| |
Main
Date: 02 Aug 2007 10:32:56
From:
Subject: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
important things like cycling?
|
|
| |
Date: 03 Aug 2007 05:00:16
From:
Subject: Re: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
On Aug 3, 12:49 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
> one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.
I do think that some members of congress should take sobriety tests
before voting. However, the President demonstrates that while sobriety
may be necessary, it is insufficient.
|
| |
Date: 02 Aug 2007 18:49:57
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:32:56 -0700, rechungREMOVETHIS@gmail.com wrote:
>We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
>appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
>too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
>important things like cycling?
What about for the lawyers presenting cases before the court. Is it wrong that
one side may have a lawyer using performance enhancers and the other doesn't.
Ron
|
| |
Date: 02 Aug 2007 11:54:30
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
On Aug 2, 2:09 pm, benn.trov...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 2, 10:32 am, rechungREMOVET...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
> > appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
> > too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
> > important things like cycling?
>
> We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
> surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement.
What and be better liars, cheaters, war profiteers, and criminals?
No thanks.
Bill C
|
| |
Date: 02 Aug 2007 11:09:22
From:
Subject: Re: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
On Aug 2, 10:32 am, rechungREMOVET...@gmail.com wrote:
> We now know that there were times when Rehnquist was doped, and it
> appears that Roberts may need performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals,
> too. Should there be doping tests for the Court, or only for really
> important things like cycling?
We already know the Bush administration is full of dopes who could
surely benefit from some PerformanceEnhancement.
|
| |
Date: 02 Aug 2007 18:01:12
From: joe dopebucket
Subject: Re: How widespread should doping tests be?
|
What kind dope are we wanting to try?
|
|
