| |
Main
Date: 15 Jul 2007 01:06:26
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
moderation.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/t
our07/tour077/DV209007
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
|
| |
Date: 16 Jul 2007 00:34:31
From: bdbafh
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
On Jul 15, 7:33 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net > wrote:
> In article <4699ff6d$0$79139$e4fe5...@news.xs4all.nl>,
> Ewoud Dronkert <firstn...@lastname.net.invalid>
>
> wrote:
> > Simon Brooke schreef:
> > > Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > >> Calvados or Brandy?
>
> > > Whisky. Don't be a dope.
>
> > Last weekend I enjoyed a bottle of Dalmore 12. Good stuff. However, best
> > was the Aberlour a'bunadh I got a few months ago. Exquisite.
>
> I usually have three or four in the cabinet. Currently
>
> Caol Ila
> Port Ellen (difficult to get now)
> Highland Park (cask strength)
> Tullibardine
>
> --
> Michael Press
The vacation trip to Delaware wait fruitful in that a fifth of
Lagavulin 16 was procured for 58 USD
<drum roll >
AND NO TAX
should have brought back more, but I was unwilling to ride back with
more than one in the backpack.
Guess I'm still a LIVEDRUNK newbie.
-bdbafh
|
| |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 05:39:07
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
On Jul 15, 4:40 am, Simon Brooke <si...@jasmine.org.uk > wrote:
> in message <rcousine-DFEF66.22231114072...@news.telus.net>, Ryan Cousineau
>
> ('rcous...@sfu.ca') wrote:
> > In article <YOURhoward-9A8F9F.18454314072...@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> > Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> >> In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072...@news.telus.net>,
> >> Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> >> > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
>
> >> > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> >> > moderation.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/20...
>
> >> > our07/tour077/DV209007
>
> >> The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan
> >> holding such
> >> a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of
> >> people are
> >> stressed out by doping in the peloton.
>
> > Can we get back to the real discussion here, please?
>
> > Calvados or Brandy?
>
> Whisky. Don't be a dope.
>
> --
> si...@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke)http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
>
> ;; lovely alternative to rice.
Scotch of course.
Bill C
|
| | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 16:36:30
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article
<1184503147.241349.319080@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com >,
Bill C <tritonrider@verizon.net > wrote:
> On Jul 15, 4:40 am, Simon Brooke <si...@jasmine.org.uk> wrote:
> > in message <rcousine-DFEF66.22231114072...@news.telus.net>, Ryan Cousineau
> >
> > ('rcous...@sfu.ca') wrote:
> > > In article <YOURhoward-9A8F9F.18454314072...@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> > > Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072...@news.telus.net>,
> > >> Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> >
> > >> > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
> >
> > >> > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> > >> > moderation.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/20...
> >
> > >> > our07/tour077/DV209007
> >
> > >> The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan
> > >> holding such
> > >> a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of
> > >> people are
> > >> stressed out by doping in the peloton.
> >
> > > Can we get back to the real discussion here, please?
> >
> > > Calvados or Brandy?
> >
> > Whisky. Don't be a dope.
>
> Scotch of course.
Need not make an exclusive choice.
USA straight rye whisky is usually very good.
--
Michael Press
|
| |
Date: 14 Jul 2007 18:59:23
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
On Jul 14, 9:45 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072...@news.telus.net>,
> Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
>
> > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> > moderation.
>
> >http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/20...
> > our07/tour077/DV209007
>
> The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan holding such
> a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of people are
> stressed out by doping in the peloton.
>
> --
> tanx,
> Howard
>
> Never take a tenant with a monkey.
>
> remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
He's a majority of one, just like the Moral Majority is a "majority".
Bill C
|
| | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 20:26:19
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
Bill C wrote:
> He's a majority of one, just like the Moral Majority is a "majority".
It would be kind of cool for Marilyn Manson to change his band name to
Marilyn Manson and the Moral Majority.
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 15:10:04
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article <469a671e$0$5546$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com >,
Donald Munro <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > He's a majority of one, just like the Moral Majority is a "majority".
>
> It would be kind of cool for Marilyn Manson to change his band name to
> Marilyn Manson and the Moral Majority.
But Manson is far less likely to end up in a special place in hell being tormented
by Satan's minions than Falwell.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 14 Jul 2007 18:45:43
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072007@news.telus.net >,
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
>
> The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> moderation.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/t
> our07/tour077/DV209007
The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan holding such
a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of people are
stressed out by doping in the peloton.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 05:23:11
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article <YOURhoward-9A8F9F.18454314072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com >,
Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072007@news.telus.net>,
> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
> >
> > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> > moderation.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/t
> > our07/tour077/DV209007
>
> The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan
> holding such
> a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of people
> are
> stressed out by doping in the peloton.
Can we get back to the real discussion here, please?
Calvados or Brandy?
But as regards your irrelevant diversion, it could mean there were fans
(plural) holding signs (plural), but the prettiest photo showed only one
of them.
Hell, considering that I've seen the fans write "[rider name] EPO" on
the roads in years past, I'd say this idea has been with us for a while.
Yeah, they were writing it about Lance,
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 16:23:52
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article
<rcousine-DFEF66.22231114072007@news.telus.net >,
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <YOURhoward-9A8F9F.18454314072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072007@news.telus.net>,
> > Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
> > >
> > > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
> > > moderation.
> > >
> > > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/t
> > > our07/tour077/DV209007
> >
> > The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan
> > holding such
> > a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of people
> > are
> > stressed out by doping in the peloton.
>
> Can we get back to the real discussion here, please?
>
> Calvados or Brandy?
Choices, choices... I'll have both with light rum and anise liquor.
--
Michael Press
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 09:40:27
From: Simon Brooke
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
in message <rcousine-DFEF66.22231114072007@news.telus.net >, Ryan Cousineau
('rcousine@sfu.ca') wrote:
> In article <YOURhoward-9A8F9F.18454314072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <rcousine-A76902.18062514072007@news.telus.net>,
>> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > This is almost a LIVEDRUNK-approved sign.
>> >
>> > The large view makes it clear why we can only approve of it in
>> > moderation.
>> >
>> >
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2007/tour07/index.php?id=/photos/2007/t
>> > our07/tour077/DV209007
>>
>> The caption says, "Fans hold up signs etc." when there's only one fan
>> holding such
>> a sign. That's not so good if they were trying to imply that a lot of
>> people are
>> stressed out by doping in the peloton.
>
> Can we get back to the real discussion here, please?
>
> Calvados or Brandy?
Whisky. Don't be a dope.
--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; lovely alternative to rice.
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 13:05:11
From: Ewoud Dronkert
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
Simon Brooke schreef:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>> Calvados or Brandy?
>
> Whisky. Don't be a dope.
Last weekend I enjoyed a bottle of Dalmore 12. Good stuff. However, best
was the Aberlour a'bunadh I got a few months ago. Exquisite.
--
E. Dronkert
|
| | | | | |
Date: 15 Jul 2007 16:33:31
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: LIVEDRUNK at the tour
|
In article <4699ff6d$0$79139$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl >,
Ewoud Dronkert <firstname@lastname.net.invalid >
wrote:
> Simon Brooke schreef:
> > Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> >> Calvados or Brandy?
> >
> > Whisky. Don't be a dope.
>
> Last weekend I enjoyed a bottle of Dalmore 12. Good stuff. However, best
> was the Aberlour a'bunadh I got a few months ago. Exquisite.
I usually have three or four in the cabinet. Currently
Caol Ila
Port Ellen (difficult to get now)
Highland Park (cask strength)
Tullibardine
--
Michael Press
|
|
