| |
Main
Date: 03 Feb 2007 02:04:13
From: Kurgan Gringioni
Subject: Tom Kunich is back
|
This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
retard.
|
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 20:21:35
From: SLAVE of THE STATE
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
On Feb 6, 6:24 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Donald Munro wrote:
> > Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
>
> >> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> >> retard.
>
> > I suspect this is not really Kunich, its a Chung generated Kunich. After
> > all his surge troll received a surge since Kunich's return and he hasn't
> > had to mess up his troll index either.
>
> He's a complete re-write. He's gone Open Source (*) and he's
> much more portable now.
>
> Bob Schwartz
>
> (*) He may be Open Source but it'd take a strong stomach to
> look at the code.
Oh, but it is well-commented!
|
| |
Date: 06 Feb 2007 09:43:13
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> retard.
I suspect this is not really Kunich, its a Chung generated Kunich. After
all his surge troll received a surge since Kunich's return and he hasn't
had to mess up his troll index either.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Feb 2007 02:24:30
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Donald Munro wrote:
> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
>
>> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
>> retard.
>
> I suspect this is not really Kunich, its a Chung generated Kunich. After
> all his surge troll received a surge since Kunich's return and he hasn't
> had to mess up his troll index either.
He's a complete re-write. He's gone Open Source (*) and he's
much more portable now.
Bob Schwartz
(*) He may be Open Source but it'd take a strong stomach to
look at the code.
|
| |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 14:33:05
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
On Feb 3, 3:04 am, "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringi...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> retard.
And you gave him his own thread. You remind me
of Carly Simon singing "You're so vain, I bet you think
this song is about you." Except, she knew it was ironic.
Also she was hotter.
Ben
|
| |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 07:18:28
From: dustoyevsky@mac.com
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
On Feb 3, 4:46 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> And you're still a left wing fool who believes if you can't solve every
> problem then either do nothing or make someone Dictator for Life so that
> they can make you feel like it isn't your responsibility.
Klassic Kunich.
The best thing about TK is, he can explain that sentence. --D-y
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 22:43:54
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> retard.
>
|
| | |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 23:37:42
From: Steve
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message
news:Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
>
> "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> > retard.
> >
>
How about yours Mr. Kunich ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.ketplace/browse_thread/thread/6e4275291db2ff8f/85a98f3ef88d5663?lnk=st&q=kunich+SAN+LEANDRO%2C+CA&rnum=21#85a98f3ef88d5663
as you state in your public posting, your address is:
Tom Kunich
3539 Monterey Blvd.
San Leandro, CA 94578
Does your counselor know that you have returned to r.b.r ?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 21:14:43
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
In article <sOCdne9EG4xQ_ljYnZ2dnUVZ_s6onZ2d@comcast.com >,
"Steve" <h90943@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> How about yours Mr. Kunich ?
Steve, as you might have noted, I'm not one to defend Kunich but I really think
it's bad form to post people's addresses. It's just not called for, no matter how
much you may dislike the guy.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 19:40:04
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
In article
<sOCdne9EG4xQ_ljYnZ2dnUVZ_s6onZ2d@comcast.com >,
"Steve" <h90943@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
> news:Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
> >
> > "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> > > retard.
> > >
> >
> How about yours Mr. Kunich ?
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.ketplace/browse_thread/thread/6e4275291db2ff8f/85a98f3ef88d5663?lnk=st&q=kunich+SAN+LEANDRO%2C+CA&rnum=21#85a98f3ef88d5663
>
> as you state in your public posting, your address is:
[...]
>
> Does your counselor know that you have returned to r.b.r ?
Do not publish the personal information of others.
--
Michael Press
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 23:35:50
From: Steve
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
>
> Do not publish the personal information of others.
>
> --
> Michael Press
He, Kunich, published it. I simply provided a link to his post.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 14:26:50
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
In article
<gdSdneSejdFAKVvYnZ2dnUVZ_sKunZ2d@comcast.com >,
"Steve" <h90943@hotmail.commie > wrote:
> >
> > Do not publish the personal information of others.
>
> He, Kunich, published it. I simply provided a link to his post.
Do not publish it anyway. You spoke in anger with
intent to cause harm.
--
Michael Press
|
| | | | | |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 21:33:02
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
"Steve" <h90943@hotmail.commie > wrote in message
news:gdSdneSejdFAKVvYnZ2dnUVZ_sKunZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>>
>> Do not publish the personal information of others.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Press
>
> He, Kunich, published it. I simply provided a link to his post.
In case you're unaware of it, I did not post that. Someone with the courage
of yourself did.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 22:36:45
From: Steve
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in message
news:ioNxh.24773$X72.10700@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "Steve" <h90943@hotmail.commie> wrote in message
> news:gdSdneSejdFAKVvYnZ2dnUVZ_sKunZ2d@comcast.com...
> >
> >>
> >> Do not publish the personal information of others.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Michael Press
> >
> > He, Kunich, published it. I simply provided a link to his post.
>
> In case you're unaware of it, I did not post that. Someone with the
courage
> of yourself did.
>
>
Sorry Tom, lesson learned. I was duped.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 15:17:04
From: Kyle Legate
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
Steve wrote:
> as you state in your public posting, your address is:
> Tom Kunich
> 3539 Monterey Blvd.
> San Leandro, CA 94578
>
Isn't that a trailer park?
|
| | | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 07:27:19
From: Steven L. Sheffield
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back to running away
|
On 2/4/07 7:17 AM, in article 52m871F1p6rrsU1@mid.individual.net, "Kyle
Legate" <legatek@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>
>> as you state in your public posting, your address is:
>> Tom Kunich
>> 3539 Monterey Blvd.
>> San Leandro, CA 94578
>>
> Isn't that a trailer park?
Nope.
http://www.google.com/maps?q=3539+Monterey+Blvd,+San+Leandro,+CA+94578&ie=UT
F8&z=19&ll=37.701687,-122.150376&spn=0.001055,0.002704&t=h&om=1
--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash
|
| | |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 16:58:38
From: Steven L. Sheffield
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
On 2/3/07 3:43 PM, in article
Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Tom Kunich"
<cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
Is that a threat?
--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 21:14:40
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
In article <C1EA6FBE.5A74D%stevens@veloworks.com >,
"Steven L. Sheffield" <stevens@veloworks.com > wrote:
> On 2/3/07 3:43 PM, in article
> Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Tom Kunich"
> <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
>
>
> Is that a threat?
Sounds like it to me. But not surprising, given the source.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 22:09:27
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
"Steven L. Sheffield" <stevens@veloworks.com > wrote in message
news:C1EA6FBE.5A74D%stevens@veloworks.com...
> On 2/3/07 3:43 PM, in article
> Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Tom Kunich"
> <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>> Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
>
> Is that a threat?
Is that a weasel?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 12:39:45
From: Joe Cipale
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Steven L. Sheffield wrote:
> On 2/3/07 3:43 PM, in article
> Ke8xh.18748$yx6.8688@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Tom Kunich"
> <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>
>>Just give me your address and we'll be free of someone.
>
>
>
> Is that a threat?
>
>
Kinda sounds like one to me. But as is typical of eunuch, he bloviates
loudly but is
unable to perfrom the action.
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 13:40:11
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
In article <1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >,
"Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com > wrote:
> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> retard.
And after the five months away, he's still an overbearing, know-it-all, rightwing
nutcase blowhard. What a surprise.
DOGPILE!!!!!
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 22:46:06
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
"Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote in message
news:YOURhoward-A8A1BF.13401103022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
>> retard.
>
> And after the five months away, he's still an overbearing, know-it-all,
> rightwing
> nutcase blowhard. What a surprise.
And you're still a left wing fool who believes if you can't solve every
problem then either do nothing or make someone Dictator for Life so that
they can make you feel like it isn't your responsibility.
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 21:14:38
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
In article <Og8xh.18749$yx6.1324@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
> news:YOURhoward-A8A1BF.13401103022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> >> retard.
> >
> > And after the five months away, he's still an overbearing, know-it-all,
> > rightwing
> > nutcase blowhard. What a surprise.
>
> And you're still a left wing fool who believes if you can't solve every
> problem then either do nothing or make someone Dictator for Life so that
> they can make you feel like it isn't your responsibility.
The guy who falls all over himself trying to think of ways to explain away the
activities of Bush and Cheney and their cohorts at Halliburton et al tries to say
something about me dodging responsibility?
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | | |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 21:31:50
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
"Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote in message
news:YOURhoward-DB9F19.21143804022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>
> The guy who falls all over himself trying to think of ways to explain
> away the
> activities of Bush and Cheney and their cohorts at Halliburton et al tries
> to say
> something about me dodging responsibility?
You have a citation on that loud mouth?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 05 Feb 2007 21:07:13
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
In article <anNxh.24771$X72.23024@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net >,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote:
> "Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
> news:YOURhoward-DB9F19.21143804022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >
> > The guy who falls all over himself trying to think of ways to explain
> > away the
> > activities of Bush and Cheney and their cohorts at Halliburton et al tries
> > to say
> > something about me dodging responsibility?
>
> You have a citation on that loud mouth?
I do have a citation on that loud mouth: see just about any post by one "Tom
Kunich" that involves politics or world events. Christ, how about this for an
example: you couldn't defend Cheney enough after he SHOT AN OLD MAN IN THE FACE.
Anytime anyone hints at saying Bush and Cheney are not GOD you shit yourself.
Obviously you take that personally in the extreme: an insult of George W. Bush is an
insult of you. Old dude, see a shrink. Soon, if not sooner.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| | | |
Date: 04 Feb 2007 12:36:00
From: Joe Cipale
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Howard Kveck" <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote in message
> news:YOURhoward-A8A1BF.13401103022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>
>>In article <1170497053.905016.245860@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>"Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
>>>retard.
>>
>> And after the five months away, he's still an overbearing, know-it-all,
>>rightwing
>>nutcase blowhard. What a surprise.
>
>
> And you're still a left wing fool who believes if you can't solve every
> problem then either do nothing or make someone Dictator for Life so that
> they can make you feel like it isn't your responsibility.
>
>
Sigh... the more things change.. the more kunich acts like a fucktard.
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 02:11:59
From: amit.ghosh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
On Feb 3, 5:16 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> > This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> > retard.
>
> Its all heathers fault. She forgot to lock her freezer.
dumbass,
i thought the vintage rbr tifecta was complete with the recent
references to: neck riding, panache and armitage.
|
| |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 12:16:44
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: Tom Kunich is back
|
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> This really fucking sucks. I thought we were finally free of that
> retard.
Its all heathers fault. She forgot to lock her freezer.
|
|
