| |
Main
Date: 27 Jul 2007 15:03:37
From: Jay Hill
Subject: Liggett blushes
|
After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
"that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
|
|
| |
Date: 27 Jul 2007 23:13:09
From:
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
On Jul 27, 11:03 am, Jay Hill <jsh...@earthlink.net > wrote:
> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jul 2007 01:24:49
From: samson
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
In article <1185603189.627942.250990@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com >,
raamman@gmail.com says...
> On Jul 27, 11:03 am, Jay Hill <jsh...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> > "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Is that complicit sob andreu still commentating ?????
The sad and unfortunate answer is yes.
S.
|
| |
Date: 27 Jul 2007 15:49:46
From: MyPostingID
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
Phil: "He's going to come in under 8 minutes!"
Paul: "Well, he's going to come in under 9 minutes..."
|
| |
Date: 28 Jul 2007 09:21:32
From: Stu Fleming
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
Jay Hill wrote:
>
> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote ...
Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat
as "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.
Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
<place >", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jul 2007 10:21:38
From: Mark
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
Stu Fleming wrote:
> Jay Hill wrote:
>>
>> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
something about how that sounded odd.
Mark J.
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Jul 2007 12:45:17
From: samson
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
In article <VtudnRcd_J6_5jbbnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com >,
remove.mandmlj.this@remove.comcast.this.net says...
> Stu Fleming wrote:
> > Jay Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
> >> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
> something about how that sounded odd.
>
> Mark J.
>
Karpets is flying?
S.
|
| | | | |
Date: 28 Jul 2007 20:21:33
From: Simon Brooke
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
in message <MPG.21153ca8ccb951699897d6@news-server.wi.rr.com >, samson
('noone@noone.net') wrote:
> In article <VtudnRcd_J6_5jbbnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> remove.mandmlj.this@remove.comcast.this.net says...
>> Stu Fleming wrote:
>> > Jay Hill wrote:
>> >>
>> >> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> >> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>>
>> Today he said "Karpets is on fire!" and then caught himself and muttered
>> something about how that sounded odd.
>
> Karpets is flying?
Flying Karpets.
--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
'You cannot put "The Internet" into the Recycle Bin.'
|
| | |
Date: 27 Jul 2007 15:36:27
From: G.T.
Subject: Re: Liggett blushes
|
"Stu Fleming" <stewart@wic.co.nz > wrote in message
news:46aa608c@news2.actrix.gen.nz...
> Jay Hill wrote:
>>
>> After Andreu's piece about electronic shifting, Phil said, roughly,
>> "that's a shocking revelation." They're straining today.
>
> Liggett and Sherwen's credulous commentary over the past 2 decades could
> be seens as virtually complicit with the rise of doping in the
> professional peloton. They have their cycling video business to promote
> ...
>
> Proposed RBR rule addition 1: When Phil or Paul describes a riding feat as
> "incredible" or "simply unbelievable", it probably is.
>
> Proposed RBR rule addition 2: When Phil or Paul make a definitive
> statement ("that's such and such a rider", "we're passing through
> <place>", "he's at the back of the field", it is probably incorrect.
I'd apply addition 2 to just Phil, not both.
Greg
--
"What have you got in that paper bag?
Is it a dose of Vitamin C?
Ain't got no time for Western medicine
I am Damo Suzuki" - Mark E Smith
|
|
