| |
Main
Date: 18 Sep 2007 10:29:35
From: Bill C
Subject: YES!! Pound going!
|
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/09/18/qc-pound0918.html?ref=rss
Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
Last Updated: Tuesday, September 18, 2007
|
|
| |
Date: 20 Sep 2007 17:28:18
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
On Sep 18, 11:17 am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
>
> I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
Are you kidding? More likely to be Pound's retirement
race - the crit they hold in the retiree's hometown where
he gets to ceremonially and emotionally cross the line
first.
There's always the possibility that whoever replaces
Pound will also be a sanctimonious putz. It goes
with the job.
Ben
|
| | |
Date: 21 Sep 2007 12:44:06
From:
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:28:18 -0000, "bjw@mambo.ucolick.org"
<bjw@mambo.ucolick.org > wrote:
>On Sep 18, 11:17 am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
>wrote:
>> Bill C wrote:
>> > Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
>>
>> I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
>
>Are you kidding? More likely to be Pound's retirement
>race - the crit they hold in the retiree's hometown where
>he gets to ceremonially and emotionally cross the line
>first.
>
>There's always the possibility that whoever replaces
>Pound will also be a sanctimonious putz. It goes
>with the job.
Hopefully, not another loudmouthed, trash-talking, counter-productive
sanctimonious putz.
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Sep 2007 17:44:53
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
In article <15t7f35ih367gp3f01akhgfumrsqmosdbc@4ax.com >, Hobbes@spnb&s.com wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:28:18 -0000, "bjw@mambo.ucolick.org"
> <bjw@mambo.ucolick.org> wrote:
> >There's always the possibility that whoever replaces
> >Pound will also be a sanctimonious putz. It goes
> >with the job.
>
> Hopefully, not another loudmouthed, trash-talking, counter-productive
> sanctimonious putz.
I think you forgot "self-aggrandizing" in that.
--
tanx,
Howard
Faberge eggs are elegant but I prefer Faberge bacon.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 20 Sep 2007 02:50:31
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
It's probabbly necessary to have someone whose really viscious. Pound
is kinda grandfatherly, no?
|
| | |
Date: 20 Sep 2007 09:55:49
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
datakoll wrote:
> It's probabbly necessary to have someone whose really viscious.
Viscous peope are thick and treacly.
|
| |
Date: 19 Sep 2007 10:19:50
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
On Sep 18, 2:17 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
>
> I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
Oooh, nice leap. Free Floyd _and_ Lose A Pound all wrapped up in one
neat package!
R
|
| | |
Date: 20 Sep 2007 16:18:27
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
In article <1190222390.284799.128420@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com >,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2:17 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
> > Bill C wrote:
> > > Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
> >
> > I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
>
> Oooh, nice leap. Free Floyd _and_ Lose A Pound all wrapped up in one
> neat package!
A career in marketing is in someone's future.
"The puny and revolting men of advertising smile
Gazing with affection at their own reflection, they smile"
------Alice Donut
--
tanx,
Howard
Faberge eggs are elegant but I prefer Faberge bacon.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
|
| |
Date: 18 Sep 2007 14:21:21
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
On Sep 18, 4:45 pm, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > He's probably moving to the US dept. of Justice, Homeland Security, or
> > the UN, all places where a total lack of morals and ethics are seen as
> > huge plusses.
>
> I was under the impression he was moving to the CAS which
> would result in the CAS becoming completely redundant as there
> would be no point in appealing to them.
I'm praying that rumor isn't confirmed. I can't think of a worse
choice, except maybe Lemond.
Bill C
|
| |
Date: 18 Sep 2007 22:45:22
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
Bill C wrote:
> He's probably moving to the US dept. of Justice, Homeland Security, or
> the UN, all places where a total lack of morals and ethics are seen as
> huge plusses.
I was under the impression he was moving to the CAS which
would result in the CAS becoming completely redundant as there
would be no point in appealing to them.
|
| |
Date: 18 Sep 2007 12:05:16
From: Dumbass
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
On Sep 18, 2:17 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net >
wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
>
> I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
>
> Bob Schwartz
According to _Absolutely False_ Pound announced in 2006 that he was
stepping down in Nov 2007. Seems too early to be due to the Landis
case.
|
| |
Date: 18 Sep 2007 18:17:35
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: YES!! Pound going!
|
Bill C wrote:
> Pound quits World Anti-Doping Agency
I wonder if that means Floyd got off.
Bob Schwartz
|
|
