| |
Main
Date: 31 Jan 2007 02:58:52
From: Keith
Subject: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838
Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which January Ullrich
refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
office January Ullrich communicated over its lawyers clearly that he
is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. “The
current publications are wrong. January Ullrich made its willing to
cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
office”, so its press speaker Michael long.
The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
publications. “It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ”,
so long.
"
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Feb 2007 01:38:48
From: hizark21@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
(http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
know that he is not guilty.
On Jan 30, 5:58 pm, Keith <nos...@nospam.com > wrote:
> http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838
>
> Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which JanuaryUllrich
> refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
> In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
> office JanuaryUllrichcommunicated over its lawyers clearly that he
> is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. "The
> current publications are wrong. JanuaryUllrichmade its willing to
> cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
> office", so its press speaker Michael long.
>
> The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
> personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
> publications. "It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
> January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
> intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
> sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
> right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ",
> so long.
> "
|
| | |
Date: 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
In article
<1170322728.921691.48790@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com >,
"hizark21@yahoo.com" <hizark21@yahoo.com > wrote:
> (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
>
> So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
> controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
> know that he is not guilty.
It took this long to complete the negotiations.
> On Jan 30, 5:58 pm, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > http://www.janullrich.de/index.php?id=17&dat_id=13838
> >
> > Loose Google translation "Messages, according to which JanuaryUllrich
> > refuses the publication of a DNA sample by its lawyers, are unfounded.
> > In a letter from 22 January 2007 to the Bonn public prosecutor's
> > office JanuaryUllrichcommunicated over its lawyers clearly that he
> > is at any time ready to deliver a saliva sample in Germany. "The
> > current publications are wrong. JanuaryUllrichmade its willing to
> > cooperate shank several times clear opposite the public prosecutor's
> > office", so its press speaker Michael long.
> >
> > The wheel professional will not accept the continuing injury of his
> > personality rights and will proceed consistently against untruthful
> > publications. "It at present unfortunately is opportun to report over
> > January against better knowledge only negatively. That is an
> > intolerable campaign, with which one of the most successful German
> > sportsmen is to be dismantled. One wins the impression that
> > right-national principles are stepped regarding January with feet. ",
> > so long.
> > "
--
Michael Press
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Feb 2007 21:45:58
From: Keith
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net >
wrote:
>In article
><1170322728.921691.48790@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
> "hizark21@yahoo.com" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
>>
>> So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
>> controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
>> know that he is not guilty.
>
>It took this long to complete the negotiations.
What do you think the deal is ?
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Feb 2007 22:18:37
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
In article
<qbk4s25r7trt1d5piah5bb83stgk75ms41@4ax.com >,
Keith <nospam@nospam.com > wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><1170322728.921691.48790@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
> > "hizark21@yahoo.com" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
> >>
> >> So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
> >> controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
> >> know that he is not guilty.
> >
> >It took this long to complete the negotiations.
>
> What do you think the deal is ?
Do not know. Guessing that Der Jan rides again.
--
Michael Press
|
| | | | | |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 02:56:32
From: Keith
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
>> >> (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
>> >>
>> >> So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
>> >> controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
>> >> know that he is not guilty.
>> >
>> >It took this long to complete the negotiations.
>>
>> What do you think the deal is ?
>
>Do not know. Guessing that Der Jan rides again.
if it is found negative ? Well we'll soon know :
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb02news&from=rss
'Ullrich gives DNA sample
By Susan Westemeyer
Jan Ullrich followed through on his promise to deliver a saliva sample
for a DNA comparison to blood taken custody in the Operación Puerto
investigation. His attorneys announced earlier this week that he was
willing to travel to Germany to give a DNA sample, which was actually
taken in Konstanz, Switzerland, on the German border.
The sample will be turned over to prosecutors in Bonn, Germany, who
must now await arrival of the blood bags from Spain, before the
comparison test can be made.'
Either he's bluffing and hopes for a non-match or he's totally stupid
not to have submitted that test last July when T-Mobile asked him to
take it...although with his race tactics over the years...
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 03 Feb 2007 23:17:53
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
"Keith" <nospam@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:eqq7s2h8vbqkuig9ho7hr2lcb84ks696lb@4ax.com...
>
> if it is found negative ? Well we'll soon know :
Keith, seeing the way that samples have been manipulated and information put
in the wrong hands, would you trust YOUR DNA in the hands of someone that
might find your DNA on the handle of a murder weapon?
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Feb 2007 19:54:19
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: Ullrich OKs DNA Test
|
"Keith" <nospam@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:qbk4s25r7trt1d5piah5bb83stgk75ms41@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:00:31 -0800, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>
> wrote:
>
>>In article
>><1170322728.921691.48790@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
>> "hizark21@yahoo.com" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> (http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/feb07/feb01news )
>>>
>>> So why did not Jan offer give a DNA last year and put a end to the
>>> controversy. If Ullrich is willing to give a DNA sample than he must
>>> know that he is not guilty.
>>
>>It took this long to complete the negotiations.
>
> What do you think the deal is ?
He gets to deposit his DNA in Dick Pound's mouth.
|
|
