| |
Main
Date: 21 Jun 2007 10:42:14
From: Rik Van Diesel
Subject: Great CN story..
|
Read story UCI goes after the "Men in Black http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 RVD
|
|
| |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 18:54:37
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:42:14 -0700, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyoneday@hotmail.com > wrote: >Read story > >UCI goes after the "Men in Black >http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > >Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > >http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 This is why Leipheimer, and now Vinokourov (who says he wears black to avoid being tailed by fanboys, are not as serious as Lance Armstrong. Lance Armstrong trains with a follow car and a bunch of bodygaurds. That's serious. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com ****************************
|
| |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 10:15:26
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 22, 10:33 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:08:24 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > >Holy crap! That happened to me. I'm not sure why they didn't take > >samples, but they rammed me off of the road. Guys were in a pickup > >and it was in Arizona. Talk about long arm of the law! > > You can't get away from them, all you can do is wear generic kit so they can't > trace you back to your team. That might be what saved you - after harvesting you > for testing they realized that you weren't on a pro team. That was just mean, Ron. At least allow me to have my delusions that the full USPS kit (I'm a little strapped at the moment and can't afford anything newer) fools people into believing I'm a pro. I mean I have the gloves and socks and matching helmet, so how can they tell for sure? R
|
| |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 06:51:37
From: Frank Drackman
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"Rik Van Diesel" <metalkprettyoneday@hotmail.com > wrote in message news:1182447734.864980.85810@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com... > Read story > > UCI goes after the "Men in Black > http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > RVD > Great, now every fattie master will have to get rid of the team kits and purchase all black kits. Next they will be cancelling the team paint jobs on the follow cars that they make their wife drive and get basic black. I guess that I can still spot them by their aero bars that are pointed almost straight up.
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 18:58:57
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:51:37 -0700, "Frank Drackman" <frankdrack@yahoo.com > wrote: > >Great, now every fattie master will have to get rid of the team kits and >purchase all black kits. Even during the Postal/Disco heydays, where I live all black was more popular among sporty cyclists. Esp Assos-type stuff. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com ****************************
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 22:24:02
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:58:57 -0400, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetremove@jt10000.com > wrote: >On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:51:37 -0700, "Frank Drackman" ><frankdrack@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >>Great, now every fattie master will have to get rid of the team kits and >>purchase all black kits. > > >Even during the Postal/Disco heydays, where I live all black was more >popular among sporty cyclists. Esp Assos-type stuff. I'm in Florida, the only people wearing black right now are fat *mountain bikers. But in winter I'll see that Assos look and black tri stuff. *Fat mountain bikers are on a whole level of fat up from your usual master fattie. Ron
|
| | | |
Date: 23 Jun 2007 01:39:16
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
In article <uvko73hldg0d8venukehiij8vj8lgvng5s@4ax.com >, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetremove@jt10000.com > wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:51:37 -0700, "Frank Drackman" > <frankdrack@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >Great, now every fattie master will have to get rid of the team kits and > >purchase all black kits. > > > Even during the Postal/Disco heydays, where I live all black was more > popular among sporty cyclists. Esp Assos-type stuff. You just know these guys are doping: http://evilcycling.com/tomrv_2004.htm -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 16:20:36
From: Frank Drackman
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"John Forrest Tomlinson" <usenetremove@jt10000.com > wrote in message news:uvko73hldg0d8venukehiij8vj8lgvng5s@4ax.com... > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:51:37 -0700, "Frank Drackman" > <frankdrack@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >>Great, now every fattie master will have to get rid of the team kits and >>purchase all black kits. > > > Even during the Postal/Disco heydays, where I live all black was more > popular among sporty cyclists. Esp Assos-type stuff. > -- > JT All black doesn't seem to be huge here. Most of the local racers seem to train in their kit and since the retirement of LA there isn't a unified replacement of the Postal kit. I bet that there are a lot of carbon Treks sitting in garages. I don't see as many on the road and not a huge volume on craigslist.
|
| |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 06:08:24
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 8:31 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote: > > I have no idea why it would make a difference in doping control what color > jersey a guy wears. Do they drive around looking for riders in team kit, ram the > guys off the road and take blood and urine samples right there. Holy crap! That happened to me. I'm not sure why they didn't take samples, but they rammed me off of the road. Guys were in a pickup and it was in Arizona. Talk about long arm of the law! R
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 18:56:42
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:08:24 -0700, RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote: >On Jun 21, 8:31 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> I have no idea why it would make a difference in doping control what color >> jersey a guy wears. Do they drive around looking for riders in team kit, ram the >> guys off the road and take blood and urine samples right there. > >Holy crap! That happened to me. I'm not sure why they didn't take >samples, but they rammed me off of the road. Guys were in a pickup >and it was in Arizona. Talk about long arm of the law! Something similar happened to a guy I know. Except he wasn't on a bike, he was walking in a field. And he wasn't wearing team kit. And he wasn't knocked over -- just a big floating disk appeared above him with bright lights. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com ****************************
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 10:33:52
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:08:24 -0700, RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote: >On Jun 21, 8:31 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> I have no idea why it would make a difference in doping control what color >> jersey a guy wears. Do they drive around looking for riders in team kit, ram the >> guys off the road and take blood and urine samples right there. > >Holy crap! That happened to me. I'm not sure why they didn't take >samples, but they rammed me off of the road. Guys were in a pickup >and it was in Arizona. Talk about long arm of the law! UCI Controllers are everywhere. Ya know the black helicopters.... Yep, it's them. Alien abduction, UCI Controllers again. And yes, they do the anal probing thing, ask Lance. You can't get away from them, all you can do is wear generic kit so they can't trace you back to your team. That might be what saved you - after harvesting you for testing they realized that you weren't on a pro team. Ron
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 20:26:35
From: Dwayne
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 8:33 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote: > ... For years I've been calling people Gay just to try to > get through to them that I have no idea what someone's sexual preferences > are and neither do they have the ability to be any more accurate about > someone else on virtually any other subject. Gee, and we thought that rhetorical device was the "Koach Kunich Korollary": http://tinyurl.com/28n7dl
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 20:14:51
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:42:14 -0700, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyoneday@hotmail.com > wrote: >Read story > >UCI goes after the "Men in Black >http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 This is absofuckinglutely the stupidest damn thing I've seen in this dumbass sport with its assclown organizations and buttmonkey inquisitors. What possible purpose is this idiotic press release supposed to serve? Is it to assure everyone that doping is solved as a problem in the sport? That they're making progress? That they have found a clue in the form of a blue pawprint? What? Real sports do not announce unconfirmed AAFs. Real sports do not announce that they have singled out a handful of athletes for additional scrutiny. Real organizations of any sort do not announce ongoing investigations into misconduct of which the public is not already aware.. I wish these people would leave the sport alone and go find something useful to do with their remaining lives. Ron UCI goes after the "Men in Black" The UCI has targeted "six or seven" top riders who are suspected of using doping products, by subjecting them to extra unannounced doping controls. Some of these riders have already produced "non-negative" results, according to Anne Gripper, director of the UCI's anti-doping program. "We have picked out six or seven riders who are considered high-risk cases because of their suspect behaviour and subsequent good performances inthe Tour de France," she told the press agency Belga. Some of these riders "have already had three or four unannounced doping controls," although the UCI only requires one per rider per year. Gripper said that "We have information that they train in strange places." The controllers refer to the riders as the "Men in Black", because they wear neutral clothing on their training rides, ra ther than their team kit, which helps them avoid attention by the UCI controllers. "Some of the results may well be announced before the start of the Tour de France," Gripper said. "Several abnormal results have already come in. We are busy with those results and not all of them are negative," she said, "but it will take time, because we have to respect the process, the analysis of the B samples, before we can make any announcements." >Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > >http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > >RVD
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 15:37:45
From: Mark Fennell
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
Rik Van Diesel wrote: > > UCI goes after the "Men in Black > http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 Cheap Disco bastards... can't even give Levi enough clothing. Or even a water-bottle cage for that matter. Notice how he's following J/A Badonkadonk... He wants on that team if the Disco thing doesn't work out. He likes the BPG (Berkeley Patients Group) sponsorship. But seriously, re the quote in the CN story... "wear neutral clothing on their training rides, rather than their team kit, which helps them avoid attention by the UCI controllers" Give me a break!! It helps them avoid attention from every Tom, Dork, and Harry who would otherwise try to ride with them... Mark http://marcofanelli.blogspot.com
|
| | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 20:31:33
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:37:45 -0800, "Mark Fennell" <marco_fennelli@yahoo.com > wrote: >Rik Van Diesel wrote: >> >> UCI goes after the "Men in Black >> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >> >> http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > >Cheap Disco bastards... can't even give Levi enough clothing. Or even a >water-bottle cage for that matter. Notice how he's following J/A >Badonkadonk... He wants on that team if the Disco thing doesn't work out. He >likes the BPG (Berkeley Patients Group) sponsorship. > >But seriously, re the quote in the CN story... "wear neutral clothing on >their training rides, rather than their team kit, which helps them avoid >attention by the UCI controllers" Give me a break!! It helps them avoid >attention from every Tom, Dork, and Harry who would otherwise try to ride >with them... > >Mark >http://marcofanelli.blogspot.com Unless the "UCI controllers" (whatever those might be) are hiding in the bushes along popular training routes watching riders shoot up. Without the team kit they can't tell who they have busted. Maybe they've got jersey recognition software wired to security cameras to catch doping riders. I have no idea why it would make a difference in doping control what color jersey a guy wears. Do they drive around looking for riders in team kit, ram the guys off the road and take blood and urine samples right there. This whole thing is stupid, counterproductive and nonsensical. They need to start testing for performance inhibiting drugs at the UCI home office. Ron
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 10:06:26
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
RonSonic wrote: > This whole thing is stupid, counterproductive and nonsensical. They need to > start testing for performance inhibiting drugs at the UCI home office. Paddy likes crack.
|
| | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 17:04:38
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 4:37 pm, "Mark Fennell" <marco_fenne...@yahoo.com > wrote: > Rik Van Diesel wrote: > > > UCI goes after the "Men in Black > >http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > >http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > Cheap Disco bastards... can't even give Levi enough clothing. Or even a > water-bottle cage for that matter. Notice how he's following J/A > Badonkadonk... He wants on that team if the Disco thing doesn't work out. He > likes the BPG (Berkeley Patients Group) sponsorship. > > But seriously, re the quote in the CN story... "wear neutral clothing on > their training rides, rather than their team kit, which helps them avoid > attention by the UCI controllers" Give me a break!! It helps them avoid > attention from every Tom, Dork, and Harry who would otherwise try to ride > with them... > > Markhttp://marcofanelli.blogspot.com The black kit Levi is wearing are some of those Nike "10/2" LANCE shmattes. Why should the UCI monitors pay attention to the Men in Black from CN and their training ride kit? They have an obligation to inform the anti-doping agencies of their whereabouts for out-of-competition tests. Beyond that, why should the UCI care if it can keep track of these guys on their training rides? Are they going to log hours in the saddle and see if anyone is suspicious because they improved but only put in 15 hours last week? Ben
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 15:17:29
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl > wrote: > <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Read story > > >> UCI goes after the "Men in > >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? > > You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be racist. > I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). So > I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? > > Benjo Hey Benjo I'm not sure where Tom was going with this bit, but he did say that occasionally agreeing with Tosi could make others think you're a racist. It would take an incredibly teeny weeny brain to make that leap. Tosi had good knowledge of cycling and could add a lot to the conversation, unfortunately it was wrapped in a really nasty package. Agreeing with him on some cycling matters has nothing to do with his views on other things. I sure as hell considered Tosi to be racist and told him so. Maybe he's got us mixed up. If so, I'm flattered. Bill C
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 01:51:33
From: benjo maso
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net > wrote in message news:1182464249.186427.54400@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl> wrote: >> <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> >> > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Read story >> >> >> UCI goes after the "Men in >> >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >> >> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >> >> >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >> >> > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? >> >> You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be >> racist. >> I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). >> So >> I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? >> >> Benjo > > Hey Benjo > I'm not sure where Tom was going with this bit, but he did say that > occasionally agreeing with Tosi could make others think you're a > racist. It would take an incredibly teeny weeny brain to make that > leap. > Tosi had good knowledge of cycling and could add a lot to the > conversation, unfortunately it was wrapped in a really nasty package. > Agreeing with him on some cycling matters has nothing to do with his > views on other things. > I sure as hell considered Tosi to be racist and told him so. Maybe > he's got us mixed up. If so, I'm flattered. Thanks! I only remember that Tosi and I agreed twice: once about the origins of the anti-doping campaign and the second time when he wrote I didn't know much about Italy and I answered he was right ... But someone sent me an e-mail writing that Tom probably mixed me up with bjw@mambo ("Ben"), who in a discussion about Guantanamo (to which both of us contributed as well) suggested that Tom saw the prisoners in Gitmo as commodities. It doesn't seem very likely (I don;t think he accused Tom of racism and I never adress someone as dumbass - not even when he is one), but who knows? Benjo
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 00:33:00
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl > wrote in message news:5e0h85F36utf7U1@mid.individual.net... > > "Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:1182464249.186427.54400@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl> wrote: >>> <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> Read story >>> >>> >> UCI goes after the "Men in >>> >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >>> >>> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >>> >>> >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >>> >>> > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? >>> >>> You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be >>> racist. >>> I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). >>> So >>> I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? >>> >>> Benjo >> >> Hey Benjo >> I'm not sure where Tom was going with this bit, but he did say that >> occasionally agreeing with Tosi could make others think you're a >> racist. It would take an incredibly teeny weeny brain to make that >> leap. >> Tosi had good knowledge of cycling and could add a lot to the >> conversation, unfortunately it was wrapped in a really nasty package. >> Agreeing with him on some cycling matters has nothing to do with his >> views on other things. >> I sure as hell considered Tosi to be racist and told him so. Maybe >> he's got us mixed up. If so, I'm flattered. > > Thanks! I only remember that Tosi and I agreed twice: once about the > origins of the anti-doping campaign and the second time when he wrote I > didn't know much about Italy and I answered he was right ... But someone > sent me an e-mail writing that Tom probably mixed me up with bjw@mambo > ("Ben"), who in a discussion about Guantanamo (to which both of us > contributed as well) suggested that Tom saw the prisoners in Gitmo as > commodities. It doesn't seem very likely (I don;t think he accused Tom of > racism and I never adress someone as dumbass - not even when he is one), > but who knows? You seem to be overly concerned about your image here Benjo. But in passing I did see at least one person imply you were racist and others agree with him. Whether or not he was mistaking you for Tosi I don't know since I consider such statements (the like of which are commonly thrown around here) to be patently absurd. For years I've been calling people Gay just to try to get through to them that I have no idea what someone's sexual preferences are and neither do they have the ability to be any more accurate about someone else on virtually any other subject. For instance - on this group Henry seems the worlds biggest jackass. However, I was emailed by one of his board enemies saying that he's a nice guy who tries to help everyone. If he is that different here as opposed to in person how the hell can you ever expect to understand anything about people you've only met through the filter of a newspaper article by someone that didn't know that person either?
|
| | | | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 23:20:53
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
In article <0NEei.2121$iz5.351@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net >, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote: > You seem to be overly concerned about your image here Benjo. But in passing > I did see at least one person imply you were racist and others agree with > him. Whether or not he was mistaking you for Tosi I don't know since I > consider such statements (the like of which are commonly thrown around here) > to be patently absurd. For years I've been calling people Gay just to try to > get through to them that I have no idea what someone's sexual preferences > are and neither do they have the ability to be any more accurate about > someone else on virtually any other subject. Oh please, quit while you're not so far behind. You spun up a strawman with Benjo as the unwitting centerpiece in an attempt to express your scorn for liberals (or whoever you don't like, which translates into "liberal"). It was pointless ideological grandstanding, more of your usual crazed ululations. I sure don't recall anyone ever insinuating or implying Benjo was racist. Yes, people sometimes use the term "racist" around here - more often than not it's in reference to you (and is correctly and accurately applied). You've been calling people gay for years because you hate and fear gays and it's one of the worst things you can think of to call someone who disagrees with you (perhaps you believe that everyone shares your phobia of gays). It's pretty amusing to see you backpedalling like mad as you try to limit the damage. -- tanx, Howard Never take a tenant with a monkey. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 04:28:16
From: benjo maso
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message news:0NEei.2121$iz5.351@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > "benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl> wrote in message > news:5e0h85F36utf7U1@mid.individual.net... >> >> "Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote in message >> news:1182464249.186427.54400@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >>> On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl> wrote: >>>> <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> Read story >>>> >>>> >> UCI goes after the "Men in >>>> >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >>>> >>>> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >>>> >>>> >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >>>> >>>> > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? >>>> >>>> You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be >>>> racist. >>>> I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, >>>> surprise). So >>>> I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? >>>> >>>> Benjo >>> >>> Hey Benjo >>> I'm not sure where Tom was going with this bit, but he did say that >>> occasionally agreeing with Tosi could make others think you're a >>> racist. It would take an incredibly teeny weeny brain to make that >>> leap. >>> Tosi had good knowledge of cycling and could add a lot to the >>> conversation, unfortunately it was wrapped in a really nasty package. >>> Agreeing with him on some cycling matters has nothing to do with his >>> views on other things. >>> I sure as hell considered Tosi to be racist and told him so. Maybe >>> he's got us mixed up. If so, I'm flattered. >> >> Thanks! I only remember that Tosi and I agreed twice: once about the >> origins of the anti-doping campaign and the second time when he wrote I >> didn't know much about Italy and I answered he was right ... But someone >> sent me an e-mail writing that Tom probably mixed me up with bjw@mambo >> ("Ben"), who in a discussion about Guantanamo (to which both of us >> contributed as well) suggested that Tom saw the prisoners in Gitmo as >> commodities. It doesn't seem very likely (I don;t think he accused Tom of >> racism and I never adress someone as dumbass - not even when he is one), >> but who knows? > > You seem to be overly concerned about your image here Benjo. But in > passing I did see at least one person imply you were racist and others > agree with him. Whether or not he was mistaking you for Tosi I don't know > since I consider such statements (the like of which are commonly thrown > around here) to be patently absurd. For years I've been calling people Gay > just to try to get through to them that I have no idea what someone's > sexual preferences are and neither do they have the ability to be any more > accurate about someone else on virtually any other subject. > > For instance - on this group Henry seems the worlds biggest jackass. > However, I was emailed by one of his board enemies saying that he's a nice > guy who tries to help everyone. If he is that different here as opposed to > in person how the hell can you ever expect to understand anything about > people you've only met through the filter of a newspaper article by > someone that didn't know that person either? > I'm not concerned about my image in rbr (who could be?), but I'm curious. If anybody implied I'm a racist and others agreed with him, I have missed it completely and I can't find it nowhere. So again: where? when? by whom? Benjo
|
| | | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 02:37:24
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl > wrote in message news:5e0qe0F3611nsU1@mid.individual.net... > > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message > news:0NEei.2121$iz5.351@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> "benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl> wrote in message >> news:5e0h85F36utf7U1@mid.individual.net... >>> >>> "Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote in message >>> news:1182464249.186427.54400@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >>>> On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl> wrote: >>>>> <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>> news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>>>> >>>>> > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> Read story >>>>> >>>>> >> UCI goes after the "Men in >>>>> >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >>>>> >>>>> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >>>>> >>>>> >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >>>>> >>>>> > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? >>>>> >>>>> You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be >>>>> racist. >>>>> I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, >>>>> surprise). So >>>>> I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? >>>>> >>>>> Benjo >>>> >>>> Hey Benjo >>>> I'm not sure where Tom was going with this bit, but he did say that >>>> occasionally agreeing with Tosi could make others think you're a >>>> racist. It would take an incredibly teeny weeny brain to make that >>>> leap. >>>> Tosi had good knowledge of cycling and could add a lot to the >>>> conversation, unfortunately it was wrapped in a really nasty package. >>>> Agreeing with him on some cycling matters has nothing to do with his >>>> views on other things. >>>> I sure as hell considered Tosi to be racist and told him so. Maybe >>>> he's got us mixed up. If so, I'm flattered. >>> >>> Thanks! I only remember that Tosi and I agreed twice: once about the >>> origins of the anti-doping campaign and the second time when he wrote I >>> didn't know much about Italy and I answered he was right ... But someone >>> sent me an e-mail writing that Tom probably mixed me up with bjw@mambo >>> ("Ben"), who in a discussion about Guantanamo (to which both of us >>> contributed as well) suggested that Tom saw the prisoners in Gitmo as >>> commodities. It doesn't seem very likely (I don;t think he accused Tom >>> of racism and I never adress someone as dumbass - not even when he is >>> one), but who knows? >> >> You seem to be overly concerned about your image here Benjo. But in >> passing I did see at least one person imply you were racist and others >> agree with him. Whether or not he was mistaking you for Tosi I don't know >> since I consider such statements (the like of which are commonly thrown >> around here) to be patently absurd. For years I've been calling people >> Gay just to try to get through to them that I have no idea what someone's >> sexual preferences are and neither do they have the ability to be any >> more accurate about someone else on virtually any other subject. >> >> For instance - on this group Henry seems the worlds biggest jackass. >> However, I was emailed by one of his board enemies saying that he's a >> nice guy who tries to help everyone. If he is that different here as >> opposed to in person how the hell can you ever expect to understand >> anything about people you've only met through the filter of a newspaper >> article by someone that didn't know that person either? >> > > I'm not concerned about my image in rbr (who could be?), but I'm curious. > If anybody implied I'm a racist and others agreed with him, I have missed > it completely and I can't find it nowhere. So again: where? when? by whom? I didn't note the time and place and I erase the threads when they get old. So you probably have as good a chance of finding it as I have. Remember they didn't actually SAY racist, I recall that it was just an implication. BTW, racism doesn't bother me in the least. I grew up in east Oakland in the heart of an almost totally black neighborhood where every black under the age of 40 hated whites just because they were white. That was OK but when some old white postal worker got angry because blacks were being promoted over him regardless of seniority he was racist. Now weirdly enough, the older blacks who actually had been discriminated against, sometimes quite severely, had very little problems with whites. They would bend over backwards to help anyone. Now THAT was the way to end racism, not crying about it.
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 14:25:24
From: Rik Van Diesel
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 12:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl > wrote: > <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Read story > > >> UCI goes after the "Men in > >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? > > You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be racist. > I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). So > I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? > > Benjo Copperopolis, April 2007, Levi
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 19:53:22
From: amit.ghosh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 3:39 pm, "benjo maso" <benjo.m...@chello.nl > wrote: > <cyclin...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Read story > > >> UCI goes after the "Men in > >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > >>http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? > > You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be racist. > I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). So > I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? dumbass, look who you're dealing with.
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 11:13:55
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 1:52 pm, fred.gar...@yahoo.com wrote: > > C'mon, you know damn well who that is. Now, as to why he's wearing > black, who knows. It's certainly not to disguise himself, as noted in > the article mentioned, since he registered for the race under his > correct identity. He's not hiding from anyone, here, but why the > black, who knows? Maybe he was in mourning. Stealth clothing? Could be the new Levi Burkha I've heard is in the works. Maybe when he's drafting the lead guy will look back and think it's just his own shadow. It's a test of the new sponsorship projection technology like they use behind home plate in MLB. It was pretty crafty of him to wear black so people wouldn't notice he won. That way they underestimate him. He had a very NY, NY look going on - 'ceptin' for the white shoes. http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813984 R
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 10:52:24
From:
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 11:46 am, cyclin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Read story > > > UCI goes after the "Men in Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > >http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? C'mon, you know damn well who that is. Now, as to why he's wearing black, who knows. It's certainly not to disguise himself, as noted in the article mentioned, since he registered for the race under his correct identity. He's not hiding from anyone, here, but why the black, who knows? Fred
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 00:03:08
From: Simon Brooke
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
in message <1182448344.802286.225320@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com >, fred.garvin@yahoo.com (' fred.garvin@yahoo.com') wrote: > On Jun 21, 11:46 am, cyclin...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Read story >> >> > UCI goes after the "Men in >> > Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >> >> > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >> >> >http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >> >> Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? > > C'mon, you know damn well who that is. Now, as to why he's wearing > black, who knows. It's certainly not to disguise himself, as noted in > the article mentioned, since he registered for the race under his > correct identity. He's not hiding from anyone, here, but why the > black, who knows? In Britain, for many years, it was the convention if not the rule that any rider not representing a club in a race must wear black. Of course, this is neither funny nor does it support any bizarre conspiracy theory. -- simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 23:34:48
From: William Asher
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
Simon Brooke wrote: <snip > > > In Britain, for many years, it was the convention if not the rule that > any rider not representing a club in a race must wear black. Of > course, this is neither funny nor does it support any bizarre > conspiracy theory. > Unless you notice that "black" has five letters. http://tinyurl.com/ys8y4x -- Bill Asher
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 10:46:58
From:
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com > wrote: > Read story > > UCI goes after the "Men in Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 > > Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. > > http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider?
|
| | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 21:39:04
From: benjo maso
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
<cyclintom@gmail.com > wrote in message news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> > wrote: >> Read story >> >> UCI goes after the "Men in >> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >> >> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >> >> http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 > > Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be racist. I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, surprise). So I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? Benjo
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Jun 2007 23:49:26
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl > wrote in message news:5e02eoF363nt8U1@mid.individual.net... > > <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Read story >>> >>> UCI goes after the "Men in >>> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >>> >>> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >>> >>> http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >> >> Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? > > You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be > racist. I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, > surprise). So I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? I said that OTHERS considered YOU to be racist.
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2007 01:56:58
From: benjo maso
Subject: Re: Great CN story..
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message news:a8Eei.6589$tb6.2509@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > "benjo maso" <benjo.maso@chello.nl> wrote in message > news:5e02eoF363nt8U1@mid.individual.net... >> >> <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:1182448018.840379.288250@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>> On Jun 21, 10:42 am, Rik Van Diesel <metalkprettyone...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Read story >>>> >>>> UCI goes after the "Men in >>>> Blackhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/jun07/jun21news2 >>>> >>>> Then go to photo and look for a rider in black. >>>> >>>> http://www.pbase.com/bohebe/image/76813205 >>> >>> Hey Rik, are we supposed to recognize that rider? >> >> You wrote that without any base of reference I consider others to be >> racist. I asked you where, when en whom. You didn't answer (surprise, >> surprise). So I ask you again. Where? When? Whom? > > I said that OTHERS considered YOU to be racist. Who? Benjo
|
|