| |
Main
Date: 23 Apr 2007 09:56:34
From:
Subject: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
|
Tour de France
Report: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
By Philip Hersh
Tribune sports reporter
Published April 23, 2007, 9:20 AM CDT
Evidence of synthetic testosterone has been found in "several'' of the
other urine samples Floyd Landis gave while winning the 2006 Tour de
France, the French newspaper L'Equipe reported on its web site Monday.
The arbitration panel hearing Landis' case approved in March a request
by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency to allow testing of the other samples.
The tests were done in the same Paris laboratory that found Landis
positive on the sample given after his dramatic mountain stage victory
that wiped out a substantial time deficit and put him in the race lead
for good.
According to L'Equipe, which did not cite the sources of its
information, two representatives each of both Landis and USADA
witnessed the retests on the "B'' portions of the urine samples.
Landis was tested eight times during the Tour de France; seven of the
eight, on which only the ``A'' portion was analyzed, originally were
declared negative. Those seven reportedly had not been analyzed with
the more sophisticated carbon-isotope ratio testing until last week.
A spokesman for Landis did not immediately return a phone call for
comment.
Copyright =A9 2007, Chicago Tribune
bye bye, fucker!
|
|
| |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 05:21:57
From: Qui si parla Campagnolo
Subject: Re: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
|
On Apr 23, 8:06 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "Davey Crockett" <daveycrocket...@azurservers.com> wrote in message
>
> news:87zm4zrmes.fsf@azurservers.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > * dupedcycl...@aol.com a =E9crit
> >> Tour de France
>
> >> Report: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
>
> >> By Philip Hersh
> >> Tribune sports reporter
> >> Published April 23, 2007, 9:20 AM CDT
>
> >> Evidence of synthetic testosterone has been found in "several'' of the
> >> other urine samples Floyd Landis gave while winning the 2006 Tour de
> >> France, the French newspaper L'Equipe reported on its web site Monday.
>
> >> The arbitration panel hearing Landis' case approved in March a request
> >> by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency to allow testing of the other samples.
> >> The tests were done in the same Paris laboratory that found Landis
> >> positive on the sample given after his dramatic mountain stage victory
> >> that wiped out a substantial time deficit and put him in the race lead
> >> for good.
>
> >> According to L'Equipe, which did not cite the sources of its
> >> information, two representatives each of both Landis and USADA
> >> witnessed the retests on the "B'' portions of the urine samples.
>
> >> Landis was tested eight times during the Tour de France; seven of the
> >> eight, on which only the ``A'' portion was analyzed, originally were
> >> declared negative. Those seven reportedly had not been analyzed with
> >> the more sophisticated carbon-isotope ratio testing until last week.
>
> >> A spokesman for Landis did not immediately return a phone call for
> >> comment.
>
> >> Copyright =A9 2007, Chicago Tribune
>
> >> bye bye, fucker!
>
> > Here's another report:
>
> >http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news?slug=3Dap-landis-doping&prov=3Dap&type=
=3Dlgns
>
> > BUT
>
> > I don't know if I would lend too much credibility to this
> > "process". ESPN is reporting that the test would be done with a
> > cyclist expert from Landis team present, and 2 USDA reps present. The
> > 2 reps did not show up, so Landis rep was not able to witness the
> > test, BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAYS. Something doesn't add up about this
> > whole thing.
>
> > DAVEY sez
>
> > Davey's personal opinion is that he was juiced up to the eyeballs,
> > but if we're going to crucify the Wanker, let's at least make sure
> > that we observe the proprieties before we boot his ass up the
> > Via Dolorosa and out the Golden Gate
>
> > Heck, then Tyler might even stand in for Simon of Cyrene ;)
>
> Davey, as I believe you said you're a lawyer, what is Floyd's legal stand=
ing
> in France concerning this sort of free and easy dealing with his career?
Floyd's screwed, the sooner his 2 years start, the sooner they will
end.
|
| |
Date: 23 Apr 2007 20:11:23
From: Davey Crockett
Subject: Re: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
|
* dupedcyclist@aol.com a écrit
> Tour de France
>
> Report: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
>
> By Philip Hersh
> Tribune sports reporter
> Published April 23, 2007, 9:20 AM CDT
>
>
> Evidence of synthetic testosterone has been found in "several'' of the
> other urine samples Floyd Landis gave while winning the 2006 Tour de
> France, the French newspaper L'Equipe reported on its web site Monday.
>
> The arbitration panel hearing Landis' case approved in March a request
> by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency to allow testing of the other samples.
> The tests were done in the same Paris laboratory that found Landis
> positive on the sample given after his dramatic mountain stage victory
> that wiped out a substantial time deficit and put him in the race lead
> for good.
>
> According to L'Equipe, which did not cite the sources of its
> information, two representatives each of both Landis and USADA
> witnessed the retests on the "B'' portions of the urine samples.
>
> Landis was tested eight times during the Tour de France; seven of the
> eight, on which only the ``A'' portion was analyzed, originally were
> declared negative. Those seven reportedly had not been analyzed with
> the more sophisticated carbon-isotope ratio testing until last week.
>
> A spokesman for Landis did not immediately return a phone call for
> comment.
>
>
>
> Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune
>
>
> bye bye, fucker!
>
Here's another report:
http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news?slug=ap-landis-doping&prov=ap&type=lgns
BUT
I don't know if I would lend too much credibility to this
"process". ESPN is reporting that the test would be done with a
cyclist expert from Landis team present, and 2 USDA reps present. The
2 reps did not show up, so Landis rep was not able to witness the
test, BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAYS. Something doesn't add up about this
whole thing.
DAVEY sez
Davey's personal opinion is that he was juiced up to the eyeballs,
but if we're going to crucify the Wanker, let's at least make sure
that we observe the proprieties before we boot his ass up the
Via Dolorosa and out the Golden Gate
Heck, then Tyler might even stand in for Simon of Cyrene ;)
--
Le vent à Dos
Davey Crockett [No 4Q to reply]
|
| | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 02:06:12
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
|
"Davey Crockett" <daveycrockett4Q@azurservers.com > wrote in message
news:87zm4zrmes.fsf@azurservers.com...
>
> * dupedcyclist@aol.com a écrit
>> Tour de France
>>
>> Report: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
>>
>> By Philip Hersh
>> Tribune sports reporter
>> Published April 23, 2007, 9:20 AM CDT
>>
>>
>> Evidence of synthetic testosterone has been found in "several'' of the
>> other urine samples Floyd Landis gave while winning the 2006 Tour de
>> France, the French newspaper L'Equipe reported on its web site Monday.
>>
>> The arbitration panel hearing Landis' case approved in March a request
>> by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency to allow testing of the other samples.
>> The tests were done in the same Paris laboratory that found Landis
>> positive on the sample given after his dramatic mountain stage victory
>> that wiped out a substantial time deficit and put him in the race lead
>> for good.
>>
>> According to L'Equipe, which did not cite the sources of its
>> information, two representatives each of both Landis and USADA
>> witnessed the retests on the "B'' portions of the urine samples.
>>
>> Landis was tested eight times during the Tour de France; seven of the
>> eight, on which only the ``A'' portion was analyzed, originally were
>> declared negative. Those seven reportedly had not been analyzed with
>> the more sophisticated carbon-isotope ratio testing until last week.
>>
>> A spokesman for Landis did not immediately return a phone call for
>> comment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune
>>
>>
>> bye bye, fucker!
>>
>
> Here's another report:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news?slug=ap-landis-doping&prov=ap&type=lgns
>
> BUT
>
> I don't know if I would lend too much credibility to this
> "process". ESPN is reporting that the test would be done with a
> cyclist expert from Landis team present, and 2 USDA reps present. The
> 2 reps did not show up, so Landis rep was not able to witness the
> test, BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAYS. Something doesn't add up about this
> whole thing.
>
> DAVEY sez
>
> Davey's personal opinion is that he was juiced up to the eyeballs,
> but if we're going to crucify the Wanker, let's at least make sure
> that we observe the proprieties before we boot his ass up the
> Via Dolorosa and out the Golden Gate
>
> Heck, then Tyler might even stand in for Simon of Cyrene ;)
Davey, as I believe you said you're a lawyer, what is Floyd's legal standing
in France concerning this sort of free and easy dealing with his career?
|
| | | |
Date: 24 Apr 2007 09:46:31
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: More evidence found against 2006 winner Floyd Landis
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> Davey, as I believe you said you're a lawyer, what is Floyd's legal standing
> in France concerning this sort of free and easy dealing with his career?
SchwartzSoft Bug Report:, Software seems to have either a pattern matching
bug with names ending in ey, or memory allocation/corruption errors.
|
|
