| |
Main
Date: 19 Dec 2006 14:43:01
From: Bill C
Subject: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
Quoted:
He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
2002.
Enjoy
Bill C
|
|
| |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 05:32:03
From: Davey Crockett
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
"Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net > writes:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> Quoted:
> He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
> 2002.
>
And that's the judge, if memory serves Davey correctly, who is
president of the High Court Appelate Division
Forget the Appelate/Plaintif. It's thr judge who has suffered the
brain damage
--
Le vent à Dos
Davey Crockett [No 4Q to reply]
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 15:54:29
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com >
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> > Quoted:
> > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
> > 2002.dumbass,
>
> was he wearing a helmet ?
Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
Bill C
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 15:54:21
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com >
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> > Quoted:
> > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
> > 2002.dumbass,
>
> was he wearing a helmet ?
Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
Bill C
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 01:03:51
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
In article <1166572461.552563.60040@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >,
"Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net > wrote:
> On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Bill C wrote:
> > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> > > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
> >
> > > Quoted:
> > > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> > > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
> > > 2002.dumbass,
> >
> > was he wearing a helmet ?
>
> Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
> Bill C
The typical guy reponse was provided by the employer, who argued that
the injuries weren't that bad. No word on whether their secondary line
was "and hey, who wouldn't want that problem?"
Counterpoint: he was in a coma for two months! I'd say the case for a
severe brain injury is presumptive.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Dec 2006 10:29:54
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:03:51 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
>In article <1166572461.552563.60040@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> "Bill C" <tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 19, 5:50 pm, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Bill C wrote:
>> > >http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
>> > > Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>> >
>> > > Quoted:
>> > > He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
>> > > working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
>> > > 2002.dumbass,
>> >
>> > was he wearing a helmet ?
>>
>> Damn, good question! The Springer material blinded me to that.
>> Bill C
>
>The typical guy reponse was provided by the employer, who argued that
>the injuries weren't that bad. No word on whether their secondary line
>was "and hey, who wouldn't want that problem?"
>
>Counterpoint: he was in a coma for two months! I'd say the case for a
>severe brain injury is presumptive.
He was faking it.
Ron
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 14:50:47
From: amit.ghosh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Not sure where this fits, but seems to be RBR material
|
Bill C wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061219/od_nm/husband_dc
> Injured man wins damages for sex overdrive
>
> Quoted:
> He was in a coma for two months after falling from a gantry while
> working at a bicycle warehouse shortly after his riage in January
> 2002.
>
dumbass,
was he wearing a helmet ?
|
|
