| |
Main
Date: 11 Dec 2005 13:10:23
From: LoGo USA
Subject: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Hey guys -
In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
of course) misspelling my name:
>Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
>Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
The winter nights are very long
In Minnesota; wine is cheap...
There - repetitious, ranting, wrong -
One writes when 'he' should simply sleep.
Is 'he' Ed Dullard, 'nget' or 'k'?
I don't much care, and doubt you do.
This shrill dyslexic dog-ape's bark
Is saying nothing good or true.
Quite unlike Matthew, Leuck or Jon,
Or herald angel singing "Hark",
His posts aren't gospel; they're a con
Conceived in Worthington by dark.
Folks, nothing Dullard's said of me,
No slurs he's coined to catch my eye,
Can change the archived history;
A lie repeated's still a lie.
My poetry is broad in scope;
I'm not hung up on sex or scat.
It's Eddie's mouth that's ripe for soap;
This forum's readers all know that!
At ARBR maybe God is dead;
Prolific putz Saint Senile rules -
A cardboard crown upon his head,
A poor pathetic Prince of Fools.
What would it take to get him hence?
Humiliation doesn't work;
He lacks perception, common sense
And empathy. The man's a jerk!
But still I hope there'll come a time
When Dullard tires of his foul game...
It's to that end I post this rhyme,
'Cuz I'd be proud to take the blame.
Regards,
Wayne
|
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 06:45:50
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> ...
> Wayne Logo (Leggett), the Poet of ARBR, is not at least making any more
> references to shit and cum...
For the first:
<http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/camp_defecation/dt23_09p12-13.html >
and for the second:
<http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/sexual_discharges/lv15_16a.html >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
"went over to the next burrough for a flu shot before mass hysteria set
in: the superduper where the shot fest was held sent out a karate man
who subtley bent muh CR-18 double wall 27" rim." - G. Daniels
|
| |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 12:57:13
From: LoGo USA
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Hey guys-
This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
(but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
(nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
we also get a complaint from the priy ego (aka Edgy -
I picture him as a squat, sour-faced, toadish old
curmudgeon, with wrinkled pouty lips, cold fish eyes
and a dull, quacking voice - sort of like an aging
Edward G. Robinson playing one of his worst bad boys):
>... calling him [Wayne] the Poet of Poop. I wish I had
>thought of that! ... [nged's] rek... was on the
>order of genius...
Now that is unfair! Gnoisy gnuisance nged ngets to pretend
that he has a job, sex with an imaginary wife (at least
presumably occasionally), that he has not one but two
(make-believe) trikes much nicer than Edgy's real (or
imaginary?) ones, and maybe even live in a milder climate.
So why does the self-professed underdog get to 'think up'
that absolutely brilliant bon mot [YAWW-WW-WN] which has
been repeated approximately sixty-seven times to date by
the dyslexic duo? One wonders just how lacking in both
intellect and talent we are supposed to think the Edgy
persona is. He says:
>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>inimitable manner.
Uninspired? Si. Truthful? No. Inimitable? I can't imagine
why anyone would even try. When Clinton was President
didn't we finally agree that the word 'truthful' becomes
pretty much meaningless once you add qualifiers?
Sad... All the poor (but much more prolific) partner gets
to do is play blathering buffoon, using dialog deleted (as
much too stodgy) from his local priest's Sunday sermon,
such as:
>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
Or he barfs up misworded, muddled messes like this:
>I could have said ... [misused ellipsis sic] "Why use
>a word that no one will know its meaning" [awkward
>wording - second attempt - sic], but it does not play
>like how [awkward wording again sic] I wanted it to
>play.
Is it DO-NG's real writer or only the poor Edgy persona
that does not realize he could meet minimal standards
for middle school composition by simply saying "Why use
a word that no one will understand?"
But on it goes:
>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>infinitum...]
Style? Sad. Communication? No. Repetition? Si, si, si.
Proper use of first person pronoun when referring to
oneself? No. Language know-how? Oh, please! Has 'highly
educated' been redefined to mean 'went to class most
days and got a mercy C- in seventh grade English while
striving not to drool all over the swelling bosoms of
one's pubescent female classmates'?
Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>something that is done by the half educated who think
>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>to be.
While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
what a modestly educated person has written, much less
attempt to criticize or emulate it.
But it gets worse:
>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
I think a single mouse click will work for most folks; it
probably isn't necessary to use 'all means'. My link is to
a simple webpage, not a blog. 'Ever' is a bit overreaching
for something that's been in existence less than a week in
the case of my webpage, or only about five years for blogs.
Isn't 'the province' up in Canada? 'Scumbags' is a compound
(not com pound) word; 'scoundrels' and 'knaves' are sadly
pretentious, archaic words. Has this DO-NG guy (who writes
the scripts for Edgy and nged) had an actual face-to-face
conversation with a real person anytime in the last twenty
years or so?
More squeaks from the shadow:
>You [Wayne] at this time are the biggest name caller ever
>to post here.
Wait, I'm confused - is that only 'at this time' or
'ever'? And from whom did nged copy his habit of sloppy
overstatement? 'Ever' is an oddly familiar word, and it
is such a long, long time. Exactly what parameter(s)
would we measure to verify nged's 'biggest' claim?
While I can certainly manage to avoid responding to the
DO-NG twins' thoughtless, pointless, endless repetitions
of 'Poet of Poop' for weeks, it is true that I'm likely
to coin an interesting (and most often true even though
unkind) rek or two about a mindless non-entity (aka
puppet or self-parodying persona) or two from time to
time here at ARBR.
But when it comes to shotgunning baseless insults (aka
lies!), to borrow a phrase, "I am the underdog, in that
there should be no doubt." Since Edgy has historically
(errantly) referred to the hundreds (maybe thousands) of
ARBR readers, using about six vile misnomers per post
(e.g., morons, idiots, cowards) roughly twice a week for
many months now, he'd be pretty tough to top.
>Nothing up my sleeve
Gnot big gnews, ngolem - gno sleeve, gno arm, gnot a
real person...
>"I am a human being" from the film "Elephant man" [sic]
Oh. Is that where he came from? For the record, those
aren't the real persons, deformed or otherwise, we see
on a movie screen; they're only two-dimensional visual
images of actors with lots of makeup and electronically
reproduced voices. They're mere projections scripted to
create the illusion that they are the actual or fictional
characters. The actors are often replaced during filming
by stand-ins, stunt doubles, voice-overs or lately even
by a bit of computer generated technomagic - you know,
sort of like nged...
>Who is polishing your jack-boots [sic] these days?
Interesting... even wearing his nged cap, the poor DO-NG
manipulator's meager muddled mentality still can't come to
terms with (simple) compound words. Anyway, I'm sorry to
harshly disappoint the ngoober, but I'm not in the ket
for a shoeshine boy this week, virtual or otherwise. But
with a little polish (black, on their virtual faces), I
bet nged and Edgy could be a really cute vaudeville act.
Regards,
Wayne
|
| | |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 04:19:34
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134766633.398564.24650@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[...]
>>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
Screw it! I have had it up to here with English words that either have to be
combined or separated by a hyphen. The Germans are the masters of extremely
long words. As far as I am concerned, when in doubt use separate words.
Anyone but a numskull will be able to read it perfectly. I wrote scum bag,
not scumbag and not scum-bag. Have I not already told you several times that
I am too lazy to look up crap like this. It comes from my being a librarian
in a former life.
What irritates me about this poor poet trying to correct me (perish the
thought) is that there are multiple ways of writing words and composing
sentences. My 'scum bag' is quite correct depending on the dictionary. God
help him if I were to do to him what he does to me. He reeks of errors,
besides making the main one of never having anything worthwhile to say.
I have called him a poor poet for good reason as he has not written anything
lately that is any good. He needs to write something to this group that I
can enjoy. It has to be well written, well thought out and not involve shit
and cum. If he is able to do this, I will drop my present criticism of him.
I know poets are sensitive and that is what I like best about them. I
enjoyed his first effort when it was about me being a troll. I sent it to
everyone I know and we had a good laugh. He needs to figure out how to be
critical of me without insulting me. Is he up to the challenge?
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 03:32:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134766633.398564.24650@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[...]
>>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>>inimitable manner.
It would have been better to write:
>>I am never that inspired although I try to be equally
>>as truthful in my own inimitable manner.
One extra "as" and Wayne goes crazy.
I could go through my entire post and make these minor corrections one by
one, but why bother. I am not writing for publication. I am writing for half
educated jackasses like Wayne Leggett. It goes without saying that I could
take a few extra seconds and perfect my writing way beyond anything that the
Poet of Poop could ever achieve.
But more to the point, what is wrong with Wayne's style? It is highly
affected and so rings false. He writes to impress, never realizing that he
is being obvious, thereby negating the desired effect. Only the half
educated like him will be impressed. The fully educated, such as yours
truly, will never be impressed. What impresses my kind is prose simply
written that anyone can understand right off the bat. I don't think he is
capable of that.
Surprisingly, Mr. Tom Sherman is an amazingly good writer. I say
surprisingly because he so wrong headed on so many political issues. Also,
most engineers are terrible writers, almost as bad as most scientists. Wayne
Leggett could learn a lot by following in the footsteps of Mr. Sherman.
Wayne is probably a liberal too like Mr. Sherman since most poets do not
have the brains to be anything else.
[...]
> Sad... All the poor (but much more prolific) partner gets
> to do is play blathering buffoon, using dialog deleted (as
> much too stodgy) from his local priest's Sunday sermon,
> such as:
>
>>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
The priests no longer preach the kind of sermons I like to hear, and so I
preach them myself to the ignorant and stupid like you. Wayne probably
thinks sex is mainly something for him to parody in his execrable verse.
[...]
>>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>>infinitum...]
Way too many ellipses. The reader cannot judge what I have written, only
what you have quoted. Selective quoting is ever the hallk of a scoundrel.
By the way, it is no mortal sin to use the same word more than once. If it
were, you would be in Hell for all eternity.
[...]
> Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
> writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
Wayne is sick all right! Mainly he needs to stop reading for details
(peccadilloes really) and concentrate on substance. I am a man of big ideas
and so that is what I concentrate on. Wayne is strictly into details and
seems to be devoid of substance. I think it comes from his interest in
verse, where details really do count. However, in prose as it applies here
on ARBR ideas are what count.
>>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>>something that is done by the half educated who think
>>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>>to be.
>
> While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
>
> Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
> effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
> Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
> opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
> common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
> to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
> antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
> knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
> what a modestly educated person has written, much less
> attempt to criticize or emulate it.
Nope, I wrote it better. Your version is weak, my version is strong. But
more importantly, my version is me and your freaking version is freaking
you. Better to stick to your verse and leave the prose to me.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
PS. Hey, Indiana Mike, am I being too nasty with this bozo? I need you to
keep me on track with the new, improved version of Ed Dolan. I am trying to
shake those dark rainbows you mentioned but I can feel them closing in on
me.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 22:51:05
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134766633.398564.24650@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hey guys-
>
> This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
> my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
> popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
> stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
> mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
> of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
> further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
> (but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
> DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
> (nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>
>>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
>
> we also get a complaint from the priy ego (aka Edgy -
> I picture him as a squat, sour-faced, toadish old
> curmudgeon, with wrinkled pouty lips, cold fish eyes
> and a dull, quacking voice - sort of like an aging
> Edward G. Robinson playing one of his worst bad boys):
>
>>... calling him [Wayne] the Poet of Poop. I wish I had
>>thought of that! ... [nged's] rek... was on the
>>order of genius...
>
> Now that is unfair! Gnoisy gnuisance nged ngets to pretend
> that he has a job, sex with an imaginary wife (at least
> presumably occasionally), that he has not one but two
> (make-believe) trikes much nicer than Edgy's real (or
> imaginary?) ones, and maybe even live in a milder climate.
> So why does the self-professed underdog get to 'think up'
> that absolutely brilliant bon mot [YAWW-WW-WN] which has
> been repeated approximately sixty-seven times to date by
> the dyslexic duo? One wonders just how lacking in both
> intellect and talent we are supposed to think the Edgy
> persona is. He says:
All of the above thus far is unintelligible. Wayne can't write prose. Maybe
that is why he writes verse. I could teach him how to write prose, but why
should I. I think he is happy in his ignorance, and I must confess, I am not
very happy in my wisdom.
>>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>>inimitable manner.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
[...]
>>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
>
> Or he barfs up misworded, muddled messes like this:
>
>>I could have said ... [misused ellipsis sic] "Why use
>>a word that no one will know its meaning" [awkward
>>wording - second attempt - sic], but it does not play
>>like how [awkward wording again sic] I wanted it to
>>play.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
How the hell do you misuse an ellipsis?
> Is it DO-NG's real writer or only the poor Edgy persona
> that does not realize he could meet minimal standards
> for middle school composition by simply saying "Why use
> a word that no one will understand?"
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
> But on it goes:
>
>>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>>infinitum...]
>
> Style? Sad. Communication? No. Repetition? Si, si, si.
> Proper use of first person pronoun when referring to
> oneself? No. Language know-how? Oh, please! Has 'highly
> educated' been redefined to mean 'went to class most
> days and got a mercy C- in seventh grade English while
> striving not to drool all over the swelling bosoms of
> one's pubescent female classmates'?
Wayne is descrbing himself of course. How else would he know about any of
this?
> Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
> writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
>
>>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>>something that is done by the half educated who think
>>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>>to be.
>
> While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
>
> Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
> effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
> Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
> opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
> common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
> to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
> antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
> knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
> what a modestly educated person has written, much less
> attempt to criticize or emulate it.
Your version is garbage and is as usual unitelligible. There has got to be
something wrong with the way your brain works. Too many drugs maybe?
> But it gets worse:
>
>>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
>
> I think a single mouse click will work for most folks; it
> probably isn't necessary to use 'all means'. My link is to
> a simple webpage, not a blog. 'Ever' is a bit overreaching
> for something that's been in existence less than a week in
> the case of my webpage, or only about five years for blogs.
> Isn't 'the province' up in Canada? 'Scumbags' is a compound
> (not com pound) word; 'scoundrels' and 'knaves' are sadly
> pretentious, archaic words. Has this DO-NG guy (who writes
> the scripts for Edgy and nged) had an actual face-to-face
> conversation with a real person anytime in the last twenty
> years or so?
I would never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you.
All blogs have gotten a very bad reputation here on ARBR because of the
criminal vandal troll, or don't you bother with anything else that is going
on here. Wayne is so stupid as not to realize there are many ways of saying
things, all equally correct. What a dunce! My original criticism of him
stands. He is only half educated and doomed to remain that way forevermore.
> More squeaks from the shadow:
Either write in verse or prose. Your half-way measures are off putting to
say the least. Also, try to strive for some consistency of style in your
writing. This present message of yours is a hodgepodge of styles. It makes
one wonder if you even went to college and if so what kind of college. It is
amazing how your verse can make you come across as sounding more educated
than you are whereas your prose exposes you for what you are. Just barely
made it through high school - right?
>>You [Wayne] at this time are the biggest name caller ever
>>to post here.
>
> Wait, I'm confused - is that only 'at this time' or
> 'ever'? And from whom did nged copy his habit of sloppy
> overstatement? 'Ever' is an oddly familiar word, and it
> is such a long, long time. Exactly what parameter(s)
> would we measure to verify nged's 'biggest' claim?
>
> While I can certainly manage to avoid responding to the
> DO-NG twins' thoughtless, pointless, endless repetitions
> of 'Poet of Poop' for weeks, it is true that I'm likely
> to coin an interesting (and most often true even though
> unkind) rek or two about a mindless non-entity (aka
> puppet or self-parodying persona) or two from time to
> time here at ARBR.
>
> But when it comes to shotgunning baseless insults (aka
> lies!), to borrow a phrase, "I am the underdog, in that
> there should be no doubt." Since Edgy has historically
> (errantly) referred to the hundreds (maybe thousands) of
> ARBR readers, using about six vile misnomers per post
> (e.g., morons, idiots, cowards) roughly twice a week for
> many months now, he'd be pretty tough to top.
Anyone who has ever been called a name by me should be honored. It is truly
deserved and should be an occasion for the miscreant to correct his
abominable behavior.
>>Nothing up my sleeve
>
> Gnot big gnews, ngolem - gno sleeve, gno arm, gnot a
> real person...
[...]
YAWN! Very tiresome. Wayne is writing for himself of course. Can there be
any doubt? He should try not to be so self absorbed.
Wayne Logo (Leggett), the Poet of ARBR, is not at least making any more
references to shit and cum, so I believe some progress is being made. It is
no good have a facility with words if you have no taste and your mind is
constantly in the gutter.
His post is way too long and only I am bothering to read it I am sure. Wayne
needs to work on being more to the point and not wandering about in a daze
so much. If he listens to me, he will improve his communication with this
group. If he doesn't listen to me, he will end up just writing to and for
himself (a form of onanism). I should really be charging him for my
services.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 01:02:43
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:tvCdnb_XSJnfBD7enZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
Here it is again with the corrections. My spell check has apparently gone
berserk.
> "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
> news:1134766633.398564.24650@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Hey guys-
>>
>> This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
>> my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
>> popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
>> stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
>> mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
>> of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
>> further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
>> (but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
>> DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
>> (nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>>
>>>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
>>
>> we also get a complaint from the priy ego (aka Edgy -
>> I picture him as a squat, sour-faced, toadish old
>> curmudgeon, with wrinkled pouty lips, cold fish eyes
>> and a dull, quacking voice - sort of like an aging
>> Edward G. Robinson playing one of his worst bad boys):
>>
>>>... calling him [Wayne] the Poet of Poop. I wish I had
>>>thought of that! ... [nged's] rek... was on the
>>>order of genius...
>>
>> Now that is unfair! Gnoisy gnuisance nged ngets to pretend
>> that he has a job, sex with an imaginary wife (at least
>> presumably occasionally), that he has not one but two
>> (make-believe) trikes much nicer than Edgy's real (or
>> imaginary?) ones, and maybe even live in a milder climate.
>> So why does the self-professed underdog get to 'think up'
>> that absolutely brilliant bon mot [YAWW-WW-WN] which has
>> been repeated approximately sixty-seven times to date by
>> the dyslexic duo? One wonders just how lacking in both
>> intellect and talent we are supposed to think the Edgy
>> persona is. He says:
>
> All of the above thus far is unintelligible. Wayne can't write prose.
> Maybe that is why he writes verse. I could teach him how to write prose,
> but why should I. I think he is happy in his ignorance, and I must
> confess, I am not very happy in my wisdom.
>
>>>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>>>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>>>inimitable manner.
>
> Inimitable means inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
> pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
> [...]
>
>>>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>>>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>>>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
>>
>> Or he barfs up misworded, muddled messes like this:
>>
>>>I could have said ... [misused ellipsis sic] "Why use
>>>a word that no one will know its meaning" [awkward
>>>wording - second attempt - sic], but it does not play
>>>like how [awkward wording again sic] I wanted it to
>>>play.
>
> Inimitable means inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
> pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
>
> How the hell do you misuse an ellipsis?
>
>> Is it DO-NG's real writer or only the poor Edgy persona
>> that does not realize he could meet minimal standards
>> for middle school composition by simply saying "Why use
>> a word that no one will understand?"
>
> Inimitable means inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
> pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
>
>> But on it goes:
>>
>>>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>>>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>>>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>>>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>>>infinitum...]
>>
>> Style? Sad. Communication? No. Repetition? Si, si, si.
>> Proper use of first person pronoun when referring to
>> oneself? No. Language know-how? Oh, please! Has 'highly
>> educated' been redefined to mean 'went to class most
>> days and got a mercy C- in seventh grade English while
>> striving not to drool all over the swelling bosoms of
>> one's pubescent female classmates'?
>
> Wayne is descrbing himself of course. How else would he know about any of
> this?
>
>> Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
>> writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
>>
>>>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>>>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>>>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>>>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>>>something that is done by the half educated who think
>>>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>>>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>>>to be.
>>
>> While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
>>
>> Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
>> effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
>> Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
>> opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
>> common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
>> to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
>> antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
>> knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
>> what a modestly educated person has written, much less
>> attempt to criticize or emulate it.
>
> Your version is garbage and is as usual unitelligible. There has got to be
> something wrong with the way your brain works. Too many drugs maybe?
>
>> But it gets worse:
>>
>>>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>>>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
>>
>> I think a single mouse click will work for most folks; it
>> probably isn't necessary to use 'all means'. My link is to
>> a simple webpage, not a blog. 'Ever' is a bit overreaching
>> for something that's been in existence less than a week in
>> the case of my webpage, or only about five years for blogs.
>> Isn't 'the province' up in Canada? 'Scumbags' is a compound
>> (not com pound) word; 'scoundrels' and 'knaves' are sadly
>> pretentious, archaic words. Has this DO-NG guy (who writes
>> the scripts for Edgy and nged) had an actual face-to-face
>> conversation with a real person anytime in the last twenty
>> years or so?
>
> I would never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you.
>
> All blogs have gotten a very bad reputation here on ARBR because of the
> criminal vandal troll, or don't you bother with anything else that is
> going on here. Wayne is so stupid as not to realize there are many ways of
> saying things, all equally correct. What a dunce! My original criticism of
> him stands. He is only half educated and doomed to remain that way
> forevermore.
>
>> More squeaks from the shadow:
>
> Either write in verse or prose. Your half-way measures are off putting to
> say the least. Also, try to strive for some consistency of style in your
> writing. This present message of yours is a hodgepodge of styles. It makes
> one wonder if you even went to college and if so what kind of college. It
> is amazing how your verse can make you come across as sounding more
> educated than you are whereas your prose exposes you for what you are.
> Just barely made it through high school - right?
>
>>>You [Wayne] at this time are the biggest name caller ever
>>>to post here.
>>
>> Wait, I'm confused - is that only 'at this time' or
>> 'ever'? And from whom did nged copy his habit of sloppy
>> overstatement? 'Ever' is an oddly familiar word, and it
>> is such a long, long time. Exactly what parameter(s)
>> would we measure to verify nged's 'biggest' claim?
>>
>> While I can certainly manage to avoid responding to the
>> DO-NG twins' thoughtless, pointless, endless repetitions
>> of 'Poet of Poop' for weeks, it is true that I'm likely
>> to coin an interesting (and most often true even though
>> unkind) rek or two about a mindless non-entity (aka
>> puppet or self-parodying persona) or two from time to
>> time here at ARBR.
>>
>> But when it comes to shotgunning baseless insults (aka
>> lies!), to borrow a phrase, "I am the underdog, in that
>> there should be no doubt." Since Edgy has historically
>> (errantly) referred to the hundreds (maybe thousands) of
>> ARBR readers, using about six vile misnomers per post
>> (e.g., morons, idiots, cowards) roughly twice a week for
>> many months now, he'd be pretty tough to top.
>
> Anyone who has ever been called a name by me should be honored. It is
> truly deserved and should be an occasion for the miscreant to correct his
> abominable behavior.
>
>>>Nothing up my sleeve
>>
>> Gnot big gnews, ngolem - gno sleeve, gno arm, gnot a
>> real person...
> [...]
>
> YAWN! Very tiresome. Wayne is writing for himself of course. Can there be
> any doubt? He should try not to be so self absorbed.
>
> Wayne Logo (Leggett), the Poet of ARBR, is not at least making any more
> references to shit and cum, so I believe some progress is being made. It
> is no good to have a facility with words if you have no taste and your
> mind is constantly in the gutter.
>
> His post is way too long and only I am bothering to read it I am sure.
> Wayne needs to work on being more to the point and not wandering about in
> a daze so much. If he listens to me, he will improve his communication
> with this group. If he doesn't listen to me, he will end up just writing
> to and for himself (a form of onanism). I should really be charging him
> for my services.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>
>
>
>
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 22:07:04
From: Mike Rice
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
On 16 Dec 2005 12:57:13 -0800, "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote:
>Hey guys-
>
>This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
>my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
>popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
>stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
>mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
>of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
>further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
>(but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
>DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
>(nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>
>>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
>
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here!
Indiana Mike
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 19:35:41
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Mike Rice Wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2005 12:57:13 -0800, "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote:
>
> >Hey guys-
> >
> >This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
> >my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
> >popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
> >stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
> >mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
> >of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
> >further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
> >(but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
> >
> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >
> >AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
> >DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
> >(nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
> >
> >>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
> >
>
> There's no need to fear, Underdog is here!
>
> Indiana Mike
Good for you Mike to use what I said to make a joke. Another poste
who only shows up here once in a while used that same line to attac
another person on the group. What a shame that some have no sense o
humor.
Willapa
--
nget
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2005 16:48:39
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
LoGo USA aka Wayne Leggett wrote:
> ...
> [PERSONAL NOTE TO TOM: LoGo (Leggett) liked the link to
> the lusciously lewd little Lego lesson. Please carry on
> an' on an' on an'...]
Well, I happened to remember that "The Brick Testament" [1] annoys the
Troll of Worthington, so I had to include the reference. ;)
[1] <http://www.thebricktestament.com/ >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 01:11:48
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1134694119.821081.241380@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> LoGo USA aka Wayne Leggett wrote:
>> ...
>> [PERSONAL NOTE TO TOM: LoGo (Leggett) liked the link to
>> the lusciously lewd little Lego lesson. Please carry on
>> an' on an' on an'...]
>
> Well, I happened to remember that "The Brick Testament" [1] annoys the
> Troll of Worthington, so I had to include the reference. ;)
>
> [1] <http://www.thebricktestament.com/>.
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
I do not go to links like a dumbbell unless I expect to find something there
that will enlighten or amuse me. I learned long ago that Mr. Sherman and I
do not have the same sense of humor. His is childish whereas mine is adult.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2005 11:19:17
From: LoGo USA
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Greetings gang -
In my (admittedly adversarial) anecdotal additions to the
annual accumulation at ARBR, as I've unabashedly assailed
the amassed anthology of annoyingly abhorrent and abrasive
aberrations added by a certain acerbic, addlepated,
aggravating asshole (addicted to adipose - if inaccurate -
admonishments ad nauseum) and his artless, inarticulate
(and inanimate) accomplice, I have dutifully and diligently
dared to develop and display a dashing, dilettantish
demeanor, differing distinctly and delightfully (I declaim)
from Dolan's daily dose of depressingly dumbed-down, deadly
dull, disdainful dialog. But then...
>... excessive...
Tom alleged, alluding to a longish Leggett-authored litany
of letters all alike. Alas, I like alliteration. Its light
little lilt is likely to alter a limping allegory into a
lively allegro, a lifeless liturgy into lovely literature.
Hey, but wait... excessive can be a good thing, right?
[PERSONAL NOTE TO TOM: LoGo (Leggett) liked the link to
the lusciously lewd little Lego lesson. Please carry on
an' on an' on an'...]
With warmest wishes,
Wayne
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 01:05:31
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134674357.238470.287480@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Greetings gang -
>
> In my (admittedly adversarial) anecdotal additions to the
> annual accumulation at ARBR, as I've unabashedly assailed
> the amassed anthology of annoyingly abhorrent and abrasive
> aberrations added by a certain acerbic, addlepated,
> aggravating asshole (addicted to adipose - if inaccurate -
> admonishments ad nauseum) and his artless, inarticulate
> (and inanimate) accomplice, I have dutifully and diligently
> dared to develop and display a dashing, dilettantish
> demeanor, differing distinctly and delightfully (I declaim)
> from Dolan's daily dose of depressingly dumbed-down, deadly
> dull, disdainful dialog. But then...
>
>>... excessive...
>
> Tom alleged, alluding to a longish Leggett-authored litany
> of letters all alike. Alas, I like alliteration. Its light
> little lilt is likely to alter a limping allegory into a
> lively allegro, a lifeless liturgy into lovely literature.
> Hey, but wait... excessive can be a good thing, right?
[...]
All top posters are idiots!
No, you are sounding dumber and dumber the more you attempt to write like a
poet. Take some time out and think about what it is you want to say. Then
try to say it in as few words as possible. Poetry ought to induce focus and
concentration, not run and on to no purpose. No one will bother to read
poetry unless it is concentrated. The days of Lord Byron are long past. Try
to get up to speed with T.S. Eliot.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 13:49:52
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
LoGo USA Wrote:
> Greetings gang -
>
> and his artless, inarticulate
> (and inanimate) accomplice,
>
>
>
> With warmest wishes,
> Wayne
I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt. If all wer
wordsmiths and no one left to make even a loaf of bread, then all woul
starve. It is going to take more than this fluff to get much of
response from me.
"I am a human being" from the film "Elephant man" Wrote:
>
>
--
nget
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2005 01:15:11
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"nget" <nget.204420@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com > wrote in message
news:nget.204420@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
>
> LoGo USA Wrote:
>> Greetings gang -
>>
>> and his artless, inarticulate
>> (and inanimate) accomplice,
>>
>>
>>
>> With warmest wishes,
>> Wayne
>
> I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt. If all were
> wordsmiths and no one left to make even a loaf of bread, then all would
> starve. It is going to take more than this fluff to get much of a
> response from me.
> "I am a human being" from the film "Elephant man" Wrote:
>>
>> k
>
>
> --
> nget
Nonsense! Your rek about Wayne Leggett being the Poet of Poop was on the
order of genius and far better than anything he has written so far.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2005 19:22:59
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan Wrote:
> "nget" <nget.204420@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
> news:nget.204420@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
> >
> > LoGo USA Wrote:
> >> Greetings gang -
> >>
> >> and his artless, inarticulate
> >> (and inanimate) accomplice,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> With warmest wishes,
> >> Wayne
> >
> > I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt. If all were
> > wordsmiths and no one left to make even a loaf of bread, then al
> would
> > starve. It is going to take more than this fluff to get much of a
> > response from me.
> > "I am a human being" from the film "Elephant man" Wrote:
> >>
> >> k
> >
> >
> > --
> > nget
>
> Nonsense! Your rek about Wayne Leggett being the Poet of Poop was o
> the
> order of genius and far better than anything he has written so far.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan - Minnesota
Maybe I do have the advantage in that I can always increase m
vocabulary, while Wayne doesn't have much of a chance to get st. H
will just have to make the best of it.
--
nget
|
| |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 16:38:32
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
> news:1134543567.677252.182000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Hey again -
> >
> > Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
> > had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
> > persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
> > mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
> > archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:
>
> I knew a two bit poet like you would know all about onanism, so that is why
> I used it. It sure sounds better than masturbating moron, don't you think?...
Onan's sin was coitus interruptus to avoid impregnation of his
sister-in-law, not masturbation. See
<http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/er_and_onan/gn38_01.html >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 21:45:24
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1134607112.045366.85990@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
>> news:1134543567.677252.182000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Hey again -
>> >
>> > Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
>> > had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
>> > persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
>> > mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
>> > archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:
>>
>> I knew a two bit poet like you would know all about onanism, so that is
>> why
>> I used it. It sure sounds better than masturbating moron, don't you
>> think?...
>
> Onan's sin was coitus interruptus to avoid impregnation of his
> sister-in-law, not masturbation. See
> <http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/er_and_onan/gn38_01.html>.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
In as much as sex is nothing but mutual masturbation anyway, I do not see
that it is a difference that matters. It is the goal that matters and since
the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone who is doing anything in that
field without that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved, besides
being a scum bucket, a scoundrel and a knave. Wayne Leggett, the poet of
ARBR, will know all about this of course.
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 16:28:46
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
LoGo USA aka Wayne Leggett wrote with excessive alliteration:
> Hey again -
>
> Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
> had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
> persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
> mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
> archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:...
The Onanists have their own website:
<http://www.onan.com/onan/index.jsp >.
Oh, you mean the Old Testament Onan? Then
<http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/er_and_onan/gn38_09.html >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 22:59:27
From: LoGo USA
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Hey again -
Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:
>What is a dog-ape? ... Why use a word that no one will
>know what it means [sic] without looking it up in a
>dictionary?
I hoped that term would not be strange to most ARBR folk,
but then I've done a crossword or two in my long life.
Tom's terse tutorial on terminology:
>A dog ape [separated by a space] is a male ape.
is (typically) technically true. But I intentionally used
the hyphenated form as a clue to its alternate meaning:
the animal that looks and behaves like a hybrid of the
two types. It's also called a baboon.
The Prince of Putzes' priy persona propounds:
>Note my name as an example of how a name should be:
>Edward Dolan.
But... with a '3D' name, one might be misled to expect
a well-rounded intellect and personality. I've subtly
suggested 'Edgar Colon' as a better alternative - very
similar, but I think it would give the reader a much
more accurate initial impression. At least that single
'D' would be a lot more appropriate for his decidedly
one-dimensional repetitious ranting - as in:
>I am a good troll... [deja vu all over again]
Does one repetition deserve another? If so:
A lie repeated's still a lie.
nget, Dullard's secondary persona insists [once more,
again... is there a pattern here?] that he (or she) is:
>No ones [sic] sock puppet
With which I half-heartedly agree. Making a sock puppet
takes a modicum of time, effort and skill. I'd say nget
is more of a 'shadow puppet', such as might be produced
by faint flickering flames from a frugal fire, filtered
through fumbling fingers upon the fake photo-finish of
cheap wood paneling that probably hasn't even been dusted
for fifteen years or so.
It is interesting to note that with the exception of
three dumped in mid-morning (when it seems our imaginary
forklift operator should be hard at work), all of nget's
ARBR messages in December are time stamped within 10
minutes of similar drivel from his alter ego's... but
hey, what's a little coincidence between a couple of
doppelgangers?
Suggestion for nget's puppet master: Please devote less
time to denying the obvious, and a bit more to learning
at least the basic rudiments of quoting when posting to
Usenet via cyclingforums. Oh and PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
do work on those reading skills. E.g.:
>Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to this
>group.
WRONG! BRAPP-PP-PP! You lose, ngoober. Unlike one poor
old paranoid, I really don't mind being paraphrased, as
long as the statement is accurate, but the nget persona
should have paid attention when his alter ego proclaimed:
>I do not like it when others paraphrase me... It takes
>brains to think you know what someone else has said...
>It is better to let the writer speak for himself by
>providing the quotation. That is what I do and that is
>what I expect of others.
Yeah, yeah, we know... generic chop suey again, right?
Despite ignoring its alter ego's good advice, the nget
ngolem displayed a dollop of paranoia for it, asking:
>I was just remembering last year at this time [lack of
>proper punctuation sic] wasn't it then that Wayne came
>out with his attack against Ed Dolan?
Actually it was early this year when Wayne, very, very
weary of TROLLish behavior, began to (sincerely) suggest
a more temperate standard for ARBR's most abrasive
poster. Oh, but a person with a serious memory defect
would have to search a bit to figure that out; when he
sees himself as having no respect or credibility at risk
for being wrong, it's much easier to just take a sloppy
shot. How nice it must be to be a mindless puppet with
no true sense of self or shame.
ARBR readers who are interested in what I'd like for us
all for Christmas this year, and who are ready for some
fairly serious prose that delineates my true feelings
about the negative effects of a perversely prolific,
selfishly irresponsible and rashly asocial antagonist
on a Usenet newsgroup (rather than more of this sort of
flippantly snippy retorts), should click here:
http://www.logo-us.com/pow/arbrxmas.htm
Warmest regards and Merry Christmas,
Wayne
|
| | |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 19:51:25
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
LoGo USA Wrote:
> Hey again -
>
> Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
> had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
> persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
> mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
> archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:
>
> >What is a dog-ape? ... Why use a word that no one will
> >know what it means [sic] without looking it up in a
> >dictionary?
>
> I hoped that term would not be strange to most ARBR folk,
> but then I've done a crossword or two in my long life.
> Tom's terse tutorial on terminology:
>
> >A dog ape [separated by a space] is a male ape.
>
> is (typically) technically true. But I intentionally used
> the hyphenated form as a clue to its alternate meaning:
> the animal that looks and behaves like a hybrid of the
> two types. It's also called a baboon.
>
> The Prince of Putzes' priy persona propounds:
>
> >Note my name as an example of how a name should be:
> >Edward Dolan.
>
> But... with a '3D' name, one might be misled to expect
> a well-rounded intellect and personality. I've subtly
> suggested 'Edgar Colon' as a better alternative - very
> similar, but I think it would give the reader a much
> more accurate initial impression. At least that single
> 'D' would be a lot more appropriate for his decidedly
> one-dimensional repetitious ranting - as in:
>
> >I am a good troll... [deja vu all over again]
>
> Does one repetition deserve another? If so:
>
> A lie repeated's still a lie.
>
> nget, Dullard's secondary persona insists [once more,
> again... is there a pattern here?] that he (or she) is:
>
> >No ones [sic] sock puppet
>
> With which I half-heartedly agree. Making a sock puppet
> takes a modicum of time, effort and skill. I'd say nget
> is more of a 'shadow puppet', such as might be produced
> by faint flickering flames from a frugal fire, filtered
> through fumbling fingers upon the fake photo-finish of
> cheap wood paneling that probably hasn't even been dusted
> for fifteen years or so.
>
> It is interesting to note that with the exception of
> three dumped in mid-morning (when it seems our imaginary
> forklift operator should be hard at work), all of nget's
> ARBR messages in December are time stamped within 10
> minutes of similar drivel from his alter ego's... but
> hey, what's a little coincidence between a couple of
> doppelgangers?
>
> Suggestion for nget's puppet master: Please devote less
> time to denying the obvious, and a bit more to learning
> at least the basic rudiments of quoting when posting to
> Usenet via cyclingforums. Oh and PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE
> do work on those reading skills. E.g.:
>
> >Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to this
> >group.
>
> WRONG! BRAPP-PP-PP! You lose, ngoober. Unlike one poor
> old paranoid, I really don't mind being paraphrased, as
> long as the statement is accurate, but the nget persona
> should have paid attention when his alter ego proclaimed:
>
> >I do not like it when others paraphrase me... It takes
> >brains to think you know what someone else has said...
> >It is better to let the writer speak for himself by
> >providing the quotation. That is what I do and that is
> >what I expect of others.
>
> Yeah, yeah, we know... generic chop suey again, right?
>
> Despite ignoring its alter ego's good advice, the nget
> ngolem displayed a dollop of paranoia for it, asking:
>
> >I was just remembering last year at this time [lack of
> >proper punctuation sic] wasn't it then that Wayne came
> >out with his attack against Ed Dolan?
>
> Actually it was early this year when Wayne, very, very
> weary of TROLLish behavior, began to (sincerely) suggest
> a more temperate standard for ARBR's most abrasive
> poster. Oh, but a person with a serious memory defect
> would have to search a bit to figure that out; when he
> sees himself as having no respect or credibility at risk
> for being wrong, it's much easier to just take a sloppy
> shot. How nice it must be to be a mindless puppet with
> no true sense of self or shame.
>
> ARBR readers who are interested in what I'd like for us
> all for Christmas this year, and who are ready for some
> fairly serious prose that delineates my true feelings
> about the negative effects of a perversely prolific,
> selfishly irresponsible and rashly asocial antagonist
> on a Usenet newsgroup (rather than more of this sort of
> flippantly snippy retorts), should click here:
>
> http://www.logo-us.com/pow/arbrxmas.htm
>
> Warmest regards and Merry Christmas,
> Wayne
And because this place is unmoderated you Wayne can come on here and
call me a ngoober. You at this time are the biggest name caller ever to
post here. I defend your right to speak your mind without censorship.
Who is polishing your jack-boots these days?
Nothing up my sleeve,
k
--
nget
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 03:18:59
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"nget" <nget.200ve1@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com > wrote in message
news:nget.200ve1@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
[...]
> And because this place is unmoderated you Wayne can come on here and
> call me a ngoober. You at this time are the biggest name caller ever to
> post here. I defend your right to speak your mind without censorship.
> Who is polishing your jack-boots these days?
> Nothing up my sleeve,
> k
>
> nget
Wayne has never gotten over you calling him the Poet of Poop. I wish I had
thought of that! I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally as
truthful in my own inimitable manner.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 14 Dec 2005 02:02:55
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134543567.677252.182000@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hey again -
>
> Gee, I thought 'disingenuously' would be the word that
> had folks saying "Huh?" But, no... Dullard's priy
> persona (he who so often subjects his constipated little
> mind to stringent voluntary peristalsis to plop out
> archaic words like 'onanist' and 'stricture') piped up:
I knew a two bit poet like you would know all about onanism, so that is why
I used it. It sure sounds better than masturbating moron, don't you think?
'Stricture' is archaic?
>>What is a dog-ape? ... Why use a word that no one will
>>know what it means [sic] without looking it up in a
>>dictionary?
No, I meant means. I believe I used the word correctly. It has several uses
you know. Of course I could have said ... "Why use a word that no one will
know its meaning", but it does not play like how I wanted it to play. I have
my style and you have yours.
> I hoped that term would not be strange to most ARBR folk,
> but then I've done a crossword or two in my long life.
> Tom's terse tutorial on terminology:
>
>>A dog ape [separated by a space] is a male ape.
>
> is (typically) technically true. But I intentionally used
> the hyphenated form as a clue to its alternate meaning:
> the animal that looks and behaves like a hybrid of the
> two types. It's also called a baboon.
Then you should have used the word baboon and found another word to rhyme
with it. Communication is of the essence, not rhymes.
> The Prince of Putzes' priy persona propounds:
>
>>Note my name as an example of how a name should be:
>>Edward Dolan.
>
> But... with a '3D' name, one might be misled to expect
> a well-rounded intellect and personality.
The 3 D's are all separated by other letters. They do not come together as
in your last name, Leggett. You take the prize for having a really stupid
spelling to your name. If you do not like the way people misspell it, then
get yourself a better name why don't you?
[...]
>>I am a good troll... [deja vu all over again]
>
> Does one repetition deserve another? If so:
>
> A lie repeated's still a lie.
Repetition is of the essense when dealing with morons. How else do they ever
learn anything.
[...]
> Actually it was early this year when Wayne, very, very
> weary of TROLLish behavior, began to (sincerely) suggest
> a more temperate standard for ARBR's most abrasive
> poster.
[...]
I am a good troll, but Wayne Leggett, the poet of poop, turned out to be a
bad troll. He thought he could allude to sex and shit and it would pass
unnoticed, not realizing that there are some standards here on ARBR thanks
to the influence of Ed Dolan.
[...]
> ARBR readers who are interested in what I'd like for us
> all for Christmas this year, and who are ready for some
> fairly serious prose that delineates my true feelings
> about the negative effects of a perversely prolific,
> selfishly irresponsible and rashly asocial antagonist
> on a Usenet newsgroup (rather than more of this sort of
> flippantly snippy retorts), should click here:
By all means go to his blog, ever the province of scum bags, scoundrels and
knaves.
Does anyone but me get the feeling that Wayne Leggett is constantly
resorting to freakish words to impress others by his vocabulary.
Unfortunately for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
something that is done by the half educated who think they have to use big
and/or odd words to convince others that they are not really as dumb as they
know themselves to be.
I urge Wayne to emulate the Great Ed Dolan. Mr. Dolan is a highly educated
person who knows how to use language without putting on a show of it. It is
a matter of good taste. You either have it or you don't - and it is very
difficult to learn. It is mostly a by-product of good breeding and a
cultured home life. Wayne would have to go to a finishing school to get up
to speed.
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 19:25:17
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Indiana" Mike Rice wrote:
> ...
> And its a welcome respite to have Wayne check in as well. This group
> may be nearly dead, and mostly off topic at present, but I, for one,
> welcome the diversion from the on-going opera 'Days Of our Blog' that
> this place has become. I've gotten to the point of scanning the thread
> to catch Tom's rejoinders & ignoring the elongated stretches put forth
> by the (extremely) loyal opposition.
Have you read the thread on Iraq where Ed Dolan and I each contributed
more than 200 posts to the thread? ;)
> Most of the streets are free of ice today and I found myself thinking
> about a ride on the ol' Tour Easy. I've been mostly off for two or
> three months since having what seemed like a cardiac incident earlier
> this fall, though tests won't be run until mid-January. I'm feeling
> recovered enough that I want to do some riding now, I'll take that as
> a good sign.
Wayne Leggett would be happy to sell you a LoGo trike to deal with
occasional icy spots.
Would a Tour Easy (with an ISO 406-mm fork) have clearance for one of
these tires:
<http://www.calhouncycle.com/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=115&idproduct=478 >?
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 18:56:14
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
nget (k who?) wrote:
>
> I was just remembering last year at this time wasn't it then that
> Wayne came out with his attack against Ed Dolan?What is it with Wayne
> and this time of the year that brings out the worst in him?Perhaps he
> was a little boy of 4 years of age asking Santa Clause for that red
> tricycle that he wanted so badly. When he didn't get it [1] he was hurt
> and never got over it.And to this day he is just plain mean at Chistmas
> time.
What is up with the lack of spaces between sentences - is this some
weird cyclingforums.com artifact?
Wayne Leggett now has really nice tricycles to play with
<http://www.logo-us.com/pix/logo016.jpg >.
What is "Chistmas?
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 19:05:26
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> ...
> Also, it is in extremely bad taste for anyone, let alone a poet, to allude
> to sex and shit....
Here is a paper that deals with concealing excrement from public view:
<http://www.age.uiuc.edu/bee/RESEARCH/cover/coverpaper1.html >.
Recumbent content: I used to ride my RANS Rocket and RANS "Wavewind" by
the aforementioned Moorman Swine Farms site on the way to the Wednesday
evening and Saturday morning club rides (in this case the "good old
days" were really better).
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
"ahno. the edo comes and goes. you stand there and experience the edo
unless you are bound by ego
riding a bike is highly valued as a way to experience and sample the
edo" - G. Daniels
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 17:10:22
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
k Leuck wrote:
> "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
> > do with double consonants.
>
> The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
Hey k,
Where are all your security alarm "friends"? They could enliven things
around here. ;)
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 18:28:35
From: Just zis Guy, you know?
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
On 11 Dec 2005 13:10:23 -0800, "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > said in
<1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >:
>I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
>one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
>what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
On the plus side, that post brightened it up a bit :-)
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
"To every complex problem there is a solution which is
simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken
|
| | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Just zis Guy, you know? Wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2005 13:10:23 -0800, "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> said in
> <1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
> >one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
> >what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
>
> On the plus side, that post brightened it up a bit :-)
>
> Guy
> --
> http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
>
> "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
> simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken
Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished wit
the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetry t
this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good at thei
word.
The Grinch,
--
nget
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 22:07:12
From: Just zis Guy, you know?
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20 +1100, nget
<nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com > said in
<nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com >:
>Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished with
>the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to
>this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good at their
>word.
And how many times has Mr Ed made his grand exit?
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
"To every complex problem there is a solution which is
simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken
|
| | | | |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 20:15:49
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <uce@ftc.gov > wrote in message
news:r1trp190are450gplde2dfsam2ca065vh5@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20 +1100, nget
> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> said in
> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>:
>
>>Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished with
>>the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to
>>this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good at their
>>word.
>
> And how many times has Mr Ed made his grand exit?
>
> Guy
I may take another Grand Farewell shortly as I believe this group has died
altogether. It was murdered by a criminal vandal troll last winter and I
might note that Guy Chapman of England did nothing to prevent it. Besides,
parting is such sweet sorrow! It needs to be done more than once.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 03:05:13
From: Mike Rice
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:15:49 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net >
wrote:
>
>"Just zis Guy, you know?" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message
>news:r1trp190are450gplde2dfsam2ca065vh5@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20 +1100, nget
>> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> said in
>> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>:
>>
>>>Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished with
>>>the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to
>>>this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good at their
>>>word.
>>
>> And how many times has Mr Ed made his grand exit?
>>
>> Guy
>
>I may take another Grand Farewell shortly as I believe this group has died
>altogether. It was murdered by a criminal vandal troll last winter and I
>might note that Guy Chapman of England did nothing to prevent it. Besides,
>parting is such sweet sorrow! It needs to be done more than once.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>
>
Heavens to Mergatroid! Exit, stage left!
So what if Ed can't stay away. He's off the sauce and easier to get
along with these days.
And its a welcome respite to have Wayne check in as well. This group
may be nearly dead, and mostly off topic at present, but I, for one,
welcome the diversion from the on-going opera 'Days Of our Blog' that
this place has become. I've gotten to the point of scanning the thread
to catch Tom's rejoinders & ignoring the elongated stretches put forth
by the (extremely) loyal opposition.
Most of the streets are free of ice today and I found myself thinking
about a ride on the ol' Tour Easy. I've been mostly off for two or
three months since having what seemed like a cardiac incident earlier
this fall, though tests won't be run until mid-January. I'm feeling
recovered enough that I want to do some riding now, I'll take that as
a good sign.
Indiana Mike
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 22:27:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Mike Rice" <jodymike@gte.net > wrote in message
news:nvdsp1l0q58onq9dlmbh1old0f98509jrh@4ax.com.gnresend...
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:15:49 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Just zis Guy, you know?" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message
>>news:r1trp190are450gplde2dfsam2ca065vh5@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20 +1100, nget
>>> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> said in
>>> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>:
>>>
>>>>Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished with
>>>>the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetry to
>>>>this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good at their
>>>>word.
>>>
>>> And how many times has Mr Ed made his grand exit?
>>>
>>> Guy
>>
>>I may take another Grand Farewell shortly as I believe this group has died
>>altogether. It was murdered by a criminal vandal troll last winter and I
>>might note that Guy Chapman of England did nothing to prevent it. Besides,
>>parting is such sweet sorrow! It needs to be done more than once.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>>
>>
>
> Heavens to Mergatroid! Exit, stage left!
>
> So what if Ed can't stay away. He's off the sauce and easier to get
> along with these days.
>
> And its a welcome respite to have Wayne check in as well. This group
> may be nearly dead, and mostly off topic at present, but I, for one,
> welcome the diversion from the on-going opera 'Days Of our Blog' that
> this place has become. I've gotten to the point of scanning the thread
> to catch Tom's rejoinders & ignoring the elongated stretches put forth
> by the (extremely) loyal opposition.
The truth is no one will read a long post, no matter the subject or how
interesting it might be. I learned this many years ago and so I have tried
to keep my messages to just a few well constructed paragraphs. Indiana Mike
also knows how to keep his posts to the right length.
On the other hand, many posts to ARBR are way too short. There is never any
excuse for a message that just runs to one or two sentences. These type of
short messages are a waste of everyone's time. Mr. Sherman is frequently
guilty of this and he should desist. If you do not have any more than that
to say, then you have essentially nothing to say. Better to shut up and wait
until you accumulate something to say. The best advice I can give in this
regard is to follow my sterling example.
> Most of the streets are free of ice today and I found myself thinking
> about a ride on the ol' Tour Easy. I've been mostly off for two or
> three months since having what seemed like a cardiac incident earlier
> this fall, though tests won't be run until mid-January. I'm feeling
> recovered enough that I want to do some riding now, I'll take that as
> a good sign.
Mike, cardio-vascular disease is the all-American way of death. Almost
everyone I know has had a by-pass operation or an angioplasty. I myself am
looking forward to dying of a stroke, unless a heart attack gets me first of
course. I am not overweight and have taken good care of myself over the
years, but life is a crap shoot and we all of us run out of luck sooner or
later. I sometimes think only my many medications are keeping me alive. One
thing is for sure. Those who think all you have to do is ride your bike a
lot and you will be safe from sickness and death are truly crazy.
As I peruse the newspaper every day looking at all the obituaries, I am
struck by how many men are kicking off in their 60's and 70's. If we make it
to our 80's, we have won the game of life. But there are not many of us that
make it that far. When you are middle age and you feel good, you think you
will live forever, but all it takes is just one little "incident" and, lo
and behold, you are shaking hands with the grim reaper.
Yes, ride your bike. It won't hurt anything, but far more important than
that is to see your doctor, follow his advice and above all, take your g.d.
medications!
Best Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 12:44:33
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Just zis Guy, you know? Wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:01:20 +1100, nget
> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> said in
> <nget.1zy3dz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>:
>
> >Guy Chapman said he was leaving the group after he had finished with
> >the threads he was on.Wayne also said he would not post more poetr
> to
> >this group. It now appears that neither of these two are good a
> their
> >word.
>
> And how many times has Mr Ed made his grand exit?
>
> Guy
> --
> http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
>
> "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
> simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken
I was just remembering last year at this time wasn't it then tha
Wayne came out with his attack against Ed Dolan?What is it with Wayn
and this time of the year that brings out the worst in him?Perhaps h
was a little boy of 4 years of age asking Santa Clause for that re
tricycle that he wanted so badly. When he didn't get it [1] he was hur
and never got over it.And to this day he is just plain mean at Chistma
time.
[1] his parents hated him.
The Grinch,
--
nget
|
| |
Date: 11 Dec 2005 18:03:47
From: Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
> news:1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Hey guys -
> >
> > In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
> > Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
> > poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
> > backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
> > of course) misspelling my name:
>
> If you want others to get your confounded name right, why don't you get a
> sensible name. Who needs a last name with double letters in it.
Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
do with double consonants.
> >>Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
> >>Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
> >
> > I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
> > one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
> > what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
>
> This newsgroup was destroyed by a criminal vandal troll which Mr. Sherman
> mindlessly defends....
When have I ever defended Ed Dolan?
> ...
> What is a dog-ape?
A dog ape is a male ape. Look in a dictionary.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
"the bacteria people tuned in-as to bioengineering at the correct
wave
Point" - G. Daniels
|
| | |
Date: 11 Dec 2005 21:42:33
From: Mark Leuck
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
> do with double consonants.
The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 02:36:58
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"k Leuck" <m..leuck@comcast.net > wrote in message
news:TZmdnSDp5I2_bwHenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
>> do with double consonants.
>
> The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
I see that k has a sense of humor after all. Note the [.].
I do not bother correcting idiots but I know k to be a very st fellow.
Somewhere along the line he decided that ordinary punctuation was not
necessary, at least not for him. This is a most grievous error and I hope
and trust that k has now come around to being a good writer like Ed Dolan
and Tom Sherman. My only aim in being here is to elevate this group to my
own high standards.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 03:47:55
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
Edward Dolan Wrote:
> "k Leuck" <m..leuck@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:TZmdnSDp5I2_bwHenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >
> > "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote i
> message
> > news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothin
> to
> >> do with double consonants.
> >
> > The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
>
> I see that k has a sense of humor after all. Note the [.].
>
> I do not bother correcting idiots but I know k to be a very s
> fellow.
> Somewhere along the line he decided that ordinary punctuation was not
> necessary, at least not for him. This is a most grievous error and
> hope
> and trust that k has now come around to being a good writer like E
> Dolan
> and Tom Sherman. My only aim in being here is to elevate this group t
> my
> own high standards.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan - Minnesota
I had a little laugh at that one too Ed.I always read what k has t
say and I'll bet I would't be the first one to say that he might be
little stubborn.
And the best part of all is you won't find him writing poetry to othe
guys on usenet.What's that all about
--
nget
|
| | | | | |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 20:08:35
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"nget" <nget.1zxs9z@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com > wrote in message
news:nget.1zxs9z@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
>
> Edward Dolan Wrote:
>> "k Leuck" <m..leuck@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:TZmdnSDp5I2_bwHenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >
>> > "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> message
>> > news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>> >>
>> >> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing
>> to
>> >> do with double consonants.
>> >
>> > The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
>>
>> I see that k has a sense of humor after all. Note the [.].
>>
>> I do not bother correcting idiots but I know k to be a very st
>> fellow.
>> Somewhere along the line he decided that ordinary punctuation was not
>> necessary, at least not for him. This is a most grievous error and I
>> hope
>> and trust that k has now come around to being a good writer like Ed
>> Dolan
>> and Tom Sherman. My only aim in being here is to elevate this group to
>> my
>> own high standards.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>
> I had a little laugh at that one too Ed.I always read what k has to
> say and I'll bet I would't be the first one to say that he might be a
> little stubborn.
> And the best part of all is you won't find him writing poetry to other
> guys on usenet.What's that all about?
I at first praised Wayne Leggett's poetry because it was quite good. This
went to his head and he then thought he could write just any old crap. But
every message is sui generis with me. So I had to take him to task for
writing about sex and shit. He took umbrage at this, thinking he had a God
given right to say anything he wanted to say to this group. But we have some
standards here at ARBR and he can either come up to those standards or get
lost.
Also, it is in extremely bad taste for anyone, let alone a poet, to allude
to sex and shit. He ought to be ashamed of himself! I have told him
repeatedly that the only proper subjects for a poet are love and death, not
necessarily in that order.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 03:08:02
From: Mike Rice
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:08:35 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net >
wrote:
>
>"nget" <nget.1zxs9z@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
>news:nget.1zxs9z@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com...
>>
>> Edward Dolan Wrote:
>>> "k Leuck" <m..leuck@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:TZmdnSDp5I2_bwHenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> >
>>> > "Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> message
>>> > news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>> >>
>>> >> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing
>>> to
>>> >> do with double consonants.
>>> >
>>> > The more you two argue the more you become alike[.]
>>>
>>> I see that k has a sense of humor after all. Note the [.].
>>>
>>> I do not bother correcting idiots but I know k to be a very st
>>> fellow.
>>> Somewhere along the line he decided that ordinary punctuation was not
>>> necessary, at least not for him. This is a most grievous error and I
>>> hope
>>> and trust that k has now come around to being a good writer like Ed
>>> Dolan
>>> and Tom Sherman. My only aim in being here is to elevate this group to
>>> my
>>> own high standards.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>>
>> I had a little laugh at that one too Ed.I always read what k has to
>> say and I'll bet I would't be the first one to say that he might be a
>> little stubborn.
>> And the best part of all is you won't find him writing poetry to other
>> guys on usenet.What's that all about?
>
>I at first praised Wayne Leggett's poetry because it was quite good. This
>went to his head and he then thought he could write just any old crap. But
>every message is sui generis with me. So I had to take him to task for
>writing about sex and shit. He took umbrage at this, thinking he had a God
>given right to say anything he wanted to say to this group. But we have some
>standards here at ARBR and he can either come up to those standards or get
>lost.
>
>Also, it is in extremely bad taste for anyone, let alone a poet, to allude
>to sex and shit. He ought to be ashamed of himself! I have told him
>repeatedly that the only proper subjects for a poet are love and death, not
>necessarily in that order.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan - Minnesota
>
>
Ed, I have never understood why Wayne (and others I won't mention,
lacking proof) fails to accept your utter authority on this subject.
You are a shining example.
Indiana Mike
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 13 Dec 2005 21:57:45
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Mike Rice" <jodymike@gte.net > wrote in message
news:elesp15n7j6673fkvs4nnftco464o7rntc@4ax.com.gnresend...
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:08:35 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> wrote:
[...]
>>I at first praised Wayne Leggett's poetry because it was quite good. This
>>went to his head and he then thought he could write just any old crap. But
>>every message is sui generis with me. So I had to take him to task for
>>writing about sex and shit. He took umbrage at this, thinking he had a God
>>given right to say anything he wanted to say to this group. But we have
>>some
>>standards here at ARBR and he can either come up to those standards or get
>>lost.
>>
>>Also, it is in extremely bad taste for anyone, let alone a poet, to allude
>>to sex and shit. He ought to be ashamed of himself! I have told him
>>repeatedly that the only proper subjects for a poet are love and death,
>>not
>>necessarily in that order.
>>
>
> Ed, I have never understood why Wayne (and others I won't mention,
> lacking proof) fails to accept your utter authority on this subject.
>
> You are a shining example.
>
> Indiana Mike
Yes, Mike, you are so right! Only I, the Great Ed Dolan, and Catholic
celibate priests know about love and death. All others should get lost on
these two subjects. I suspect Wayne Leggett is ried and has ten children,
so of course he is totally unqualified to speak on love and death but
without a doubt knows all about sex and shit. Profundity is not for the
likes of him. That is reserved for great souls and highly refined intellects
like myself.
Mr. Sherman should also stay off of matters like love and death and stick to
the blogs which as everyone knows are full of naught but scum bags,
scoundrels and knaves.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 14:00:15
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
'Sunset Lowracer [TM Wrote:
> Fanatic']Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
> > news:1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > Hey guys -
> > >
> > > In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
> > > Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
> > > poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
> > > backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
> > > of course) misspelling my name:
> >
> > If you want others to get your confounded name right, why don't yo
> get a
> > sensible name. Who needs a last name with double letters in it.
>
> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
> do with double consonants.
>
> I just call him Wayne the poopy poet.I think that name is good enoug
> for what he has done here.
> > >>Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
> > >>Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
> > >
> > > I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
> > > one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
> > > what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
> >
> > This newsgroup was destroyed by a criminal vandal troll which Mr
> Sherman
> > mindlessly defends....
>
> When have I ever defended Ed Dolan?
>
> Tom only defends monkeys from Chicago.
> > ...
> > What is a dog-ape?
>
> A dog ape is a male ape. Look in a dictionary.
> Tom is an expert in the primate department.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valle
--
nget
|
| | |
Date: 11 Dec 2005 20:39:35
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1134353027.307242.274960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com> wrote in message
>> news:1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Hey guys -
>> >
>> > In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
>> > Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
>> > poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
>> > backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
>> > of course) misspelling my name:
>>
>> If you want others to get your confounded name right, why don't you get a
>> sensible name. Who needs a last name with double letters in it.
>
> Note that Ed Dolan's error involved a wrong vowel, and had nothing to
> do with double consonants.
But to use the same vowel more than once in a name is in very bad taste. I
am surprised that Wayne has not changed his name to one that others will not
be constantly tripping over. Note my name as an example of how a name should
be: Edward Dolan. Do you see more than one vowel of the same letter in
either name? Do you see double consonants of the same letter together?
The poet of ARBR should really do something about his confounded name. Has
he no respect for names, not even his own? Yea, it is his DUTY to change his
name so Ed Dolan will not have to trip over it ever again.
>> >>Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
>> >>Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
>> >
>> > I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
>> > one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
>> > what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
>>
>> This newsgroup was destroyed by a criminal vandal troll which Mr. Sherman
>> mindlessly defends....
>
> When have I ever defended Ed Dolan?
I am a good troll, not an evil troll.
>> ...
>> What is a dog-ape?
>
> A dog ape is a male ape. Look in a dictionary.
But why use a word that no one will know what it means without looking it up
in a dictionary? Wayne badly needs an editor who could help him out on
things like this.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Dec 2005 19:11:43
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
"LoGo USA" <wayne@logo-us.com > wrote in message
news:1134335423.173819.193480@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hey guys -
>
> In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
> Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
> poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
> backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
> of course) misspelling my name:
If you want others to get your confounded name right, why don't you get a
sensible name. Who needs a last name with double letters in it.
>>Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
>>Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
>
> I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
> one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
> what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
This newsgroup was destroyed by a criminal vandal troll which Mr. Sherman
mindlessly defends. He does not care about this newsgroup so why should I -
or anyone else for that matter.
> The winter nights are very long
> In Minnesota; wine is cheap...
> There - repetitious, ranting, wrong -
> One writes when 'he' should simply sleep.
I have given up on the vino. It was bad for my health, although it did have
the effect of making ARBR read better than it otherwise does.
> Is 'he' Ed Dullard, 'nget' or 'k'?
> I don't much care, and doubt you do.
> This shrill dyslexic dog-ape's bark
> Is saying nothing good or true.
What is a dog-ape?
> Quite unlike Matthew, Leuck or Jon,
> Or herald angel singing "Hark",
> His posts aren't gospel; they're a con
> Conceived in Worthington by dark.
>
> Folks, nothing Dullard's said of me,
> No slurs he's coined to catch my eye,
> Can change the archived history;
> A lie repeated's still a lie.
And so are your many scribblings highlighting sexual and excretory
functions. Shame on you!
> My poetry is broad in scope;
> I'm not hung up on sex or scat.
> It's Eddie's mouth that's ripe for soap;
> This forum's readers all know that!
>
> At ARBR maybe God is dead;
> Prolific putz Saint Senile rules -
> A cardboard crown upon his head,
> A poor pathetic Prince of Fools.
That is all ARBR and you deserve. There is no point in being intelligent
when in the midst of fools.
> What would it take to get him hence?
> Humiliation doesn't work;
> He lacks perception, common sense
> And empathy. The man's a jerk!
>
> But still I hope there'll come a time
> When Dullard tires of his foul game...
> It's to that end I post this rhyme,
> 'Cuz I'd be proud to take the blame.
Just don't post your usual crap alluding to shit and cum and everything will
be just fine here.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2005 11:31:21
From: nget
Subject: Re: Disabusing Dullard's Disingenuously Distasteful Discourse
|
LoGo USA Wrote:
> Hey guys -
>
> In the contemporary, contentious thread, 'Move Over
> Rich...', ARBR's insidiously infamous, least favorite
> poster took his tenth or twentieth blatantly belligerent
> backhand swipe at me, repeatedly (though inconsistently,
> of course) misspelling my name:
>
> >Mr. Sherman has apparently been unduly influenced by
> >Wayne Leggitt, the ARBR poet of excrement.
>
> I suppose such sloppily transparent efforts merit at least
> one quick poetic reply as we approach the end of one of
> what must rank as one of ARBR's worst years ever.
>
> The winter nights are very long
> In Minnesota; wine is cheap...
> There - repetitious, ranting, wrong -
> One writes when 'he' should simply sleep.
>
> Is 'he' Ed Dullard, 'nget' or 'k'?
> I don't much care, and doubt you do.
> This shrill dyslexic dog-ape's bark
> Is saying nothing good or true.
>
> Quite unlike Matthew, Leuck or Jon,
> Or herald angel singing "Hark",
> His posts aren't gospel; they're a con
> Conceived in Worthington by dark.
>
> Folks, nothing Dullard's said of me,
> No slurs he's coined to catch my eye,
> Can change the archived history;
> A lie repeated's still a lie.
>
> My poetry is broad in scope;
> I'm not hung up on sex or scat.
> It's Eddie's mouth that's ripe for soap;
> This forum's readers all know that!
>
> At ARBR maybe God is dead;
> Prolific putz Saint Senile rules -
> A cardboard crown upon his head,
> A poor pathetic Prince of Fools.
>
> What would it take to get him hence?
> Humiliation doesn't work;
> He lacks perception, common sense
> And empathy. The man's a jerk!
>
> But still I hope there'll come a time
> When Dullard tires of his foul game...
> It's to that end I post this rhyme,
> 'Cuz I'd be proud to take the blame.
>
> Regards,
> Wayne
Merry Christmas to you Wayne.You could use a sip of wine to mellow yo
out.
No ones sock puppet,
--
nget
|
|
