ass-face Sheryl Crow

bicycle-forum.net
Promoting biking discussion.

Main

Date: 22 Apr 2007 22:03:05
From: Callistus Valerius
Subject: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Global warming was the talking point last night at the White House
Correspondents' Association dinner when singer Sheryl Crow and "Inconvenient
Truth" producer Laurie David walked over to Table 92 at the Hilton
Washington to chat with Karl Rove -- and the resulting exchange was suitably
heated.

Rove's version: "She came over to insult me and she succeeded."

Things got so hot that Crow stepped in to defuse the situation and then got
into it with Rove herself. "You work for me," she told the presidential
adviser, according to singed bystanders. "No," was his response. "I work for
the American people."
----------
Crow thinks the President works for her?? Anyone know what's so appealing
about her, I must of missed it. There's some new rap song, and one of the
lyrics says "you can't make a housewife out of a ho." Lance should pay
attention.

Date: 25 Apr 2007 05:14:32
From: Bob Schwartz
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Callistus Valerius wrote:

Doucheus Baggus,

If your face looked as good as Sheryl Crowe's ass, just
imagine how popular you'd be.

Bob Schwartz

Date: 25 Apr 2007 05:27:59
From: William Asher
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Bob Schwartz <bob.schwartz@REMOVEsbcglobal.net > wrote in news:YsBXh.2770
$H_.1571@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:

> If your face looked as good as Sheryl Crowe's ass, just
> imagine how popular you'd be.

Couldn't you do something about that for him, I mean in a professional
capacity? Would his insurance pay for it if his psychiatrist was on board?
What would be the technical term for implanting Sheryl Crowe's ass in
someone's face? Crowecrackoplasty? Sherylbuttosuction?

--
Bill Asher

Date: 25 Apr 2007 10:16:54
From: Donald Munro
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Bob Schwartz wrote:
>> If your face looked as good as Sheryl Crowe's ass, just
>> imagine how popular you'd be.

William Asher wrote:
> Couldn't you do something about that for him, I mean in a professional
> capacity? Would his insurance pay for it if his psychiatrist was on board?

Professional capacity ? Presumably creating a virtual Doucheus Baggus with
Sheryl Crowe 's ass as an avatar would be fairly easy, the difficult part
would be updating the nntp AI.

> What would be the technical term for implanting Sheryl Crowe's ass in
> someone's face? Crowecrackoplasty? Sherylbuttosuction?

Didn't Trdina or Albright already perform this surgery on Kunich using a
dog's ass ? I seem to recall one of them posting a link a few years ago.

Date: 23 Apr 2007 09:13:44
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 23, 11:14 am, cyclin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 22, 7:52 pm, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 7:30 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > >"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in
> > > >news:dVRWh.4188$j63.2571@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
> > > ><snip>
> > > >> Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> > > >> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
>
> > > >Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?
>
> > > Bwahahaha.
>
> > > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
>
> > That's because they've created laws, and privileges that isolate them
> > from the ordinary people and allow them to assume a pretty much
> > untouchable aristocracy that is NOT responsible to us anymore.
> > Greg is right a shitload of the time, just a little ideological.
> > The bastards need to be brought to account all across the board, but
> > noone wants to do that, they are all angling for favors and political
> > advantage.
>
> Is tha so? Have you even bothered to try to talk to them? Or is this
> more of your assumptions based on your beliefs concerning things you
> know little to nothing about?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Quick example. They may not be able to charge Nifong with any criminal
actions due to the laws protecting "officials" doing their jobs. This
has been an issue for ages.
This is like Boxer and Pelosi having concealed carry, personal
protection, pistol permits while trying to disarm all the rest of us
and it's not just those two by any stretch of the imagination.
We have been dealing with a mess here locally for years where the
Housing Authority looted the "shelters account", stole everything that
wasn't nailed down, took bribes, etc...and they are having a bitch of
a time making much of anything stick because the people charged keep
claiming they were trying to act in the bests interest of the city,
and with the advice of a city lawyer.
You have to prove active intent and/or gross negligence, not
incompetence, carelessness, or anything else. They, and most others
are smart enough to keep saying they were "doing the job the best they
could, for the good of the public" and the DAs have to prove it was
otherwise.
The protections that politcians have voted themselves over the years
are totally incompatible with representative democracy. The rigging of
the system to massively favor incumbents is another aspect of it too.
Bill C

Date: 23 Apr 2007 08:20:52
From:
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 23, 10:16 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net > wrote:
>
> This sounds more like Beevis and Butthead than a supposedly reasonable
> person. Boogers and clam sauce on the arm to go with a shit covered ass.
> Nice solution.
>
> Maybe lance left because, on top of the excrement odor, she was using
> leaves once a month instead of a modern product.
>
> Not an attractive personality to me, but hey maybe it works for
> someone.

It seems to work for Kveck (note all of his exceptionally brilliant
postings on the motorcycle groups), BJ and some of the others. The
jury is still out for JT.

Date: 27 Apr 2007 22:24:39
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

In article <1177341652.086706.125330@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com >,
cyclintom@gmail.com wrote:

> It seems to work for Kveck (note all of his exceptionally brilliant
> postings on the motorcycle groups),

Apparently I missed this earlier. Tom, get some professional
psychiatric help, and do it soon. This creepy internet stalker dude
thing you seem to have for me is just weird. Maybe at least try to get
into an anger management class. Creep.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Date: 23 Apr 2007 08:17:01
From:
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Date: 25 Apr 2007 17:33:41
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

In article <1177341421.804062.171990@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com >,
cyclintom@gmail.com wrote:

> On Apr 23, 12:01 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > > > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > > > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
> >
> > It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a drunk
> > retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.
>
> Sure he did. Just read Kveck who personally knows Rove and Crow. Why
> he's the expert on these people and not only that but his opinions on
> these people are better than biographical presentations.

What the fuck are you rattling on about, you pinhead? You regularly
make great and grand statements on people you don't know and never will.
That's the point of *discussion* groups like this. So don't try to come
off as all offended and innocent of it, Tommykins. Goddamn, you are a
cretin all the time.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Date: 23 Apr 2007 21:36:20
From: Crescentius Vespasianus
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

> >
> > It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a
drunk
> > retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers
Neighborhood.
>
> Sure he did. Just read Kveck who personally knows Rove and Crow. Why
> he's the expert on these people and not only that but his opinions on
> these people are better than biographical presentations.
---------
just because you would sit there, and listen to a drunk tell you how to
wipe your ass, doesn't mean Karl Rove should of.

Date: 28 Apr 2007 21:15:37
From: Fred Fredburger
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

cyclintom@gmail.com wrote:

> On Apr 23, 12:01 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>> > > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
>> > > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
>> > > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public
>> > > setting.
>>
>> It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a drunk
>> retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers
>> Neighborhood.
>
> Sure he did. Just read Kveck who personally knows Rove and Crow. Why
> he's the expert on these people and not only that but his opinions on
> these people are better than biographical presentations.

Then ... since you don't personally know Kveck or Rove or Crow, why are you
entitled to have an opinion on Kveck's opinion on Crow's opinion of Rove's
conduct?

I'm not stating an opinion, just asking for an explanation of the rules for
when, if ever, someone other than yourself is entitled to have one.

Date: 23 Apr 2007 08:14:03
From:
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 22, 7:52 pm, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net > wrote:
> On Apr 22, 7:30 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in
> > >news:dVRWh.4188$j63.2571@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
> > ><snip>
> > >> Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> > >> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
>
> > >Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?
>
> > Bwahahaha.
>
> > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
>
> That's because they've created laws, and privileges that isolate them
> from the ordinary people and allow them to assume a pretty much
> untouchable aristocracy that is NOT responsible to us anymore.
> Greg is right a shitload of the time, just a little ideological.
> The bastards need to be brought to account all across the board, but
> noone wants to do that, they are all angling for favors and political
> advantage.

Is tha so? Have you even bothered to try to talk to them? Or is this
more of your assumptions based on your beliefs concerning things you
know little to nothing about?

Date: 23 Apr 2007 07:16:57
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 23, 12:01 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com >
wrote:
> > > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
>
> -------------
> It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a drunk
> retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.

She's a REAL deep thinker, and you've got to have serious questions
about her hygene.:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/21/AR2007042101385_pf.html

Crow (4/19, Springfield, Tenn.): I have spent the better part of this
tour trying to come up with easy ways for us all to become a part of
the solution to global warming. Although my ideas are in the earliest
stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. One
of my favorites is in the area of forest conservation which we heavily
rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many squares
of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don't want to
rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I
think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work
with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those
pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required.

Crow (4/19): I also like the idea of not using paper napkins, which
happen to be made from virgin wood and represent the height of
wastefulness. I have designed a clothing line that has what's called a
"dining sleeve." The sleeve is detachable and can be replaced with
another "dining sleeve," after usage. The design will offer the
"diner" the convenience of wiping his mouth on his sleeve rather than
throwing out yet another barely used paper product. I think this idea
could also translate quite well to those suffering with an annoying
head cold.

This sounds more like Beevis and Butthead than a supposedly reasonable
person.
Boogers and clam sauce on the arm to go with a shit covered ass. Nice
solution.
Maybe lance left because, on top of the excrement odor, she was using
leaves once a month instead of a modern product.
Not an attractive personality to me, but hey maybe it works for
someone.
Bill C

Date: 24 Apr 2007 21:57:17
From: 3-Jane Tessier Ashpool
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Bill C <tritonrider@verizon.net > writes:

> This sounds more like Beevis and Butthead than a supposedly reasonable
> person.
> Boogers and clam sauce on the arm to go with a shit covered ass. Nice
> solution.
> Maybe lance left because, on top of the excrement odor, she was using
> leaves once a month instead of a modern product.
> Not an attractive personality to me, but hey maybe it works for
> someone.
> Bill C

You can take the girl of out the trailer park...

Date: 23 Apr 2007 16:29:25
From: Sandy
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Dans le message de
news:1177337817.656966.151490@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
Bill C <tritonrider@verizon.net > a r�fl�chi, et puis a d�clar� :
> On Apr 23, 12:01 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>> And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
>>>> don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
>>>> not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public
>>>> setting.
>>
>> -------------
>> It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a
>> drunk retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers
>> Neighborhood.
>
> She's a REAL deep thinker, and you've got to have serious questions
> about her hygene.:
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/21/AR2007042101385_pf.html
>
> Crow (4/19, Springfield, Tenn.): I have spent the better part of this
> tour trying to come up with easy ways for us all to become a part of
> the solution to global warming. Although my ideas are in the earliest
> stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. One
> of my favorites is in the area of forest conservation which we heavily
> rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many squares
> of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don't want to
> rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I
> think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work
> with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those
> pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required.
>
> Crow (4/19): I also like the idea of not using paper napkins, which
> happen to be made from virgin wood and represent the height of
> wastefulness. I have designed a clothing line that has what's called a
> "dining sleeve." The sleeve is detachable and can be replaced with
> another "dining sleeve," after usage. The design will offer the
> "diner" the convenience of wiping his mouth on his sleeve rather than
> throwing out yet another barely used paper product. I think this idea
> could also translate quite well to those suffering with an annoying
> head cold.
>
> This sounds more like Beevis and Butthead than a supposedly reasonable
> person.
> Boogers and clam sauce on the arm to go with a shit covered ass. Nice
> solution.
> Maybe lance left because, on top of the excrement odor, she was using
> leaves once a month instead of a modern product.
> Not an attractive personality to me, but hey maybe it works for
> someone.
> Bill C

Maybe next time, she'll meet the deadline of 31/3.
Very, very wishful thinking. Wait until you suffer politicians such as we
have.

--
Sandy
-
Darwinism, born in ideological struggle, has never escaped from an intimate
reciprocal relationship with worldviews exported from and imported into the
science. No one challenges the claim that evolutionary theory has had a wide
effect on social theory. It is a clich� of cultural history that the
explanation of evolution by natural selection served as an ideological
justification for laissez-faire capitalism and the colonial domination of
the lesser breeds without the law

- Richard Lewontin

Date: 22 Apr 2007 21:20:35
From:
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

Callistus Valerius wrote:

> I must of missed it.

must HAVE, not must of.

Date: 22 Apr 2007 18:24:09
From: bjw@mambo.ucolick.org
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 22, 4:30 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com >
wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> >> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
>
> >Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?
>
> Bwahahaha.
>
> And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.

Ms. Crow, like any liberal^H^H^H^H^H^H^H detainee^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
citizen, has the right to petition the government through a Combatant
Status Review Tribunal. Rove rightly dismissed her attempt to
jump the line - you know how those Hollywood types are.

Actually, probably Laurie David and Karl Rove kind of
deserve to be locked up with each other in a small room.
Or they could handcuff them together and remake "Midnight Run"
and "The 39 Steps."

Ben

Date: 22 Apr 2007 18:55:47
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

In article <1177291449.798120.184330@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com >,
"bjw@mambo.ucolick.org" <bjw@mambo.ucolick.org > wrote:

> On Apr 22, 4:30 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> wrote:
> > On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> > >> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
> >
> > >Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?
> >
> > Bwahahaha.
> >
> > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.

> Actually, probably Laurie David and Karl Rove kind of
> deserve to be locked up with each other in a small room.
> Or they could handcuff them together and remake "Midnight Run"
> and "The 39 Steps."

Or if they choose to use Krazy Glue, it'd be a remake of "D.O.A.", with Rove in
the Dennis Quaid role and David in the Meg Ryan role.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Date: 23 Apr 2007 14:58:59
From: Curtis L. Russell
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:55:47 -0700, Howard Kveck
<YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com > wrote:

> Or if they choose to use Krazy Glue, it'd be a remake of "D.O.A.", with Rove in
>the Dennis Quaid role and David in the Meg Ryan role.
>
>--

Oh, puhleeze, Edmond O'Brien, Pamela Britton, unless you are
suggesting they are at best second rate remakes.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

Date: 25 Apr 2007 17:34:15
From: Howard Kveck
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

In article <0e0q235rh8sf51fknpg25f3ah02v4h068b@4ax.com >,
Curtis L. Russell <curtis@md-bicycling.org > wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:55:47 -0700, Howard Kveck
> <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > Or if they choose to use Krazy Glue, it'd be a remake of "D.O.A.", with
> > Rove in
> >the Dennis Quaid role and David in the Meg Ryan role.
> >
> >--
>
> Oh, puhleeze, Edmond O'Brien, Pamela Britton, unless you are
> suggesting they are at best second rate remakes.

Oh, the origianl D.O.A. was vastly better than the cheesy remake. But
the cheesy remake did make use of Krazy Glue - that was the only reason
to mention it.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Date: 22 Apr 2007 16:52:27
From: Bill C
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On Apr 22, 7:30 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com >
wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in
> >news:dVRWh.4188$j63.2571@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
> ><snip>
> >> Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> >> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
>
> >Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?
>
> Bwahahaha.
>
> And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
>
> --
> JT
> ****************************
> Remove "remove" to reply
> Visithttp://www.jt10000.com
> ****************************

That's because they've created laws, and privileges that isolate them
from the ordinary people and allow them to assume a pretty much
untouchable aristocracy that is NOT responsible to us anymore.
Greg is right a shitload of the time, just a little ideological.
The bastards need to be brought to account all across the board, but
noone wants to do that, they are all angling for favors and political
advantage.
Bill C

Date: 23 Apr 2007 04:01:21
From: Callistus Valerius
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

> > And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
> > don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
> > not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.
-------------
It was some stupid DC shingdig, Rove didn't have to listen to a drunk
retard like Crow slur gibberish to him. This isn't Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.

Date: 22 Apr 2007 23:07:53
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

"Callistus Valerius" <jazzyboss@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:tYQWh.24334$PL.21395@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Global warming was the talking point last night at the White House
> Correspondents' Association dinner when singer Sheryl Crow and
> "Inconvenient
> Truth" producer Laurie David walked over to Table 92 at the Hilton
> Washington to chat with Karl Rove -- and the resulting exchange was
> suitably
> heated.
>
> Rove's version: "She came over to insult me and she succeeded."
>
> Things got so hot that Crow stepped in to defuse the situation and then
> got
> into it with Rove herself. "You work for me," she told the presidential
> adviser, according to singed bystanders. "No," was his response. "I work
> for
> the American people."
> ----------
> Crow thinks the President works for her?? Anyone know what's so appealing
> about her, I must of missed it. There's some new rap song, and one of the
> lyrics says "you can't make a housewife out of a ho." Lance should pay
> attention.

Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
sitting and getting into a public argument with him?

Today these people don't even have the slightest trace of common sense.

Date: 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05
From: William Asher
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com > wrote in
news:dVRWh.4188$j63.2571@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

<snip >
> Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?

Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?

--
Bill Asher

Date: 22 Apr 2007 19:30:21
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

On 22 Apr 2007 23:12:05 GMT, William Asher <gcnp58@yahoo.com > wrote:

>"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in
>news:dVRWh.4188$j63.2571@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
><snip>
>> Imagine Robert Redford walking up to a table where John Ehrlichman was
>> sitting and getting into a public argument with him?
>
>Would that be before or after Ehrlichman went to prison?

Bwahahaha.

And more seriously, Robert Redford and Cheryl Crow are citizens. I
don't see how someone paid by the US government for policy work can
not expect to hear it from citizens when they are in a public setting.

--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

Date: 23 Apr 2007 01:03:25
From: Andreas
Subject: Re: ass-face Sheryl Crow

"Callistus Valerius" <jazzyboss@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:tYQWh.24334$PL.21395@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...

> ----------
> Crow thinks the President works for her?? Anyone know what's so appealing
> about her, I must of missed it. There's some new rap song, and one of the
> lyrics says "you can't make a housewife out of a ho." Lance should pay
> attention.

"In his attempt to dismiss us, Mr. Rove turned to head toward his table, but
as soon as he did so, Sheryl reached out to touch his arm. Karl swung around
and spat, "Don't touch me." How hardened and removed from reality must a
person be to refuse to be touched by Sheryl Crow? Unphased, Sheryl abruptly
responded, "You can't speak to us like that, you work for us." Karl then
quipped, "I don't work for you, I work for the American people." To which
Sheryl promptly reminded him, "We are the American people."

At that point Mr. Rove apparently decided he had had enough. Like a
groundhog fearful of his own shadow, he scurried to his table in an attempt
to hibernate for another year from his responsibility to address global
warming. Drama aside, you would expect as an American citizen to be able to
engage in a civil discussion with a public official. Instead, Mr. Rove was
dismissive, condescending, and quite frankly a bully."

Bully? Nahh, he's so sweet, tender, lovely!

http://darkblack999.blogspot.com/2007/04/dont-touch-me-there.html

LOL

She's so serious about raising consciousness about climate crisis that she
was willing to touch karl rove - how yuckie must that have been?

Andreas