| |
Main
Date: 17 Mar 2006 16:14:44
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
Greivously
Relentless
Egomaniacal
ARBR
Troll
Jim McNaa
P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
(dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
|
|
| |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 20:33:34
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Every time you reply with your cut and paste boilerplate ...
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I
can't be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the
acceptable manner or get lost.
...you contradict yourself by taking the time to read what I've written
and respond with a disclaimer, This is being bothered ... taking the
time and making the effort to respond. Either be bothered or don't,
but don't be bothered and then calim that you're not. Doing so makes
you out to be the fool that everyone knows you are. The conundrum
continues!
Jim
|
| | |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 22:53:13
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1144294414.561804.239320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Every time you reply with your cut and paste boilerplate ...
>
> You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I
> can't be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the
> acceptable manner or get lost.
>
> ...you contradict yourself by taking the time to read what I've written
> and respond with a disclaimer, This is being bothered ... taking the
> time and making the effort to respond. Either be bothered or don't,
> but don't be bothered and then calim that you're not. Doing so makes
> you out to be the fool that everyone knows you are. The conundrum
> continues!
>
> Jim
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2006 14:20:19
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
> ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin.
Eddie, Eddie, Eddie
Ed Gin has hardly been on this group in the past couple of years and
only to harass you. How long will you keep whining about Ed Gin. He
got you hook, line and sinker! Your constant harping on Ed Gin proves
that. Get over it! Wah! Wah!! Wah!!!
Recently there was a post on BROL about the decline of ARBR. Ed Gin
was not mentioned. You were top of the list. Of course you know that,
Oh Great One.
How's momma? Is she still working to support you, or did having you as
a lazy, worthless, good for nothing son finally kill her?
Enjoy,
Perry B
|
| | |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 21:44:39
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
<perryb67@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1144012819.790127.251150@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
>> ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin.
>
>
> Eddie, Eddie, Eddie
>
> Ed Gin has hardly been on this group in the past couple of years and
> only to harass you. How long will you keep whining about Ed Gin. He
> got you hook, line and sinker! Your constant harping on Ed Gin proves
> that. Get over it! Wah! Wah!! Wah!!!
Nope, there is nothing anyone can say to me that will phase me in the
slightest. But I do object to forged names and addresses. That was the main
criminal activity that Ed Gin was guilty of. He was also nothing but a
mindless, stupid troll, never being in the least responsive to anything that
was ever said. He trolled on all threads and effectively destroyed ARBR
mainly because of cowards like you who would not take a stand.
> Recently there was a post on BROL about the decline of ARBR. Ed Gin
> was not mentioned. You were top of the list. Of course you know that,
> Oh Great One.
Only those of us who have been here for many years truly know what took down
ARBR. It was Ed Gin as is proven by the falloff in the postings of two
winters ago.
> How's momma? Is she still working to support you, or did having you as
> a lazy, worthless, good for nothing son finally kill her?
Still talking baby talk I see. JimmyMac acts like the teenager that he is
and you act like the baby that you are. Let this be a lesson to all and
sundry to think twice about going into the teaching profession. The kids
will reduce you to the likes of a Perry Butler if you are not careful.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 01 Apr 2006 09:58:07
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Can the condescending lectures. How many time need you be told? I
don't take advice or direction from someone who errantly assumes that
he is my superior. You are right. Everyone on the newsgroups knows
you very well. Have you not heard the many objections to your very
presence and your outrageous rhetoric? Why are you divisive? Why are
you in denial? You are tweaking them? Aren't you the pompous ass?
If they adjusted, then why do they continue to object? Ed Gin and Tom
Sherman and I were taking potshots at one another ... yes, and I
realize that, but enough about them and your diversionary tactics.
This has nothing to do with either of them. This is comical. The man
with a plethora of hang-ups suggests that I get psychiatric help. You
are facetious and delusional. I'll grant you that.
|
| | |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 21:46:58
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143914287.222401.74210@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Can the condescending lectures. How many time need you be told? I
> don't take advice or direction from someone who errantly assumes that
> he is my superior. You are right. Everyone on the newsgroups knows
> you very well. Have you not heard the many objections to your very
> presence and your outrageous rhetoric? Why are you divisive? Why are
> you in denial? You are tweaking them? Aren't you the pompous ass?
> If they adjusted, then why do they continue to object? Ed Gin and Tom
> Sherman and I were taking potshots at one another ... yes, and I
> realize that, but enough about them and your diversionary tactics.
> This has nothing to do with either of them. This is comical. The man
> with a plethora of hang-ups suggests that I get psychiatric help. You
> are facetious and delusional. I'll grant you that.
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 01 Apr 2006 09:52:31
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Hey, brain dead, when are you going to come to the realization that I
do not and will not take advise or direction from you. You are beyond
stupid. I will address you any way I please and labeling the manner in
which I address you as email, does not make it so. Unlike you, I don't
think of the universe comprised of readers hanging on my every word.
That is why you come of as arrogant NOT intelligent.
Screed should be your middle name. You exhibit a classic defense
mechanism in almost all of you post ... projection. You attribute of
others traits and behaviors that you find undesirable in yourself. You
criticize in others the very faults that you manifest.
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1143865715.626627.206990@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > Ed,
> >
> > I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
> > intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
> > great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
> > that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
> > Are you really that dense?
>
> No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it is
> just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers who
> will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I come
> across as intelligent and why you do not.
>
> > Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
> > no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
> > numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
> > Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
> > the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
> > the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
> > venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
> > misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
> > though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
> > as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
> > not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
> > have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.
>
> RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
> even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM is a
> paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.
>
> However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
> ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also noticed
> the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
> some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
> something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
> screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a whole.
> Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was doing
> for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 21:30:36
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143913951.569470.15690@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Hey, brain dead, when are you going to come to the realization that I
> do not and will not take advise or direction from you. You are beyond
> stupid. I will address you any way I please and labeling the manner in
> which I address you as email, does not make it so. Unlike you, I don't
> think of the universe comprised of readers hanging on my every word.
> That is why you come of as arrogant NOT intelligent.
>
> Screed should be your middle name. You exhibit a classic defense
> mechanism in almost all of you post ... projection. You attribute of
> others traits and behaviors that you find undesirable in yourself. You
> criticize in others the very faults that you manifest.
>
> Jim McNaa
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1143865715.626627.206990@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> > Ed,
>> >
>> > I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
>> > intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
>> > great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
>> > that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
>> > Are you really that dense?
>>
>> No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it
>> is
>> just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers
>> who
>> will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I
>> come
>> across as intelligent and why you do not.
>>
>> > Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
>> > no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
>> > numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
>> > Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
>> > the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
>> > the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
>> > venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
>> > misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
>> > though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
>> > as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
>> > not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
>> > have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.
>>
>> RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
>> even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM
>> is a
>> paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.
>>
>> However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
>> ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also
>> noticed
>> the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
>> some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
>> something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
>> screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a
>> whole.
>> Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was
>> doing
>> for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.
|
| |
Date: 31 Mar 2006 21:38:43
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
I bottom posted. Woops, I'll have to correct that.
Don't you ever tire of these extended sermons of yours.
Sherman and Gin are not one and the same. I never said they were, but
they are not polar opposites either. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
issue with that. I felt that anyone who defended Gin should be treated
no differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice. Just because
you do not understand that concept, does not mean that the issue is
open for debate.
Sherman WAS a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
verb? Your observations regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
are half-baked and matter not.
I need to come up with a way to deal with you? I'm doing just fine
... thanks. No advice is needed. I don't take advice from someone
whom I have no respect for. I will deal with you as I chose. I have
to tell you though that nothing would please me more than to deal with
you up close and personal like. Like someone else said in the past.
If you were to say half the crap that you do to someone's face
instead of from behind a keyboard, you'd find out how someone deals
with the likes of you.
As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it you'd
likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.
The bottom line is that in the greater scheme of things, Ed Dolan
matters not. He thinks otherwise and wishes that others did too, but
alas the mouth that roared ... head swollen, Ed Dolan is his own worst
enemy. He will never achieve the recognition that he so desperately
craves. He will die a lonely man. His legacy will be his insanity.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 01 Apr 2006 03:13:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143869923.301493.137940@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Ed,
>
> I bottom posted. Woops, I'll have to correct that.
>
> Don't you ever tire of these extended sermons of yours.
Just do it right and we can get onto other things.
[...]
> The bottom line is that in the greater scheme of things, Ed Dolan
> matters not. He thinks otherwise and wishes that others did too, but
> alas the mouth that roared ... head swollen, Ed Dolan is his own worst
> enemy. He will never achieve the recognition that he so desperately
> craves. He will die a lonely man. His legacy will be his insanity.
Jim, no one will listen to tripe like this. Everyone on these newgroups
knows me better than you think. They know I am just tweaking them and they
have adjusted to it. Sometimes I think that is all Ed Gin was doing to you.
That is basically all that Tom Sherman was doing to you also. Do you not
have any insight at all? Have you ever considered seeking a bit a
psychiatric help for your various hang ups.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 31 Mar 2006 20:28:35
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
Are you really that dense?
Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 01 Apr 2006 02:43:45
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143865715.626627.206990@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
> intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
> great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
> that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
> Are you really that dense?
No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it is
just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers who
will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I come
across as intelligent and why you do not.
> Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
> no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
> numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
> Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
> the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
> the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
> venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
> misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
> though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
> as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
> not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
> have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.
RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM is a
paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.
However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also noticed
the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a whole.
Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was doing
for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 31 Mar 2006 19:02:19
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,,
I know this isn't email, but I know how this bugs you, and I top posted
again too ;^)
Sherman and Gin are not one and the same and I never said they were,
but they are not polar opposites. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
issue with that. I did not feel that anyone who defended Gin should be
treated any differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice and
as such is not open for debate.
Sherman was a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
verb? Your opinion regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
matters not and is half-baked anyways.
I don't need to come up with a way to deal with you. I will deal with
you as I chose. I have to tell you though that nothing would please me
more than to deal with you up close and personal like. Like someone
else said in the past. If you were to say half the crap you do to
someone else in their face instead of from behind that keyboard, you'd
find out how someone deals with the likes of you.
As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it
you'd likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1143775294.831032.251780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > HEAD Dolan wrote...
> >
> >> We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3
> >> of us
> >> have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.
> >
> > This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
> > it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
> > whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
> > Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
> > senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
> > identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
> > McNaa has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
> > all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
> > and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
> > he isn't talking out his ass, that is.
> >
> > Jim McNaa
>
> FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!
>
> Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was the
> same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
> elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?
>
> Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
> together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on was
> their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
> that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally say
> something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a miracle.
> But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.
>
> You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both Sherman
> and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you disagree
> with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in anyone
> on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.
>
> Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania. You
> should try to relax more and you might be more likable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 01 Apr 2006 03:01:25
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143860539.039146.181250@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Ed,,
>
> I know this isn't email, but I know how this bugs you, and I top posted
> again too ;^)
>
> Sherman and Gin are not one and the same and I never said they were,
> but they are not polar opposites. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
> issue with that. I did not feel that anyone who defended Gin should be
> treated any differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice and
> as such is not open for debate.
Yes, I do agree with you that Sherman was wrong to defend Gin, but still he
was not anything like Gin. He was merely being loyal to a friend apparently.
As you well know, I hate Gin just as much as you do.
> Sherman was a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
> verb? Your opinion regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
> matters not and is half-baked anyways.
Well, those posts are in the past now and it seems Tom Sherman is no longer
with us.
> I don't need to come up with a way to deal with you. I will deal with
> you as I chose. I have to tell you though that nothing would please me
> more than to deal with you up close and personal like. Like someone
> else said in the past. If you were to say half the crap you do to
> someone else in their face instead of from behind that keyboard, you'd
> find out how someone deals with the likes of you.
Now you are acting like a child yet once again. Please try to grow up and
act your age. Remember one thing for sure, not everyone in this world will
like you no matter how you try to please.
> As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
> misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
> contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
> shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it
> you'd likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.
Poor JimmyMac, ever the child of his primitive emotions. I actually would
like to met Ed Gin in person to perhaps discover what dynamic was in play
there. Ed Gin forged names and addresses, but other than that I do not
believe he was all that bad a person. He called me every name in the book,
but so what, I do that all the time myself. And so does JimmyMac, but he
does it in a very curious roundabout way to say the least.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Jim McNaa
>
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1143775294.831032.251780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> > HEAD Dolan wrote...
>> >
>> >> We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how
>> >> all 3
>> >> of us
>> >> have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.
>> >
>> > This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
>> > it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
>> > whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
>> > Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
>> > senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
>> > identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
>> > McNaa has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
>> > all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
>> > and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
>> > he isn't talking out his ass, that is.
>> >
>> > Jim McNaa
>>
>> FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!
>>
>> Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was
>> the
>> same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
>> elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?
>>
>> Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
>> together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on
>> was
>> their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
>> that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally
>> say
>> something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a
>> miracle.
>> But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.
>>
>> You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both
>> Sherman
>> and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you
>> disagree
>> with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in
>> anyone
>> on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.
>>
>> Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania.
>> You
>> should try to relax more and you might be more likable.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Mar 2006 19:21:34
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
HEAD Dolan wrote...
> We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us
> have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.
This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
McNaa has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
he isn't talking out his ass, that is.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 31 Mar 2006 01:05:47
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143775294.831032.251780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> HEAD Dolan wrote...
>
>> We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3
>> of us
>> have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.
>
> This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
> it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
> whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
> Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
> senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
> identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
> McNaa has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
> all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
> and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
> he isn't talking out his ass, that is.
>
> Jim McNaa
FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!
Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was the
same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?
Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on was
their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally say
something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a miracle.
But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.
You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both Sherman
and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you disagree
with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in anyone
on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.
Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania. You
should try to relax more and you might be more likable.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 29 Mar 2006 23:13:43
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Assumptions ... assumptions .... Opinions stated as fact. Nothing ever
changes where Head Swollen Ed Dolan is concerned. I'll tell you what
would make not only me happy, but everyone else too, Ed ... if you'd
take your obnoxious, sorry ass out of here, and for good this time.
Leave and don't come back like you promised you would at least half a
dozen times. You broke that promise as many times as you made it.
Well, so much for your credibility, Ed. If you feel that you are
wasting too much time on the newsgroup inhabitants and they are
unworthy of your self-proclaimed, alleged greatness, then take the
obvious appropriate action. Get the hell out of here and don't let the
door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Speaking of whiners. Quit whining about me giving you what you asked
for. You invited me to take you on in a private email. If you
don't' like the fact that I did as you asked, then you should be
angry with the person responsible ... you. You got exactly what you
asked for. As for focusing on you, Gin and Sherman, Gin is a nemesis
from way back and as I recall you focused pretty well on him yourself.
When Sherman came to the defense of Gin and crowd, of course I focused
on him. Correct me if I am wrong here, but Sherman has been a focus of
yours extending back for years. In case you haven't seen the obvious
difference here, allow me to enlighten you. You are unable to
selectively focus on anyone. You take on just about everyone priily
because they are not like you, don't hold your values, don't agree
with you, don't give you the respect that you demand. Grow up
HEADward the GRATE!
Ed Dolan has often implied that ARBR is HIS domain a place where he
performs housekeeping chores to curtail his inferiors like a cowboy
riding heard on cattle. Recently, he extended his reign to RBM and
another newsgroup that sounds as though it were specifically created
for him ... alt.usenet.kooks. I had a look to find nothing new.
Thread after thread-worn thread, one can hear the same old broken
record playing the same old song over and over and over. Ed is in dire
need of new material. He has been regurgitating the same old crap now
for years now. I'm not surprised though that he feels the need to look
in only once a week. He was catching a lot of flack from numerous
posters who appreciate him about as much as I do, which is to say not
at all. The bottom line is that Ed has an over-inflated opinion of his
importance. Ed needs to get over himself. Most everyone else has.
The odd thing is that Ed Dolan should know this by now, but he is in
denial.
Jim McNaa
P.S. I'll not apologize for being articulate. It is a pity that one
who was once a librarian struggles so with what I write and in
frustration objects to that which he cannot comprehend.
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1143424761.894620.48720@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here is how JimmyMac shoud have formatted his post:
>
> > bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> >> I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
> >> He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
> >> Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
> >> be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
> > philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
> > by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
> > misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
> > perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
> > but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
> > that yours is a minoity opinion.
> >
> > Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
> > not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
> > enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
> > disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
> > he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
> > by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
> > lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
> > rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
> > intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
> > Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.
> >
> > Jim McNaa
> >
> > bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> >> I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
> >> He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
> >> Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
> >> be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
>
> JimmyMac is a light weight. He loves to read his own words, which is why he
> misuses almost all of them. But what is even more startling is how his mind
> works. It is full of nothing but spite and envy. We saw this played out with
> Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us have responded to him -
> with contempt and disdain. He mainly engenders pity.
>
> JimmyMac refuses to post properly and never has anything to say that anyone
> would want to read, not even me when he is doing nothing but blathering
> about me. It is nothing but a long-winded whine. Since that is the case, I
> will refuse to read him any further, but will comment on what others have to
> say about him if anything.
>
> However, I am going to do one thing which should make JimmyMac happy. I am
> only going to look in on these newsgroups about once a week from now on. I
> am simply wasting too much time on all the idiots, morons and imbeciles
> which infest these groups - none of whom deserve my Greatness.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 31 Mar 2006 00:40:55
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143702823.264265.303730@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Ed,
Here JimmyMac addresses me as though there is no one else on this group.
That is only his first of many mistakes.
> Assumptions ... assumptions .... Opinions stated as fact. Nothing ever
> changes where Head Swollen Ed Dolan is concerned. I'll tell you what
> would make not only me happy, but everyone else too, Ed ... if you'd
> take your obnoxious, sorry ass out of here, and for good this time.
> Leave and don't come back like you promised you would at least half a
> dozen times. You broke that promise as many times as you made it.
> Well, so much for your credibility, Ed. If you feel that you are
> wasting too much time on the newsgroup inhabitants and they are
> unworthy of your self-proclaimed, alleged greatness, then take the
> obvious appropriate action. Get the hell out of here and don't let the
> door hit you in the ass on the way out.
>
> Speaking of whiners. Quit whining about me giving you what you asked
> for. You invited me to take you on in a private email. If you
> don't' like the fact that I did as you asked, then you should be
> angry with the person responsible ... you. You got exactly what you
> asked for. As for focusing on you, Gin and Sherman, Gin is a nemesis
> from way back and as I recall you focused pretty well on him yourself.
> When Sherman came to the defense of Gin and crowd, of course I focused
> on him. Correct me if I am wrong here, but Sherman has been a focus of
> yours extending back for years. In case you haven't seen the obvious
> difference here, allow me to enlighten you. You are unable to
> selectively focus on anyone. You take on just about everyone priily
> because they are not like you, don't hold your values, don't agree
> with you, don't give you the respect that you demand. Grow up
> HEADward the GRATE!
Yes, JimmyMac has got it right about no one on these freaking cycling groups
proving worthy of me - no, not even the redoubtable Tom Sherman. However, I
do selectively focus on who has ever earned my ire. Sooner or later, that
includes everyone. However, I try not to waste too much time on any one
given individual since they are never worth it.
> Ed Dolan has often implied that ARBR is HIS domain a place where he
> performs housekeeping chores to curtail his inferiors like a cowboy
> riding heard on cattle. Recently, he extended his reign to RBM and
> another newsgroup that sounds as though it were specifically created
> for him ... alt.usenet.kooks. I had a look to find nothing new.
That kooks newsgroup is for LM. I will not post to it (at least not in
conjunction with ARBR and RBM) since it is strictly for kooks. After all,
different universes are involved.
By the way, I can not make even a dent on RBM as it is just way too large a
newsgroup. ARBR is a different story however.
> Thread after thread-worn thread, one can hear the same old broken
> record playing the same old song over and over and over. Ed is in dire
> need of new material. He has been regurgitating the same old crap now
> for years now. I'm not surprised though that he feels the need to look
> in only once a week. He was catching a lot of flack from numerous
> posters who appreciate him about as much as I do, which is to say not
> at all. The bottom line is that Ed has an over-inflated opinion of his
> importance. Ed needs to get over himself. Most everyone else has.
> The odd thing is that Ed Dolan should know this by now, but he is in
> denial.
I will continue to tweak all the dopes that regularly show up on these
cycling groups. They do not deserve someone like me, but I am compassionate
and merciful. How else would they ever learn what fools they are.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 30 Mar 2006 07:50:39
From: netDenizen
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
>>
>>Ed Dolan the Great so-and-so - Minnesota???
I see that the midnight poster is still there. Try singing it to the
Stones' Midnight Rambler.
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2006 17:59:21
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Bill,
As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
that yours is a minoity opinion.
Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.
Jim McNaa
bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
> I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
> He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
> Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
> be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
|
| | |
Date: 29 Mar 2006 18:48:35
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1143424761.894620.48720@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Here is how JimmyMac shoud have formatted his post:
> bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
>> I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
>> He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
>> Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
>> be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
> Bill,
>
> As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
> philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
> by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
> misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
> perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
> but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
> that yours is a minoity opinion.
>
> Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
> not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
> enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
> disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
> he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
> by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
> lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
> rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
> intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
> Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.
>
> Jim McNaa
>
> bcrowell@excite.com wrote:
>> I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
>> He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
>> Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
>> be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
JimmyMac is a light weight. He loves to read his own words, which is why he
misuses almost all of them. But what is even more startling is how his mind
works. It is full of nothing but spite and envy. We saw this played out with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us have responded to him -
with contempt and disdain. He mainly engenders pity.
JimmyMac refuses to post properly and never has anything to say that anyone
would want to read, not even me when he is doing nothing but blathering
about me. It is nothing but a long-winded whine. Since that is the case, I
will refuse to read him any further, but will comment on what others have to
say about him if anything.
However, I am going to do one thing which should make JimmyMac happy. I am
only going to look in on these newsgroups about once a week from now on. I
am simply wasting too much time on all the idiots, morons and imbeciles
which infest these groups - none of whom deserve my Greatness.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 30 Mar 2006 05:58:45
From: Little Meow
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... S P A N K E D !!!
|
Edward Dolan edolan@iw.net wrote in news:Zu2dnZ3kvcNzt7bZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> However, I am going to do one thing which should make JimmyMac happy. I am
> only going to look in on these newsgroups about once a week from now on. I
> am simply wasting too much time on all the idiots, morons and imbeciles
> which infest these groups - none of whom deserve my Greatness.
>
Translation: "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! I GOT SPANKED TOO HARD!!!"
[ froups adjusted to where Ed is on topic ]
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2006 06:04:34
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!
|
| |
Date: 25 Mar 2006 16:52:10
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Here are some examples of your recent more outlandish babble and my
response...
You are obviously my inferior as everyone can so plainly see.
... Opinion stated as fact ... and erroneous at that. Keep repeating
it Ed and perhaps even you too will one day believe it to be true.
Everyone on these newsgroups LOVES me. That is obvious from all the
responses I get to my every utterance.
... Opinion stated as fact ... and erroneous at that. For some
peculiar reason, you confuse responses the negative with love. From
what I've read, most here loathe you.
Note how no one ever responds to anything you have to say.
... Yep, so what's your point??? See my next comment in this regard
That is because you are a world class bore and have the peculiar knack
of never saying anything that anyone would be interested in reading.
... Or is it because readers don't find what I say objectionable or
take issue with what I say, particularly with regard to your sorry ass.
It is logical to assume that the readers are simply in agreement with
my assessment of ARBR's quintessential parasitic TROLL. You are
responded to simply because readers take issue with your provocative
crap. Are you deaf ... dumb ... blind ... or "D" ... ALL of the above
the above.
I know that what pleases me will please millions of other folks.
... This assertion is so ludicrous as to require no comment.
Readers (I know how Ed likes it when I do that ;^) ...
Unfortunately, Ed Dolan is in this world, but fortunately Ed has
determined not to be part of it ... a hermit who resides in the
confining corner of cyberspace where from behind a keyboard he snipes
at those who dare venture into what he considers his exclusive domain
... ARBR. In a twisted crusade to garner recognition, the myopic
"visionary" engages his "inferiors" in a quest to bolster his fragile
ego and faltering insecurities. His repertoire of expression is, like
him mind, traditionally narrow, focused but askew and his rhetoric is
voluminous, but boringly repetitious. Ed is a fool who demands to be
heard. He has deluded himself into believing that the readership
actually cares about the shit this obnoxious asshole has to say. Pity
the man, for he is beyond SICK!!!
Jim McNaa
|
| |
Date: 25 Mar 2006 15:31:17
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed Dolan has yet to get it through his thick skull that I could care
less if he reads what I write, I have not intention of taking direction
from him and actually, do not value his opinion and wish he would abide
by his word and not bother with me. Then again this is the same man
who has given his word to depart ARBR, never to return countless times.
So much for the man's credibility.
Jim Mcnaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1142902581.012625.298310@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
> be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
> manner or get lost.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. What follows below was not even read by me even though I presume it is
> all about me. JimmyMac knows what he must do if he wants me to read what he
> has written. Unless and until he does, I shall not bother with him.
>
>
>
>
> >H E A D Dolan - Order or the Perpetual SORRY-ASSES,
> >
> > Fab is right. You are a little confused. I didn't ask you anything
> > about recumbent bicycles. Fred Hall who appended to my post did. I
> > wouldn't presume to ask you to pontificate about something you know
> > little about ... as if you need encouragement.
> >
> > Who is this proverbial "we" that is here to amuse. Do you have a
> > multiple personality disorder?
> >
> > You really have deluded yourself if you think anyone finds you amusing.
> > If you were so amusing, why then have so many asked you to take leave
> > of ARBR? Forget it. That was obviously a rhetorical question.
> >
> > You take on everyone because you haven't learned how to pick your
> > fights. You haven't the sense to differentiate between who is who is
> > not a fool. I simply targeted the biggest fool on ARBR. If you
> > consider being the biggest fool to be a compliment, then you are even a
> > bigger fool than I gave you credit for.
> >
> > You presume that you are envied when you are pitied. You presume that
> > everyone is your inferior. You presume incorrectly ... megalomaniac.
> > On one thing we can agree. You are obsesses only with yourself and
> > your alleged greatness. Who else would you consider worthy of yourself
> > other than yourself? Right next to narcissist in the dictionary is a
> > picture of Eg Dolan.
> >
> > ANALYSIS of Ed Dolan...
> >
> > Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
> > unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
> > ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
> > mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
> > contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
> > the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
> > emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
> > need of a therapist.
> >
> > The gap between Ed and reality is immense and insurmountable. Just
> > listen to what the man says of himself for what he intimates is very
> > telling. He professes to have attained spiritual fulfillment by
> > abnegating contact with others, in effect rejecting his humankind's
> > collective communal consciousness.
> >
> > Often, in disdain, Ed has avowed his cerebral transcendence over all of
> > ARBR's subscribers, pretentiously extolling his fanaticized
> > preeminence. For the sake of argument, humor Ed in his delusional
> > state and consider this. There is an inherent human desire to be
> > recognized by one's peers, but Ed contends that he has no peers.
> > Consequently, the very recognition that Ed demands is circumvented by
> > his own arrogance. Nonetheless, in utter contradiction, he perseveres
> > in his insatiable crusade to be heard by those who seemingly matter
> > not. Is this not just a bit incongruous?
> >
> > The pompous Ed Dolan subscribes to the mistaken impression that the
> > readership savors his every word whereas in reality the only person who
> > values what the man says is the many saying it. Ed is a pedant who is
> > enraptured be his own vacuous gibberish. With no one worthy of his
> > companionship, the sanctimonious hermit has little more than ARBR from
> > which to derive meaning in his life. ARBR has assumed an exaggerated
> > prominence in Ed's hierarchical order of relevance. ARBR has emerged
> > as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and
> > self-esteem. Regardless of Ed's expressed opinion of the ARBR
> > readership, without the lifeblood of the ARBR audience to sustain him,
> > Ed has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence.
> > Pity the misguided fool. It must really suck to be him.
> >
> > Jim McNaa
> >
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "Fred Hall" <fkhall@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:dviato$l49$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> > On Sat, 18 2006 00:47:04 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Greivously
> >> >>> Relentless
> >> >>> Egomaniacal
> >> >>> ARBR
> >> >>> Troll
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Jim McNaa
> >> >>>
> >> >>> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
> >> >>> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
> >> >>
> >> >>The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
> >> >>stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
> >> >
> >> > Do you have any recumbent bicycles to discuss, troll?
> >>
> >> JimmyMac and I do not have anything at all to say about recumbent
> >> bicycles.
> >> We are here mainly to amuse fools like you. However, JimmyMac has become
> >> a
> >> figure of derision and ridicule due to his obsession with the Great Ed
> >> Dolan. Note how the Great Ed Dolan takes on all fools, whereas JimmyMac
> >> only
> >> has eyes for the Great Ed Dolan. This is a compliment to me of course. I
> >> recognize that my Greatness engenders envy in my inferiors, but I must go
> >> on
> >> my way oblivious to all the dwarfs and midgets who pester about me like
> >> gnats and flies.
> >>
> >> But JimmyMac is always obsessed with someone. If it is not me, then it is
> >> Tom Sherman. Before him it was Ed Gin. And so it goes, just one
> >> pettifogging
> >> obsession after another. Please note that the only person the Great Ed
> >> Dolan
> >> is obsessed with is Himself. That is the measure of my Greatness.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> >
|
| |
Date: 20 Mar 2006 16:56:21
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
H E A D Dolan - Order or the Perpetual SORRY-ASSES,
Fab is right. You are a little confused. I didn't ask you anything
about recumbent bicycles. Fred Hall who appended to my post did. I
wouldn't presume to ask you to pontificate about something you know
little about ... as if you need encouragement.
Who is this proverbial "we" that is here to amuse. Do you have a
multiple personality disorder?
You really have deluded yourself if you think anyone finds you amusing.
If you were so amusing, why then have so many asked you to take leave
of ARBR? Forget it. That was obviously a rhetorical question.
You take on everyone because you haven't learned how to pick your
fights. You haven't the sense to differentiate between who is who is
not a fool. I simply targeted the biggest fool on ARBR. If you
consider being the biggest fool to be a compliment, then you are even a
bigger fool than I gave you credit for.
You presume that you are envied when you are pitied. You presume that
everyone is your inferior. You presume incorrectly ... megalomaniac.
On one thing we can agree. You are obsesses only with yourself and
your alleged greatness. Who else would you consider worthy of yourself
other than yourself? Right next to narcissist in the dictionary is a
picture of Eg Dolan.
ANALYSIS of Ed Dolan...
Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
need of a therapist.
The gap between Ed and reality is immense and insurmountable. Just
listen to what the man says of himself for what he intimates is very
telling. He professes to have attained spiritual fulfillment by
abnegating contact with others, in effect rejecting his humankind's
collective communal consciousness.
Often, in disdain, Ed has avowed his cerebral transcendence over all of
ARBR's subscribers, pretentiously extolling his fanaticized
preeminence. For the sake of argument, humor Ed in his delusional
state and consider this. There is an inherent human desire to be
recognized by one's peers, but Ed contends that he has no peers.
Consequently, the very recognition that Ed demands is circumvented by
his own arrogance. Nonetheless, in utter contradiction, he perseveres
in his insatiable crusade to be heard by those who seemingly matter
not. Is this not just a bit incongruous?
The pompous Ed Dolan subscribes to the mistaken impression that the
readership savors his every word whereas in reality the only person who
values what the man says is the many saying it. Ed is a pedant who is
enraptured be his own vacuous gibberish. With no one worthy of his
companionship, the sanctimonious hermit has little more than ARBR from
which to derive meaning in his life. ARBR has assumed an exaggerated
prominence in Ed's hierarchical order of relevance. ARBR has emerged
as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and
self-esteem. Regardless of Ed's expressed opinion of the ARBR
readership, without the lifeblood of the ARBR audience to sustain him,
Ed has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence.
Pity the misguided fool. It must really suck to be him.
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Fred Hall" <fkhall@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dviato$l49$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > On Sat, 18 2006 00:47:04 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >>> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
> >>>
> >>> Greivously
> >>> Relentless
> >>> Egomaniacal
> >>> ARBR
> >>> Troll
> >>>
> >>> Jim McNaa
> >>>
> >>> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
> >>> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
> >>
> >>The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
> >>stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
> >
> > Do you have any recumbent bicycles to discuss, troll?
>
> JimmyMac and I do not have anything at all to say about recumbent bicycles.
> We are here mainly to amuse fools like you. However, JimmyMac has become a
> figure of derision and ridicule due to his obsession with the Great Ed
> Dolan. Note how the Great Ed Dolan takes on all fools, whereas JimmyMac only
> has eyes for the Great Ed Dolan. This is a compliment to me of course. I
> recognize that my Greatness engenders envy in my inferiors, but I must go on
> my way oblivious to all the dwarfs and midgets who pester about me like
> gnats and flies.
>
> But JimmyMac is always obsessed with someone. If it is not me, then it is
> Tom Sherman. Before him it was Ed Gin. And so it goes, just one pettifogging
> obsession after another. Please note that the only person the Great Ed Dolan
> is obsessed with is Himself. That is the measure of my Greatness.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 22 Mar 2006 22:02:39
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142902581.012625.298310@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
PS. What follows below was not even read by me even though I presume it is
all about me. JimmyMac knows what he must do if he wants me to read what he
has written. Unless and until he does, I shall not bother with him.
>H E A D Dolan - Order or the Perpetual SORRY-ASSES,
>
> Fab is right. You are a little confused. I didn't ask you anything
> about recumbent bicycles. Fred Hall who appended to my post did. I
> wouldn't presume to ask you to pontificate about something you know
> little about ... as if you need encouragement.
>
> Who is this proverbial "we" that is here to amuse. Do you have a
> multiple personality disorder?
>
> You really have deluded yourself if you think anyone finds you amusing.
> If you were so amusing, why then have so many asked you to take leave
> of ARBR? Forget it. That was obviously a rhetorical question.
>
> You take on everyone because you haven't learned how to pick your
> fights. You haven't the sense to differentiate between who is who is
> not a fool. I simply targeted the biggest fool on ARBR. If you
> consider being the biggest fool to be a compliment, then you are even a
> bigger fool than I gave you credit for.
>
> You presume that you are envied when you are pitied. You presume that
> everyone is your inferior. You presume incorrectly ... megalomaniac.
> On one thing we can agree. You are obsesses only with yourself and
> your alleged greatness. Who else would you consider worthy of yourself
> other than yourself? Right next to narcissist in the dictionary is a
> picture of Eg Dolan.
>
> ANALYSIS of Ed Dolan...
>
> Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
> unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
> ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
> mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
> contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
> the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
> emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
> need of a therapist.
>
> The gap between Ed and reality is immense and insurmountable. Just
> listen to what the man says of himself for what he intimates is very
> telling. He professes to have attained spiritual fulfillment by
> abnegating contact with others, in effect rejecting his humankind's
> collective communal consciousness.
>
> Often, in disdain, Ed has avowed his cerebral transcendence over all of
> ARBR's subscribers, pretentiously extolling his fanaticized
> preeminence. For the sake of argument, humor Ed in his delusional
> state and consider this. There is an inherent human desire to be
> recognized by one's peers, but Ed contends that he has no peers.
> Consequently, the very recognition that Ed demands is circumvented by
> his own arrogance. Nonetheless, in utter contradiction, he perseveres
> in his insatiable crusade to be heard by those who seemingly matter
> not. Is this not just a bit incongruous?
>
> The pompous Ed Dolan subscribes to the mistaken impression that the
> readership savors his every word whereas in reality the only person who
> values what the man says is the many saying it. Ed is a pedant who is
> enraptured be his own vacuous gibberish. With no one worthy of his
> companionship, the sanctimonious hermit has little more than ARBR from
> which to derive meaning in his life. ARBR has assumed an exaggerated
> prominence in Ed's hierarchical order of relevance. ARBR has emerged
> as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and
> self-esteem. Regardless of Ed's expressed opinion of the ARBR
> readership, without the lifeblood of the ARBR audience to sustain him,
> Ed has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence.
> Pity the misguided fool. It must really suck to be him.
>
> Jim McNaa
>
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "Fred Hall" <fkhall@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dviato$l49$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> > On Sat, 18 2006 00:47:04 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >>> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
>> >>>
>> >>> Greivously
>> >>> Relentless
>> >>> Egomaniacal
>> >>> ARBR
>> >>> Troll
>> >>>
>> >>> Jim McNaa
>> >>>
>> >>> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
>> >>> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
>> >>
>> >>The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
>> >>stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
>> >
>> > Do you have any recumbent bicycles to discuss, troll?
>>
>> JimmyMac and I do not have anything at all to say about recumbent
>> bicycles.
>> We are here mainly to amuse fools like you. However, JimmyMac has become
>> a
>> figure of derision and ridicule due to his obsession with the Great Ed
>> Dolan. Note how the Great Ed Dolan takes on all fools, whereas JimmyMac
>> only
>> has eyes for the Great Ed Dolan. This is a compliment to me of course. I
>> recognize that my Greatness engenders envy in my inferiors, but I must go
>> on
>> my way oblivious to all the dwarfs and midgets who pester about me like
>> gnats and flies.
>>
>> But JimmyMac is always obsessed with someone. If it is not me, then it is
>> Tom Sherman. Before him it was Ed Gin. And so it goes, just one
>> pettifogging
>> obsession after another. Please note that the only person the Great Ed
>> Dolan
>> is obsessed with is Himself. That is the measure of my Greatness.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2006 16:12:47
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed Dolt...an,
And just how ... GRATE one can a post originated by me be construed as
stalking. In the loosest sense of the term, that is precisely what you
have been doing to a number of posters here, particularly Tom Sherman.
On the other hand, stalking is defined very specifically by law and you
obviously haven't a clue what stalking means as defined from a legal
stand point, but running your mouth about something you know next to
nothing about is not the least bit unusual for the GRATE one ... HEAD
Dolan - Order of the Perpetual SOURPUSSES.
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
> >
> > Greivously
> > Relentless
> > Egomaniacal
> > ARBR
> > Troll
> >
> > Jim McNaa
> >
> > P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
> > (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
>
> The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
> stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 18 Mar 2006 23:21:35
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142727167.305331.11840@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Ed Dolt...an,
>
> And just how ... GRATE one can a post originated by me be construed as
> stalking. In the loosest sense of the term, that is precisely what you
> have been doing to a number of posters here, particularly Tom Sherman.
> On the other hand, stalking is defined very specifically by law and you
> obviously haven't a clue what stalking means as defined from a legal
> stand point, but running your mouth about something you know next to
> nothing about is not the least bit unusual for the GRATE one ... HEAD
> Dolan - Order of the Perpetual SOURPUSSES.
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> > Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
>> >
>> > Greivously
>> > Relentless
>> > Egomaniacal
>> > ARBR
>> > Troll
>> >
>> > Jim McNaa
>> >
>> > P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
>> > (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
>>
>> The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
>> stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Mar 2006 05:26:26
From: Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:kJSdnb0eZf7sd4HZRVn-tw@prairiewave.com...
>>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
This maybe why you are such a WANKER.
Minnesota is 'America's septic tank'.
http://members.internettrash.com/mnsucks/
|
| | | | |
Date: 19 Mar 2006 01:02:53
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <fm@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:6Y5Tf.160042$B94.87847@pd7tw3no...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:kJSdnb0eZf7sd4HZRVn-tw@prairiewave.com...
>>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>
>
> This maybe why you are such a WANKER.
Fab shoud really stop with the WANKING or he will go blind.
> Minnesota is 'America's septic tank'.
>
> http://members.internettrash.com/mnsucks/
Sure, I am going to be dumb enough to go to a link given to me by a WANKER?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 19 Mar 2006 15:48:33
From: Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:LfadnUcR1bWzn4DZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> Sure, I am going to be dumb enough to go to a link given to me by a
> WANKER?
>
Ed you're a bit mixed up, you are the WANKER.
Anyway, check that link out, it should be fun for a guy from 'America's
septic tank'
like you.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 20 Mar 2006 04:34:47
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <fm@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:l3fTf.162022$B94.137569@pd7tw3no...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:LfadnUcR1bWzn4DZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>> Sure, I am going to be dumb enough to go to a link given to me by a
>> WANKER?
>>
>
> Ed you're a bit mixed up, you are the WANKER.
Nonsense, those who bring up the subject of wanking are ALWAYS wankers
themselves. Elementary my dear Watson!
> Anyway, check that link out, it should be fun for a guy from 'America's
> septic tank'
> like you.
I know all about Minnesota, both its virtues and its defects. There is no
one in the universe who can tell me anything about Minnesota, least of all a
scum bag like you.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | |
Date: 19 Mar 2006 00:58:56
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <fm@shaw.ca > wrote in message
news:6Y5Tf.160042$B94.87847@pd7tw3no...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:kJSdnb0eZf7sd4HZRVn-tw@prairiewave.com...
>>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>
>
> This maybe why you are such a WANKER.
>
> Minnesota is 'America's septic tank'.
>
> http://members.internettrash.com/mnsucks/
>
>
|
| |
Date: 18 Mar 2006 00:47:04
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
>
> Greivously
> Relentless
> Egomaniacal
> ARBR
> Troll
>
> Jim McNaa
>
> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 18 Mar 2006 19:08:18
From: Fred Hall
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
On Sat, 18 2006 00:47:04 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net >
wrote:
>
>"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
>>
>> Greivously
>> Relentless
>> Egomaniacal
>> ARBR
>> Troll
>>
>> Jim McNaa
>>
>> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
>> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
>
>The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
>stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
Do you have any recumbent bicycles to discuss, troll?
>
>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>aka
>Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Apr 2006 21:18:08
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
Ed,
Every time you reply with your cut and paste boilerplate ...
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I
can't be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the
acceptable manner or get lost.
...you contradict yourself by taking the time to read what I've written
and respond with a disclaimer, This is being bothered ... taking the
time and making the effort to respond. Either be bothered or don't,
but don't be bothered and then calim that you're not. Doing so makes
you out to be the fool that everyone knows you are. The conundrum
continues!
I suppose we could continue to do this endlessly, so that you could
continue to make my point dunderhead. This is the easy way out for you
and I do understand your laziness and cowardice.
Jim
|
| | | | |
Date: 06 Apr 2006 10:12:53
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1144297088.274647.48750@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Every time you reply with your cut and paste boilerplate ...
>
> You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I
> can't be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the
> acceptable manner or get lost.
>
> ...you contradict yourself by taking the time to read what I've written
> and respond with a disclaimer, This is being bothered ... taking the
> time and making the effort to respond. Either be bothered or don't,
> but don't be bothered and then calim that you're not. Doing so makes
> you out to be the fool that everyone knows you are. The conundrum
> continues!
>
> I suppose we could continue to do this endlessly, so that you could
> continue to make my point dunderhead. This is the easy way out for you
> and I do understand your laziness and cowardice.
>
> Jim
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Mar 2006 05:33:33
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!
|
"Fred Hall" <fkhall@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:dviato$l49$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Sat, 18 2006 00:47:04 -0600, "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:1142640883.963021.191270@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>> Ed Dolan is G R E A T.....
>>>
>>> Greivously
>>> Relentless
>>> Egomaniacal
>>> ARBR
>>> Troll
>>>
>>> Jim McNaa
>>>
>>> P.S. HEAD Dolan the GRATE, be apprized that no linguistic tools
>>> (dictionary, thesaurus, etc.) were required.
>>
>>The only one doing any trolling here is JimmyMac. He has also become a
>>stalker. Is anything more pathetic than that!
>
> Do you have any recumbent bicycles to discuss, troll?
JimmyMac and I do not have anything at all to say about recumbent bicycles.
We are here mainly to amuse fools like you. However, JimmyMac has become a
figure of derision and ridicule due to his obsession with the Great Ed
Dolan. Note how the Great Ed Dolan takes on all fools, whereas JimmyMac only
has eyes for the Great Ed Dolan. This is a compliment to me of course. I
recognize that my Greatness engenders envy in my inferiors, but I must go on
my way oblivious to all the dwarfs and midgets who pester about me like
gnats and flies.
But JimmyMac is always obsessed with someone. If it is not me, then it is
Tom Sherman. Before him it was Ed Gin. And so it goes, just one pettifogging
obsession after another. Please note that the only person the Great Ed Dolan
is obsessed with is Himself. That is the measure of my Greatness.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
