| |
Main
Date: 15 May 2007 09:23:41
From:
Subject: Landis Situation Survey
|
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089
limited to first 50 responders...
|
|
| |
Date: 16 May 2007 07:59:53
From:
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey - Results
|
On May 15, 9:23 am, critpo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089
>
> limited to first 50 responders...
Results are in. Luckily, I took the results last night when it hit 50
- once it goes over 50, the "free" survey suddenly requires you to pay
to see the results.
-----------------
1) Did Floyd Landis dope during the 2006 TdF?
YES: 27
NO: 23
2) Should the results be thrown out due to lab irregularities?
YES: 35
NO: 15
3) Should Dick Pound lose his WADA chair due to his public statements
in this case?
YES: 38
NO: 12
4) Do you believe there is some type of conspiracy by the USADA
against Landis (e.g. the "get Floyd to get Lance" theory)?
YES: 17
NO: 33
5) Do you think a majority of the top 20 GC riders in the 2006 TdF
used some form of dope during the event?
YES: 32
NO: 18
--------------------
Interpretation - while split on the question of FL's doping, most are
in agreement that the results are invalid, Pound is out-of-control,
there's no conspiracy, and that a majority of the GC riders doped.
|
| | |
Date: 17 May 2007 09:39:09
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey - Results
|
On 16 May 2007 07:59:53 -0700, critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
>On May 15, 9:23 am, critpo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089
>>
>> limited to first 50 responders...
>
>Results are in. Luckily, I took the results last night when it hit 50
>- once it goes over 50, the "free" survey suddenly requires you to pay
>to see the results.
>-----------------
>1) Did Floyd Landis dope during the 2006 TdF?
>YES: 27
>NO: 23
>
>2) Should the results be thrown out due to lab irregularities?
>YES: 35
>NO: 15
>
>3) Should Dick Pound lose his WADA chair due to his public statements
>in this case?
>YES: 38
>NO: 12
>
>4) Do you believe there is some type of conspiracy by the USADA
>against Landis (e.g. the "get Floyd to get Lance" theory)?
>YES: 17
>NO: 33
>
>5) Do you think a majority of the top 20 GC riders in the 2006 TdF
>used some form of dope during the event?
>YES: 32
>NO: 18
>--------------------
>
>Interpretation - while split on the question of FL's doping, most are
>in agreement that the results are invalid, Pound is out-of-control,
>there's no conspiracy, and that a majority of the GC riders doped.
Uh, yeah. That's what some number of people think. So what. We all know this and
we all know what opinion is worth.
What's with the fascination with what people think. I'd rather hear what people
who know know.
Ron
|
| |
Date: 16 May 2007 02:29:02
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
On May 15, 2:56 pm, Marty <m_p...@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
> I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?
11:1 with at least one trace of synthetic metabolites.
|
| |
Date: 15 May 2007 14:56:47
From: Marty
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
On May 15, 2:54 pm, critpo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> > >> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>
> > >The suspense is agonizing.
>
> > >R
>
> > Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
> > and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
>
> It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?
--
Marty
|
| |
Date: 15 May 2007 13:54:27
From:
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org >
wrote:
> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> >> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>
> >The suspense is agonizing.
>
> >R
>
> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
|
| | |
Date: 15 May 2007 23:30:10
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org>
> wrote:
>> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
>>>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>>> The suspense is agonizing.
>>> R
>> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
>> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
>
> It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
>
Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
|
| | | |
Date: 16 May 2007 19:14:18
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
In article <Vv2dnTxDuvFuOdfbnZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com >,
Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh > wrote:
> critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org>
> > wrote:
> >> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> >>>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
> >>> The suspense is agonizing.
> >>> R
> >> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
> >> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
> >
> > It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
> >
>
> Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 May 2007 10:20:16
From: Simon Brooke
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
in message <YOURhoward-D495EA.19141816052007@comcast.dca.giganews.com >,
Howard Kveck ('YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com') wrote:
> In article <Vv2dnTxDuvFuOdfbnZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh> wrote:
>
>> critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
>> > On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either
>> >>>> it reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few
>> >>>> days...
>> >>> The suspense is agonizing.
>> >>> R
>> >> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
>> >> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
>> >
>> > It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
>> >
>>
>> Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
>
> http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html
Pah! Johnny-come-latelies. You want the real thing:
http://www.last.fm/music/The+Bonzo+Dog+Band/_/I'm+Bored
--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
"The result is a language that... not even its mother could
love. Like the camel, Common Lisp is a horse designed by
committee. Camels do have their uses."
;; Scott Fahlman, 7 March 1995
|
| | | | | |
Date: 17 May 2007 16:55:02
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
In article <gbjth4-3om.ln1@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk >,
Simon Brooke <simon@jasmine.org.uk > wrote:
> in message <YOURhoward-D495EA.19141816052007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> Howard Kveck ('YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com') wrote:
>
> > In article <Vv2dnTxDuvFuOdfbnZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> > Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh> wrote:
> >> Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
> >
> > http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html
>
> Pah! Johnny-come-latelies. You want the real thing:
>
> http://www.last.fm/music/The+Bonzo+Dog+Band/_/I'm+Bored
Ahh yes, the Bonzos. Great stuff. I love "The Intro and the Outro". "Count Basie
Orchestra on triangle." Nice. But what the hell, there's always this:
http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/buzzcocks/boredom.html
http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/clash/im_so_bored_with_the_usa.html
http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/adverts/bored_teenagers.html
http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/paul_westerberg/a_star_is_bored.html
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | |
Date: 16 May 2007 20:11:01
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
Howard Kveck wrote:
> In article <Vv2dnTxDuvFuOdfbnZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh> wrote:
>
>> critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell <cur...@md-bicycling.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
>>>>>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>>>>> The suspense is agonizing.
>>>>> R
>>>> Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
>>>> and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
>>> It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.
>>>
>> Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
>
> http://www.houseoflyrics.com/lyrics/iggy_pop/im_bored.html
>
That was perfect!
|
| | | |
Date: 16 May 2007 10:07:18
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
Fred Fredburger wrote:
> Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!
Only if ennui is the plural for enema.
|
| |
Date: 15 May 2007 10:44:31
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
critposer@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 15, 9:23 am, critpo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089
> >
> > limited to first 50 responders...
>
> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
The suspense is agonizing.
R
|
| | |
Date: 15 May 2007 13:53:18
From: Curtis L. Russell
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com >
wrote:
>> Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
>> reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
>
>The suspense is agonizing.
>
>R
Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
|
| |
Date: 15 May 2007 10:21:11
From:
Subject: Re: Landis Situation Survey
|
On May 15, 9:23 am, critpo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fw59hmkm0kazold302089
>
> limited to first 50 responders...
Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
|
|
