| |
Main
Date: 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16
From: datakoll
Subject: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
to knee jerk or moralize about it.
|
|
| |
Date: 07 Aug 2007 21:04:25
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Aug 7, 4:12 pm, rechungREMOVET...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 7, 9:21 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
> > > possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
> > > to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>
> > An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
> > healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
> > and often SOP. However, an investigation that
> > begins with the preconception that it's looking
> > for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
> > surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
> > of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
> > lot of conditions that could be caused by any
> > number of factors, including drugs or something
> > else; yet if you already have an answer in your
> > head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.
>
> Dumbass,
>
> Those WMDs have got to be somewhere.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
cox is a white rat
|
| |
Date: 07 Aug 2007 20:12:59
From:
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Aug 7, 9:21 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org >
wrote:
> On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
> > possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
> > to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>
> An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
> healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
> and often SOP. However, an investigation that
> begins with the preconception that it's looking
> for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
> surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
> of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
> lot of conditions that could be caused by any
> number of factors, including drugs or something
> else; yet if you already have an answer in your
> head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.
Dumbass,
Those WMDs have got to be somewhere.
|
| |
Date: 07 Aug 2007 19:21:03
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Aug 6, 3:47 pm, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
> possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
> to knee jerk or moralize about it.
An autopsy or investigation in the case of a
healthy person who dies unsually young is fine,
and often SOP. However, an investigation that
begins with the preconception that it's looking
for signs of a condition caused by drug use is,
surprise, very possibly going to turn up signs
of drug use, whether real or not. There are a
lot of conditions that could be caused by any
number of factors, including drugs or something
else; yet if you already have an answer in your
head, it tends to crowd out the alternatives.
|
| |
Date: 07 Aug 2007 00:59:56
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
> >possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
> >to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>
> No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.
>
> Ron
Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??
|
| | |
Date: 07 Aug 2007 11:35:19
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:59:56 -0000, datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com > wrote:
>On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
>> >possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
>> >to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>>
>> No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.
>>
>> Ron
>
> Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??
If I had to bet... yeah. At least I understand the sheriffs and which way they
bend. UCI, I haven't a damn clue what's wrong with them.
Ron
|
| | |
Date: 06 Aug 2007 18:10:47
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
datakoll wrote:
> On Aug 6, 7:47 pm, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
>>> possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
>>> to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>> No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.
>>
>> Ron
>
> Florida Sheriff's cleaner than UCI ??
>
Yeah. Even Alabama Sheriffs.
|
| |
Date: 06 Aug 2007 19:47:02
From: RonSonic
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com > wrote:
>
>scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
>possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
>to knee jerk or moralize about it.
No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.
Ron
|
| | |
Date: 06 Aug 2007 19:15:04
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: UCI investigation of Cox's death
|
In article <amcfb3d4i8sdo81ap07brfrmq2ugbmcdi5@4ax.com >,
RonSonic <ronsonic@tampabay.rr.com > wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:47:16 -0000, datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >scientific autopsy/research of athlete's pathologic conditions
> >possibly casued by drug use is positive not negative: no good reason
> >to knee jerk or moralize about it.
>
> No but if I die young I want detectives to investigate, not the UCI.
Oh, so you want detectives, not defectives. The nerve...
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
|
