| |
Main
Date: 02 Mar 2007 10:40:42
From: Robert Chung
Subject: Het Volk
|
Nuyens.
|
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 14:33:42
From: Kurgan Gringioni
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 3, 12:15 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com >
wrote:
> On Sat, 3 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >Bret wrote:
> >> On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
>
> >>>> Max Van Heeswijk
>
> >>> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
>
> >> Almost called it.
>
> >Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
>
> Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or
> maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish.
> Pretty much called it I did.
Dumbass -
You have the perfect bike racer mentality.
thanks,
K. Gringioni.
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 11:39:22
From: Kenny
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2 mrt, 10:40, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid > wrote:
> Nuyens.
The separation of the former Quick Step team mates Boonen, Pozzato and
Nuyens gave us some very attractive racing. What an extraordinary
finale!
I think we all know how things would have ended if they wore the same
jersey in the pursuit of Flecha and O'grady...
For once Roger De Vlaeminck is right: big names can't be in the same
team (He hated being in the same team with Moser.)
Kenny
|
| |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 07:50:47
From: Bret
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com >
wrote:
> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
>
> <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> wrote:
> >Max Van Heeswijk
>
> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
Almost called it.
Bret
|
| | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 17:41:14
From: Robert Chung
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
Bret wrote:
> On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
>>> Max Van Heeswijk
>>
>> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
>
> Almost called it.
Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Pozzato did that very well. I saw him win Haut Var last weekend and he
didn't really seem to need much pop that time.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 10:32:28
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
Robert Chung wrote:
> Pozzato did that very well. I saw him win Haut Var last weekend and he
> didn't really seem to need much pop that time.
O'Grady looks like he might be a contender in some of the classics;
perhaps the old Riis magic is working again. I wonder if he's doing
Milan-San Remo ?
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 20:56:06
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
"Donald Munro" <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:45ea85c1$0$6891$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
> Robert Chung wrote:
>> Pozzato did that very well. I saw him win Haut Var last weekend and he
>> didn't really seem to need much pop that time.
>
> O'Grady looks like he might be a contender in some of the classics;
> perhaps the old Riis magic is working again. I wonder if he's doing
> Milan-San Remo ?
That was what I thought when I saw O'Grady running so strongly at the front.
I hope he doesn't lose hope since he has always seemed to be almost there
only to lose it in the last little bit.
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 15:15:09
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On Sat, 3 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <me@address.invalid >
wrote:
>Bret wrote:
>> On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
>
>>>> Max Van Heeswijk
>>>
>>> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
>>
>> Almost called it.
>
>Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or
maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish.
Pretty much called it I did.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 19:48:12
From: Geraard Spergen
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> On Sat, 3 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <me@address.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Bret wrote:
>>> On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
>>>>> Max Van Heeswijk
>>>> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
>>> Almost called it.
>> Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
>
> Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or
> maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish.
> Pretty much called it I did.
Wow, retroactive candyassing, a whole new skill.
Eeckhout could've been in there if things had gone a little differently.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 03 Mar 2007 20:10:57
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
In article <45ea3ee0$0$30744$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com >,
Geraard Spergen <GSpergen@spammagnet.com > wrote:
> John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 2007 17:41:14 +0100, "Robert Chung" <me@address.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Bret wrote:
> >>> On 2, 4:47 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
> >>>>> Max Van Heeswijk
> >>>> Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
> >>> Almost called it.
> >> Yeah, that would've made the candyassing even worse.
> >
> > Yeah, I meant to say it'd be Flecha, or else he'd be top five, or
> > maybe not if several other guys were ahead of him or he didn't finish.
> > Pretty much called it I did.
>
> Wow, retroactive candyassing, a whole new skill.
>
> Eeckhout could've been in there if things had gone a little differently.
Since Pozzato (allegedly) didn't sign on, is he the real winner? JT may be
vindicated.
http://tinyurl.com/2ukeas (goes to CN)
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:49:46
From: Bret
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 10:11 pm, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com >
wrote:
> On 2, 6:28 pm, "Bret" <bret.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2, 4:00 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > > In article <54q9opF20s52...@mid.individual.net>, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Nuyens.
>
> > You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> > win.
>
> > Bret
>
> dumbass,
>
> boonen knows about the het volk exclusion principle. if you win het
> volk you can't win the ronde.
Yeah, they might k him too closely if he shows his cards too early.
Bret
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:47:40
From: Bret
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 9:16 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Bret wrote:
> > You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> > win.
>
> That's what Unibet says. Being a fatty master I am picking PVP.
>
> Bob Schwartz
I wouldn't mind at all if PVP won. It's just not as likely.
Bret
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:11:52
From: amit.ghosh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 6:28 pm, "Bret" <bret.w...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 2, 4:00 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <54q9opF20s52...@mid.individual.net>, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Nuyens.
>
> You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> win.
>
> Bret
dumbass,
boonen knows about the het volk exclusion principle. if you win het
volk you can't win the ronde.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 20:51:15
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 9:16 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Bret wrote:
> > You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> > win.
>
> That's what Unibet says. Being a fatty master I am picking PVP.
>
Tyler Farrar. No, wait, Hoste.
Ben
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 19:47:43
From: yeahyeah
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 4:40 am, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid > wrote:
> Nuyens.
Steegmans.
|
| | |
Date: 04 Mar 2007 08:51:21
From: Robert Chung
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
yeahyeah wrote:
> Steegmans.
Thank, btw, for not putting down 11 names.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 19:46:08
From: dustoyevsky@mac.com
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 3:40 am, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid > wrote:
> Nuyens.
Stijn Devolder
--D-y, aspiring clairvoyant
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:28:12
From: Bret
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 4:00 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> In article <54q9opF20s52...@mid.individual.net>, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Nuyens.
You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
win.
Bret
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 21:04:18
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
In article <1172878092.848706.167180@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com >,
"Bret" <bret.wade@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 2, 4:00 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > In article <54q9opF20s52...@mid.individual.net>, "Robert Chung"
> > <m...@address.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nuyens.
>
> You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> win.
I contemplated picking Boonen. He has had some good finishes in the race (12, 2 and
5 since 2003) and he already has five wins (four of those were in the Tour of Qatar
and one in the Ruto del Sol) this year.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 22:16:03
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
Bret wrote:
> You're all ignoring the elephant in the room. I think Boonen might
> win.
That's what Unibet says. Being a fatty master I am picking PVP.
Bob Schwartz
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 15:00:12
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
In article <54q9opF20s52gU1@mid.individual.net >, "Robert Chung" <me@address.invalid>
wrote:
> Nuyens.
Gert Steegmans
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 18:38:39
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
Max Van Heeswijk
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 18:47:37
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On Fri, 02 2007 18:38:39 -0500, John Forrest Tomlinson
<usenetremove@jt10000.com > wrote:
>Max Van Heeswijk
Or Juan Antonio Flecha.
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 14:30:01
From: Keven
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 1:46 pm, "Andre" <ANDREJANSSE...@YAHOO.COM > wrote:
> On 2, 10:05 am, Geraard Spergen <GSper...@spammagnet.com> wrote:
>
> > Robert Chung wrote:
> > > Nuyens.
>
> > Eekhout
>
> Gilbert
Jartazi Promo Fashion
247 Geert Omloop (Bel) <<<<<<<<<WINNER. I mean, come on.
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 13:46:48
From: Andre
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 10:05 am, Geraard Spergen <GSper...@spammagnet.com > wrote:
> Robert Chung wrote:
> > Nuyens.
>
> Eekhout
Gilbert
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 07:05:23
From: Geraard Spergen
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
Robert Chung wrote:
> Nuyens.
>
>
Eekhout
|
| |
Date: 02 Mar 2007 04:32:44
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Het Volk
|
On 2, 4:40 am, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid > wrote:
> Nuyens.
Longshot, but I'll say Wesseman pulls the surprise.
Bill C
|
|
