| |
Main
Date: 08 Mar 2006 19:34:33
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
> --- Asked by ED: ----
>> > > But just
>> > > for the record, I would like to hear what you think sexual
> gratification
>> > > consists of?
>> >
>
> --- Answered by GG: ----
>> > Closeness, intimacy, energy, laughter, bonding, mental and tactile
>> > stimulation, the incredibly primal (and completely natural) feeling of
> two
>> > strong bodies coming together in union....I could go on, but presumably
> you
>> > get the idea.
>> >
>> > That you would have to ask such a question is a sad testament to your
> narrow
>> > and fearful way of looking at the world.
>
> Did my answer make you uncomfortable? Given the fearful way you view
> sexuality and intimacy, I suspect it would. Regardless, it was directly
> relevant to the discussion, and your snippage reveals more about your
> fears
> and intellectual dishonesty than anything else.
GaryG is an Epicurean. Ed Dolan is an Ascetic. These are diametrically
opposed philosophies. Never the twain shall meet. I am not going to explain
these terms as they can be found in any encyclopedia.
I determined to become an ascetic by the time I was in my mid-teens. Just
being around the other type has always disgusted me. Since they disgusted
me, there had to be something the matter with how they thought about things.
It seemed they were overly into the flesh, and so I went in the opposite
direction and got into the spirit above all else. In fact, I may have become
too mental for my own good, but once embarked on this path I never looked
back.
The 4 years I spent in the Navy confirmed me in every thought I ever had
about the matter. I abjured forever the pursuit of pleasure because I did
not like what it did to people. To avoid pain is one thing, but to actively
pursue pleasure was a horror. People became worse than swine. I resolved
never to have any association with such pigs once I got out of the Navy if I
could help it.
I have always enjoyed going without and doing without. I like to wander
about in deserts and experience the emptiness of things. I infinitely prefer
to be alone than to ever be with anyone. I do need the artifacts of mankind,
but I do not need man himself. So what does all this have to do with GaryG?
Well, he is the exact opposite of me, so by telling you about me, I am also
telling you about him.
We all have to make some choices about the kind of person we want to be.
GaryG has chosen his way and I have chosen my way. What he describes above
as the good things of life horrifies me. Any kind of intimacy is a living
death. I can't stand to be touched or to even have anyone close to me.
Laughter is for fools. I can go for months without speaking to anyone other
than the most elementary type of greetings.
Most men will not be ascetics. Most men will be Epicureans like GaryG. The
gulf between us is vast and unbridgeable. He seems like an animal to me, no
better than a dog. I would rather be dead than be like him. And all of this
because of a difference in philosophy!
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.
T.S.Eliot - The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 14 Mar 2006 20:33:46
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
Ed,
TRANSLATION: I am responding to indicate that I have no intention of
responding. Is this not similar to the statement ... "This page
intentionally left balnk"??? What we have here is HEAD Dolan (rhymes
with swollen) exhibiting more of his contradictory nonsense as the
conundrum continues.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 14 Mar 2006 23:22:55
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142397226.464101.152180@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> TRANSLATION: I am responding to indicate that I have no intention of
> responding. Is this not similar to the statement ... "This page
> intentionally left balnk"??? What we have here is HEAD Dolan (rhymes
> with swollen) exhibiting more of his contradictory nonsense as the
> conundrum continues.
>
> Jim McNaa
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 14 Mar 2006 19:47:31
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
Ed,
TRANSLATION: I am responding to indicate that I have no intention of
responding. Is this not similar to the statement ... "This page
intentionally left balnk"??? What we have here is HEAD Dolan (rhymes
with swollen) exhibiting more of his contradictory nonsense as the
conundrum continues.
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1142226932.458389.288640@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > GaryG,
> >
> > I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
> > Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
> > say ... just asking the question answers itself.
> >
> > Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
> > between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
> > between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
> > the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
> > questions.
>
> Jim does not post properly, therefore I can't be bothered with him.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 14 Mar 2006 22:21:56
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
<jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142394451.525170.147530@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> TRANSLATION: I am responding to indicate that I have no intention of
> responding. Is this not similar to the statement ... "This page
> intentionally left balnk"??? What we have here is HEAD Dolan (rhymes
> with swollen) exhibiting more of his contradictory nonsense as the
> conundrum continues.
>
> Jim McNaa
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1142226932.458389.288640@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> > GaryG,
>> >
>> > I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
>> > Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
>> > say ... just asking the question answers itself.
>> >
>> > Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
>> > between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
>> > between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
>> > the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
>> > questions.
>>
>> Jim does not post properly, therefore I can't be bothered with him.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 21:16:09
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
GaryG,
I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
say ... just asking the question answers itself.
Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
questions.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 01:50:53
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142226969.155005.77360@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> GaryG,
>
> I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
> Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
> say ... just asking the question answers itself.
>
> Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
> between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
> between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
> the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
> questions.
Jim does not post properly, therefore I can't be bothered with him.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 21:15:32
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
GaryG,
I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
say ... just asking the question answers itself.
Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
questions.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 01:50:04
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142226932.458389.288640@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> GaryG,
>
> I already voted. It seems to me that the vote could be simplified.
> Would one rather be normal like you or abnormal like Ed? As Ed would
> say ... just asking the question answers itself.
>
> Good questions regarding sex and procreation and here's more. Is sex
> between ital partners for pure enjoyment permissible? Is sex
> between unried partners for the purpose of bringing a bastard into
> the world permissible? I'm not taking a stand ... just asking the
> questions.
Jim does not post properly, therefore I can't be bothered with him.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 20:58:50
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Ed,
So you do want to start a poll after all. The way I understand this is
the question is whether I would rather be a hermit like Head Dolan or a
fornicator like GaryG. Whoever is keeping count,,would you please k
me down as one for GaryG.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 00:10:50
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142225930.232500.111550@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSOTERS ARE DIOTS!
> Ed,
>
> So you do want to start a poll after all. The way I understand this is
> the question is whether I would rather be a hermit like Head Dolan or a
> fornicator like GaryG. Whoever is keeping count,,would you please k
> me down as one for GaryG.
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 17:13:40
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Ed,
An artifact is anything made by man, including his thoughts, whether
spoken
Or written.
... No one needed a definition, but thanks for confirming that a link
is an artifact, something that you claim to NEED.
I will gladly go to a link provided it is properly introduced.
... You have never gone to a link suggested so I guess that means that
you didn't consider them to be properly introduced whatever that escape
clause means. I would like to properly introduce you to the following
link. Never mind. You'd weasel you way out because that's what
weasels do.
We all know from our recent Ed Gin experience not to go to links that
are
given to us by scoundrels. Or do we?
... So now you speak not just for the "GRATE" one assume that you speak
for everyone ... NOT!!!
I am easy to take or leave.
Well, You're not easy to take, but it would be easy to take you
leaving. I'll grant you that.
I am only on a couple of threads at a time
... that just happens to comprise the greatest (I know you like that
word) number of posts by the most prolific poster of off-topic nonsense
as you have often boasted. What an achievement ... NOT!!!
and they are almost always off-topic threads, just as this one is. I
leave it to
the reader as to whether or not I am influential, but I hope to be at
least
entertaining if nothing else.
... Well, not according to readership that has asked you to take you
tired act elsewhere. I was not aware that obnoxious and entertaining
were synonyms. Has my Thesaurus failed me?
Jim
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1142095716.555455.120220@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> > Readers,
> >
> > Unlike Ed, I do not have an irrational fear of contact with my fellow
> > man or my fellow man's links. Didn't Ed claim to be in need of man's
> > artifacts? Is not a link an artifact of man? Truth be told, Ed fears
> > being confronted with the truth. He fears what the link has to offer.
>
> I freely choose not to have much contact with my fellow man.
>
> An artifact is anything made by man, including his thoughts, whether spoken
> or written. I will gladly go to a link provided it is properly introduced.
> We all know from our recent Ed Gin experience not to go to links that are
> given to us by scoundrels. Or do we?
>
> > The GRATE Ed Dolan claims not to be susceptible to the suggestions and
> > directions of others, but demands that we be susceptible to his, like
> > that one-sided proposition would somehow be appealing to those whom he
> > insults and castigates ... NOT!!! Ed also demands that we aspire to
> > his opined, imaginary "greatness" and in the same breath asserts that
> > such attainment is impossible. Unfortunately, Ed's contradictory,
> > nonsensical mantra has become an unwanted and unneeded part and parcel
> > of ARBR. Countless members have told him that countless times, but he
> > refuses to heed the message. What Ed fails to comprehend is that there
> > is a common denominator in all this ... Ed Dolan.
>
> I am easy to take or leave. I am only on a couple of threads at a time and
> they are almost always off-topic threads, just as this one is. I leave it to
> the reader as to whether or not I am influential, but I hope to be at least
> entertaining if nothing else.
>
> The solution for anyone who does not like what I have to say is to just not
> read my messages. You don't even have to kill file me. Just don't read my
> messages. Hells Bells, I do that all the time to fully 90% of the posters
> here on ARBR.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 22:16:09
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
<jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142126020.003004.308300@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
No need to address me by name. When you write to a newsgroup, everyone is
equally invited to read what you have written and to respond if they so
wish.
> An artifact is anything made by man, including his thoughts, whether
> spoken
> or written.
>
> ... No one needed a definition, but thanks for confirming that a link
> is an artifact, something that you claim to NEED.
Most folks will not know what is meant by 'artifact'. They will think it is
an object like a piece of pottery dug up by an archeologist.
I choose which artifacts that I am going to bother with. An improperly
introduced link is strictly for fools. I am very selective about what
artifacts I bother with, just as I am with what men I bother with. Do you
think I would ever bother with a scum bucket like Ed Gin? Of course not! I
CHOOSE who and what I am going to give my attention to. And I CHOOSE what I
am NOT going to give my attention to.
> I will gladly go to a link provided it is properly introduced.
>
> ... You have never gone to a link suggested so I guess that means that
> you didn't consider them to be properly introduced whatever that escape
> clause means. I would like to properly introduce you to the following
> link. Never mind. You'd weasel you way out because that's what
> weasels do.
A proper introduction means that I know what I am going to see without any
surprises. We all know from bitter experience that a scum bucket like Ed Gin
will refer you to pornographic images. Maybe you don't mind seeing that kind
of crapola, but I do.
[...]
> ... Well, not according to readership that has asked you to take you
> tired act elsewhere. I was not aware that obnoxious and entertaining
> were synonyms. Has my Thesaurus failed me?
I have received numerous communications from others who tell me to continue
with my ministrations. They have the wit to see the entertainment value that
I provide to an otherwise terminally boring newsgroup. ARBR would be as dead
as a door nail without the Great Ed Dolan's intervention. I mean, how would
any of you know what big jackasses you are if it weren't for me.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 15:33:40
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Unless it has altered his ISP, this thing's Internet Service Provider
is
PrairieWave Communications
a...@iw.net
Simply forward a copy of its posts--including FULL HEADERS [1]--to
PrairieWave, explaining that it is in violation of THEIR Acceptable Use
Policy, section 1.i.13.b [2], and ask them to deal with it. If enough
people do this, it will be shut down, at least temporarily.
Gotta be more productive than communicating with it, no?
----
[1] If using Google to access r.b.m., click "show options," then click
"show original" and copy the entirety of the post that shows up;
[2] "postings that do not conform to the various conventions,
guidelines and local culture found in each newsgroup as a whole.
Posting multiple copies of the same message in a 30-day period
(spamming) is prohibited. Posting articles with falsified header
information is prohibited."
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 22:23:57
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<neil0502@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142120020.735505.189920@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Unless it has altered his ISP, this thing's Internet Service Provider
> is
>
> PrairieWave Communications
> a...@iw.net
>
>
> Simply forward a copy of its posts--including FULL HEADERS [1]--to
> PrairieWave, explaining that it is in violation of THEIR Acceptable Use
>
> Policy, section 1.i.13.b [2], and ask them to deal with it. If enough
> people do this, it will be shut down, at least temporarily.
>
>
> Gotta be more productive than communicating with it, no?
> ----
> [1] If using Google to access r.b.m., click "show options," then click
> "show original" and copy the entirety of the post that shows up;
>
>
> [2] "postings that do not conform to the various conventions,
> guidelines and local culture found in each newsgroup as a whole.
> Posting multiple copies of the same message in a 30-day period
> (spamming) is prohibited. Posting articles with falsified header
> information is prohibited."
Lots of luck with that since I do not violate any of the conventions. But it
is always good to hear from the peanut gallery even though they never have
anything to say.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 10:01:11
From: D'ohBoy
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<snippage of Ed being Ed >
Ed -
You possess surprising tolerance for such a powerful being.
D'ohBoy
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 08:48:36
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Readers,
Unlike Ed, I do not have an irrational fear of contact with my fellow
man or my fellow man's links. Didn't Ed claim to be in need of man's
artifacts? Is not a link an artifact of man? Truth be told, Ed fears
being confronted with the truth. He fears what the link has to offer.
The GRATE Ed Dolan claims not to be susceptible to the suggestions and
directions of others, but demands that we be susceptible to his, like
that one-sided proposition would somehow be appealing to those whom he
insults and castigates ... NOT!!! Ed also demands that we aspire to
his opined, imaginary "greatness" and in the same breath asserts that
such attainment is impossible. Unfortunately, Ed's contradictory,
nonsensical mantra has become an unwanted and unneeded part and parcel
of ARBR. Countless members have told him that countless times, but he
refuses to heed the message. What Ed fails to comprehend is that there
is a common denominator in all this ... Ed Dolan.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 13:08:05
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142095716.555455.120220@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> Readers,
>
> Unlike Ed, I do not have an irrational fear of contact with my fellow
> man or my fellow man's links. Didn't Ed claim to be in need of man's
> artifacts? Is not a link an artifact of man? Truth be told, Ed fears
> being confronted with the truth. He fears what the link has to offer.
I freely choose not to have much contact with my fellow man.
An artifact is anything made by man, including his thoughts, whether spoken
or written. I will gladly go to a link provided it is properly introduced.
We all know from our recent Ed Gin experience not to go to links that are
given to us by scoundrels. Or do we?
> The GRATE Ed Dolan claims not to be susceptible to the suggestions and
> directions of others, but demands that we be susceptible to his, like
> that one-sided proposition would somehow be appealing to those whom he
> insults and castigates ... NOT!!! Ed also demands that we aspire to
> his opined, imaginary "greatness" and in the same breath asserts that
> such attainment is impossible. Unfortunately, Ed's contradictory,
> nonsensical mantra has become an unwanted and unneeded part and parcel
> of ARBR. Countless members have told him that countless times, but he
> refuses to heed the message. What Ed fails to comprehend is that there
> is a common denominator in all this ... Ed Dolan.
I am easy to take or leave. I am only on a couple of threads at a time and
they are almost always off-topic threads, just as this one is. I leave it to
the reader as to whether or not I am influential, but I hope to be at least
entertaining if nothing else.
The solution for anyone who does not like what I have to say is to just not
read my messages. You don't even have to kill file me. Just don't read my
messages. Hells Bells, I do that all the time to fully 90% of the posters
here on ARBR.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 07:57:14
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Gary,
Yep ... no testicular fortitude and a badly scambled psyche about sums
it up.
Jim McNaa .
GaryG wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:YIudnY8m26vTbI3Z4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
> >
> > "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> > news:HU5Qf.239$2W7.73@fe07.lga...
> > > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:HIGdnTJRrZdez43ZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> > [...]
> >
> > >> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
> > >>
> > >> Ad infinitum!
> >
> > > Poor ED. After reading this posting (where you snipped the parts that
> > > obviously made you uncomfortable), and after reading your posts to
> others,
> > > I
> > > stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
> >
> > Stand by it all you want. I am not a fornicator like you are.
> >
> > > Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the norm
> > > of
> > > human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality (homosexual
> > > or
> > > heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of a
> > > diseased pattern of thinking.
> >
> > Sex is for procreation - period! It is not for recreation - period!
>
> Were you sexually abused when you were young? You've mentioned Catholic
> priests previously, and this could be one reason for your bizarre fears of
> sexual intimacy.
>
> You've also often criticized homosexual behavior because you claim that it's
> "unnatural"...well, I can assure you that your own fears of sex are every
> bit as "unnatural", from the perspective of the perpetuation of the species.
>
> BTW - have you ever "procreated"? Or, attempted to?
>
> >
> > > That you would brag about your mental illness, and assert its
> "greatness"
> > > is
> > > just pathetic and sad.
> > >
> > > If it came down to a vote on whether folks would rather live like the
> > > "great
> > > ED", or the "fornicator GaryG", you and I both know that I would win in
> a
> > > landslide.
> >
> > I think you might be right about that Gary. But that only goes to show how
> > degenerate and sinful everyone is. Quantity has nothing to do with
> quality,
> > most especially when we are talking about morality.
> >
> > > You really should seek out some professional help...you're not too old
> to
> > > change, though I suspect you're too afraid to try.
> >
> > Yes, I am set in my ways like concrete, but I took this set in my
> mid-teens
> > and have never seen any reason to change.
> >
> > > BTW - most "saints" have been recognized for their humanity...how can
> you
> > > claim to be a saint when humanity and human contact "disgusts" you?
> >
> > I am a vengeful and wrathful Saint, kind of like the God of the Old
> > Testament. None of this Christian "niceness" for me.
>
> In your own mind you may be vengeful and wrathful, ED. But in reality,
> you're a bag of neuroses and fears. You spend two hours per day spewing
> forth your silly "wrath" on usenet, because you're too afraid to do it
> face-to-face in your neighborhood bar.
>
> You really are a mess...
>
> GG
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> >
> >
> >
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 11:07:07
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142092634.494343.26210@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Gary,
>
> Yep ... no testicular fortitude and a badly scambled psyche about sums
> it up.
>
> Jim McNaa .
Jim should have written "no balls" instead of "no testicular fortitude", but
he is ever wordy and being misled by his own lack of education. It is good
to have some native intelligence, but it is even more important to have an
education.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 07:34:59
From: Tom Keats
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
In article <J_AQf.34138$wl.23005@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk >,
"Pinky" <tapan@PSANTISPAMblueyonder.co.uk > writes:
>
> "Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8l2uud.7ob.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
>> In article <bO6dneD3s7moG5LZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com>,
>
>
> Heavily snipped <snip><snip> <snip>
I don't blame ya.
> Well said Tom.
I forgot to implore the rec.bicycles.racing folks to
heavily cross-post to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, thereby
letting 'em know what's what.
cheers,
Tom
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 12:06:21
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:3nquud.3q1.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
[...]
> I forgot to implore the rec.bicycles.racing folks to
> heavily cross-post to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, thereby
> letting 'em know what's what.
Newsgroups trimmed.
All newsgroups appear very strange to me. I would say most of the posts that
appear on RBM do not interest me much, if at all. But that seems equally
true of all newsgroups. Some brainless nitwit will post a topic and then
other brainless nitwits will want to comment on it. It is nothing if not the
blind leading the blind.
RBM is a large group, but there are regulars there that dominate the group
just like they do on ARBR. There is a danger in being too small a group as
it can easily be destroyed by a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. However,
it is not so easy to destroy a large group as there are just too many topics
and posts each and every day. The fact that 99% of them are rubbish doesn't
matter. It means that a criminal vandal troll will not be able to destroy
it. That is the advantage of RBM over ARBR - and it is the only advantage.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 09:03:42
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Ed,
I have no son named Tim.
Yes, you said that you could NOT do without mankind's artifacts even
though you could easily do without mankind. I not only read that, I
comprehended it. You read what I wrote. Comprehended it not and
pleaded with Tom Sherman for an interpretation and you were once a
librarian???
Your perception of me falls far short of reality. This is not
surprising, since you have are obviously out of touch with reality.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 11:24:52
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142010221.987523.187800@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> I have no son named Tim.
Yes, I stand corrected on that, but the name McNaa is really rare in
these parts (SW Minnesota). I think it is a more common name in Chicagoland
no doubt. I suspect Dolan is a more common name there too.
> Yes, you said that you could NOT do without mankind's artifacts even
> though you could easily do without mankind. I not only read that, I
> comprehended it. You read what I wrote. Comprehended it not and
> pleaded with Tom Sherman for an interpretation and you were once a
> librarian???
When you do no include the pertinent paragraph you are referencing, then I
cannot be bothered. It is well known that I never go back and look anything
up. Either present the object for my inspection or else forget about it.
I once went 2 years without talking to anyone, except for the most
elementary asking and answering. That is what I meant when I said I could
easily do without mankind.
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 08:52:45
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Ed,
Sorry about all those typos of mine. Just stopped by to indicate how
errant your analysis is ... nothing out of the ordinary there though.
Consistency is your only virtue and our misfortune.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 11:40:54
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142009565.806948.115980@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Ed,
>
> Sorry about all those typos of mine. Just stopped by to indicate how
> errant your analysis is ... nothing out of the ordinary there though.
> Consistency is your only virtue and our misfortune.
>
> Jim McNaa
It appears that you are using the Google website as your newsreader which
may account for your consistent top posting. Why not get these simple things
right so we can move on?
Also, I do like some of the previous message to go on. I do not like to turn
Usenet into email type messages. Please post like everybody else does.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 07:42:31
From: D'ohBoy
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<snippage of my response to Ed's masturbatory rantings >
Hey, Ed, did you know you're named after a dysfunction of the male
reproductive organ? Or, is it more appropriate to say that E.D. was
named after you?
Just wondering -
D'ohBoy
|
| |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 06:12:53
From: D'ohBoy
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<snippage of Ed's masturbatory rantings >
Hi, FreakBoy,
Wouldn't a "god" be aware of his own god-hood?
Too bad you're from Minnesota. If you had been from WI, then your
ascension to Valhalla would have been assured. As it is, you're just a
wanna-be.
D'ohBoy
|
| | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 11:48:53
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"D'ohBoy" <petengail@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1141999973.594575.216080@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> <snippage of Ed's masturbatory rantings>
>
> Hi, FreakBoy,
>
> Wouldn't a "god" be aware of his own god-hood?
I am always in the process of becoming and never having quite arrived.
> Too bad you're from Minnesota. If you had been from WI, then your
> ascension to Valhalla would have been assured. As it is, you're just a
> wanna-be.
Wisconsin is the greatest state in the nation for cycling, no doubt about
that. However, Minnesota actually has better bike trails as they are paved
whereas many in Wisconsin aren't.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
PS. Always good to hear from the masturbating crowd on ARBR and RBM. Wonder
whatever happened to Slugger?
|
| |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 12:08:00
From: D'ohBoy
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
<snippage of Ed's wild rantings >
You, sir, are a FREAK.
D'ohBoy
>From the "What a surprise" file: Based on Dick Cheney's disclosed
Halliburton stock holdings, he makes $21,709.56 from the Iraq War EVERY
SINGLE DAY. THAT'S OVER $7.3 MILLION PER YEAR.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:43:29
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"D'ohBoy" <petengail@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1141934880.834134.316280@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> <snippage of Ed's wild rantings>
>
> You, sir, are a FREAK.
>
> D'ohBoy
But I am interesting and amusing to read, unlike the 99% who post here. ARBR
and RBM have never had it so good!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 19:05:37
From: di
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:UN-dnTmgt4UuVo3ZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
>
> "D'ohBoy" <petengail@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1141934880.834134.316280@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> <snippage of Ed's wild rantings>
>>
>> You, sir, are a FREAK.
>>
>> D'ohBoy
>
> But I am interesting and amusing to read, unlike the 99% who post here.
> ARBR and RBM have never had it so good!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
immature 13 year old punks should stay off the newsgroup.
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 19:24:43
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"di" <di9999@cox.net > wrote in message
news:zh4Qf.116739$QW2.77541@dukeread08...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:UN-dnTmgt4UuVo3ZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
>>
>> "D'ohBoy" <petengail@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1141934880.834134.316280@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>>> <snippage of Ed's wild rantings>
>>>
>>> You, sir, are a FREAK.
>>>
>>> D'ohBoy
>>
>> But I am interesting and amusing to read, unlike the 99% who post here.
>> ARBR and RBM have never had it so good!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>
>>
>
> immature 13 year old punks should stay off the newsgroup.
There is no 13 year old in the entire history of the world who has ever
written like the Great Ed Dolan. I am so mature that I already have one foot
in the grave. But thanks for calling me a punk. No one has paid me a
compliment like that in ages.
Don't you think di for a user name is a bit too much. Why not just d? Or how
about just a blank space, like so . This would go nicely with your
overall general blankness.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 20:47:06
From: di
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:t4mdnY58jKfDSI3ZRVn-jA@prairiewave.com...
>
> "di" <di9999@cox.net> wrote in message There is no 13 year old in the
> entire history of the world who has ever written like the Great Ed Dolan.
> I am so mature that I already have one foot in the grave. But thanks for
> calling me a punk. No one has paid me a compliment like that in ages.
>
> Don't you think di for a user name is a bit too much. Why not just d? Or
> how about just a blank space, like so . This would go nicely with your
> overall general blankness.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
Why not list just a some of the greatness you accomplished lately? Someone
as st and great as you claim should not need more than a 2 letter user
name.
You sound a little like the John Kerry campaign statements:
"I will do a better job"
how?
"Because I have a plan"
what's your plan?
"I plan to do a better job"
I think you've been sitting around in the cold to much this winter, get out
a little.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 21:07:33
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"di" <di9999@cox.net > wrote in message
news:JM5Qf.116757$QW2.36856@dukeread08...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:t4mdnY58jKfDSI3ZRVn-jA@prairiewave.com...
There is no 13 year old in the
>> entire history of the world who has ever written like the Great Ed Dolan.
>> I am so mature that I already have one foot in the grave. But thanks for
>> calling me a punk. No one has paid me a compliment like that in ages.
>>
>> Don't you think di for a user name is a bit too much. Why not just d? Or
>> how about just a blank space, like so . This would go nicely with your
>> overall general blankness.
>
> Why not list just a some of the greatness you accomplished lately?
> Someone as st and great as you claim should not need more than a 2
> letter user name.
[...]
My Greatness shouts out at you with my every post. Even I am overwhelmed by
my own Greatness. I am often confused as to whether I have become a god or
not. I am like one of the Ceasars apparently. There is just no way some as
Great as Me could possibly be just a mere human being. No, I think I must be
a god!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 21:22:01
From: di
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:is6dnaeKbozlcI3ZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>
> My Greatness shouts out at you with my every post. Even I am overwhelmed
> by my own Greatness. I am often confused as to whether I have become a god
> or not. I am like one of the Ceasars apparently. There is just no way some
> as Great as Me could possibly be just a mere human being. No, I think I
> must be a god!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
"Yawn" , just as I thought
|
| |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 11:53:42
From:
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
A G R E E D. If he had the skills, he couldn't have authored anything
mor fitting. My compliments to whaever is responsible. I initially
thought that this was likely a tongue in cheek link, but was pleased to
find tha it is not. I thoroughly enjoyed this, particulary the
silloute at the end since it was a befitting tribut to the vermin
himself.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:39:50
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
<jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1141934022.157491.258090@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE FREAKING IDIOTS!
>A G R E E D. If he had the skills, he couldn't have authored anything
> mor fitting. My compliments to whaever is responsible. I initially
> thought that this was likely a tongue in cheek link, but was pleased to
> find tha it is not. I thoroughly enjoyed this, particulary the
> silloute at the end since it was a befitting tribut to the vermin
> himself.
Jimmymac would go to any link at all. That is how he got into so much
trouble with Ed Gin and Company on the blog spams that were running on these
newsgroups a few weeks ago. You really do have to be an idiot to do as
others suggest.
The Great Ed Dolan does his own thing and is not susceptible to the
suggestions and directions of others, most especially when those others are
midgets and dwarfs. Greatness like mine demands that others also be Great.
Sorni and Jimmymac just don't qualify any which way you look at it.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 11:11:11
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
GarG and Jeff Gripe,
Both of you obviously have Ed's number and his goat and he very well
knows it although he will never admit to it, not even to himself.
Since Ed can find no one worthy of himself, my advice to him would be
to just go F*** himself ;^) I have his number too and submit for your
enjoyment my take on Ed Dolan.....
Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
need of a therapist.
The gap between Ed and reality is immense and insurmountable. Just
listen to what the man says of himself for what he intimates is very
telling. He professes to have attained spiritual fulfillment by
abnegating contact with others, in effect rejecting his humankind's
collective communal consciousness.
Often, in disdain, Ed has avowed his cerebral transcendence over all of
ARBR's subscribers, pretentiously extolling his fanaticized
preeminence. For the sake of argument, humor Ed in his delusional
state and consider this. There is an inherent human desire to be
recognized by one's peers, but Ed contends that he has no peers.
Consequently, the very recognition that Ed demands is circumvented by
his own arrogance. Nonetheless, in utter contradiction, he perseveres
in his insatiable crusade to be heard by those who seemingly matter
not. Is this not just a bit incongruous?
The pompous Ed Dolan subscribes to the mistaken impression that the
readership savors his every word whereas in reality the only person who
values what the man says is the many saying it. Ed is a pedant who is
enraptured be his own vacuous gibberish. With no one worthy of his
companionship, the sanctimonious hermit has little more than ARBR from
which to derive meaning in his life. ARBR has assumed an exaggerated
prominence in Ed's hierarchical order of relevance. ARBR has emerged
as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and
self-esteem. Regardless of Ed's expressed opinion of the ARBR
readership, without the lifeblood of the ARBR audience to sustain him,
Ed has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence.
Pity the misguided fool. It must really suck to be him.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:22:19
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1141931471.082473.249010@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> GarG and Jeff Gripe,
>
> Both of you obviously have Ed's number and his goat and he very well
> knows it although he will never admit to it, not even to himself.
> Since Ed can find no one worthy of himself, my advice to him would be
> to just go F*** himself ;^) I have his number too and submit for your
> enjoyment my take on Ed Dolan.....
Jeff and Gary have been out to lunch from day one with me - and they always
will be. After all, they are liberals and I am not. What else do you ever
have to know!
> Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
> unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
> ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
> mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
> contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
> the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
> emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
> need of a therapist.
Get rid of that WordWeb utility program on your computer. It is making you
look like a fool. Just try to say in your own words what it is you want to
say and forget all that gibberish that you are so fond of. All it does for
the rest of us is to make our eyes glaze over and our brains go numb.
By the way, you could take some lessons from your son Tim in how to write to
a newsgroup. I detect a kindred spirit in him, but not in you.
> The gap between Ed and reality is immense and insurmountable. Just
> listen to what the man says of himself for what he intimates is very
> telling. He professes to have attained spiritual fulfillment by
> abnegating contact with others, in effect rejecting his humankind's
> collective communal consciousness.
Mr. Sherman, help me out here! What the f*** is he talking about? I am
beginning to see what drove Ed Gin to distraction with this monomaniac!
I believe I said I could NOT do without mankind's artifacts even though I
could easily do without mankind. In other words, I need Beethoven's music,
but I do not need Beethoven the man. Please learn how to read.
> Often, in disdain, Ed has avowed his cerebral transcendence over all of
> ARBR's subscribers, pretentiously extolling his fanaticized
> preeminence. For the sake of argument, humor Ed in his delusional
> state and consider this. There is an inherent human desire to be
> recognized by one's peers, but Ed contends that he has no peers.
> Consequently, the very recognition that Ed demands is circumvented by
> his own arrogance. Nonetheless, in utter contradiction, he perseveres
> in his insatiable crusade to be heard by those who seemingly matter
> not. Is this not just a bit incongruous?
Everyone on ARBR is an idiot. This is well known and incontestable. Mr.
McNaa illustrates this peculiar phenomenon every time he posts. His
earnestness is truly laughable. Note well that the Great Ed Dolan treats the
group with the contempt they richly deserve. That is why I am appreciated
and, indeed, revered - and why Mr. McNaa is regarded universally as the
nut that he is.
> The pompous Ed Dolan subscribes to the mistaken impression that the
> readership savors his every word whereas in reality the only person who
> values what the man says is the many saying it. Ed is a pedant who is
> enraptured be his own vacuous gibberish. With no one worthy of his
> companionship, the sanctimonious hermit has little more than ARBR from
> which to derive meaning in his life. ARBR has assumed an exaggerated
> prominence in Ed's hierarchical order of relevance. ARBR has emerged
> as the source from which he garners his sense of accomplishment and
> self-esteem. Regardless of Ed's expressed opinion of the ARBR
> readership, without the lifeblood of the ARBR audience to sustain him,
> Ed has nothing and is nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence.
> Pity the misguided fool. It must really suck to be him.
I will admit I spend about 2 hours a day out of my life on ARBR. Is that
excessive? I think not considering all the many laughs I get out of this
group. It sure beats the hell out of spending an equivalent 2 hours with the
TV.
Mr. McNaa is a man who is consumed by hatred and envy. We saw this played
out very clearly with Tom Sherman and also with Ed Gin. Ed Gin was a scum
bucket but Mr. McNaa never had a clue about how to deal with him. He
blathered on about him the way he is doing now about me. It is all really
quite comical. I mean, how do you get to be so clueless?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 14:29:05
From: $$$
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:7uCdnUuw-psjW43ZRVn-vw@prairiewave.com...
>
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1141931471.082473.249010@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[....]
>> Ed Dolan has conspicuously demonstrated that he is consumed by an
>> unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
>> ARBR's self-anointed apotheosis, a quintessential legend in his own
>> mind ... the consummate conundrum ... a complex amalgam of absurd
>> contradiction ... one who maintains an opinion of himself far beyond
>> the opinion that others will ever have of him ... an incongruous,
>> emotionally-challenged, bigoted, egomaniacal misanthrope who is in dire
>> need of a therapist.
>
> Get rid of that WordWeb utility program on your computer. It is making
> you look like a fool. Just try to say in your own words what it is you
> want to say and forget all that gibberish that you are so fond of. All it
> does for the rest of us is to make our eyes glaze over and our brains go
> numb.
>
[....]
Ed:
Trying to read McNaa's pomp-ridden gibberish is painful. Do yourself and
the rest of the world a favor and kill file him at once.
|
| |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 04:34:30
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
TAKE IT PRIVATE
(And no, that's not a gay Gomer Pyle thing.)
|
| | |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 23:44:40
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com > wrote in message
news:qfOPf.4277$pV5.3234@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> TAKE IT PRIVATE
>
> (And no, that's not a gay Gomer Pyle thing.)
I point out the differences between an ascetic and an Epicurean and GaryG
thinks he can psychologize me. Well, I will just continue to call him out
for the fornicator that he is and let the chips fall where they may.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 19:04:19
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:bO6dneD3s7moG5LZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> > --- Asked by ED: ----
> >> > > But just
> >> > > for the record, I would like to hear what you think sexual
> > gratification
> >> > > consists of?
> >> >
> >
> > --- Answered by GG: ----
> >> > Closeness, intimacy, energy, laughter, bonding, mental and tactile
> >> > stimulation, the incredibly primal (and completely natural) feeling
of
> > two
> >> > strong bodies coming together in union....I could go on, but
presumably
> > you
> >> > get the idea.
> >> >
> >> > That you would have to ask such a question is a sad testament to your
> > narrow
> >> > and fearful way of looking at the world.
> >
> > Did my answer make you uncomfortable? Given the fearful way you view
> > sexuality and intimacy, I suspect it would. Regardless, it was directly
> > relevant to the discussion, and your snippage reveals more about your
> > fears
> > and intellectual dishonesty than anything else.
>
> GaryG is an Epicurean. Ed Dolan is an Ascetic. These are diametrically
> opposed philosophies. Never the twain shall meet. I am not going to
explain
> these terms as they can be found in any encyclopedia.
I prefer "hedonist", but Epicurean is close enough.
>
> I determined to become an ascetic by the time I was in my mid-teens. Just
> being around the other type has always disgusted me. Since they disgusted
> me, there had to be something the matter with how they thought about
things.
Alternatively, there could be something the matter with how you think about
everyone else. The fact that 99% of humanity "disgusts" you seems
diagnostic of a mental illness...have you ever been to a mental health
professional to discuss your feelings?
> It seemed they were overly into the flesh, and so I went in the opposite
> direction and got into the spirit above all else. In fact, I may have
become
> too mental for my own good, but once embarked on this path I never looked
> back.
>
> The 4 years I spent in the Navy confirmed me in every thought I ever had
> about the matter. I abjured forever the pursuit of pleasure because I did
> not like what it did to people. To avoid pain is one thing, but to
actively
> pursue pleasure was a horror. People became worse than swine. I resolved
> never to have any association with such pigs once I got out of the Navy if
I
> could help it.
I know a guy who once felt as you seem to regarding intimacy and the
pleasures of the flesh. He earned a degree in theology, and joined a
Catholic monastery aftewards. However, shortly before he was to take his
final vows, he realized that he had actually been running away from who he
really was. It turns out that he was actually a homosexual...the
realization of that fact came as quite a shock to him, but it also released
a great burden that he'd been carrying for many years. He's now in a
committed relationship, having been "ried" about 10 years ago.
I'm not saying you're in the closet, but it does illustrate that running
away from human contact can be a way of covering up a deeper underlying
issue.
>
> I have always enjoyed going without and doing without. I like to wander
> about in deserts and experience the emptiness of things. I infinitely
prefer
> to be alone than to ever be with anyone. I do need the artifacts of
mankind,
> but I do not need man himself. So what does all this have to do with
GaryG?
> Well, he is the exact opposite of me, so by telling you about me, I am
also
> telling you about him.
>
> We all have to make some choices about the kind of person we want to be.
> GaryG has chosen his way and I have chosen my way. What he describes above
> as the good things of life horrifies me. Any kind of intimacy is a living
> death. I can't stand to be touched or to even have anyone close to me.
> Laughter is for fools. I can go for months without speaking to anyone
other
> than the most elementary type of greetings.
To most people, that sounds bizarre...bordering on mental illness.
>
> Most men will not be ascetics. Most men will be Epicureans like GaryG. The
> gulf between us is vast and unbridgeable. He seems like an animal to me,
no
> better than a dog. I would rather be dead than be like him. And all of
this
> because of a difference in philosophy!
But ED, it's more than just a difference in philosophies...you've made it so
with your incessant use of invective.
Not only do you claim that your way is "better", but you describe everyone
else as "animals", "perverts", "immoral", "idiots", etc. while at the same
time trumpeting your own ostensible "greatness". It's this belligerent
style that earns you the wrath of normal folks (that, plus your avowed
hatred of women, blacks, Jews, atheists, and most everybody else on the
planet).
>
> I should have been a pair of ragged claws
> Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.
On that, we can all agree.
GG
>
> T.S.Eliot - The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 21:57:43
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:xWMPf.416$Hg3.220@fe06.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:bO6dneD3s7moG5LZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> I determined to become an ascetic by the time I was in my mid-teens. Just
>> being around the other type has always disgusted me. Since they disgusted
>> me, there had to be something the matter with how they thought about
> things.
>
> Alternatively, there could be something the matter with how you think
> about
> everyone else. The fact that 99% of humanity "disgusts" you seems
> diagnostic of a mental illness...have you ever been to a mental health
> professional to discuss your feelings?
Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never occur to
him that he is pig.
[...]
> I know a guy who once felt as you seem to regarding intimacy and the
> pleasures of the flesh. He earned a degree in theology, and joined a
> Catholic monastery aftewards. However, shortly before he was to take his
> final vows, he realized that he had actually been running away from who he
> really was. It turns out that he was actually a homosexual...the
> realization of that fact came as quite a shock to him, but it also
> released
> a great burden that he'd been carrying for many years. He's now in a
> committed relationship, having been "ried" about 10 years ago.
Anyone who pursues the ministry in this day and age is all screwed up,
almost as screwed up as GaryG, who sleeps around and is stupid enough to
boast about it.
> I'm not saying you're in the closet, but it does illustrate that running
> away from human contact can be a way of covering up a deeper underlying
> issue.
I freely choose not to have much contact with other humans. There is no
"running away".
[...]
> But ED, it's more than just a difference in philosophies...you've made it
> so
> with your incessant use of invective.
Invective is the way of Great Saints like myself.
> Not only do you claim that your way is "better", but you describe everyone
> else as "animals", "perverts", "immoral", "idiots", etc. while at the same
> time trumpeting your own ostensible "greatness". It's this belligerent
> style that earns you the wrath of normal folks (that, plus your avowed
> hatred of women, blacks, Jews, atheists, and most everybody else on the
> planet).
Yes, it is not easy to be a Great Saint like Myself. I especially hate
fornicators like yourself. Come back and see me when you get some morality.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 20:51:31
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:YoKdnabXF7xeOpLZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:xWMPf.416$Hg3.220@fe06.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:bO6dneD3s7moG5LZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
> >> I determined to become an ascetic by the time I was in my mid-teens.
Just
> >> being around the other type has always disgusted me. Since they
disgusted
> >> me, there had to be something the matter with how they thought about
> > things.
> >
> > Alternatively, there could be something the matter with how you think
> > about
> > everyone else. The fact that 99% of humanity "disgusts" you seems
> > diagnostic of a mental illness...have you ever been to a mental health
> > professional to discuss your feelings?
>
> Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never occur
to
> him that he is pig.
Non-responsive + ad hominem.
Your reply also ignores the fact that your feelings are so far from normal
as to be reasonably ascribed to mental illness. You may just be really
weird, but mental illness certainly cannot be ruled out given your stated
beliefs, actions, and feelings.
> [...]
>
> > I know a guy who once felt as you seem to regarding intimacy and the
> > pleasures of the flesh. He earned a degree in theology, and joined a
> > Catholic monastery afterwards. However, shortly before he was to take
his
> > final vows, he realized that he had actually been running away from who
he
> > really was. It turns out that he was actually a homosexual...the
> > realization of that fact came as quite a shock to him, but it also
> > released
> > a great burden that he'd been carrying for many years. He's now in a
> > committed relationship, having been "ried" about 10 years ago.
>
> Anyone who pursues the ministry in this day and age is all screwed up,
> almost as screwed up as GaryG, who sleeps around and is stupid enough to
> boast about it.
>
> > I'm not saying you're in the closet, but it does illustrate that running
> > away from human contact can be a way of covering up a deeper underlying
> > issue.
>
> I freely choose not to have much contact with other humans. There is no
> "running away".
Given that you started having feelings of disgust towards your fellow human
beings when you were in your "middle teens", it seems much more likely that
this was a manifestation of something innate within you, rather than
something you consciously "chose".
> [...]
>
> > But ED, it's more than just a difference in philosophies...you've made
it
> > so
> > with your incessant use of invective.
>
> Invective is the way of Great Saints like myself.
Ascribing an exalted status unto oneself is also consistent with mental
illness. Ted Kaczynski felt that he was a "great" person too, and that
everyone else was evil and stupid. He too shut himself off from the rest of
humanity, except for his intermittent writings.
Can you provide any examples of other "Great Saints" who routinely expressed
disgust for humanity, and viewed everyone else as "idiots", "perverts", etc?
>
> > Not only do you claim that your way is "better", but you describe
everyone
> > else as "animals", "perverts", "immoral", "idiots", etc. while at the
same
> > time trumpeting your own ostensible "greatness". It's this belligerent
> > style that earns you the wrath of normal folks (that, plus your avowed
> > hatred of women, blacks, Jews, atheists, and most everybody else on the
> > planet).
>
> Yes, it is not easy to be a Great Saint like Myself. I especially hate
> fornicators like yourself. Come back and see me when you get some
morality.
Dear ED - don't you realize? You hate everyone...most especially yourself.
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | | | |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 23:38:06
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:1vOPf.91$yY1.17@fe04.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:YoKdnabXF7xeOpLZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never occur
> to
>> him that he is a pig.
>
> Non-responsive + ad hominem.
Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission. That is what all
fornicators are. I am simply telling it like it is. Now you began to see
the dangers of getting personal maybe?
> Your reply also ignores the fact that your feelings are so far from normal
> as to be reasonably ascribed to mental illness. You may just be really
> weird, but mental illness certainly cannot be ruled out given your stated
> beliefs, actions, and feelings.
You are crazy as a loon! If I were you, I would just go drown myself. Why
bother a doctor or a psychologist with the fact that you just like to f***,
even though you aren't ried. Talk about irresponsibility!
[...]
>> Invective is the way of Great Saints like myself.
>
> Ascribing an exalted status unto oneself is also consistent with mental
> illness. Ted Kaczynski felt that he was a "great" person too, and that
> everyone else was evil and stupid. He too shut himself off from the rest
> of
> humanity, except for his intermittent writings.
My Greatness only comes about because of midgets and dwarfs like you. If you
were anything but a fornicator, I would then not be so Great, but since that
is all you are, I am Great by comparison.
[...]
> Dear ED - don't you realize? You hate everyone...most especially
> yourself.
I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You have
no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 12:04:42
From: Bernd Illig
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Am Wed, 08 2006 23:38:06 -0600 schrieb Edward Dolan:
> (rest snipped)
> I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
> sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You have
> no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
>
As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
Bernd
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 10:12:47
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Bernd Illig" <ib48366@googlemail.com > wrote in message
news:pan.2006.03.09.11.04.40.475185@googlemail.com...
> Am Wed, 08 2006 23:38:06 -0600 schrieb Edward Dolan:
>
>> (rest snipped)
>
>> I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
>> sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You
>> have
>> no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
>>
>
> As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
> recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
> that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
>
> Bernd
It won't hurt you to know what kind of scum buckets we have here on ARBR. It
is one thing to be a fornicator and it is quite another to be boasting about
it in a public forum. My disgust runneth over! How about you?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 08:20:48
From: Rich
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
Bernd Illig wrote:
> As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
> recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
> that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
Ed Dolan is synonymous with off topic. So simply add "Dolan" to your
filter.
Rich
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 11:02:45
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Rich" <richa_colorado@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1210hub63thu53d@corp.supernews.com...
> Bernd Illig wrote:
>
>> As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
>> recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
>> that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
>
> Ed Dolan is synonymous with off topic. So simply add "Dolan" to your
> filter.
>
> Rich
For a newsgroup to be on topic forever is an abomination. We would all die
of boredom and deservedly so. No, the Great Ed Dolan will not let that
happen and he is here to bring a little joy into your otherwise drab lives.
After you have read the scintillating messages concerning rear derailleurs,
disc brakes, helmets, lights, etc. then you come to off topic and maybe get
something that will brighten your day. Why should we all dumb ourselves down
to the typical dumb post that shows up like clockwork on ARBR and RBM. We
are better than that, even if I have to drum it into your thick skulls
against your will.
Ed, if I do say so myself, many thanks for all you do for these blasted
newsgroups, the members of which do not have the brains to come in out of
the rain. Hells Bells, if it weren't for you, I would just as soon lay down
and give up the ghost. But why go to Hell before you die when you can read
the Great Ed Dolan and get a little bit of Heaven right here on this earth
via a newsgroup, even ones so lowly as ARBR and RBM.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 08:33:11
From: Jeff Grippe
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Bernd Illig" <ib48366@googlemail.com > wrote in message
news:pan.2006.03.09.11.04.40.475185@googlemail.com...
> Am Wed, 08 2006 23:38:06 -0600 schrieb Edward Dolan:
>
>> (rest snipped)
>
>> I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
>> sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You
>> have
>> no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
>>
>
> As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
> recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
> that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
>
> Bernd
You are most certainly correct. The problem is that ED provokes responses.
There are some of us who enjoy the apparently pointless exercise of going at
it with him. There are also times when he says things that are so outrageous
that we just can't help but respond. But it is all off topic as you pointed
out.
Unless he chooses to "leave us forever" again, I fear this will continue. I
realize that I am one of the people helping it to continue and you have my
apology for that.
Jeff
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 10:42:23
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Jeff Grippe" <jgrippe@hilldun.com > wrote in message
news:1210bof41q7j564@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Bernd Illig" <ib48366@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.03.09.11.04.40.475185@googlemail.com...
>> Am Wed, 08 2006 23:38:06 -0600 schrieb Edward Dolan:
>>
>>> (rest snipped)
>>
>>> I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
>>> sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You
>>> have
>>> no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
>>>
>>
>> As a frequent lurker I am asking me for a while what this has to do with
>> recumbents and this newsgroup?? Could you _please_ k your postings OT
>> that one is able to filter the subject? Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Bernd
>
> You are most certainly correct. The problem is that ED provokes responses.
> There are some of us who enjoy the apparently pointless exercise of going
> at it with him. There are also times when he says things that are so
> outrageous that we just can't help but respond. But it is all off topic as
> you pointed out.
>
> Unless he chooses to "leave us forever" again, I fear this will continue.
> I realize that I am one of the people helping it to continue and you have
> my apology for that.
>
> Jeff
Jeff, along with GaryG and NYC, has also boasted of his licentiousness and
lustfulness. I call them the three musketeers of pornography, ever willing
to engage in swill like swine at the drop of a hat. I do question their
humanity and even their humanness. They seem worse than animals to me. After
all, pigs only behave the way they do because of their nature. But men are
constantly going against their natures when you consider that we have minds
that we can think with. Only we humans can be perverse.
It is inexcusable for mature men to be acting like teenagers and I for one
am outraged! ARBR has become an Augean stable and we need to clean up our
act so newbies will not be turned off by the stink of a few human asses who
bring disgrace on us all.
The cure for what ails this newsgroup is to contemplate the Holiness of
Saint Edward the Great. This is just another appellation for Ed Dolan the
Great. To be both Great and a Great Saint is quite rare and this group has
been doubly blessed to have both my personas ever at their beck and call.
Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
altogether too good for this world also. I am a Medieval Man and I belong to
the High Middle Ages. I am only comfortable in a Great Gothic Cathedral - or
else in the depths of the Grand Canyon.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 17:23:13
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
> altogether too good for this world also.
Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 13:14:30
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
It's too bad HIS EDNESS doesn't follow links. This one is pretty good.
"Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com > wrote in message
news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
>> altogether too good for this world also.
>
> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>
>
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 12:08:02
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
"Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com > wrote in message
news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
>> altogether too good for this world also.
>
> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
No one will go to your link because all one would get for their trouble is
mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of properly introducing
any link that you want folks to go to. But your type depends on the suckers
and the mugs for their sustenance. It is ever the way of the scoundrel.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:10:40
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
>>> altogether too good for this world also.
>>
>> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>
> No one will go to your link because all one would get for their
> trouble is mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of
> properly introducing any link that you want folks to go to. But your
> type depends on the suckers and the mugs for their sustenance. It is
> ever the way of the scoundrel.
So you're paranoid too?!? LOL
(Ed, it's FUNNY. LIGHT-HEARTED, EVEN. BUY A CLUE.)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:26:22
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
"Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com > wrote in message
news:Ac_Pf.9954$e1.4957@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I am
>>>> altogether too good for this world also.
>>>
>>> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>>
>> No one will go to your link because all one would get for their
>> trouble is mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of
>> properly introducing any link that you want folks to go to. But your
>> type depends on the suckers and the mugs for their sustenance. It is
>> ever the way of the scoundrel.
>
> So you're paranoid too?!? LOL
>
> (Ed, it's FUNNY. LIGHT-HEARTED, EVEN. BUY A CLUE.)
Sorry, either properly introduce a link or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 00:37:54
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:Ac_Pf.9954$e1.4957@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I
>>>>> am altogether too good for this world also.
>>>>
>>>> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>>>
>>> No one will go to your link because all one would get for their
>>> trouble is mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of
>>> properly introducing any link that you want folks to go to. But your
>>> type depends on the suckers and the mugs for their sustenance. It is
>>> ever the way of the scoundrel.
>>
>> So you're paranoid too?!? LOL
>>
>> (Ed, it's FUNNY. LIGHT-HEARTED, EVEN. BUY A CLUE.)
>
> Sorry, either properly introduce a link or get lost.
Ed, link. Link, Ed. http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
Bill "no directions needed" S.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 19:15:49
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
"Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com > wrote in message
news:CT3Qf.8272$pV5.5543@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:Ac_Pf.9954$e1.4957@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that I
>>>>>> am altogether too good for this world also.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>>>>
>>>> No one will go to your link because all one would get for their
>>>> trouble is mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of
>>>> properly introducing any link that you want folks to go to. But your
>>>> type depends on the suckers and the mugs for their sustenance. It is
>>>> ever the way of the scoundrel.
>>>
>>> So you're paranoid too?!? LOL
>>>
>>> (Ed, it's FUNNY. LIGHT-HEARTED, EVEN. BUY A CLUE.)
>>
>> Sorry, either properly introduce a link or get lost.
>
> Ed, link. Link, Ed. http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>
> Bill "no directions needed" S.
Nope, I need to know what I will see and read before I go to any link from
those like you that I do not trust. If and when I find out you are lying
about it, then you will never hear the end of it. However, I will consider
going to the link if you will tell me the truth of what I will find there.
That is the only way.
Thus spake Zarathustra.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 02:30:22
From: Sorni
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on...Ed Dolan!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:CT3Qf.8272$pV5.5543@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Ac_Pf.9954$e1.4957@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>> "Sorni" <sornidelicates@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:5wZPf.6102$pV5.3830@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yea, I know I am way too good for this group and it may be that
>>>>>>> I am altogether too good for this world also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh-oh. He might be right: http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> No one will go to your link because all one would get for their
>>>>> trouble is mostly likely a virus. Now you see the importance of
>>>>> properly introducing any link that you want folks to go to. But
>>>>> your type depends on the suckers and the mugs for their
>>>>> sustenance. It is ever the way of the scoundrel.
>>>>
>>>> So you're paranoid too?!? LOL
>>>>
>>>> (Ed, it's FUNNY. LIGHT-HEARTED, EVEN. BUY A CLUE.)
>>>
>>> Sorry, either properly introduce a link or get lost.
>>
>> Ed, link. Link, Ed. http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com/
>>
>> Bill "no directions needed" S.
>
> Nope, I need to know what I will see and read before I go to any link
> from those like you that I do not trust. If and when I find out you
> are lying about it, then you will never hear the end of it. However,
> I will consider going to the link if you will tell me the truth of
> what I will find there. That is the only way.
>
> Thus spake Zarathustra.
I'll give you a hint. Someone sent the link to me...with MY NAME in it.
Bill "lived to tell about it" S.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 08 Mar 2006 21:57:47
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:SZednXfgM5yiIpLZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:1vOPf.91$yY1.17@fe04.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:YoKdnabXF7xeOpLZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
> >> Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never
occur
> > to
> >> him that he is a pig.
> >
> > Non-responsive + ad hominem.
>
> Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission.
Ummm, ED - I've never admitted to that...your mental state may be reading
something like that into my self-described hedonism, but in reality I'm
nothing more than a fun-loving serial monogamist.
Like most men, I've had fantasies of sleeping with a bunch of different
women, but I find the logistics of that lifestyle too daunting, and I also
find myself drawn to only one woman at a time.
> That is what all
> fornicators are. I am simply telling it like it is. Now you began to see
> the dangers of getting personal maybe?
Not really...nothing that a weirdo like yourself can say bothers me much at
all.
>
> > Your reply also ignores the fact that your feelings are so far from
normal
> > as to be reasonably ascribed to mental illness. You may just be really
> > weird, but mental illness certainly cannot be ruled out given your
stated
> > beliefs, actions, and feelings.
>
> You are crazy as a loon! If I were you, I would just go drown myself.
Why would I want to do that? I have an active social, physical,
intellectual, and sexual life. My girlfriend and I spent yesterday evening
planning our training schedules for some of our upcoming adventures. Life
is too beautiful and good to consider checking out any time soon.
You, on the other hand, have no one close to you (physically or
intellectually, and certainly not sexually). You also seem to be very
bitter and angry.
I suspect that most men, whether conservative or liberal, would choose my
life over yours...your "greatness" notwithstanding.
> Why
> bother a doctor or a psychologist with the fact that you just like to
f***,
> even though you aren't ried. Talk about irresponsibility!
Earth to ED - most men like to f***. It's one of the more pleasant parts of
life.
If you weren't a virgin, you might understand. Were you sexually abused
when you were young?
> [...]
>
> >> Invective is the way of Great Saints like myself.
> >
> > Ascribing an exalted status unto oneself is also consistent with mental
> > illness. Ted Kaczynski felt that he was a "great" person too, and that
> > everyone else was evil and stupid. He too shut himself off from the rest
> > of
> > humanity, except for his intermittent writings.
>
> My Greatness only comes about because of midgets and dwarfs like you.
Your "greatness" comes about because you see everyone else as midgets and
dwarfs - this is yet another indication of how out of touch you are with
reality.
> If you
> were anything but a fornicator, I would then not be so Great, but since
that
> is all you are, I am Great by comparison.
> [...]
>
> > Dear ED - don't you realize? You hate everyone...most especially
> > yourself.
>
> I mainly realize that I hate fornicators like you. You boast of your
> sinfulness and encourage the young like NYC to become as you are. You have
> no shame. You are a disgrace to all humanity. Are you even human?
More human than you in many respects. And I stand by my earlier assertion
that you hate yourself most of all.
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
>
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 10:07:28
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:9tPPf.2081$tB6.417@fe07.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:SZednXfgM5yiIpLZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
>> news:1vOPf.91$yY1.17@fe04.lga...
>> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> > news:YoKdnabXF7xeOpLZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
>> [...]
>> >> Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never
> occur
>> > to
>> >> him that he is a pig.
>> >
>> > Non-responsive + ad hominem.
>>
>> Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission.
>
> Ummm, ED - I've never admitted to that...your mental state may be reading
> something like that into my self-described hedonism, but in reality I'm
> nothing more than a fun-loving serial monogamist.
"Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
> Like most men, I've had fantasies of sleeping with a bunch of different
> women, but I find the logistics of that lifestyle too daunting, and I also
> find myself drawn to only one woman at a time.
"Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
>> That is what all
>> fornicators are. I am simply telling it like it is. Now you began to see
>> the dangers of getting personal maybe?
>
> Not really...nothing that a weirdo like yourself can say bothers me much
> at
> all.
"Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
Ad infinitum!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 18:54:38
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:HIGdnTJRrZdez43ZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:9tPPf.2081$tB6.417@fe07.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:SZednXfgM5yiIpLZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >>
> >> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1vOPf.91$yY1.17@fe04.lga...
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:YoKdnabXF7xeOpLZRVn-gQ@prairiewave.com...
> >> [...]
> >> >> Here is GaryG attempting to psychologize his dilemma. It will never
> > occur
> >> > to
> >> >> him that he is a pig.
> >> >
> >> > Non-responsive + ad hominem.
> >>
> >> Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission.
> >
> > Ummm, ED - I've never admitted to that...your mental state may be
reading
> > something like that into my self-described hedonism, but in reality I'm
> > nothing more than a fun-loving serial monogamist.
>
> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
>
> > Like most men, I've had fantasies of sleeping with a bunch of different
> > women, but I find the logistics of that lifestyle too daunting, and I
also
> > find myself drawn to only one woman at a time.
>
> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
>
> >> That is what all
> >> fornicators are. I am simply telling it like it is. Now you began to
see
> >> the dangers of getting personal maybe?
> >
> > Not really...nothing that a weirdo like yourself can say bothers me much
> > at
> > all.
>
> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
>
> Ad infinitum!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
Poor ED. After reading this posting (where you snipped the parts that
obviously made you uncomfortable), and after reading your posts to others, I
stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the norm of
human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality (homosexual or
heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of a
diseased pattern of thinking.
That you would brag about your mental illness, and assert its "greatness" is
just pathetic and sad.
If it came down to a vote on whether folks would rather live like the "great
ED", or the "fornicator GaryG", you and I both know that I would win in a
landslide.
You really should seek out some professional help...you're not too old to
change, though I suspect you're too afraid to try.
BTW - most "saints" have been recognized for their humanity...how can you
claim to be a saint when humanity and human contact "disgusts" you?
GG
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Mar 2006 21:23:55
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:HU5Qf.239$2W7.73@fe07.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:HIGdnTJRrZdez43ZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
>>
>> Ad infinitum!
> Poor ED. After reading this posting (where you snipped the parts that
> obviously made you uncomfortable), and after reading your posts to others,
> I
> stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
Stand by it all you want. I am not a fornicator like you are.
> Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the norm
> of
> human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality (homosexual
> or
> heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of a
> diseased pattern of thinking.
Sex is for procreation - period! It is not for recreation - period!
> That you would brag about your mental illness, and assert its "greatness"
> is
> just pathetic and sad.
>
> If it came down to a vote on whether folks would rather live like the
> "great
> ED", or the "fornicator GaryG", you and I both know that I would win in a
> landslide.
I think you might be right about that Gary. But that only goes to show how
degenerate and sinful everyone is. Quantity has nothing to do with quality,
most especially when we are talking about morality.
> You really should seek out some professional help...you're not too old to
> change, though I suspect you're too afraid to try.
Yes, I am set in my ways like concrete, but I took this set in my mid-teens
and have never seen any reason to change.
> BTW - most "saints" have been recognized for their humanity...how can you
> claim to be a saint when humanity and human contact "disgusts" you?
I am a vengeful and wrathful Saint, kind of like the God of the Old
Testament. None of this Christian "niceness" for me.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 10 Mar 2006 07:25:25
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:YIudnY8m26vTbI3Z4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:HU5Qf.239$2W7.73@fe07.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:HIGdnTJRrZdez43ZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
>
> >> "Nope, you are a pig and a slob by your own admission." - Ed Dolan
> >>
> >> Ad infinitum!
>
> > Poor ED. After reading this posting (where you snipped the parts that
> > obviously made you uncomfortable), and after reading your posts to
others,
> > I
> > stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
>
> Stand by it all you want. I am not a fornicator like you are.
>
> > Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the norm
> > of
> > human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality (homosexual
> > or
> > heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of a
> > diseased pattern of thinking.
>
> Sex is for procreation - period! It is not for recreation - period!
Were you sexually abused when you were young? You've mentioned Catholic
priests previously, and this could be one reason for your bizarre fears of
sexual intimacy.
You've also often criticized homosexual behavior because you claim that it's
"unnatural"...well, I can assure you that your own fears of sex are every
bit as "unnatural", from the perspective of the perpetuation of the species.
BTW - have you ever "procreated"? Or, attempted to?
>
> > That you would brag about your mental illness, and assert its
"greatness"
> > is
> > just pathetic and sad.
> >
> > If it came down to a vote on whether folks would rather live like the
> > "great
> > ED", or the "fornicator GaryG", you and I both know that I would win in
a
> > landslide.
>
> I think you might be right about that Gary. But that only goes to show how
> degenerate and sinful everyone is. Quantity has nothing to do with
quality,
> most especially when we are talking about morality.
>
> > You really should seek out some professional help...you're not too old
to
> > change, though I suspect you're too afraid to try.
>
> Yes, I am set in my ways like concrete, but I took this set in my
mid-teens
> and have never seen any reason to change.
>
> > BTW - most "saints" have been recognized for their humanity...how can
you
> > claim to be a saint when humanity and human contact "disgusts" you?
>
> I am a vengeful and wrathful Saint, kind of like the God of the Old
> Testament. None of this Christian "niceness" for me.
In your own mind you may be vengeful and wrathful, ED. But in reality,
you're a bag of neuroses and fears. You spend two hours per day spewing
forth your silly "wrath" on usenet, because you're too afraid to do it
face-to-face in your neighborhood bar.
You really are a mess...
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 11:01:42
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:mTgQf.219$KR5.171@fe02.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:YIudnY8m26vTbI3Z4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> > I
>> > stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
>>
>> Stand by it all you want. I am not a fornicator like you are.
>>
>> > Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the
>> > norm
>> > of
>> > human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality
>> > (homosexual
>> > or
>> > heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of a
>> > diseased pattern of thinking.
>>
>> Sex is for procreation - period! It is not for recreation - period!
>
> Were you sexually abused when you were young? You've mentioned Catholic
> priests previously, and this could be one reason for your bizarre fears of
> sexual intimacy.
Are you a psychologist? What degrees do you have from what universities? I
thought you told me once that you were a software developer. If that is
true, that disqualifies you from everything in life that matters.
The one thing we do know about you for sure is that you are a shameless
fornicator. We know that because you boasted about it on these newsgroups.
You treat women badly and you mislead the young. I can only regard you with
disdain and disgust.
[...]
>> I am a vengeful and wrathful Saint, kind of like the God of the Old
>> Testament. None of this Christian "niceness" for me.
>
> In your own mind you may be vengeful and wrathful, ED. But in reality,
> you're a bag of neuroses and fears. You spend two hours per day spewing
> forth your silly "wrath" on usenet, because you're too afraid to do it
> face-to-face in your neighborhood bar.
Just stop being such a fornicator why don't you. You disgust all right
thinking souls (but apparently not left thinking souls). You are an
abomination and an affront to all humanity. Your only ally is scum like NYC.
He thinks you are wonderful and he would no doubt like to join you in your
fornications. Try to find a slut and a whore for him too like you have for
yourself as I think he is more talk than action. The young tend to be like
that you know, not having the plumbed the depths of depravity like you have.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 17:24:59
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:NuSdneplC_zmn47ZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:mTgQf.219$KR5.171@fe02.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:YIudnY8m26vTbI3Z4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
> >> > I
> >> > stand by my assertion that you are mentally ill.
> >>
> >> Stand by it all you want. I am not a fornicator like you are.
> >>
> >> > Clearly, the way you feel about humanity puts you far, far from the
> >> > norm
> >> > of
> >> > human thoughts and feelings. And the way you fear sexuality
> >> > (homosexual
> >> > or
> >> > heterosexual), and live your life as a hermit, is also indicative of
a
> >> > diseased pattern of thinking.
> >>
> >> Sex is for procreation - period! It is not for recreation - period!
> >
> > Were you sexually abused when you were young? You've mentioned Catholic
> > priests previously, and this could be one reason for your bizarre fears
of
> > sexual intimacy.
>
> Are you a psychologist? What degrees do you have from what universities? I
> thought you told me once that you were a software developer. If that is
> true, that disqualifies you from everything in life that matters.
Evasion duly noted.
FWIW, I'm not a psychologist, but I have known people who've suffered from
the after effects of sexual abuse. Your behaviors and attitudes, especially
your intense fears of intimacy and sexuality, and your refusal to answer
questions about your sexual life, raise the possibility of a history of
abuse.
BTW - have you ever procreated? Or attempted to? Does this question upset
you? You've snipped it from your replies several times...
>
> The one thing we do know about you for sure is that you are a shameless
> fornicator. We know that because you boasted about it on these newsgroups.
> You treat women badly
My girlfriend would disagree. I treat her very well.
As for being a "shameless fornicator" - that's a label that doesn't really
bother me. "Fornication" just means sex between unried partners. For
tens of thousands of years before the rise of religions and
"church-sanctioned" unions, fornication was the norm. Nowadays it's no
longer considered a sin or aberrant behavior by most of the world (with the
exception of whackos like Ossama bin Laden and ED).
> and you mislead the young. I can only regard you with
> disdain and disgust.
That's OK, ED - you regard most of humanity with disdain and disgust, so I'm
in good company.
> [...]
>
> >> I am a vengeful and wrathful Saint, kind of like the God of the Old
> >> Testament. None of this Christian "niceness" for me.
> >
> > In your own mind you may be vengeful and wrathful, ED. But in reality,
> > you're a bag of neuroses and fears. You spend two hours per day spewing
> > forth your silly "wrath" on usenet, because you're too afraid to do it
> > face-to-face in your neighborhood bar.
>
> Just stop being such a fornicator why don't you. You disgust all right
> thinking souls (but apparently not left thinking souls). You are an
> abomination and an affront to all humanity. Your only ally is scum like
NYC.
Funny...I don't see anyone else jumping into these posts defending your
"greatness", but I do see a lot of other people posting that you're a whacko
and an idiot.
> He thinks you are wonderful and he would no doubt like to join you in your
> fornications. Try to find a slut and a whore for him too like you have for
> yourself as I think he is more talk than action. The young tend to be like
> that you know, not having the plumbed the depths of depravity like you
have.
You really are a mess.
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 11 Mar 2006 21:46:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:vLKQf.561$pV1.352@fe02.lga...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:NuSdneplC_zmn47ZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> Are you a psychologist? What degrees do you have from what universities?
>> I
>> thought you told me once that you were a software developer. If that is
>> true, that disqualifies you from everything in life that matters.
>
> Evasion duly noted.
>
> FWIW, I'm not a psychologist, but I have known people who've suffered from
> the after effects of sexual abuse. Your behaviors and attitudes,
> especially
> your intense fears of intimacy and sexuality, and your refusal to answer
> questions about your sexual life, raise the possibility of a history of
> abuse.
>
> BTW - have you ever procreated? Or attempted to? Does this question
> upset
> you? You've snipped it from your replies several times...
The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud fornicator
like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words.
The main thing you have to know about me is that I am a Great Saint and as
Holy and Sanctimonious as they come. I sit in judgment of slobs like you
with a conscience as pure as the driven snow. I am not known as Saint Edward
the Great in these parts for nothing.
[...]
> As for being a "shameless fornicator" - that's a label that doesn't really
> bother me. "Fornication" just means sex between unried partners. For
> tens of thousands of years before the rise of religions and
> "church-sanctioned" unions, fornication was the norm. Nowadays it's no
> longer considered a sin or aberrant behavior by most of the world (with
> the
> exception of whackos like Ossama bin Laden and ED).
[...]
Sorry, but you disgust me. You seem like a diseased piece of human filth.
Only the fires of Hell can cleanse you of your abominations. By the way, I
will see you in Hell too, but I will be there for very different reasons
than you.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 18:04:01
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:ytednXHht6Q6BI7ZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:vLKQf.561$pV1.352@fe02.lga...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:NuSdneplC_zmn47ZnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
>
> >> Are you a psychologist? What degrees do you have from what
universities?
> >> I
> >> thought you told me once that you were a software developer. If that is
> >> true, that disqualifies you from everything in life that matters.
> >
> > Evasion duly noted.
> >
> > FWIW, I'm not a psychologist, but I have known people who've suffered
from
> > the after effects of sexual abuse. Your behaviors and attitudes,
> > especially
> > your intense fears of intimacy and sexuality, and your refusal to answer
> > questions about your sexual life, raise the possibility of a history of
> > abuse.
> >
> > BTW - have you ever procreated? Or attempted to? Does this question
> > upset
> > you? You've snipped it from your replies several times...
>
> The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud fornicator
> like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
> absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words.
Why? It's a legitimate question. Much of your rhetoric is concerned with
your fears of sexuality, and your intense disapproval of sex for any other
purpose than procreation. Asking you whether or not you've ever had sexual
relations is a logical question to ask in the context of this discussion.
If you can't see that, or you're too fearful to answer it, it adds more
weight to the "ED is mentally ill" point of view.
>
> The main thing you have to know about me is that I am a Great Saint and as
> Holy and Sanctimonious as they come. I sit in judgment of slobs like you
> with a conscience as pure as the driven snow. I am not known as Saint
Edward
> the Great in these parts for nothing.
Deluded little man - you're not known as "Saint Edward" anywhere but in your
own mind..
> [...]
>
> > As for being a "shameless fornicator" - that's a label that doesn't
really
> > bother me. "Fornication" just means sex between unried partners.
For
> > tens of thousands of years before the rise of religions and
> > "church-sanctioned" unions, fornication was the norm. Nowadays it's no
> > longer considered a sin or aberrant behavior by most of the world (with
> > the
> > exception of whackos like Ossama bin Laden and ED).
> [...]
>
> Sorry, but you disgust me. You seem like a diseased piece of human filth.
That's OK, ED. Most of humanity disgusts you, so I'm in good company.
> Only the fires of Hell can cleanse you of your abominations. By the way, I
> will see you in Hell too, but I will be there for very different reasons
> than you.
Yes...it's very obvious that you hate yourself most of all...that's a sad
way to live, but it seems as if you're determined to live out your life as a
lonely, angry, fearful hermit.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 20:58:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on GaryG
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:8q4Rf.1165$pV1.260@fe02.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:ytednXHht6Q6BI7ZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud fornicator
>> like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
>> absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words.
>
> Why? It's a legitimate question. Much of your rhetoric is concerned with
> your fears of sexuality, and your intense disapproval of sex for any other
> purpose than procreation. Asking you whether or not you've ever had
> sexual
> relations is a logical question to ask in the context of this discussion.
"The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud fornicator
like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words." - Ed
Dolan
[...]
> Yes...it's very obvious that you hate yourself most of all...that's a sad
> way to live, but it seems as if you're determined to live out your life as
> a
> lonely, angry, fearful hermit.
We hermits are universally misunderstood, We freely CHOOSE to be hermits. It
is partly because of all the human scum in the world like GaryG, but it is
more fundamental than that. Yea, we actually enjoy our own company. We
simply do not need others. Ask yourself, would you rather be a hermit like
the Great Ed Dolan or a pitiful fornicator like the disgusting GaryG. Hells
Bells, just asking the question answers itself!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 20:26:10
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:UtmdncsB2LNRQonZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:8q4Rf.1165$pV1.260@fe02.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:ytednXHht6Q6BI7ZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
> >> The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud
fornicator
> >> like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
> >> absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words.
> >
> > Why? It's a legitimate question. Much of your rhetoric is concerned
with
> > your fears of sexuality, and your intense disapproval of sex for any
other
> > purpose than procreation. Asking you whether or not you've ever had
> > sexual
> > relations is a logical question to ask in the context of this
discussion.
>
> > If you can't see that, or you're too fearful to answer it, it adds more
> > weight to the "ED is mentally ill" point of view.
>
> "The day I answer any questions from a self-confessed and proud fornicator
> like you is the day I will have died and gone to Hell. You are just too
> absurd for words - and as you know, I am seldom at a loss for words." - Ed
> Dolan
OK, then...evasion duly noted (yet again).
However, could you tell me why the question is "too absurd for words"?
You're normally more verbose in your explanations, and this one doesn't seem
to hold water. You've asked me about my sexual experience and attitudes,
and I've answered them. In the course of a discussion like this, these
sorts of questions are understandable and on topic...and yet you can't even
address your objections to the question, much less the question itself.
Your inability to discuss these simple, "natural" activities lends more
credence to the theory that you are have some sort of signifcant sexual
dysfunctional. This, in turn, means that your lectures on proper sexual
behavior cannot be taken seriously...it would be like someone with
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder lecturing us on the "proper" way we should all
wash our hands (e.g., "fifty times per day").
BTW - you've said before that sex is for "procreation only". Does that mean
that a post-menopausal woman can never have sex? Or a sterile guy?
> [...]
>
> > Yes...it's very obvious that you hate yourself most of all...that's a
sad
> > way to live, but it seems as if you're determined to live out your life
as
> > a
> > lonely, angry, fearful hermit.
>
> We hermits are universally misunderstood, We freely CHOOSE to be hermits.
I suspect that you really do need human contact, but you're too insecure and
fearful to do it in the real world. So, you spend a couple of hours a day
venting your anger and fear on usenet, and boasting of how "great" you are.
It's a sad and lonely way to live, but presumably it gives you some sort of
stimulation and the semblance of the human contact you are unable to achieve
otherwise.
> It
> is partly because of all the human scum in the world like GaryG, but it is
> more fundamental than that. Yea, we actually enjoy our own company. We
> simply do not need others. Ask yourself, would you rather be a hermit like
> the Great Ed Dolan or a pitiful fornicator like the disgusting GaryG.
Hells
> Bells, just asking the question answers itself!
Shall we have a vote then?
For the record, my girlfriend and I went on a run on Friday evening. We
went for a 45 mile bike ride with 3200 feet of climbing on Saturday, and
went for a 5 mile run this morning. We also had some intensely fun sexual
encounters during that time frame (one nice thing is that we both are
comfortable taking the initiative in that department).
So, everyone, ask yourselves:
Would you rather live in a house in frozen Minnesota filled with a dozen
'bents, and no other human companionship, or live a life with an athletic,
attractive girlfriend who loves life, loves to laugh, and loves physical
activity?
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 00:46:13
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:qv6Rf.1198$pV1.179@fe02.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:UtmdncsB2LNRQonZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
> However, could you tell me why the question is "too absurd for words"?
> You're normally more verbose in your explanations, and this one doesn't
> seem
> to hold water. You've asked me about my sexual experience and attitudes,
> and I've answered them. In the course of a discussion like this, these
> sorts of questions are understandable and on topic...and yet you can't
> even
> address your objections to the question, much less the question itself.
I don't believe I ever asked you anything about yourself. How could that be?
I am never interested in anyone enough to the extent that I would ask any
questions. What I know about you is the result of you freely offering
information which I never asked for.
Mostly, I talk about myself which is the only person I have any interest in.
I have told you that I am Great Saint. That is all you will ever have to
know about me as far as my morals are concerned. If you want to tell the
entire newsgroup that you are a fornicator and that you lust after pleasure,
then that is your business. But don't compare yourself to me. You are close
to the Devil and I am close to God. I mean, what do we possibly have in
common?
> Your inability to discuss these simple, "natural" activities lends more
> credence to the theory that you are have some sort of signifcant sexual
> dysfunctional. This, in turn, means that your lectures on proper sexual
> behavior cannot be taken seriously...it would be like someone with
> Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder lecturing us on the "proper" way we should
> all
> wash our hands (e.g., "fifty times per day").
>
> BTW - you've said before that sex is for "procreation only". Does that
> mean
> that a post-menopausal woman can never have sex? Or a sterile guy?
Yes, to both of the above.
[...]
>> We hermits are universally misunderstood, We freely CHOOSE to be hermits.
The paragraph that I wrote above hangs together just fine that way I wrote
it and does not need any editing by a numskull like you.
[...]
>> It
>> is partly because of all the human scum in the world like GaryG, but it
>> is
>> more fundamental than that. Yea, we actually enjoy our own company. We
>> simply do not need others. Ask yourself, would you rather be a hermit
>> like
>> the Great Ed Dolan or a pitiful fornicator like the disgusting GaryG.
> Hells
>> Bells, just asking the question answers itself!
>
> Shall we have a vote then?
>
> For the record, my girlfriend and I went on a run on Friday evening. We
> went for a 45 mile bike ride with 3200 feet of climbing on Saturday, and
> went for a 5 mile run this morning. We also had some intensely fun sexual
> encounters during that time frame (one nice thing is that we both are
> comfortable taking the initiative in that department).
Excuse me while I resort to the smallest room in my house and have a good
retch. What an abomination you and your slut are. The Devil take you!
> So, everyone, ask yourselves:
>
> Would you rather live in a house in frozen Minnesota filled with a dozen
> 'bents, and no other human companionship, or live a life with an athletic,
> attractive girlfriend who loves life, loves to laugh, and loves physical
> activity?
Yes, let us take the vote and I have every confidence that the entire
universe will side with the Great Ed Dolan.
By the way, there is only one class of people who have any morality at all
and that is the middle class. The very rich and the very poor do not have
any morality. They have always behaved like swine and they always will. I
have got GaryG down as coming from the very poor - in other words, trash!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 23:43:33
From: GaryG
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:jOCdnQkxYcqgiIjZ4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
>
> "GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com> wrote in message
> news:qv6Rf.1198$pV1.179@fe02.lga...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:UtmdncsB2LNRQonZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
> > However, could you tell me why the question is "too absurd for words"?
> > You're normally more verbose in your explanations, and this one doesn't
> > seem
> > to hold water. You've asked me about my sexual experience and
attitudes,
> > and I've answered them. In the course of a discussion like this, these
> > sorts of questions are understandable and on topic...and yet you can't
> > even
> > address your objections to the question, much less the question itself.
>
> I don't believe I ever asked you anything about yourself. How could that
be?
> I am never interested in anyone enough to the extent that I would ask any
> questions. What I know about you is the result of you freely offering
> information which I never asked for.
Of course you did, ED. Have you forgotten, or do you simply have a
selective memory? Specifically, you asked me "But just for the record, I
would like to hear what you think sexual gratification consists of?" in this
post:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/thread/b7ddf7754eda0a79/412a31d40491115e?lnk=st&q=%22I+would+like+to+hear+what+you+think+sexual+gratification%22&rnum=2#412a31d40491115e
or, http://tinyurl.com/pamfx for those of you with news readers that break
long links.
>
> Mostly, I talk about myself which is the only person I have any interest
in.
Yawn...
> I have told you that I am Great Saint.
And yet...you're not.
Sainthood is conferred, not asserted, and aside from your delusions of
grandeur, nobody else is proclaiming your sainthood.
> That is all you will ever have to
> know about me as far as my morals are concerned. If you want to tell the
> entire newsgroup that you are a fornicator and that you lust after
pleasure,
> then that is your business. But don't compare yourself to me. You are
close
> to the Devil and I am close to God.
No, you're a narcissistic megalomaniac with sexual dysfunction who is close
to insanity.
> I mean, what do we possibly have in
> common?
>
> > Your inability to discuss these simple, "natural" activities lends more
> > credence to the theory that you are have some sort of signifcant sexual
> > dysfunctional. This, in turn, means that your lectures on proper sexual
> > behavior cannot be taken seriously...it would be like someone with
> > Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder lecturing us on the "proper" way we should
> > all
> > wash our hands (e.g., "fifty times per day").
> >
> > BTW - you've said before that sex is for "procreation only". Does that
> > mean
> > that a post-menopausal woman can never have sex? Or a sterile guy?
>
> Yes, to both of the above.
Wow...you really are a completly bizarre person, assuming you actually
believe that. You claim to be a "man of the world", and yet you have not a
whit of understanding of human nature, sexuality, love, etc. What a sad and
pathetic existence.
> [...]
>
> >> We hermits are universally misunderstood, We freely CHOOSE to be
hermits.
>
> The paragraph that I wrote above hangs together just fine that way I wrote
> it and does not need any editing by a numskull like you.
> [...]
>
> >> It
> >> is partly because of all the human scum in the world like GaryG, but it
> >> is
> >> more fundamental than that. Yea, we actually enjoy our own company. We
> >> simply do not need others. Ask yourself, would you rather be a hermit
> >> like
> >> the Great Ed Dolan or a pitiful fornicator like the disgusting GaryG.
> > Hells
> >> Bells, just asking the question answers itself!
> >
> > Shall we have a vote then?
> >
> > For the record, my girlfriend and I went on a run on Friday evening. We
> > went for a 45 mile bike ride with 3200 feet of climbing on Saturday, and
> > went for a 5 mile run this morning. We also had some intensely fun
sexual
> > encounters during that time frame (one nice thing is that we both are
> > comfortable taking the initiative in that department).
>
> Excuse me while I resort to the smallest room in my house and have a good
> retch. What an abomination you and your slut are. The Devil take you!
So, a completely normal, and natural physical interaction between two
healthy, active people, for the purpose of expressing closeness, joy, and
love makes you want to retch? Wow! You really are a screwed up mess, ED.
>
> > So, everyone, ask yourselves:
> >
> > Would you rather live in a house in frozen Minnesota filled with a dozen
> > 'bents, and no other human companionship, or live a life with an
athletic,
> > attractive girlfriend who loves life, loves to laugh, and loves physical
> > activity?
>
> Yes, let us take the vote and I have every confidence that the entire
> universe will side with the Great Ed Dolan.
>
> By the way, there is only one class of people who have any morality at all
> and that is the middle class. The very rich and the very poor do not have
> any morality. They have always behaved like swine and they always will. I
> have got GaryG down as coming from the very poor - in other words, trash!
Poor ED...reduced to ad hominem due to sexual frustration and loneliness.
GG
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 02:38:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Ed Dolan on his sexual history
|
"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@NOSPAMX.com > wrote in message
news:to9Rf.673$Yu5.437@fe04.lga...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:jOCdnQkxYcqgiIjZ4p2dnA@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>> I don't believe I ever asked you anything about yourself. How could that
> be?
>> I am never interested in anyone enough to the extent that I would ask any
>> questions. What I know about you is the result of you freely offering
>> information which I never asked for.
>
> Of course you did, ED. Have you forgotten, or do you simply have a
> selective memory? Specifically, you asked me "But just for the record, I
> would like to hear what you think sexual gratification consists of?" in
> this
> post:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/thread/b7ddf7754eda0a79/412a31d40491115e?lnk=st&q=%22I+would+like+to+hear+what+you+think+sexual+gratification%22&rnum=2#412a31d40491115e
>
> or, http://tinyurl.com/pamfx for those of you with news readers that
> break
> long links.
So why did you volunteer information about your personal sex life. That was
not ever what I wanted to know. I wanted to know in the abstract what you
thought sexual gratification consisted of. There was never any need to crow
about your disgusting self. Why embarrass the group with your immoralities.
[...]
>> I mean, what do we possibly have in
>> common?
>>
>> > Your inability to discuss these simple, "natural" activities lends more
>> > credence to the theory that you are have some sort of signifcant sexual
>> > dysfunctional. This, in turn, means that your lectures on proper
>> > sexual
>> > behavior cannot be taken seriously...it would be like someone with
>> > Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder lecturing us on the "proper" way we
>> > should
>> > all
>> > wash our hands (e.g., "fifty times per day").
I have already told you many times that you are unnatural. You do not have a
clue about what is natural for our species. You are perverted and depraved.
You badly need to take a course in physical anthropology and also cultural
anthropology with a view to the study of comparative cultures.
But can any kind of secularism ever make up for a grounding in religion.
Frankly, I doubt it. That is why I despair of all secularisms, no matter on
what they are based. I don't think scientific rationalism will succeed any
better than Communism did in replacing religion, at least not when it comes
to how men should behave morally.
>> > BTW - you've said before that sex is for "procreation only". Does that
>> > mean
>> > that a post-menopausal woman can never have sex? Or a sterile guy?
>>
>> Yes, to both of the above.
>
> Wow...you really are a completly bizarre person, assuming you actually
> believe that. You claim to be a "man of the world", and yet you have not
> a
> whit of understanding of human nature, sexuality, love, etc. What a sad
> and
> pathetic existence.
You are the greatest ignoramus I have yet encountered on these newsgroups.
[...]
>> By the way, there is only one class of people who have any morality at
>> all
>> and that is the middle class. The very rich and the very poor do not have
>> any morality. They have always behaved like swine and they always will. I
>> have got GaryG down as coming from the very poor - in other words, trash!
>
> Poor ED...reduced to ad hominem due to sexual frustration and loneliness.
I have said something above about morality and how it relates to class but,
as usual, all you can see is that I am calling you trash. You are incapable
of intellectual discourse.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
