| |
Main
Date: 23 May 2007 21:39:34
From: SandM
Subject: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
I think that the panel will go 2-1
|
|
| |
Date: 25 May 2007 00:11:06
From: wimpyVO2
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
On May 23, 9:39 pm, "SandM" <h90...@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
>
> I think that the panel will go 2-1
My guess is Landis wins 2-1
McLaren is USADA's guy so he votes Guilty
Campbell is Landis' pick, former athlete, known pro-athlete
arbitrator, votes Not Guilty
Brunet, the neutral arbitrator, seemed most interested in the
defense's arguments on bad lab work, asking questions. I think he
leans Not Guilty.
|
| |
Date: 24 May 2007 20:43:24
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
On May 25, 2:40 am, "SandM" <h90...@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> "Bob Schwartz" <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > SandM wrote:
>
> > > What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
>
> > > I think that the panel will go 2-1
>
> > Candyass! Which way?
>
> > Guilty, 2-1.
>
>
> In favor of Floyd. They did not prove that he doped and he showed that the
> test results were shaky at best. Landis loses in the court of public
> opinion. He makes poor decisions and has a buffoon of a manager, oops, had.
2-1 guilty, then bumped to Switzerland for the appeal, where, if the
defense has any common sense, they'll tweak the presentation to
eliminate the shoot-thyself-in-the-foot debacles. Then it's a new
game, the Tour is over, there's a new champion, and Floyd can be
exonerated, pardoned or banned for the remainder and everyone goes
home a winner.
R
|
| | |
Date: 25 May 2007 10:30:50
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
RicodJour wrote:
> 2-1 guilty, then bumped to Switzerland for the appeal, where, if the
> defense has any common sense, they'll tweak the presentation to
> eliminate the shoot-thyself-in-the-foot debacles.
So clean and uncorrupted Switzerland will be introduced to the soap opera.
|
| |
Date: 24 May 2007 08:48:23
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
SandM wrote:
> What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
>
> I think that the panel will go 2-1
Candyass! Which way?
Guilty, 2-1.
Bob Schwartz
|
| | |
Date: 24 May 2007 23:40:37
From: SandM
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
"Bob Schwartz" <bob.schwartz@REMOVEsbcglobal.net > wrote in message
news:LIg5i.2729$u56.51@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
> SandM wrote:
> > What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
> >
> > I think that the panel will go 2-1
>
> Candyass! Which way?
>
> Guilty, 2-1.
>
> Bob Schwartz
In favor of Floyd. They did not prove that he doped and he showed that the
test results were shaky at best. Landis loses in the court of public
opinion. He makes poor decisions and has a buffoon of a manager, oops, had.
|
| |
Date: 23 May 2007 19:56:22
From: DirtRoadie
Subject: Re: Taking bets on Landis v. USADA
|
On May 23, 10:39 pm, "SandM" <h90...@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?
>
> I think that the panel will go 2-1
I agree on the 2-1. Campbell rulles for Landis. I haven't yet decided
whether one of the others will join him.
DR
|
|
