| |
Main
Date: 07 Apr 2007 11:58:34
From:
Subject: States distribution of license holders?
|
Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
holders?
I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
Thanks, JP
allbikemag.com
|
|
| |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 18:02:03
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
rick-paulos@uiowa.edu wrote:
> This data is a year old. Uses end of 2005 numbers. Any record
> missing gender, category or not in 1 of the 50 states or DC, was
> removed so the totals will be slightly less.
>
> http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table1.html
> http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table3.html
> http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table4.html
Thanks!
Interesting states.
Well, it looks like the sunny-warm states are doing pretty darn good.
I'm used to the USCF being the only game in town. Is there another
major race org out there these days (years)? Are their numbers far
less, stronger in certain regions?
--JP
|
| |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 17:54:42
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Bob Schwartz wrote:
> JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Anyone else wonder how many racers there are per state? In each main
> > org? Unaffiliated? Gung-ho buyers of raceware? Got any data?
>
> What kind of race?
>
> Bob Schwartz
See RBR.
Maybe start with road.
--JP
|
| |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 15:28:54
From: rick-paulos@uiowa.edu
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
This data is a year old. Uses end of 2005 numbers. Any record
missing gender, category or not in 1 of the 50 states or DC, was
removed so the totals will be slightly less.
http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table1.html
http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table3.html
http://www.bikeiowa.org/misc/table4.html
I did this analysis to compare cat 5 percentages in my state with the
others. It is high because of so many new licensees.
I also noticed the higher percentages of cat 1 are in certain states
like CO and OR where they have their own local orgs. Its not
necessarily that the riders are better or worse, the higher cats tend
to travel more and would need a USAC license to compete in most other
states whereas the beginners tend to stay near home and can enter all
the local races without needing a USAC license so this skews the
categories higher. And some states have so few racers, the
percentages are pretty much meaningless.
The return to 'all licenses expire dec 31' in 2005 means we can get
accurate counts now. The previous 365 day licenses meant the numbers
could go up or down daily.
R
|
| |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 10:58:53
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Bob Schwartz wrote:
> JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> > How many racers are in each state.
> >
> > Doesn't seem like too tough of a map to make.
> >
> > Yeah, we don't have to limit it to license holders, although that
> > would be a nice, easy break-out to include.
>
> Dumbass,
You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
> If you are not going to define 'racer', the map is impossible
> to make.
Who said I'm not going to? Define it how you like. I'd say that event
participants would work, plus license holders from the main (2 or 3?)
groups.
> And once you do define 'racer' it is still not going
> to be easy because of the large number of racing organizations
> and the degree of membership overlap.
Not that hard. Anyone out there SELLING to these people knows how many
there are per state.
> Don't expect much help until you know what you are asking for.
I'm not picky and I'm no one's boss.
Anyone else wonder how many racers there are per state? In each main
org? Unaffiliated? Gung-ho buyers of raceware? Got any data?
--JP
> Bob Schwartz
|
| | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 00:58:08
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
<JeffOYB@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> Bob Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> Dumbass,
>
> You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
> having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe themselves
to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
"lifedrunk"?
When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out laughing
in their faces.
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 16:46:50
From: William Asher
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> Bob Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>> Dumbass,
>>
>> You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
>> having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
>
> To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe
> themselves to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless
> postings about "lifedrunk"?
>
> When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out
> laughing in their faces.
Sometimes, you make me break out in song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE4HGlmtOcg
--
Bill Asher
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 09:40:24
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > Bob Schwartz wrote:
> >>
> >> Dumbass,
> >
> > You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
> > having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
>
> To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe themselves
> to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
> "lifedrunk"?
>
> When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out laughing
> in their faces.
Dumbass: I know you're misspelling "LIVEDRUNK" just to piss me off.
It's not working. My hockey team just won, and my new CX frame is in the
kitchen.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 01:08:53
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <rcousine-161BAF.02402312042007@news.telus.net >,
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > Bob Schwartz wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dumbass,
> > >
> > > You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
> > > having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
> >
> > To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe themselves
> > to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
> > "lifedrunk"?
> >
> > When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out laughing
> > in their faces.
>
> Dumbass: I know you're misspelling "LIVEDRUNK" just to piss me off.
>
> It's not working. My hockey team just won,
In four overtimes in the first game of the
first of four seven game series, _and_ your defenseman
Brent Sopel did not play because he
wrenched his back picking up a cracker (biscuit?)
from the floor. Enjoy it while you can.
> and my new CX frame is in the
> kitchen.
So where's the dog?
--
Michael Press
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 06:10:49
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <rubrum-31E953.18085312042007@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com >,
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net > wrote:
> In article <rcousine-161BAF.02402312042007@news.telus.net>,
> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> > > <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > > > Bob Schwartz wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Dumbass,
> > > >
> > > > You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
> > > > having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
> > >
> > > To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe
> > > themselves
> > > to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
> > > "lifedrunk"?
> > >
> > > When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out
> > > laughing
> > > in their faces.
> >
> > Dumbass: I know you're misspelling "LIVEDRUNK" just to piss me off.
> >
> > It's not working. My hockey team just won,
>
> In four overtimes in the first game of the
> first of four seven game series, _and_ your defenseman
> Brent Sopel did not play because he
> wrenched his back picking up a cracker (biscuit?)
> from the floor. Enjoy it while you can.
You don't understand. The Canucks entered the league in 1970. Since
then, they have been in the Stanley Cup Finals every twelfth season.
But, and this is the important part, they've always played a team from
New York!
With the strike cancelling one season, 2006-2007 is the 36th season. The
cup is foreordained by, like, the Mayan Calendar or something.
> > and my new CX frame is in the
> > kitchen.
>
> So where's the dog?
Living room. Do dogs usually antagonize bike frames? The better question
is where I'm going to live if I don't get the bike parts (and computer
parts...) out of the house pretty soon.
It turns out, according to some members of my household (not the dog)
that bike frames aren't supposed to be kept in the kitchen!
That's crazy talk, but she did buy me a 4-pack of Guinness for Easter,
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 23:22:03
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <rcousine-3C1763.23104912042007@news.telus.net >,
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> It turns out, according to some members of my household (not the dog)
> that bike frames aren't supposed to be kept in the kitchen!
That's what the living room is for.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 06:23:21
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <YOURhoward-8AF202.23220312042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com >,
Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:
> In article <rcousine-3C1763.23104912042007@news.telus.net>,
> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > It turns out, according to some members of my household (not the dog)
> > that bike frames aren't supposed to be kept in the kitchen!
>
> That's what the living room is for.
That's where the new rims and shifters are
Those things are for a friend though, so they don't count,
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 17:29:15
From: Kyle Legate
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>> <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>> Bob Schwartz wrote:
>>>> Dumbass,
>>> You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
>>> having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
>> To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe themselves
>> to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
>> "lifedrunk"?
>>
>> When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out laughing
>> in their faces.
>
> Dumbass: I know you're misspelling "LIVEDRUNK" just to piss me off.
>
> It's not working. My hockey team just won, and my new CX frame is in the
> kitchen.
>
Speaking of LIVEDRUNK, what's up with the jerseys?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 06:04:57
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <5871ibF2em9enU1@mid.individual.net >,
Kyle Legate <legatek@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> >> <JeffOYB@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1176314333.002001.232000@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>> Bob Schwartz wrote:
> >>>> Dumbass,
> >>> You guys are still using that lame flame? Ouch. That's like a mtbiker
> >>> having a tattoo or goofy facial hair.
> >> To the crowd here it defines "cool". These guys actually believe
> >> themselves
> >> to be intelligent and suave - haven't you seen the endless postings about
> >> "lifedrunk"?
> >>
> >> When you meet them in person it's all you can do not to burst out laughing
> >> in their faces.
> >
> > Dumbass: I know you're misspelling "LIVEDRUNK" just to piss me off.
> >
> > It's not working. My hockey team just won, and my new CX frame is in the
> > kitchen.
> >
> Speaking of LIVEDRUNK, what's up with the jerseys?
Sigh. Carl asked me that about a month ago. Same answer: I've been lazy.
Not drunk, oh no. Or at least, not drunk enough.
Honest. I'll get back on that. Soon?
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | |
Date: 12 Apr 2007 14:28:59
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
"Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote in message
news:rcousine-161BAF.02402312042007@news.telus.net...
> In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>
> It's not working. My hockey team just won, and my new CX frame is in the
> kitchen.
I have a Pinarello aluminum frame in a 55 cm. Too small for me and too big
for you.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 06:07:06
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <LmrTh.21883$tD2.14765@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in message
> news:rcousine-161BAF.02402312042007@news.telus.net...
> > In article <AufTh.20556$PL.3969@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> >
> > It's not working. My hockey team just won, and my new CX frame is in the
> > kitchen.
>
> I have a Pinarello aluminum frame in a 55 cm. Too small for me and too big
> for you.
Okay, now I'm mad.
Wait, my CX frame is just right!
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 12:40:32
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> Wait, my CX frame is just right!
The handlebars are lower than Ballan's ?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Apr 2007 03:01:45
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <461f5e60$0$28029$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com >,
Donald Munro <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > Wait, my CX frame is just right!
>
> The handlebars are lower than Ballan's ?
I'm shaped like a fire hydrant, and about 2.5 fire hydrants tall. On my
road bike, the stem is tilted up, and the bars are nearly level with my
saddle.
On the CX bike, I'll probably run about the same position, since I use
'cross levers for control in technical sections, which makes the tops a
very normal place to ride from.
CX levers are great,
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 22:01:27
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> Anyone else wonder how many racers there are per state? In each main
> org? Unaffiliated? Gung-ho buyers of raceware? Got any data?
Dumbass,
What kind of race?
Bob Schwartz
|
| | | |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 15:15:08
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <XUcTh.9337$YL5.994@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net >,
Bob Schwartz <bob.schwartz@REMOVEsbcglobal.net > wrote:
> JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Anyone else wonder how many racers there are per state? In each main
> > org? Unaffiliated? Gung-ho buyers of raceware? Got any data?
>
> Dumbass,
>
> What kind of race?
>
> Bob Schwartz
The Potter-bot needs work, Bob. Just sayin'.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 06:57:55
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
How many racers are in each state.
Doesn't seem like too tough of a map to make.
Yeah, we don't have to limit it to license holders, although that
would be a nice, easy break-out to include.
--JP
allbikemag.com
|
| | |
Date: 11 Apr 2007 14:36:37
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> How many racers are in each state.
>
> Doesn't seem like too tough of a map to make.
>
> Yeah, we don't have to limit it to license holders, although that
> would be a nice, easy break-out to include.
Dumbass,
If you are not going to define 'racer', the map is impossible
to make. And once you do define 'racer' it is still not going
to be easy because of the large number of racing organizations
and the degree of membership overlap.
Don't expect much help until you know what you are asking for.
Bob Schwartz
|
| |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 18:51:21
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Casey Kerrigan wrote:
> In article <1176038444.725599.195970@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[ ]
> I got those numbers from the USCF database Info that promoters can
> download from the USAC web site. Only the currrent weekly Info is
> available. contact your local association and they can probably either
> give you the link and password to download the Info or send you the
> file you can i9mport into a database and look up the states you are
> interested in.
Way too awkward.
I just wanted to see a map showing how many racers were where.
If someone might give me a password, then they should just put the
darn info up on the homepage.
--JP
|
| | |
Date: 10 Apr 2007 21:23:19
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> I just wanted to see a map showing how many racers were where.
20 years ago, USCF membership would give you that. It doesn't
anymore. There are thousands of people that race their brains
out every weekend and never hold a license of any kind. Over
the course of a season I'll bet there are at least 2000 more
than occasional racers showing up to Wisport and WORS races
that don't carry a license of any kind and that is just
Wisconsin. Peak USCF membership here was 600 something and
that has almost certainly dropped even as total race entries
expanded.
Bob Schwartz
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 06:20:44
From:
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
Bret wrote:
> On Apr 7, 7:49 pm, Casey Kerrigan <c...@caseykerrigan.com> wrote:
[ ]
> > At the end of 2006 there were 41,347 USCF riders
> >
> > CA had 7514 USCF members
> > TX had 2431
> > NY had 2288
> > WA had 1903
> > FL had 1623
> > CO had 1529
> >
> > The New england states combined had a bit over 3,000 USCF riders
>
>
> There were 2939 ACA license holders in CO in 2006. That's the number
> you need if you're trying to judge the size of the racing population
> in CO.
Ah, two sets of books. Lovely. Lots of overlap, right?
Anyone know what the Midwest would come in at? MI, MN, WI, IL, IA, OH,
IN...
Where'd you get those stats, Casey? Link? Thanks. --jP
|
| | |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 07:33:55
From: Casey Kerrigan
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <1176038444.725599.195970@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com >,
<JeffOYB@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Bret wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 7:49 pm, Casey Kerrigan <c...@caseykerrigan.com> wrote:
> [ ]
> > > At the end of 2006 there were 41,347 USCF riders
> > >
> > > CA had 7514 USCF members
> > > TX had 2431
> > > NY had 2288
> > > WA had 1903
> > > FL had 1623
> > > CO had 1529
> > >
> > > The New england states combined had a bit over 3,000 USCF riders
> >
> >
> > There were 2939 ACA license holders in CO in 2006. That's the number
> > you need if you're trying to judge the size of the racing population
> > in CO.
>
> Ah, two sets of books. Lovely. Lots of overlap, right?
>
> Anyone know what the Midwest would come in at? MI, MN, WI, IL, IA, OH,
> IN...
>
> Where'd you get those stats, Casey? Link? Thanks. --jP
>
I got those numbers from the USCF database Info that promoters can
download from the USAC web site. Only the currrent weekly Info is
available. contact your local association and they can probably either
give you the link and password to download the Info or send you the
file you can i9mport into a database and look up the states you are
interested in.
|
| |
Date: 07 Apr 2007 22:15:32
From: Bret
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
On Apr 7, 7:49 pm, Casey Kerrigan <c...@caseykerrigan.com > wrote:
> In article <461831c9$0$19444$4c368...@roadrunner.com>, Colin Campbell
>
>
>
> <cmca...@adelphia.net> wrote:
> > Jeff...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
> > > holders?
>
> > > I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
>
> > > Thanks, JP
> > > allbikemag.com
>
> > I can't seem to find it, either, but I know I've seen it in the past.
> > My recollection is that California had the most licensed riders, with
> > Texas second. These two states were a good ways ahead of the rest of
> > the pack, and with population trends and climate factors, I expect it
> > hasn't changed.
>
> At the end of 2006 there were 41,347 USCF riders
>
> CA had 7514 USCF members
> TX had 2431
> NY had 2288
> WA had 1903
> FL had 1623
> CO had 1529
>
> The New england states combined had a bit over 3,000 USCF riders
There were 2939 ACA license holders in CO in 2006. That's the number
you need if you're trying to judge the size of the racing population
in CO.
http://www.americancycling.org/info/documents/stats/docs/06-ACA-membership-Stats.pdf
Bret
|
| | |
Date: 09 Apr 2007 20:44:23
From: Mike Murray
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
There were 3,290 annual and 1,014 single event memberships for OBRA in
Oregon.
--
Mike Murray
"Bret" <bret.wade@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1176009332.510253.147060@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 7, 7:49 pm, Casey Kerrigan <c...@caseykerrigan.com> wrote:
>> In article <461831c9$0$19444$4c368...@roadrunner.com>, Colin Campbell
>>
>>
>>
>> <cmca...@adelphia.net> wrote:
>> > Jeff...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> > > Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
>> > > holders?
>>
>> > > I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
>>
>> > > Thanks, JP
>> > > allbikemag.com
>>
>> > I can't seem to find it, either, but I know I've seen it in the past.
>> > My recollection is that California had the most licensed riders, with
>> > Texas second. These two states were a good ways ahead of the rest of
>> > the pack, and with population trends and climate factors, I expect it
>> > hasn't changed.
>>
>> At the end of 2006 there were 41,347 USCF riders
>>
>> CA had 7514 USCF members
>> TX had 2431
>> NY had 2288
>> WA had 1903
>> FL had 1623
>> CO had 1529
>>
>> The New england states combined had a bit over 3,000 USCF riders
>
>
> There were 2939 ACA license holders in CO in 2006. That's the number
> you need if you're trying to judge the size of the racing population
> in CO.
>
> http://www.americancycling.org/info/documents/stats/docs/06-ACA-membership-Stats.pdf
>
> Bret
>
|
| |
Date: 07 Apr 2007 18:42:11
From: stevenwoo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
On Apr 7, 11:58 am, Jeff...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
> holders?
>
> I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
>
> Thanks, JP
> allbikemag.com
Your local association officers or officials probably know or can find
out...
http://www.ncncaracing.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2210&highlight=#2210
|
| |
Date: 07 Apr 2007 17:05:27
From: Colin Campbell
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
> holders?
>
> I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
>
> Thanks, JP
> allbikemag.com
>
>
I can't seem to find it, either, but I know I've seen it in the past.
My recollection is that California had the most licensed riders, with
Texas second. These two states were a good ways ahead of the rest of
the pack, and with population trends and climate factors, I expect it
hasn't changed.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Apr 2007 18:49:16
From: Casey Kerrigan
Subject: Re: States distribution of license holders?
|
In article <461831c9$0$19444$4c368faf@roadrunner.com >, Colin Campbell
<cmcampb@adelphia.net > wrote:
> JeffOYB@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Anyone know what the state-by-state distribution is of USCF license
> > holders?
> >
> > I tried googling and looking on the usacycling.org site, no luck.
> >
> > Thanks, JP
> > allbikemag.com
> >
> >
> I can't seem to find it, either, but I know I've seen it in the past.
> My recollection is that California had the most licensed riders, with
> Texas second. These two states were a good ways ahead of the rest of
> the pack, and with population trends and climate factors, I expect it
> hasn't changed.
At the end of 2006 there were 41,347 USCF riders
CA had 7514 USCF members
TX had 2431
NY had 2288
WA had 1903
FL had 1623
CO had 1529
The New england states combined had a bit over 3,000 USCF riders
|
|
