bicycle-forum.net
Promoting biking discussion.

Main
Date: 11 Jan 2006 08:31:01
From: =?iso-8859-1?B?TWlz4GpvdXJsZQ==?=
Subject: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.

fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
cyclists they are a dead god.





 
Date: 19 Jan 2006 08:40:32
From: Gary
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not like trolls
What is a Troll?

An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the
Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset
people.

Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for
their bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are
hurting real people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human
but are a kind of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow
whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering
they cause, the greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the
moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.

Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise).
You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or
compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel
remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules
of courtesy or social responsibility.

Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is
something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not
be changed by mere words.

Misājourle wrote:
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>


  
Date: 20 Jan 2006 02:10:50
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not like trolls

"Gary" <specializedallez@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:IxNzf.1427$oG.1390@dukeread09...
> What is a Troll?
> An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the
> Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset
> people.
>
> Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for their
> bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are hurting real
> people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human but are a kind
> of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow whatsoever for
> the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering they cause, the
> greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the moment, the relative
> anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.
>
> Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise).
> You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or
> compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel
> remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules
> of courtesy or social responsibility.
>
> Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is
> something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not be
> changed by mere words.

Newsgroups trimmed.

An excellent piece of writing Gary. I am going to save it and give it to an
idiot by the name of Wayne Leggett, the Poet of ARBR, who thinks I am a
troll. It will clear up the matter once and for all. I will include the
example below so it will be crystal clear to him as he is exceptionally
stupid.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota


> Misājourle wrote:
>> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
>> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
>> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
>> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>>
>> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
>> cyclists they are a dead god.
>>





  
Date: 19 Jan 2006 09:47:02
From: Ken M
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not like trolls
Gary wrote:
> What is a Troll?
>
> An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the
> Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset
> people.
>
> Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for
> their bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are
> hurting real people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human
> but are a kind of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow
> whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering
> they cause, the greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the
> moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.
>
> Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise).
> You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or
> compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel
> remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules
> of courtesy or social responsibility.
>
> Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is
> something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not
> be changed by mere words.

But trolls will always be around lurking somewhere in the background,
hiding in some dark little corner of the net and in some dark little
corner of whatever world they live in, many times they live only in the
imaginary world that could only exist in their minds. Trolls are best
left unfed and ignored.

Ken
--
You never have the wind with you - either it is against you or you're
having a good day. ~Daniel Behrman, The Man Who Loved Bicycles

Homepage: http://kcm-home.tripod.com/





 
Date: 15 Jan 2006 11:57:40
From: white dome trail 94575
Subject: Re 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

HH wrote:
> "Nuckin' Futz" <anon@anon.com> wrote in message
> news:7Piyf.559$eV4.163@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> > Nuckin' Futz wrote:
> >> PS: "Kennedy earned C grades at the private Milton Academy, but was
> >> admitted to Harvard as a "legacy" -- his father and older brothers had
> >> attended there, so the younger and dimmer Kennedy's admission was
> >> virtually assured. While attending, he was expelled twice, once for
> >> cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for
> >> him." (From http://www.nndb.com/people/623/000023554/)
> >
> > Heck, the rest of it is a pretty fun read, too:
> > "While expelled, Kennedy enlisted in the Army, but mistakenly signed up
> > for four years instead of two. His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, then U.S.
> > Ambassador to England, pulled the necessary strings to have his enlistment
> > shortened to two years, and to ensure that he served in Europe, not Korea,
> > where a war was raging. Kennedy was assigned to Paris, never advanced
> > beyond the rank of Private, and returned to Harvard upon being discharged.
> >
> > While attending law school at the University of Virginia, he was cited for
> > reckless driving four times, including once when he was clocked driving 90
> > miles per hour in a residential neighborhood with his headlights off after
> > dark. Yet his Virginia driver's license was never revoked. He passed the
> > bar exam in 1959, and two years later was appointed an Assistant to the
> > District Attorney in Massachusetts' Suffolk County.
> >
> > In 1962, at age 30 (Constitutionally, the minimum age to hold a Senate
> > seat) he ran for the Senate. His timing was perfect -- his brother John
> > had given up the seat to become President, and Kennedy easily won the
> > office. He was re-elected in 1964, 1970, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1994, and 2000.
> >
> > In 1964, he was seriously injured in a plane crash, and hospitalized for
> > several months. His sister Kathleen and nephew "John John" were killed in
> > separate plane crashes.
> >
> > On July 19, 1969, Kennedy attended a party on Chappaquiddick Island in
> > Massachusetts. At about 11:00 PM, he borrowed his chauffeur's keys to his
> > Oldsmobile limousine, and offered to give a ride home to y Jo Kopechne,
> > a campaign worker. Leaving the island via an unlit, narrow, rickety wooden
> > bridge, Kennedy steered the car off the bridge and into Poucha Pond.
> >
> > He swam to shore and walked back to the party -- passing several houses
> > and a fire station -- and two friends returned with him to the scene of
> > the accident. According to their later testimony, they told him what he
> > already knew, that he was required by law to immediately report the
> > accident to the authorities. Instead Kennedy made his way to his hotel,
> > called his lawyer, and went to sleep.
> >
> > Kennedy called the police the next morning. By then the wreck had already
> > been discovered. Before dying, Kopechne had scratched at the upholstered
> > floor above her head in the upside-down car. The Kennedy family began
> > pulling strings, ensuring that any inquiry would be contained. Her corpse
> > was whisked out-of-state to her family, before an autopsy could be
> > conducted.
> >
> > Further details are uncertain, but after the accident Kennedy says he
> > repeatedly dove under the water trying to rescue Kopechne, and he didn't
> > call police because he was in a state of shock. In versions not so kind,
> > it is widely assumed Kennedy was drunk, that he was having an affair with
> > Kopechne, and/or that he held off calling police in hopes that his family
> > could fix the problem overnight.
> >
> > Since the accident, Kennedy's political enemies have referred to him as
> > the distinguished Senator from Chappaquiddick, or worse. He pled guilty to
> > leaving the scene of an accident, and was given a suspended sentence of
> > two months. Kopechne's family received a small payout from the Kennedy's
> > insurance policy, and never sued. There was later an effort to have her
> > body exhumed and autopsied, but her family successfully fought against
> > this in court, and Kennedy's family paid their attorney's bills.
> >
> > In 1973, at the height of Nixon's Watergate scandal, Kennedy thundered
> > from the Senate floor, "Do we operate under a system of equal justice
> > under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for
> > the high and mighty?"
> >
> > In 1980, Kennedy challenged Carter, his own party's sitting President, for
> > the Democratic nomination. Kennedy's bid was hampered by questions of
> > Chappaquiddick and by an interview with CBS Newsman Roger Mudd, who asked
> > the straightforward question, "Why do you want to be President?" Kennedy
> > couldn't come up with a straightforward answer. Carter was nominated for
> > re-election, but the party's divisions contributed to the victory won by
> > Reagan.
> >
> > In a late-1980s media profile, Kennedy was succinctly described as someone
> > who "grew to manhood without learning to be an adult." He is rumored to
> > have had several affairs while ried to his first wife, and had often
> > been seen in public while thoroughly tanked and/or behaving obnoxiously.
> > In 1987 he was caught in flagrante delicto with an unidentified woman on
> > the floor of a restaurant. His public image since the early 1990s and
> > during his second riage has been more conservative and restrained."
> >
> > Some would say "shaky".
> >
> > NF
> >
> >
>
> Just the other night I heard on cable TV that Teddy is considered to be a
> Lion of the Democratic Party.

and in the water - he swims in the nude.



 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 18:04:50
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

Nuckin' Futz wrote:
> youarehollyerthanthou@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Have you thought of being a speech writer for our president? I think
> > the way your mind works and your style is right up his ally.
>
> As opposed to, say, Ted Kennedy? Elmer Fundt meets Foster Brooks. (He
> could mix paints with those shaky hands.)
>
> "yJo unavailable for comment"... NF

Michael Douglas of Midland, Texas unavailable for comment:
<http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp >.

--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley



  
Date: 15 Jan 2006 02:43:08
From: Nuckin' Futz
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Johnny Sunset wrote:
> Nuckin' Futz wrote:
>> youarehollyerthanthou@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Have you thought of being a speech writer for our president? I think
>>> the way your mind works and your style is right up his ally.
>>
>> As opposed to, say, Ted Kennedy? Elmer Fundt meets Foster Brooks.
>> (He could mix paints with those shaky hands.)
>>
>> "yJo unavailable for comment"... NF
>
> Michael Douglas of Midland, Texas unavailable for comment:
> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp>.


So you equate a tragic accident (at age 17) with being blind drunk AND
trying to cover up your crime? http://www.ytedk.com/

His performance in the Alito hearing was ALMOST as shameful. Reading some
obscure article (which turned out to be /satire/ by the way) and trying to
link it to the nominee. Why is it that Democrats can practice "guilt by
(nonexistent) association", call African American conservatives names like
Uncle Tom, House N*gg*r, etc., and get a total pass; while a Republican says
one thing and is pilloried unmercifully (e.g., Trent Lott). And of course
there's always KKK Byrd...

THROW THE HYPOCRITES OUT! (A la doltish D'ohBoy.)

NF

PS: "Kennedy earned C grades at the private Milton Academy, but was
admitted to Harvard as a "legacy" -- his father and older brothers had
attended there, so the younger and dimmer Kennedy's admission was virtually
assured. While attending, he was expelled twice, once for cheating on a
test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for him." (From
http://www.nndb.com/people/623/000023554/)

PSS: Hillary and Harry Belafonte! Think anyone will associate THEM?!?
(And if the Bush US is such a fascist state, why the hell is he even allowed
back in the country?)




   
Date: 15 Jan 2006 02:53:55
From: Nuckin' Futz
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Nuckin' Futz wrote:
> PS: "Kennedy earned C grades at the private Milton Academy, but was
> admitted to Harvard as a "legacy" -- his father and older brothers had
> attended there, so the younger and dimmer Kennedy's admission was
> virtually assured. While attending, he was expelled twice, once for
> cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for
> him." (From http://www.nndb.com/people/623/000023554/)

Heck, the rest of it is a pretty fun read, too:
"While expelled, Kennedy enlisted in the Army, but mistakenly signed up for
four years instead of two. His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, then U.S.
Ambassador to England, pulled the necessary strings to have his enlistment
shortened to two years, and to ensure that he served in Europe, not Korea,
where a war was raging. Kennedy was assigned to Paris, never advanced beyond
the rank of Private, and returned to Harvard upon being discharged.

While attending law school at the University of Virginia, he was cited for
reckless driving four times, including once when he was clocked driving 90
miles per hour in a residential neighborhood with his headlights off after
dark. Yet his Virginia driver's license was never revoked. He passed the bar
exam in 1959, and two years later was appointed an Assistant to the District
Attorney in Massachusetts' Suffolk County.

In 1962, at age 30 (Constitutionally, the minimum age to hold a Senate seat)
he ran for the Senate. His timing was perfect -- his brother John had given
up the seat to become President, and Kennedy easily won the office. He was
re-elected in 1964, 1970, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1994, and 2000.

In 1964, he was seriously injured in a plane crash, and hospitalized for
several months. His sister Kathleen and nephew "John John" were killed in
separate plane crashes.

On July 19, 1969, Kennedy attended a party on Chappaquiddick Island in
Massachusetts. At about 11:00 PM, he borrowed his chauffeur's keys to his
Oldsmobile limousine, and offered to give a ride home to y Jo Kopechne, a
campaign worker. Leaving the island via an unlit, narrow, rickety wooden
bridge, Kennedy steered the car off the bridge and into Poucha Pond.

He swam to shore and walked back to the party -- passing several houses and
a fire station -- and two friends returned with him to the scene of the
accident. According to their later testimony, they told him what he already
knew, that he was required by law to immediately report the accident to the
authorities. Instead Kennedy made his way to his hotel, called his lawyer,
and went to sleep.

Kennedy called the police the next morning. By then the wreck had already
been discovered. Before dying, Kopechne had scratched at the upholstered
floor above her head in the upside-down car. The Kennedy family began
pulling strings, ensuring that any inquiry would be contained. Her corpse
was whisked out-of-state to her family, before an autopsy could be
conducted.

Further details are uncertain, but after the accident Kennedy says he
repeatedly dove under the water trying to rescue Kopechne, and he didn't
call police because he was in a state of shock. In versions not so kind, it
is widely assumed Kennedy was drunk, that he was having an affair with
Kopechne, and/or that he held off calling police in hopes that his family
could fix the problem overnight.

Since the accident, Kennedy's political enemies have referred to him as the
distinguished Senator from Chappaquiddick, or worse. He pled guilty to
leaving the scene of an accident, and was given a suspended sentence of two
months. Kopechne's family received a small payout from the Kennedy's
insurance policy, and never sued. There was later an effort to have her body
exhumed and autopsied, but her family successfully fought against this in
court, and Kennedy's family paid their attorney's bills.

In 1973, at the height of Nixon's Watergate scandal, Kennedy thundered from
the Senate floor, "Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law?
Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and
mighty?"

In 1980, Kennedy challenged Carter, his own party's sitting President, for
the Democratic nomination. Kennedy's bid was hampered by questions of
Chappaquiddick and by an interview with CBS Newsman Roger Mudd, who asked
the straightforward question, "Why do you want to be President?" Kennedy
couldn't come up with a straightforward answer. Carter was nominated for
re-election, but the party's divisions contributed to the victory won by
Reagan.

In a late-1980s media profile, Kennedy was succinctly described as someone
who "grew to manhood without learning to be an adult." He is rumored to have
had several affairs while ried to his first wife, and had often been seen
in public while thoroughly tanked and/or behaving obnoxiously. In 1987 he
was caught in flagrante delicto with an unidentified woman on the floor of a
restaurant. His public image since the early 1990s and during his second
riage has been more conservative and restrained."

Some would say "shaky".

NF




    
Date: 15 Jan 2006 10:44:57
From: HH
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

"Nuckin' Futz" <anon@anon.com > wrote in message
news:7Piyf.559$eV4.163@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Nuckin' Futz wrote:
>> PS: "Kennedy earned C grades at the private Milton Academy, but was
>> admitted to Harvard as a "legacy" -- his father and older brothers had
>> attended there, so the younger and dimmer Kennedy's admission was
>> virtually assured. While attending, he was expelled twice, once for
>> cheating on a test, and once for paying a classmate to cheat for
>> him." (From http://www.nndb.com/people/623/000023554/)
>
> Heck, the rest of it is a pretty fun read, too:
> "While expelled, Kennedy enlisted in the Army, but mistakenly signed up
> for four years instead of two. His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, then U.S.
> Ambassador to England, pulled the necessary strings to have his enlistment
> shortened to two years, and to ensure that he served in Europe, not Korea,
> where a war was raging. Kennedy was assigned to Paris, never advanced
> beyond the rank of Private, and returned to Harvard upon being discharged.
>
> While attending law school at the University of Virginia, he was cited for
> reckless driving four times, including once when he was clocked driving 90
> miles per hour in a residential neighborhood with his headlights off after
> dark. Yet his Virginia driver's license was never revoked. He passed the
> bar exam in 1959, and two years later was appointed an Assistant to the
> District Attorney in Massachusetts' Suffolk County.
>
> In 1962, at age 30 (Constitutionally, the minimum age to hold a Senate
> seat) he ran for the Senate. His timing was perfect -- his brother John
> had given up the seat to become President, and Kennedy easily won the
> office. He was re-elected in 1964, 1970, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1994, and 2000.
>
> In 1964, he was seriously injured in a plane crash, and hospitalized for
> several months. His sister Kathleen and nephew "John John" were killed in
> separate plane crashes.
>
> On July 19, 1969, Kennedy attended a party on Chappaquiddick Island in
> Massachusetts. At about 11:00 PM, he borrowed his chauffeur's keys to his
> Oldsmobile limousine, and offered to give a ride home to y Jo Kopechne,
> a campaign worker. Leaving the island via an unlit, narrow, rickety wooden
> bridge, Kennedy steered the car off the bridge and into Poucha Pond.
>
> He swam to shore and walked back to the party -- passing several houses
> and a fire station -- and two friends returned with him to the scene of
> the accident. According to their later testimony, they told him what he
> already knew, that he was required by law to immediately report the
> accident to the authorities. Instead Kennedy made his way to his hotel,
> called his lawyer, and went to sleep.
>
> Kennedy called the police the next morning. By then the wreck had already
> been discovered. Before dying, Kopechne had scratched at the upholstered
> floor above her head in the upside-down car. The Kennedy family began
> pulling strings, ensuring that any inquiry would be contained. Her corpse
> was whisked out-of-state to her family, before an autopsy could be
> conducted.
>
> Further details are uncertain, but after the accident Kennedy says he
> repeatedly dove under the water trying to rescue Kopechne, and he didn't
> call police because he was in a state of shock. In versions not so kind,
> it is widely assumed Kennedy was drunk, that he was having an affair with
> Kopechne, and/or that he held off calling police in hopes that his family
> could fix the problem overnight.
>
> Since the accident, Kennedy's political enemies have referred to him as
> the distinguished Senator from Chappaquiddick, or worse. He pled guilty to
> leaving the scene of an accident, and was given a suspended sentence of
> two months. Kopechne's family received a small payout from the Kennedy's
> insurance policy, and never sued. There was later an effort to have her
> body exhumed and autopsied, but her family successfully fought against
> this in court, and Kennedy's family paid their attorney's bills.
>
> In 1973, at the height of Nixon's Watergate scandal, Kennedy thundered
> from the Senate floor, "Do we operate under a system of equal justice
> under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for
> the high and mighty?"
>
> In 1980, Kennedy challenged Carter, his own party's sitting President, for
> the Democratic nomination. Kennedy's bid was hampered by questions of
> Chappaquiddick and by an interview with CBS Newsman Roger Mudd, who asked
> the straightforward question, "Why do you want to be President?" Kennedy
> couldn't come up with a straightforward answer. Carter was nominated for
> re-election, but the party's divisions contributed to the victory won by
> Reagan.
>
> In a late-1980s media profile, Kennedy was succinctly described as someone
> who "grew to manhood without learning to be an adult." He is rumored to
> have had several affairs while ried to his first wife, and had often
> been seen in public while thoroughly tanked and/or behaving obnoxiously.
> In 1987 he was caught in flagrante delicto with an unidentified woman on
> the floor of a restaurant. His public image since the early 1990s and
> during his second riage has been more conservative and restrained."
>
> Some would say "shaky".
>
> NF
>
>

Just the other night I heard on cable TV that Teddy is considered to be a
Lion of the Democratic Party. Somehow Teddy the Lion doesn't sound quite
right. But if he really was a lion we could just take him to a vet and have
him put to sleep. That way we would not have to listen to one of his
morality lectures ever again. Wouldn't that be nice.




 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 16:55:51
From:
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

Mis=E0jourle wrote:
> Hayvern wrote:
> > Hey, come on man, I don't go to your job and kick the shovel out of
> > your hands, or jump on your wife in bed.
>
> vforvivictory

Have you thought of being a speech writer for our president? I think
the way your mind works and your style is right up his ally.
Miller



  
Date: 15 Jan 2006 01:27:04
From: Nuckin' Futz
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
youarehollyerthanthou@yahoo.com wrote:

> Have you thought of being a speech writer for our president? I think
> the way your mind works and your style is right up his ally.

As opposed to, say, Ted Kennedy? Elmer Fundt meets Foster Brooks. (He
could mix paints with those shaky hands.)

"yJo unavailable for comment"... NF




 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 12:40:46
From: =?iso-8859-1?B?TWlz4GpvdXJsZQ==?=
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

Hayvern wrote:
> Hey, come on man, I don't go to your job and kick the shovel out of
> your hands, or jump on your wife in bed.

vforvivictory



 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 07:56:10
From: Hayvern
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Hey, come on man, I don't go to your job and kick the shovel out of
your hands, or to your wife's work and jump on the bed!



 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 01:15:49
From: LioNiNoiL_a t_Y a h 0 0_d 0 t_c 0 m
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Misàjourle wrote:

> fucken cyclists thing [sic] they are god
> but when i hit a fucken cyclists [sic]...

... then you're a fucken god-murderer.

Yip-fucken-ee.

--
"Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)


 
Date: 14 Jan 2006 01:05:25
From: LioNiNoiL_a t_Y a h 0 0_d 0 t_c 0 m
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Some Florida moron wrote:

> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane

Yeah, moron.

--
"Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)


 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 13:23:38
From: Alex Rodriguez
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Ignore the troll, he will then crawl back under his rock.
---------------
Alex



 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 08:21:00
From: =?iso-8859-1?B?TWlz4GpvdXJsZQ==?=
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

B=2EA. wrote:
> Mis=E0jourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com> wrote in message
> news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> > kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> > lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> > charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
> >
> > fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> > cyclists they are a dead god.
> >
>
> Keep on drinking/getting drunk/getting dui(s) like you do and you'll be a
> cyclist too! :D Only for you it won't be by choice but out of necessity.
> ;)
>
> Your grasp of law is about as good as your grasp of gram, human life or
> even courtesy. At least here in Florida the total opposite of what yous
> said is true. To wit:
>
> 316.2065 Bicycle regulations.--

316.2065 Bicycle regulations is get the fuck out
of the way because the vehicle is a Bowling ball
and cyclists are the Bowling Pins.



  
Date: 14 Jan 2006 01:08:04
From: LioNiNoiL_a t_Y a h 0 0_d 0 t_c 0 m
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Some Florida moron wrote:

> 316.2065 Bicycle regulations is get the fuck out
> of the way because the vehicle is a Bowling ball

... and some Florida moron is the driver.

--
"Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)


 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 08:01:53
From: Servojohn
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
>Keep on drinking/getting drunk/getting dui(s) like you do and you'll be a
>cyclist too! :D Only for you it won't be by choice but out of necessity.

The sad thing is that losing an operators license doesn't stop the
chronic DUI offender, or many other chronic driving problem people
either, they'll just drive without a license.

The other sad thing is that it doesn't matter where the bicylist gets
hit, typically the punishment is commensurate.

JHH



 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 06:18:33
From: Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

Allison Manning wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2006 08:31:01 -0800, "Mis=E0jourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com>
> wrote:
>
> >99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> >kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> >lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> >charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
> >
> >fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> >cyclists they are a dead god.
> Did you realize that 99.999% of the roads in our great country do not
> have bike lanes for us cyclists to travel in? So we're actually
> doing better than your 'statistic'.
> Contact your Congressman and do something about it!

Don't feed the animals Allison....



 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 12:04:25
From: JJ
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

"Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com > wrote in message
news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 +10dB


 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 21:29:48
From: xzzy
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
are you Damian Caranco of Denver, Colorado?

John Bickmore
www.MyReader.net

"Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com > wrote in message
news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>




  
Date: 11 Jan 2006 23:05:28
From: Ironman89
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
xzzy wrote:
> are you Damian Caranco of Denver, Colorado?
>
> John Bickmore
> www.MyReader.net
>
> "Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com> wrote in message
> news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>>99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
>>kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
>>lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
>>charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>>
>>fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
>>cyclists they are a dead god.
>>
>
>
>
Denver CO, I doubt it.
ahhh, here is what the net says about his provider...


Gawab.com is a leading e-mail service provider worldwide, and the first in the
Middle East to provide websites with fully outsourcing e-mail solutions.

Gawab in Arabic means a "letter", and this is what we have been providing to our
users; letters through cyberspace or better known as email..


   
Date: 12 Jan 2006 23:19:26
From: Tony Rall
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Ironman89 wrote:
> Denver CO, I doubt it.
> ahhh, here is what the net says about his provider...
>
> Gawab.com

No, that's not his provider. That's his claimed email address, but
that can easily be forged. He is posting from a machine connected to
Uunet - part of MCI. The machine is located in Florida. It appears
to be using a dial-up connection.

Here are 2 of the addresses he's used:
1Cust6657.an1.tpa9.da.uu.net [63.21.26.1] (Tampa)
1Cust6884.an2.mia18.da.uu.net [63.21.218.228] (Miami)

--
Tony Rall


    
Date: 14 Jan 2006 08:28:16
From: tptguydb
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Maybe it's time to turn him in to the local authorities.

The threat or perceived threat of violence is assault, and with a motor
vehicle it is known as assault with a deadly weapon. I think jail time might
be a goo thing for this looser.


"Tony Rall" <trall@almaden.ibm.com > wrote in message
news:43C7547E.313FD99@almaden.ibm.com...
> Ironman89 wrote:
> > Denver CO, I doubt it.
> > ahhh, here is what the net says about his provider...
> >
> > Gawab.com
>
> No, that's not his provider. That's his claimed email address, but
> that can easily be forged. He is posting from a machine connected to
> Uunet - part of MCI. The machine is located in Florida. It appears
> to be using a dial-up connection.
>
> Here are 2 of the addresses he's used:
> 1Cust6657.an1.tpa9.da.uu.net [63.21.26.1] (Tampa)
> 1Cust6884.an2.mia18.da.uu.net [63.21.218.228] (Miami)
>
> --
> Tony Rall




 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 03:10:33
From: B.A.
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com > wrote in message
news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>

Keep on drinking/getting drunk/getting dui(s) like you do and you'll be a
cyclist too! :D Only for you it won't be by choice but out of necessity.
;)

Your grasp of law is about as good as your grasp of gram, human life or
even courtesy. At least here in Florida the total opposite of what yous
said is true. To wit:

316.2065 Bicycle regulations.--

(1) Every person propelling a vehicle by human power has ALL of the rights
and all of the duties applicable to the driver of ANY OTHER VEHICLE under
this chapter...

No where in florida law is a bicycle lane even mentioned. But I doubt you
were able to either read or comprehend this far. ;)




 
Date: 12 Jan 2006 03:02:14
From: B.A.
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
"Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com > wrote in message
news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>




 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 18:06:14
From: =?iso-8859-1?B?TWlz4GpvdXJsZQ==?=
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so

Allison Manning wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2006 08:31:01 -0800, "Mis=E0jourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com>
> wrote:
>
> >99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> >kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> >lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> >charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
> >
> >fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> >cyclists they are a dead god.
> Did you realize that 99.999% of the roads in our great country do not
> have bike lanes for us cyclists to travel in? So we're actually
> doing better than your 'statistic'.
> Contact your Congressman and do something about it!

takes to long this way is faster

fucken cyclists think they are god but when i hit a fucken
cyclists they are a dead god.



  
Date: 14 Jan 2006 01:17:22
From: LioNiNoiL_a t_Y a h 0 0_d 0 t_c 0 m
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Misàjourle wrote:

> takes to [sic[ long this way is faster

... a faster way to prison : yip-fucken-ee.

--
"Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)


  
Date: 14 Jan 2006 01:06:54
From: LioNiNoiL_a t_Y a h 0 0_d 0 t_c 0 m
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Some Florida moron wrote:

> fucken cyclists think they are god

Compared to some Florida morons, they *are* god.

--
"Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)


  
Date: 12 Jan 2006 03:10:56
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Misājourle wrote:

> fucken cyclists think they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.

"Ye old warrior" is what...maybe 12? ROTFL




 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 20:30:19
From: Allison Manning
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
On 11 Jan 2006 08:31:01 -0800, "Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com >
wrote:

>99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
>kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
>lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
>charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
>fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
>cyclists they are a dead god.
Did you realize that 99.999% of the roads in our great country do not
have bike lanes for us cyclists to travel in? So we're actually
doing better than your 'statistic'.
Contact your Congressman and do something about it!


 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 18:25:01
From: John Forrest Tomlinson
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
What he said.

Sweet.

Later

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************


 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 14:44:10
From: treynolds@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Mis=E0jourle wrote:
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.

Sounds like his trip to the liquor store was delayed three seconds by a
cyclist so he came home and posted that message.



 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 22:35:26
From: GWood
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Kinda fucken hard to fucken argue with a fucken train of fucken logic like
that.

But I'm bored already.




  
Date: 11 Jan 2006 21:26:40
From: The Wogster
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
GWood wrote:
> Kinda fucken hard to fucken argue with a fucken train of fucken logic like
> that.
>
> But I'm bored already.
>
>
You could have got at least one more in there, maybe two, wanna try
again. Besides that, it's kinda hard to take someone seriously when 22%
of the words are expletives. Mind you if your going to use an
expletive, at least learn how to spell the word properly.

W


 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 17:34:12
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Misājourle wrote:
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.

There are some miraculous new drugs out there today. Look in to one.

Bill "or twelve" S.




 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 11:02:21
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
Wow, what a schmuckeroo you are!
"Misājourle" <yeoldwarrior@gawab.com > wrote in message
news:1136997061.062513.43600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so if a Vehicle hits and
> kills a cyclists because the dumb fucken cyclists is not in the bike
> lane -the law says NO FUCKEN BIG DEAL and the cyclists will be
> charged with Illegal/unsafe lane change dead or not.
>
> fucken cyclists thing they are god but when i hit a fucken
> cyclists they are a dead god.
>
>



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


 
Date: 11 Jan 2006 08:35:47
From: gds
Subject: Re: 99% of cyclists do not ride in the bike lane so
thanks for clearing that up