| |
Main
Date: 13 Mar 2007 10:13:36
From: Callistus Valerius
Subject: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
|
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:32:37
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
On 13, 5:17 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
ith that.
>
> Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping. Or
> that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him - is
> it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
Apparently it's illegal for him to import it into
Australia like a dumbass who thinks he's too much of
a bigshot to read the rules or have his bags searched,
which is the issue here. I mean, none of us actually
think Sly was _taking_ HGH. It was obviously for his
dog.
>
> And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
> racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel about
> 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that were
> second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
> shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
Bring the name out, tough guy. Also, how high were his
socks? We don't care about having racks on a bike. Maybe
he was touring and the racks were the right thing for the
job. We only care about the correctness of his socks.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Ben
|
| | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 08:32:07
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
bjw@mambo.ucolick.org wrote:
> Bring the name out, tough guy. Also, how high were his
> socks? We don't care about having racks on a bike. Maybe
> he was touring and the racks were the right thing for the
> job. We only care about the correctness of his socks.
> Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Thank you for sticking to the heart of the matter. It is clear that Tom
is conflicted about socks. That's where we need to focus our attention.
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 20:39:43
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Charles" <guyonabike@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
> > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> >
> > I even met one of you - a little weazel about
> >> 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that
> > were
> >> second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
> >> shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
> >>
> >>
> > Tom, I thought that you promised not to memtion that in public. Besides I
> > am
> > 5'-5" tall
>
> Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
> don't. Being short in stature isn't the same as being short on character.
So why would you even mention someone's height? If you can pedal
forwards as fast as you back pedal, you must be one fast freak.
R
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 20:49:53
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article <1173843583.537118.255880@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com >,
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote:
> > "Charles" <guyonabike@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > I even met one of you - a little weazel about
> > >> 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that
> > > were
> > >> second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
> > >> shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Tom, I thought that you promised not to memtion that in public. Besides I
> > > am
> > > 5'-5" tall
> >
> > Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
> > don't. Being short in stature isn't the same as being short on character.
>
> So why would you even mention someone's height?
Ohhhh, maybe because he's short on character?
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 18:25:06
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
On 13, 4:09 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net > wrote:
> "Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
>
> > > By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.
>
> > However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
> > quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
> > ape-like goon".
>
> > Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)
>
> But he was not a calg to begin with. His first, or one of his first,
> screen appearances is in Bananas, where he is a lip jutting little puke
> whose face needs slapping.
I was just thinking of that appearance. Even as a
little puke, he's still bigger than Woody Allen, although
Woody briefly gets the better of him in that scene.
Ben
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 16:00:57
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Fred Fredburger" <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh> wrote in message
> news:5ZCdncF4kp75vmrYnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@comcast.com...
> > Phil Holman wrote:
> >> However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
> >> quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
> >> ape-like goon".
> >
> > Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?
>
> And yet in the The Lord's of Flatbush he proved to be a great actor. And to
> add to that he was also one of the screenwriters for that movie.
Seen any movies in this century? He was much better in Cop Land.
> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster, richer and
> more successful than you are.
It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
with that.
R
|
| | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 00:17:07
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote in message
news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster, richer
>> and
>> more successful than you are.
>
> It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
> quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
> with that.
Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping. Or
that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him - is
it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that someone
might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he wanted to depict
it.
And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel about
5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that were
second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:57:04
From: jean-yves hervé
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article <7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping. Or
> that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him - is
> it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
I for one clearly remember being lectured by you on the impossibility of
winning 5 TdF w/o being on the juice. Of course at the time (1996 or
1997) we were arguing about Miguel Indurain. Of course once LA started
winning the Tour you switched to the "drugs have no effect on
performance" line.
jyh.
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 03:17:44
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"jean-yves hervé" <jyh@cs.uri.edu > wrote in message
news:jyh-94D1CD.22570413032007@news.lga.highwinds-media.com...
> In article <7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>> Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping.
>> Or
>> that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him -
>> is
>> it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
>
> I for one clearly remember being lectured by you on the impossibility of
> winning 5 TdF w/o being on the juice. Of course at the time (1996 or
> 1997) we were arguing about Miguel Indurain. Of course once LA started
> winning the Tour you switched to the "drugs have no effect on
> performance" line.
Unless you want me saying that you have a faulty memory perhaps you ought to
cite the postings in which you think I said that.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 17 Mar 2007 14:43:28
From: jean-yves hervé
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article <sPJJh.127197$_73.56970@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "jean-yves hervé" <jyh@cs.uri.edu> wrote in message
> news:jyh-94D1CD.22570413032007@news.lga.highwinds-media.com...
> > I for one clearly remember being lectured by you on the impossibility of
> > winning 5 TdF w/o being on the juice. Of course at the time (1996 or
> > 1997) we were arguing about Miguel Indurain. Of course once LA started
> > winning the Tour you switched to the "drugs have no effect on
> > performance" line.
>
> Unless you want me saying that you have a faulty memory perhaps you ought to
> cite the postings in which you think I said that.
I can't find the old posts, so let's blame faulty memory. Sorry about
that.
jyh.
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:30:25
From: Charles
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message
news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
> news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
I even met one of you - a little weazel about
> 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that
were
> second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
> shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
>
>
Tom, I thought that you promised not to memtion that in public. Besides I am
5'-5" tall
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 03:18:50
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Charles" <guyonabike@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:z66dneVbk6eRwmrYnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> I even met one of you - a little weazel about
>> 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that
> were
>> second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
>> shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
>>
>>
> Tom, I thought that you promised not to memtion that in public. Besides I
> am
> 5'-5" tall
Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
don't. Being short in stature isn't the same as being short on character.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:18:04
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
> don't.
You're being wonderfully Freudian today!
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 11:55:28
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
>> Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
>> don't.
Fred Fredburger wrote:
> You're being wonderfully Freudian today!
Don't tell me you were about to post something that would have polluted
rbr for years to come.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 08:26:03
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Donald Munro wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>>> Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
>>> don't.
>
> Fred Fredburger wrote:
>> You're being wonderfully Freudian today!
>
> Don't tell me you were about to post something that would have polluted
> rbr for years to come.
C'mon, you saw it too!
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 17:52:44
From: Phil Holman
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message
news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
> news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> Tom Kunich wrote:
>>> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster,
>>> richer and
>>> more successful than you are.
>>
>> It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
>> quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
>> with that.
>
> Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
> doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
> wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
>
> I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
> someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
> wanted to depict it.
>
> And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
> racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
> about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
> components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
> understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
> never return.
>
Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.
Phil H
|
| | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 01:55:35
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice > wrote in message
news:epednQNJfKns2mrYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>
>> And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
>> racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
>> about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components
>> that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain
>> English until a shop owner asked him to leave and never return.
>>
> Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
> just so we don't tread on your toes.
Why would you need something like that Phil? You generally aren't one to run
people down in order to make yourself feel superior.
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 18:23:31
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article <epednQNJfKns2mrYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com >, "Phil Holman"
<piholmanc@yourservice > wrote:
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >> Tom Kunich wrote:
> >>> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster,
> >>> richer and
> >>> more successful than you are.
> >>
> >> It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
> >> quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
> >> with that.
> >
> > Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
> > doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
> > wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
> >
> > I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
> > someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
> > wanted to depict it.
> >
> > And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
> > racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
> > about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
> > components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
> > understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
> > never return.
> >
> Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
> just so we don't tread on your toes.
Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
his means? Bizarre stuff.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 01:54:01
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote in message
news:YOURhoward-1303071823310001@c-24-6-74-51.hsd1.ca.comcast.net...
> In article <epednQNJfKns2mrYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com>, "Phil Holman"
> <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
>
>> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
>> news:7aHJh.127147$_73.67919@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> > "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1173826857.103339.10090@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> >> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> >>> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster,
>> >>> richer and
>> >>> more successful than you are.
>> >>
>> >> It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
>> >> quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
>> >> with that.
>> >
>> > Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
>> > doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
>> > wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?
>> >
>> > I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
>> > someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
>> > wanted to depict it.
>> >
>> > And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
>> > racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
>> > about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
>> > components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
>> > understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
>> > never return.
>> >
>> Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
>> just so we don't tread on your toes.
>
> Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
> down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
> his means? Bizarre stuff.
I was figuring on running a picture of you Kveck - should I include how many
miles you rode last year?
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 19:23:20
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article <ZAIJh.9633$PL.8525@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net >, "Tom
Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
> news:YOURhoward-1303071823310001@c-24-6-74-51.hsd1.ca.comcast.net...
>
> > In article <epednQNJfKns2mrYnZ2dnUVZ_qCmnZ2d@comcast.com>, "Phil Holman"
> > <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
> >> Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
> >> just so we don't tread on your toes.
> >
> > Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
> > down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
> > his means? Bizarre stuff.
>
> I was figuring on running a picture of you Kveck - should I include how many
> miles you rode last year?
Ahhh, now we understand. It's all about BIG Tom and the flotilla of
bicycles that're in his garage and don't you forget it! Because having a
lot of bikes and claiming to ride a lot of miles makes you a BIGGER man,
if you know what I mean. It also makes you right in any discussion. Huh,
seems like you were saying just a few days ago that "Speed and distance
aren't important."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/60542d4b79f0c0a4?hl
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 03:16:29
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote in message
news:YOURhoward-1303071923200001@c-24-6-74-51.hsd1.ca.comcast.net...
>
> Ahhh, now we understand. It's all about BIG Tom and the flotilla of
> bicycles that're in his garage and don't you forget it!
Actually no - it's about SMALL Kveck and how he has a need to belittle
others in order to make himself feel valuable.
If you ain't got your own, you ain't got nothing.
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 10:49:13
From: Jason Spaceman
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Adriaaaaannnnn!
http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg
Callistus Valerius wrote:
> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 11:24:51
From: Curtis L. Russell
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
On Tue, 13 2007 10:49:13 -0400, Jason Spaceman
<notreally@jspaceman.homelinux.org > wrote:
>Adriaaaaannnnn!
>
>http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg
>
>Callistus Valerius wrote:
>
>> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>>
>>
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.
By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 15:02:58
From: Phil Holman
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Curtis L. Russell" <curtis@md-bicycling.org > wrote in message
news:4dgdv253eve9pbm1pq26tp7h96nbn4fgrs@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 2007 10:49:13 -0400, Jason Spaceman
> <notreally@jspaceman.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
>>Adriaaaaannnnn!
>>
>>http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg
>>
>>Callistus Valerius wrote:
>>
>>> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>>>
>>>
>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
>
> For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.
>
> By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.
However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".
Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)
Phil H
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 23:09:49
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
In article
<jK2dncHwHKsBgmrYnZ2dnUVZ_rGinZ2d@comcast.com >,
"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice > wrote:
> "Curtis L. Russell" <curtis@md-bicycling.org> wrote in message
> news:4dgdv253eve9pbm1pq26tp7h96nbn4fgrs@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 13 2007 10:49:13 -0400, Jason Spaceman
> > <notreally@jspaceman.homelinux.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Adriaaaaannnnn!
> >>
> >>http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg
> >>
> >>Callistus Valerius wrote:
> >>
> >>> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
> >
> > For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.
> >
> > By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.
>
> However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
> quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
> ape-like goon".
>
> Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)
But he was not a calg to begin with. His first, or one of his first,
screen appearances is in Bananas, where he is a lip jutting little puke
whose face needs slapping.
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 15:19:16
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Phil Holman wrote:
> "Curtis L. Russell" <curtis@md-bicycling.org> wrote in message
> news:4dgdv253eve9pbm1pq26tp7h96nbn4fgrs@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 2007 10:49:13 -0400, Jason Spaceman
>> <notreally@jspaceman.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Adriaaaaannnnn!
>>>
>>> http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg
>>>
>>> Callistus Valerius wrote:
>>>
>>>> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
>> For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.
>>
>> By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.
>
> However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
> quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
> ape-like goon".
Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:39:22
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Fred Fredburger" <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh > wrote in message
news:5ZCdncF4kp75vmrYnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Phil Holman wrote:
>> However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
>> quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
>> ape-like goon".
>
> Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?
And yet in the The Lord's of Flatbush he proved to be a great actor. And to
add to that he was also one of the screenwriters for that movie.
It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster, richer and
more successful than you are.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 22:11:32
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Fred Fredburger" <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.huh> wrote in message
> news:5ZCdncF4kp75vmrYnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Phil Holman wrote:
>>> However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
>>> quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
>>> ape-like goon".
>> Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?
>
> And yet in the The Lord's of Flatbush he proved to be a great actor. And to
> add to that he was also one of the screenwriters for that movie.
>
> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much ster, richer and
> more successful than you are.
>
>
Oh, I'm not peeved. I'm having fun.
Your peevish response makes this thread a bunch funnier, thanks!
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 13:52:43
From: Jim Flom
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
"Callistus Valerius" <jazzyboss@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:kPuJh.12368$Jl.6408@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
When that story first broke I said to myself, "HGH."
|
| | |
Date: 14 Mar 2007 21:26:45
From: Stu Fleming
Subject: Re: Rocky Balboa caught !!
|
Jim Flom wrote:
> "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyboss@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kPuJh.12368$Jl.6408@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml
>
> When that story first broke I said to myself, "HGH."
I said "Viagra".
|
|
