
From: Cycler
Subject: Re: Floyd Landis is Not Guilty
|
>You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone accused guilty.
Well said
Cycler
|
|
