| |
Main
Date: 16 Apr 2007 19:11:39
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: nice pes
|
not that I'm looking at them or anything
http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/PhotosTest/07roubaix-009000
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
|
|
| |
Date: 17 Apr 2007 12:12:29
From: joseph.santaniello@gmail.com
Subject: Re: nice pes
|
On Apr 17, 8:51=C2=A0am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
<joseph.santanie...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Apr 17, 1:11 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
> wrote:
>
> > not that I'm looking at them or anything
>
> >http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/PhotosTest/07roubaix-009000
> > --
> > JT
> > ****************************
> > Remove "remove" to reply
> > Visithttp://www.jt10000.com
> > ****************************
>
> ??
pes
|
| | |
Date: 18 Apr 2007 05:07:51
From: ST
Subject: Re: nice pes
|
On 4/17/07 12:12 PM, in article
1176837149.292967.27230@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com,
"joseph.santaniello@gmail.com" <joseph.santaniello@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Apr 17, 8:51 am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
> <joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 17, 1:11 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> not that I'm looking at them or anything
>>
>>> http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/PhotosTest/07roubaix-009000
>>> --
>>> JT
>>> ****************************
>>> Remove "remove" to reply
>>> Visithttp://www.jt10000.com
>>> ****************************
>>
>> ??
>
> pes
|
| |
Date: 16 Apr 2007 23:51:21
From: joseph.santaniello@gmail.com
Subject: Re: nice pes
|
On Apr 17, 1:11 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com >
wrote:
> not that I'm looking at them or anything
>
> http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/PhotosTest/07roubaix-009000
> --
> JT
> ****************************
> Remove "remove" to reply
> Visithttp://www.jt10000.com
> ****************************
??
|
| |
Date: 16 Apr 2007 22:22:12
From: Carl Sundquist
Subject: P-R attrition
|
Surprisingly, I can't find any mention of cramping in any of the cyclingnews
reports. I would have expected it to be a major factor. Was it mentioned
anywhere else?
|
| | |
Date: 17 Apr 2007 23:43:34
From: Alexander Lackner
Subject: Re: P-R attrition
|
Carl Sundquist schrieb:
> Surprisingly, I can't find any mention of cramping in any of the
> cyclingnews reports. I would have expected it to be a major factor. Was
> it mentioned anywhere else?
Judging from how Boonen's shorts looked in the last race hour, he must
have had sphincter cramps. Reminded me of how somebody told of riding in
Ullrichs wheel on a mountain stage when Jan had a bad case of diarrhea,
who was that again?
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Apr 2007 02:40:05
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: P-R attrition
|
"Alexander Lackner" <alexanunspamder.lackunspamner@chello.at > wrote in
message news:29cde$46253f74$5472c31b$17824@news.chello.at...
> Carl Sundquist schrieb:
>> Surprisingly, I can't find any mention of cramping in any of the
>> cyclingnews reports. I would have expected it to be a major factor. Was
>> it mentioned anywhere else?
> Judging from how Boonen's shorts looked in the last race hour, he must
> have had sphincter cramps. Reminded me of how somebody told of riding in
> Ullrichs wheel on a mountain stage when Jan had a bad case of diarrhea,
> who was that again?
We had an expro who signed on one time and was talking about how in 1990
LeMond got diarhea really bad and had to ride for a couple of days in really
bad shape. He said that his team would surround him so that the press
couldn't get any pictures of him riding with the crap running down his legs.
I can't even imagine the courage that takes for everyone involved not to
mention Greg himself.
|
|
