| |
Main
Date: 18 May 2007 15:45:28
From: raylopez99
Subject: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
I check out the Powerpoint / PDF slides at http://www.floydfairnessfund.org/
Can somebody please explain the signficance of these slides?
I have read that keeping urine samples unrefrigerated will result in
the TE ratios getting skewed upwards. One slide implies the same can
occur for samples contaminated with bacteria.
What about the lack of anonymity and that some samples look relabeled?
Looks sinister.
RL
|
|
| |
Date: 19 May 2007 03:43:55
From: raylopez99
Subject: Re: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
On May 18, 4:48 pm, "Sandy" <leu...@frree.fr > wrote:
> Were you honestly [snickering laugh] interested, you would be glued to the
> screen watching the proceedings. And you would have learned, within your
> capacity.
What screen, puta?
RL
|
| |
Date: 18 May 2007 21:11:38
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
On May 19, 2:20 am, "SandM" <h90...@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> "B. Lafferty" <M...@Italia.com> wrote in message
>
> > "Sandy" <leu...@frree.fr> wrote in message
> >
> > > And you would have learned, within your capacity.
>
> > One of the best put downs I've ever read. Thanks!
>
> He's back !!!!!!!!!!!
Did Lance come out of retirement?
R
|
| |
Date: 19 May 2007 01:48:07
From: Sandy
Subject: Re: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
Dans le message de
news:1179528327.965665.296850@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
raylopez99 <raylopez99@yahoo.com > a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :
> I check out the Powerpoint / PDF slides at
> http://www.floydfairnessfund.org/
>
> Can somebody please explain the signficance of these slides?
>
> I have read that keeping urine samples unrefrigerated will result in
> the TE ratios getting skewed upwards. One slide implies the same can
> occur for samples contaminated with bacteria.
>
> What about the lack of anonymity and that some samples look relabeled?
>
> Looks sinister.
>
Were you honestly [snickering laugh] interested, you would be glued to the
screen watching the proceedings. And you would have learned, within your
capacity.
|
| | |
Date: 19 May 2007 01:04:45
From: B. Lafferty
Subject: Re: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
"Sandy" <leurre@frree.fr > wrote in message
news:464e3b37$0$2135$426a34cc@news.free.fr...
> And you would have learned, within your capacity.
One of the best put downs I've ever read. Thanks!
|
| | | |
Date: 18 May 2007 23:20:53
From: SandM
Subject: Re: Quick explanation of Landis defense needed--tampering, contamination
|
"B. Lafferty" <Magni@Italia.com > wrote in message
news:N2s3i.16845$3P3.10001@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Sandy" <leurre@frree.fr> wrote in message
> news:464e3b37$0$2135$426a34cc@news.free.fr...
> > And you would have learned, within your capacity.
>
> One of the best put downs I've ever read. Thanks!
>
>
He's back !!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
