| |
Main
Date: 12 Mar 2007 15:54:54
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: white socks?
|
On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
|
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2007 16:30:59
From: RicodJour
Subject: Re: white socks?
|
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
> http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
White is much safer. As a gym instructor once explained to me, when
queried on why I had to wear white socks, "In case your ankles start
bleeding, we'll know it." I really couldn't argue.
R
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2007 02:25:54
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: white socks?
|
In article <1173742259.381577.112150@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com >,
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com > wrote:
> John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
> > On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
> > http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
>
> White is much safer. As a gym instructor once explained to me, when
> queried on why I had to wear white socks, "In case your ankles start
> bleeding, we'll know it." I really couldn't argue.
>
> R
Uh-oh.
(my teams priy colour is red. I just took delivery of three pairs of
new socks).
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2007 15:32:10
From: joseph.santaniello@gmail.com
Subject: Re: white socks?
|
On 12, 11:01 pm, MagillaGorilla <MagillaGori...@zoo.com > wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote:
> > "John Forrest Tomlinson" <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> wrote in message
> >news:1gfbv2p0ugmtvpco71mo128cokg2j0rhqu@4ax.com...
>
> >>On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
> >>http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
>
> > You'll have to give me a little help here - what are you talking about?
>
> See, this is why people can't take you seriously, Tom. You just "don't
> get" what is obvious to everyone else.
>
> It's almost as if you are a crack baby, but 60 years older.
>
> Having said that, at least the Disco boys got rid of their knee-high
> 1970's socks that Lance wore, which will almost certainly disgrace his
> legacy in the sport.
>
> Magilla
He was overcompensating for starting his cycling career wearing a
speedo and grease pencil.
Joseph
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2007 20:31:21
From: Tom Kunich
Subject: Re: white socks?
|
"John Forrest Tomlinson" <usenetremove@jt10000.com > wrote in message
news:1gfbv2p0ugmtvpco71mo128cokg2j0rhqu@4ax.com...
> On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
> http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
You'll have to give me a little help here - what are you talking about?
|
| | |
Date: 12 Mar 2007 18:01:05
From: MagillaGorilla
Subject: Re: white socks?
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "John Forrest Tomlinson" <usenetremove@jt10000.com> wrote in message
> news:1gfbv2p0ugmtvpco71mo128cokg2j0rhqu@4ax.com...
>
>>On a bike racer in the 2000s? Now I've seen everything:
>>http://www.velonews.com/images/int/11876.17745.f.jpg
>
>
> You'll have to give me a little help here - what are you talking about?
>
>
See, this is why people can't take you seriously, Tom. You just "don't
get" what is obvious to everyone else.
It's almost as if you are a crack baby, but 60 years older.
Having said that, at least the Disco boys got rid of their knee-high
1970's socks that Lance wore, which will almost certainly disgrace his
legacy in the sport.
Magilla
|
|
