| |
Main
Date: 03 Jan 2006 14:02:49
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
How does this look, folks?
It's got full suspension and disc brakes! Only wish the seat was mesh,
for air flow, and that it was much lighter than 36 lbs.
http://www.bicycleman.com/recumbents/hp_velotechnik/hp_velotechnik_street_machine.htm
Y'all know of anything else like this, but better?
The Street Machine is ~$3K...that's my budget.
TIA!
|
|
| |
Date: 10 Jan 2006 18:08:22
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
oldslowbenter wrote:
> "HH" <HH@bigpicture.com> wrote in message
> news:B7ydnVjICa0KWF7enZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >...
> > A $325.00 cutting tool to cut a seat cushion makes for a pricy seat pad.
> > Would save some money to buy the Buns of Steel thing on TV work out on it
> > for a while I think.
>
> That's why we buy pads from the Bike Rack. They have the tool and amortize
> it over a lot of pads and lots of trim offs to make bent bike seats. Here's
> the link to the manufacurer's site.http://www.supracor.com/about.html
I understand that the Supracor pads are used a lot on the Creative
Mobility [1] side of the business to prevent potential problems from
pressure sores.
[1] <http://thebikerack.com/site/page.cfm?PageID=396 >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley Pedant
|
| |
Date: 06 Jan 2006 13:12:21
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Peter Clinch wrote:
>
>
> I've tried the Bodylink on the Grasshopper (also worth a try, same cost
> and basic options as the Streetmachine GTe but with a 20/20 wheel setup
> so you only have to carry one flavour of spare tube).
What role does wheel size play?
I can see how it'd raise the sitting height...but does it also mean a
faster ride for some reason?
Why do a few have the same wheel size and most do not? What advantage
does a 26/26 'bent have?
> It's very
> adjustable, though to be honest I prefer the older non-adjusting one
> because it happens to fit me very well.
> But for A.N.Other rider the Bodylink has a better chance of fitting
> because you can fiddle it in so many ways. Sit on it and see... One
> thing my gf like about her bike is the seat shape cuts away around the
> shoulders.
Yeah, I was wondering how these seats affect the shoulders as well as
the back!
> I prefer the HPVel seat for the opposite reason; they're a
> personal thing and the only way to see what's best is take a seat and
> see for yourself.
Can't wait!!
> I've never felt the need for a headrest, and I have my seat at maximum
> recline, but again sucking it and seeing is the best way to decide.
It'd be nice to know it's there...there are times when I'm biking along
on a smooth straight road that's empty for maybe like a whole quarter
mile and I imagine how lovely it would be to just lay back and stare up
at the passing sky.
> Pete.
> --
> Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
> Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
> Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
> net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | |
Date: 16 Jan 2006 09:31:43
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> What role does wheel size play?
Sorry for the delay, been off skiing for the week...
Wheel size isn't nearly as significant as many people seem to assume for
a general purpose bike, especially if the wheels have good suspension
(and on an HPVel, they do) because that swallows up most of the rolling
resistance issues, as long as you're not on rough stuff. Alex Moulton
demonstrated that back in the 60s, but there's still people about who
think small wheels must mean slow.
The priy advantage of a 26" rear AFAICT on the Streetmachine is that
you've got a lot bigger choice of off-the-shelf gear solutions designed
for that wheel size without having to fettle things or use rather
exclusive bits.
> Why do a few have the same wheel size and most do not? What advantage
> does a 26/26 'bent have?
It will have lower rolling resistance, all else being equal, but give it
good suspension and "lower" will be pretty insignificant. HPVel make
good suspension. My partner uses a 20/20 semi-low Nazca Fiero and has
been loaded touring on it on unsurfaced tracks okay. I think most of
the thing about 26/26 is the still widespread perception that bigger
wheels make a "serious" bike.
> It'd be nice to know it's there...there are times when I'm biking along
> on a smooth straight road that's empty for maybe like a whole quarter
> mile and I imagine how lovely it would be to just lay back and stare up
> at the passing sky.
But you can't do that with a headrest, they stop your head reclining
further...
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Jan 2006 21:26:00
From: Simon Kellett
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk > writes:
> The priy advantage of a 26" rear AFAICT on the Streetmachine is
> that you've got a lot bigger choice of off-the-shelf gear solutions
> designed for that wheel size without having to fettle things or use
> rather exclusive bits.
It depends on what gearing you want: I find most bikes vastly
over-geared so all my bents are 406 all-round which makes things easier,
for the same reason as you give :-)
(And having all wheels the same size reduces the number of spares you
need.)
--
Simon Kellett, Darmstadt, Germany
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2006 09:37:39
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Simon Kellett wrote:
> It depends on what gearing you want: I find most bikes vastly
> over-geared so all my bents are 406 all-round which makes things easier,
> for the same reason as you give :-)
The Streetmachine gearing as standard is, IMHO, pretty daft. Top gear
is such a monster that I've /never/ spun it out, despite trying quite
hard on some very big hills. But that's more down to the chainwheels
than anything else, 30/42/52. Once I get a Round Tuit I'll be regearing
by either a Rohloff and a small chainwheel (if I come into some money!)
or moving to a more MTB-a-like set of chainwheels. With something like
22/32/44 and a closer spaced rear cassette it would give a much better
spread for loaded touring.
But I seem to be in a relative minority thinking that! By default I'd
look for a 20/20 if I was starting now (like you say, only one set of
spares), but as yet I haven't found a 20/20 with quite the same Magic X
Factor for me as the 20/26 HPVels. Roos got Magic X with the Fiero, but
though the seat suits her very well with the cutaway shoulders I just
prefer the supported ones from the HPVel seats. As usual, trying it out
in person is the key.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 18:18:58
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
oldslowbenter wrote:
> "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1136470757.525690.90000@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > ...
> > I'd like to meet some sexy girl on a 'bent!
>
> There's a couple cruising around monkey island, but you'd have to catch them
> first, and good luck with that....
I remember riding the 20/20 Wishbone on the Bike Psychos century about
4 years ago in a paceline with "Doc" (Speedmachine) and the Monkey
Sisters Wendy (Stealth) and Barb (Red Sunset). Barb is now riding a
Velokraft VK-1, which make me wonder whatever happened to that Red
Sunset?
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 17:54:14
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
oldslowbenter wrote:
> ...
> New versions have the 'body link' adjustable seat. Old ones came small -
> large. Original medium seat was too long for my torso. Lumbar curve hit too
> high and felt like a device from the Spamish Inquisition..no, the real
> one...I bought a new small size and it's very comfortable,especially with a
> $150 piece of Supracor substituted for the air flow cushion inside the air
> flow pad.
Is Supracor the stuff The Bike Rack in St. Charles sells? I know
someone who bought a $50 piece to improve the comfort of the stoker
seat on a Bike Friday DoubleDay.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 09 Jan 2006 22:00:13
From: gotbent
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136512454.008587.33800@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> oldslowbenter wrote:
>> ...
>> New versions have the 'body link' adjustable seat. Old ones came small -
>> large. Original medium seat was too long for my torso. Lumbar curve hit
>> too
>> high and felt like a device from the Spamish Inquisition..no, the real
>> one...I bought a new small size and it's very comfortable,especially with
>> a
>> $150 piece of Supracor substituted for the air flow cushion inside the
>> air
>> flow pad.
>
> Is Supracor the stuff The Bike Rack in St. Charles sells? I know
> someone who bought a $50 piece to improve the comfort of the stoker
> seat on a Bike Friday DoubleDay.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>
>
That is the stuff. I had a piece over the foam pad on my V-rex, too. That
has since been grafted onto the HP SpM to make the cushion version 2. If you
don't have one of these, http://www.abbeon.com/tools/zetz9t.html the stuff
is a bugger to cut.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Jan 2006 08:32:59
From: HH
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"gotbent" <gofast@golow.com > wrote in message
news:1136865695_851@spool6-east.superfeed.net...
>
> "Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1136512454.008587.33800@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> oldslowbenter wrote:
>>> ...
>>> New versions have the 'body link' adjustable seat. Old ones came small -
>>> large. Original medium seat was too long for my torso. Lumbar curve hit
>>> too
>>> high and felt like a device from the Spamish Inquisition..no, the real
>>> one...I bought a new small size and it's very comfortable,especially
>>> with a
>>> $150 piece of Supracor substituted for the air flow cushion inside the
>>> air
>>> flow pad.
>>
>> Is Supracor the stuff The Bike Rack in St. Charles sells? I know
>> someone who bought a $50 piece to improve the comfort of the stoker
>> seat on a Bike Friday DoubleDay.
>>
>> --
>> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>>
>>
> That is the stuff. I had a piece over the foam pad on my V-rex, too. That
> has since been grafted onto the HP SpM to make the cushion version 2. If
> you don't have one of these, http://www.abbeon.com/tools/zetz9t.html the
> stuff is a bugger to cut.
>
A $325.00 cutting tool to cut a seat cushion makes for a pricy seat pad.
Would save some money to buy the Buns of Steel thing on TV work out on it
for a while I think.
I mean how expensive and cushey does a recumbent bike seat need to be?
|
| | | | |
Date: 10 Jan 2006 09:01:51
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"HH" <HH@bigpicture.com > wrote in message
news:B7ydnVjICa0KWF7enZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "gotbent" <gofast@golow.com> wrote in message
> news:1136865695_851@spool6-east.superfeed.net...
>>
>> "Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1136512454.008587.33800@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> oldslowbenter wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> New versions have the 'body link' adjustable seat. Old ones came
>>>> small -
>>>> large. Original medium seat was too long for my torso. Lumbar curve hit
>>>> too
>>>> high and felt like a device from the Spamish Inquisition..no, the real
>>>> one...I bought a new small size and it's very comfortable,especially
>>>> with a
>>>> $150 piece of Supracor substituted for the air flow cushion inside the
>>>> air
>>>> flow pad.
>>>
>>> Is Supracor the stuff The Bike Rack in St. Charles sells? I know
>>> someone who bought a $50 piece to improve the comfort of the stoker
>>> seat on a Bike Friday DoubleDay.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>>>
>>>
>> That is the stuff. I had a piece over the foam pad on my V-rex, too. That
>> has since been grafted onto the HP SpM to make the cushion version 2. If
>> you don't have one of these, http://www.abbeon.com/tools/zetz9t.html the
>> stuff is a bugger to cut.
>>
>
> A $325.00 cutting tool to cut a seat cushion makes for a pricy seat pad.
> Would save some money to buy the Buns of Steel thing on TV work out on it
> for a while I think.
That's why we buy pads from the Bike Rack. They have the tool and amortize
it over a lot of pads and lots of trim offs to make bent bike seats. Here's
the link to the manufacurer's site.http://www.supracor.com/about.html
>How expensive and cushey does a recumbent bike seat need to be?
>
Some people ride right on the carbon fibre without any cushion. I need more
cush for my tush than that.
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 18:07:59
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
oldslowbenter wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1136422814.047591.263010@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > ...
> > I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
> > even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
> > bars since they look so much better (opinion).
> >
> > --
> > Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
> >
> >
> A purple Sunset??? Just an opinion, of course.
I think the "T" bars that Shaved Head Earl put on my Red Sunset look
better than the stock "C" bars on Purple Sunset.
I wouldn't want to be seen on a common Orange Sunset - there must be
about 6 of those in Chicagoland.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 22:31:19
From: gotbent
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136513279.270363.90670@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> oldslowbenter wrote:
>> "Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1136422814.047591.263010@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > ...
>> > I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
>> > even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
>> > bars since they look so much better (opinion).
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>> >
>> >
>> A purple Sunset??? Just an opinion, of course.
>
> I think the "T" bars that Shaved Head Earl put on my Red Sunset look
> better than the stock "C" bars on Purple Sunset.
Is your "T" bar set up like the ones Hairy O'l Bearded Earl had on his
Sunset? The ones with the RANS "flipit"? If it is, I'd ditch the POS RANS
stupid 3 blade no anti wear washers compression hinge made out of thick
aluminum and buy a Pat Franz 'flipit'. Have Shiny Head Earl to a stemectomy
on the Sunset. Any fotos of the purple one. I can't remember seeing a Sunset
with übermann bars..
>
> I wouldn't want to be seen on a common Orange Sunset - there must be
> about 6 of those in Chicagoland.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 18:02:15
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Johnny Sunset wrote:
> >
> >
> > I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
> > even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
> > bars since they look so much better (opinion).
> >
> > --
> > Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>
>
> You mean OSS? USS seems more "natural" and "aesthetic" to me.
While the Speedmachine is now available with USS, there are two
different OSS setups. See
<http://www.hpvelotechnik.com/produkte/spm/details_e.html >.
> I can't wait to test-ride already!!
>
> I don't understand your comment about the seat, though. Isn't it
> adjustable?
As Peter Clinch [1, 2] states below in this thread, adjusting distance
to the pedals is not something one wants to do on a frequent basis on a
sliding boom bicycle.
[1] Medical Physics IT Officer, University of Dundee, Ninewells
Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
[2] <
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/msg/67d0e58c49442bd9?dmode=source&hl=en >.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 06 Jan 2006 09:34:18
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Johnny Sunset wrote:
> As Peter Clinch [1, 2] states below in this thread, adjusting distance
> to the pedals is not something one wants to do on a frequent basis on a
> sliding boom bicycle.
It's a trike, but the Hase Kettwiesel makes it easy with an automatic
chain tensioner that makes the overall length immaterial and QRs on the
boom bolts.
You can put a similar setup on anything (Ben Cooper, HPVel dealer in
Glasgow sets up his demo Streetmachine like this) but it's a bit daft on
a personal machine that typically nobody else uses.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 07:04:37
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Peter Clinch wrote:
>
>
> Above seat steering (more usual on the Speedmachine, the original
> version only had over-seat) usually falls into two categories,
> "Superman" bars with the arms held straight out in front and "hamster"
> bars with the arms held close to the chest (a little like a hamster
> sitting up holding a nut). The Speedmachine now has underseat ergobars
> as an option.
OIC! I'll probably go with the GTe, though -- the Street Machine.
Any experience with that new Bodyliner seat available? Wonder what's
the difference. I'm especially interested in the headrest option.
> And make sure you do test ride everything you can. It's easy to select
> a 'bent on paper and find it isn't quite what you'd thought. Don't set
> your heart on anything you haven't ridden yet, no matter what the
> reputation.
Yes, that's true. I must stop drooling all over my keyboard....
> I know a lady who fits the bill but the bad news for you is she lives
> with me! ;-)
Hey, I just wanna meet her, is all. Help motivate me up them hills....
> Pete.
> --
> Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
> Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
> Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
> net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 16:15:06
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Any experience with that new Bodyliner seat available? Wonder what's
> the difference. I'm especially interested in the headrest option.
I've tried the Bodylink on the Grasshopper (also worth a try, same cost
and basic options as the Streetmachine GTe but with a 20/20 wheel setup
so you only have to carry one flavour of spare tube). It's very
adjustable, though to be honest I prefer the older non-adjusting one
because it happens to fit me very well.
But for A.N.Other rider the Bodylink has a better chance of fitting
because you can fiddle it in so many ways. Sit on it and see... One
thing my gf like about her bike is the seat shape cuts away around the
shoulders. I prefer the HPVel seat for the opposite reason; they're a
personal thing and the only way to see what's best is take a seat and
see for yourself.
I've never felt the need for a headrest, and I have my seat at maximum
recline, but again sucking it and seeing is the best way to decide.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 06:40:31
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Johnny Sunset wrote:
>
>
> I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
> even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
> bars since they look so much better (opinion).
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
You mean OSS? USS seems more "natural" and "aesthetic" to me.
I can't wait to test-ride already!!
I don't understand your comment about the seat, though. Isn't it
adjustable?
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 15:00:32
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> You mean OSS? USS seems more "natural" and "aesthetic" to me.
Try them. In practice the difference is less than you might expect IME.
Note that if you want to go faster OSS is probably more aerodynamic.
I prefer USS, but I've owned and loved an OSS bike and wouldn't rule out
another.
> I don't understand your comment about the seat, though. Isn't it
> adjustable?
Yes, or rather the boom is, but if you're just having a quick hack on
someone else's bike then getting out the allen keys to do the boom, and
take a couple of links out of the chain (or put some extra ones back) is
more of a faff than it's usually worth.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 10:15:26
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"Peter Clinch" <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk > wrote in message
news:424qg8F1gkp98U1@individual.net...
> NYC XYZ wrote:
>
>> You mean OSS? USS seems more "natural" and "aesthetic" to me.
>
> Try them. In practice the difference is less than you might expect IME.
> Note that if you want to go faster OSS is probably more aerodynamic.
>
> I prefer USS, but I've owned and loved an OSS bike and wouldn't rule out
> another.
>
>> I don't understand your comment about the seat, though. Isn't it
>> adjustable?
>
> Yes, or rather the boom is, but if you're just having a quick hack on
> someone else's bike then getting out the allen keys to do the boom, and
> take a couple of links out of the chain (or put some extra ones back) is
> more of a faff than it's usually worth.
>
> Pete.
> --
> Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
> Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
> Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
> net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
>
>
New versions have the 'body link' adjustable seat. Old ones came small -
large. Original medium seat was too long for my torso. Lumbar curve hit too
high and felt like a device from the Spamish Inquisition..no, the real
one...I bought a new small size and it's very comfortable,especially with a
$150 piece of Supracor substituted for the air flow cushion inside the air
flow pad.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 06:19:17
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
gotbent wrote:
>
>
> much prunage
>
> Check out www.recumbents.com there's a '03 Speedmachine with a tailfairing
> for bout $2500.
The 'bent LBS -- ~300 miles away! -- sells the basic GTe new for
$26xx...with accessories and taxes that'll be $3K. The extra dollars
will be worth it for a brand new aluminum Street Machine, I think.
> I have an older one too. It's a sweet ride, even if I can't
> make it go all that fast.
Is it you or the machine? Seriously, I'm curious, since I'd like not
to be slower than a kid on skates, you know!
F'r instance, the best flat speed I'd seen yet from my Trek 1000c
upright is ~31 mph, IIRC. Actually, a human being can sprint up to
like 25 mph...so I guess that's not very fast after all, what I can do
on a bike!
> Some people say they have trouble starting up and
> steering Sm's with the hampster bars.
What are hampster bars? Their "ergobars" look all right.
> I bought mine used and never had a
> test ride. I saw one once and I wanted it, but couldn't afford it.
> Eventually I had some cash, the I gotta have it itch and the opportunity. It
> came with the aero bars and I never had a problem steering (Don't put the
> brakes on in a slow speed turn! Never, ever!)
I have no 'bent experience.
I am so looking forward to test-riding a bunch of stuff at the LBS come
Spring!
> I think that it's more stable
> than my SWB RANS. I upgraded to new air shock, new Magura Louise calipers
> and a seat that's the right size. It's red. It's a really sweet ride.
Oh, Goodness, I haven't even gone skiing yet and I'm already hoping for
Spring to come!
> fat old geezer onna bent
I'd like to meet some sexy girl on a 'bent!
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 10:22:23
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136470757.525690.90000@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> gotbent wrote:
>>
>>
>> much prunage
>>
>> Check out www.recumbents.com there's a '03 Speedmachine with a
>> tailfairing
>> for bout $2500.
>
> The 'bent LBS -- ~300 miles away! -- sells the basic GTe new for
> $26xx...with accessories and taxes that'll be $3K. The extra dollars
> will be worth it for a brand new aluminum Street Machine, I think.
>
>> I have an older one too. It's a sweet ride, even if I can't
>> make it go all that fast.
>
> Is it you or the machine? Seriously, I'm curious, since I'd like not
> to be slower than a kid on skates, you know!
It's me. I'm a FOG, like my siggy said. I can do 30 mph sprint, though to
show a speed violation on the local road side radar speed reminder thingy
the cops leave at various places in the subdivision.
>
> F'r instance, the best flat speed I'd seen yet from my Trek 1000c
> upright is ~31 mph, IIRC. Actually, a human being can sprint up to
> like 25 mph...so I guess that's not very fast after all, what I can do
> on a bike!
>
>> Some people say they have trouble starting up and
>> steering Sm's with the hampster bars.
>
> What are hampster bars? Their "ergobars" look all right.
"T" bars vs" U" bars.
>
>> I bought mine used and never had a
>> test ride. I saw one once and I wanted it, but couldn't afford it.
>> Eventually I had some cash, the I gotta have it itch and the opportunity.
>> It
>> came with the aero bars and I never had a problem steering (Don't put the
>> brakes on in a slow speed turn! Never, ever!)
>
> I have no 'bent experience.
>
> I am so looking forward to test-riding a bunch of stuff at the LBS come
> Spring!
>
>> I think that it's more stable
>> than my SWB RANS. I upgraded to new air shock, new Magura Louise calipers
>> and a seat that's the right size. It's red. It's a really sweet ride.
>
> Oh, Goodness, I haven't even gone skiing yet and I'm already hoping for
> Spring to come!
>
>> fat old geezer onna bent
>
> I'd like to meet some sexy girl on a 'bent!
There's a couple cruising around monkey island, but you'd have to catch them
first, and good luck with that....their husbands are really fast too. Good
Luck and enjoy your new bwnt whatever youend up with.
>
>> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
>> News==----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
>> Newsgroups
>> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
>> =----
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 14:50:39
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> What are hampster bars? Their "ergobars" look all right.
Above seat steering (more usual on the Speedmachine, the original
version only had over-seat) usually falls into two categories,
"Superman" bars with the arms held straight out in front and "hamster"
bars with the arms held close to the chest (a little like a hamster
sitting up holding a nut). The Speedmachine now has underseat ergobars
as an option.
> I have no 'bent experience.
>
> I am so looking forward to test-riding a bunch of stuff at the LBS come
> Spring!
And make sure you do test ride everything you can. It's easy to select
a 'bent on paper and find it isn't quite what you'd thought. Don't set
your heart on anything you haven't ridden yet, no matter what the
reputation.
> I'd like to meet some sexy girl on a 'bent!
I know a lady who fits the bill but the bad news for you is she lives
with me! ;-)
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 17:00:14
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
gotbent, a self-described fat old geezer onna bent, wrote:
> "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1136411776.085334.85290@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Great points! So it's decided, then...I'll see you out there -- in my
> > GTe!
> >
> > Ouch...$3K...I'd just spent $3K this past month...!
> >
> much prunage
>
> Check out www.recumbents.com there's a '03 Speedmachine with a tailfairing
> for bout $2500. I have an older one too. It's a sweet ride, even if I can't
> make it go all that fast. Some people say they have trouble starting up and
> steering Sm's with the hampster bars. I bought mine used and never had a
> test ride. I saw one once and I wanted it, but couldn't afford it.
> Eventually I had some cash, the I gotta have it itch and the opportunity. It
> came with the aero bars and I never had a problem steering (Don't put the
> brakes on in a slow speed turn! Never, ever!) I think that it's more stable
> than my SWB RANS. I upgraded to new air shock, new Magura Louise calipers
> and a seat that's the right size. It's red. It's a really sweet ride.
I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
bars since they look so much better (opinion).
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 10:10:40
From: oldslowbenter
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136422814.047591.263010@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> gotbent, a self-described fat old geezer onna bent, wrote:
>> "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1136411776.085334.85290@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Great points! So it's decided, then...I'll see you out there -- in my
>> > GTe!
>> >
>> > Ouch...$3K...I'd just spent $3K this past month...!
>> >
>> much prunage
>>
>> Check out www.recumbents.com there's a '03 Speedmachine with a
>> tailfairing
>> for bout $2500. I have an older one too. It's a sweet ride, even if I
>> can't
>> make it go all that fast. Some people say they have trouble starting up
>> and
>> steering Sm's with the hampster bars. I bought mine used and never had a
>> test ride. I saw one once and I wanted it, but couldn't afford it.
>> Eventually I had some cash, the I gotta have it itch and the opportunity.
>> It
>> came with the aero bars and I never had a problem steering (Don't put the
>> brakes on in a slow speed turn! Never, ever!) I think that it's more
>> stable
>> than my SWB RANS. I upgraded to new air shock, new Magura Louise calipers
>> and a seat that's the right size. It's red. It's a really sweet ride.
>
> I had no trouble riding a HP Velotechnik Speedmachine with the "T" bars
> even though the seat was about 5 cm too far back. I would get the "T"
> bars since they look so much better (opinion).
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
>
>
A purple Sunset??? Just an opinion, of course.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 13:56:16
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Great points! So it's decided, then...I'll see you out there -- in my
GTe!
Ouch...$3K...I'd just spent $3K this past month...!
Nigel Cliffe wrote:
>
>
> Different geometry = different seating position = different comfort
> depending on your body and personal preferences.
>
> Speed-M geometry comes from a "mostly racing / fast day rides" machine. Its
> a little bit low and feet in the air (though not extreme). Its a bit harder
> to look over ones shoulder due to the rider's neck being more horizontal
> than vertical. Therefore, I think some form of mirror would be essential
> (which requires some thought on fitting to an USS version of the machine,
> unless you go for helmet or spectacle mounted options).
>
> Street-M geometry comes from a touring machine, and the rider sits a little
> more upright with feet a bit lower, though still fully recumbent (rather
> than Bike-E "half recumbent"). Shoulder observations are a bit easier as
> its more upright.
>
> The seat angles overlap; Speed-M is 25 to 35 degrees. Street-M is 30 to 40
> degrees.
>
> The bottom bracket on the Speed-M is MUCH higher than the Street-M when
> referenced from the rider's seat (160mm or 6.5inches difference). I think
> this accounts for most of teh difference in rider position and perceptions
> as to which is more comfortable, rather than the recline angles.
> This might be an issue for you; its a bit harder to swing ones leg up the
> extra distance, and if you suffer cold feet or pins&needles from having your
> feet working up high, it would probably be worse on the Speed-M.
>
>
> There isn't much weight difference when riding a Speed-M and a steel
> Street-M. I expect the USS option on the Speed-M will bring the weights of
> the two machines to near enough identical kerb-weights.
>
>
>
>
>
> Which you'd prefer comes down to test rides. They are very different riding
> experiences.
>
> If making a comparison on speed, use a stop-watch or other measuring device.
> For most people, the Speed-M will feel a bit faster at a given constant
> speed because your eyes are nearer the tarmac.
>
>
> - Nigel
>
>
>
> --
> Nigel Cliffe,
> Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/
|
| | |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 18:27:01
From: gotbent
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136411776.085334.85290@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Great points! So it's decided, then...I'll see you out there -- in my
> GTe!
>
> Ouch...$3K...I'd just spent $3K this past month...!
>
much prunage
Check out www.recumbents.com there's a '03 Speedmachine with a tailfairing
for bout $2500. I have an older one too. It's a sweet ride, even if I can't
make it go all that fast. Some people say they have trouble starting up and
steering Sm's with the hampster bars. I bought mine used and never had a
test ride. I saw one once and I wanted it, but couldn't afford it.
Eventually I had some cash, the I gotta have it itch and the opportunity. It
came with the aero bars and I never had a problem steering (Don't put the
brakes on in a slow speed turn! Never, ever!) I think that it's more stable
than my SWB RANS. I upgraded to new air shock, new Magura Louise calipers
and a seat that's the right size. It's red. It's a really sweet ride.
fat old geezer onna bent
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 08:40:06
From: NYC XYZ
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Thanks again for the info (and to everyone else as well!).
Can you tell me what you think the difference is between the Street
Machine GTe and the Speed Machine?
I mean, sure one's supposed to be built for speed -- though the company
website's photos show it being used just like any other tourer -- and
so it's got an even lower profile...which means it probably can't take
that under-seat rack...but other than that and the price, it seems the
same as a GTe, no? I mean, is it just better components?
For the ~$300 difference in price, I think I might even wind up with a
Speed Machine after all if it really is faster! My main concern WRT
speed is really hill-climbing. I love to climb them much as the next
cyclist, but it's nice feeling that your efforts aren't compromised by
a hog of a machine underneath! =)
Peter Clinch wrote:
> Nigel Cliffe wrote:
> > NYC XYZ wrote:
>
> >>How does this look, folks?
> >>
> >>It's got full suspension and disc brakes!
>
> It only has discs if you specify them as optional extras. As standard
> it comes with Tektro V brakes, which are okay but nothing special. I
> upgraded the Vs to Magura HS 33 hydraulic rim brakes, which are also a
> standard factory option and will weigh in at less than discs, and also
> allow the lighter fork option without the disc mount.
>
> The suspension is superb. I thought it was a bit pointless on a road
> machine at first, but it's done very well and makes a big difference to
> comfort and efficiency on poorer surfaces, especially fully loaded as
> the luggage travels suspended too.
>
> >> Only wish the seat was
> >>mesh, for air flow, and that it was much lighter than 36 lbs.
>
> I graduated to it from a mesh seat machine, and frankly prefer the hard
> shell. The ventilation isn't so good, granted, but the support is
> better (especially at more reclined angles) and it makes pushing against
> the seat more effective IMHO.
>
> It /is/ heavy, but having said that all the things that make it heavy
> are doing a useful job (at least useful in the context of serious
> touring, which the bike is designed for). Note that the latest version,
> the GTe, has an alloy frame and is consequently a bit lighter
>
> >>Y'all know of anything else like this, but better?
>
> For what it does and what I want, not much. Now HPVel have introduced a
> version of the Speedmachine with USS that will take 4 panniers I might
> look at that as an alternative if I was replacing mine after some
> disaster, but I've never really been left thinking I should have bought
> something else.
>
> > However, consensus from reports, and my own rides on loaned examples:
> > Excellent Touring machine, good for long trips, loaded with luggage, etc.
> > Not a sports machine, and won't win any races. Not the lightest bike on the
> > planet. Cell-foam seat better than you might think.
>
> Pretty much on the money there, I'd say. Though I wouldn't mind
> something hot as an extra machine rather than an alternative, the SMGT
> is the most refined bike I've ever ridden and that more than makes up
> for the relatively sluggish performance for me. And while not great on
> the flat or climbing, the gears go low enough that you can still get the
> climbing done, and back down the other side the suspension adds quite a
> bit to the road holding so if it's a less than perfect road you can
> easily pass most bikes going down the other side.
>
> > Has competitors from
> > various other European makers (eg. Challenge might be the best known).
>
> And Optima and M5 from the Dutch "Big 3", and numerous others. You can
> save money by going this way but I don't think their suspension is quite
> so thoroughly sorted.
>
> > You may want to see if the newer "bodylink" seat shell is available on a new
> > machine. That is used on the Grasshopper model, and I think was being moved
> > across the whole range.
>
> The GTe has a Bodylink as standard, the chromoly framed GT still uses
> the individually sized seats. Though the Bodylink has all sorts of
> adjustments I could never get the one I tried quite as good /for me/ as
> the seat on my Streetmachine...
>
> > The choice of components does alter the way it rides; I've had a go on
> > different examples with different front suspension, gearing and braking
> > systems (disk vs V-brake, fancy springs vs. basic, derrailleur vs rohloff).
> > My preference was for the simpler and cheaper options; in all cases the
> > springs seem to need tuning to the rider's weight and preferences.
>
> I would certainly go for the hydraulic rim brakes over the Vs: they work
> /considerably/ better, and if you're doing 30+ mph with full touring
> luggage that's a Good Thing. Aside from ordering the spring unit that
> matched my basic weight I've never bothered fiddling with the suspension
> at all, aside from greasing the bushes at the back once a year, and it
> doesn't seem to have been anything other than superb.
>
> > As with any machine at that sort of price, get a decent test ride.
>
> Absolutely. Recumbents vary a lot in the flesh and what looks perfect
> on paper can just not ring the bells when you're on it. And what looks
> wrong on paper or at first glance can actually be Just Right when you
> get on and try it out. Roos' Nazca Fiero fits that latter category
>
> Pete.
> --
> Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
> Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
> Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
> net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | |
Date: 05 Jan 2006 09:19:15
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Can you tell me what you think the difference is between the Street
> Machine GTe and the Speed Machine?
Priily, about 20cm of seat height, so you're quite a bit lower and
more aerodynamic.
> I mean, sure one's supposed to be built for speed -- though the company
> website's photos show it being used just like any other tourer -- and
> so it's got an even lower profile...which means it probably can't take
> that under-seat rack...
The original version would only allow 2 panniers on the rack, but the
2006 version will allow 4. However, if you get panniers like Radical's
'bent specific ones then you can take 4 panniers' worth of gear in a
pair anyway (70l for the big ones, my partner uses a pair of 50l on her
20/20 semi-low Nazca Fiero, HP Vel's "Moonbiker" bags are rebadged
Radicals but only available in the biggest size).
> but other than that and the price, it seems the
> same as a GTe, no? I mean, is it just better components?
No, the geometry is very different. While you sit /on/ a Streetmachine
it's like you sit *in* a Speedmachine. While the StM is incredibly
refined and encourages me to take my time, the SpM encourages me to Go
As Fast As Possible. Though either can be used for loaded touring
they're quite different beasts in many ways.
> For the ~$300 difference in price, I think I might even wind up with a
> Speed Machine after all if it really is faster!
20cm head height is a lot of extra wind to hold you back. My partner's
'bent is similarly about a head lower than my Streetmachine, and when
we're riding into the wind she's noticeably better off, and if it's
behind a lowish wall then she just disappears into the distance.
> My main concern WRT
> speed is really hill-climbing. I love to climb them much as the next
> cyclist, but it's nice feeling that your efforts aren't compromised by
> a hog of a machine underneath! =)
Neither are the lightest machines so either will take their time getting
up the braes. But the gearing goes low enough that you /will/ get up
them as long as you keep spinning and then you have a truly superb piece
of kit to scream down the other side.
As has already been said, testing in person is the best way to decide
for yourself which is best by a country mile, and then some.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| | |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 19:19:07
From: Nigel Cliffe
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> Thanks again for the info (and to everyone else as well!).
>
> Can you tell me what you think the difference is between the Street
> Machine GTe and the Speed Machine?
Different geometry = different seating position = different comfort
depending on your body and personal preferences.
Speed-M geometry comes from a "mostly racing / fast day rides" machine. Its
a little bit low and feet in the air (though not extreme). Its a bit harder
to look over ones shoulder due to the rider's neck being more horizontal
than vertical. Therefore, I think some form of mirror would be essential
(which requires some thought on fitting to an USS version of the machine,
unless you go for helmet or spectacle mounted options).
Street-M geometry comes from a touring machine, and the rider sits a little
more upright with feet a bit lower, though still fully recumbent (rather
than Bike-E "half recumbent"). Shoulder observations are a bit easier as
its more upright.
The seat angles overlap; Speed-M is 25 to 35 degrees. Street-M is 30 to 40
degrees.
The bottom bracket on the Speed-M is MUCH higher than the Street-M when
referenced from the rider's seat (160mm or 6.5inches difference). I think
this accounts for most of teh difference in rider position and perceptions
as to which is more comfortable, rather than the recline angles.
This might be an issue for you; its a bit harder to swing ones leg up the
extra distance, and if you suffer cold feet or pins&needles from having your
feet working up high, it would probably be worse on the Speed-M.
There isn't much weight difference when riding a Speed-M and a steel
Street-M. I expect the USS option on the Speed-M will bring the weights of
the two machines to near enough identical kerb-weights.
Which you'd prefer comes down to test rides. They are very different riding
experiences.
If making a comparison on speed, use a stop-watch or other measuring device.
For most people, the Speed-M will feel a bit faster at a given constant
speed because your eyes are nearer the tarmac.
- Nigel
--
Nigel Cliffe,
Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/
|
| |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 10:04:33
From: Nigel Cliffe
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> How does this look, folks?
>
> It's got full suspension and disc brakes! Only wish the seat was
> mesh, for air flow, and that it was much lighter than 36 lbs.
>
> http://www.bicycleman.com/recumbents/hp_velotechnik/hp_velotechnik_street_machine.htm
>
> Y'all know of anything else like this, but better?
>
> The Street Machine is ~$3K...that's my budget.
If Pete Clinch is still reading, he'll no doubt give you the benefit of
several years of ownership and touring.
However, consensus from reports, and my own rides on loaned examples:
Excellent Touring machine, good for long trips, loaded with luggage, etc.
Not a sports machine, and won't win any races. Not the lightest bike on the
planet. Cell-foam seat better than you might think. Has competitors from
various other European makers (eg. Challenge might be the best known).
You may want to see if the newer "bodylink" seat shell is available on a new
machine. That is used on the Grasshopper model, and I think was being moved
across the whole range.
The choice of components does alter the way it rides; I've had a go on
different examples with different front suspension, gearing and braking
systems (disk vs V-brake, fancy springs vs. basic, derrailleur vs rohloff).
My preference was for the simpler and cheaper options; in all cases the
springs seem to need tuning to the rider's weight and preferences.
As with any machine at that sort of price, get a decent test ride. And
within HP-V's range, look also at the Grasshopper (twin 20in wheels) and the
Speedmachine (a bit more reclined, but still touring capable). The Street
Machine now comes with either Aluminum or Steel frame in Europe; you might
want to enquire which is better for your intended use.
- Nigel
--
Nigel Cliffe,
Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/
|
| | |
Date: 04 Jan 2006 11:08:18
From: Peter Clinch
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
Nigel Cliffe wrote:
> NYC XYZ wrote:
>>How does this look, folks?
>>
>>It's got full suspension and disc brakes!
It only has discs if you specify them as optional extras. As standard
it comes with Tektro V brakes, which are okay but nothing special. I
upgraded the Vs to Magura HS 33 hydraulic rim brakes, which are also a
standard factory option and will weigh in at less than discs, and also
allow the lighter fork option without the disc mount.
The suspension is superb. I thought it was a bit pointless on a road
machine at first, but it's done very well and makes a big difference to
comfort and efficiency on poorer surfaces, especially fully loaded as
the luggage travels suspended too.
>> Only wish the seat was
>>mesh, for air flow, and that it was much lighter than 36 lbs.
I graduated to it from a mesh seat machine, and frankly prefer the hard
shell. The ventilation isn't so good, granted, but the support is
better (especially at more reclined angles) and it makes pushing against
the seat more effective IMHO.
It /is/ heavy, but having said that all the things that make it heavy
are doing a useful job (at least useful in the context of serious
touring, which the bike is designed for). Note that the latest version,
the GTe, has an alloy frame and is consequently a bit lighter
>>Y'all know of anything else like this, but better?
For what it does and what I want, not much. Now HPVel have introduced a
version of the Speedmachine with USS that will take 4 panniers I might
look at that as an alternative if I was replacing mine after some
disaster, but I've never really been left thinking I should have bought
something else.
> However, consensus from reports, and my own rides on loaned examples:
> Excellent Touring machine, good for long trips, loaded with luggage, etc.
> Not a sports machine, and won't win any races. Not the lightest bike on the
> planet. Cell-foam seat better than you might think.
Pretty much on the money there, I'd say. Though I wouldn't mind
something hot as an extra machine rather than an alternative, the SMGT
is the most refined bike I've ever ridden and that more than makes up
for the relatively sluggish performance for me. And while not great on
the flat or climbing, the gears go low enough that you can still get the
climbing done, and back down the other side the suspension adds quite a
bit to the road holding so if it's a less than perfect road you can
easily pass most bikes going down the other side.
> Has competitors from
> various other European makers (eg. Challenge might be the best known).
And Optima and M5 from the Dutch "Big 3", and numerous others. You can
save money by going this way but I don't think their suspension is quite
so thoroughly sorted.
> You may want to see if the newer "bodylink" seat shell is available on a new
> machine. That is used on the Grasshopper model, and I think was being moved
> across the whole range.
The GTe has a Bodylink as standard, the chromoly framed GT still uses
the individually sized seats. Though the Bodylink has all sorts of
adjustments I could never get the one I tried quite as good /for me/ as
the seat on my Streetmachine...
> The choice of components does alter the way it rides; I've had a go on
> different examples with different front suspension, gearing and braking
> systems (disk vs V-brake, fancy springs vs. basic, derrailleur vs rohloff).
> My preference was for the simpler and cheaper options; in all cases the
> springs seem to need tuning to the rider's weight and preferences.
I would certainly go for the hydraulic rim brakes over the Vs: they work
/considerably/ better, and if you're doing 30+ mph with full touring
luggage that's a Good Thing. Aside from ordering the spring unit that
matched my basic weight I've never bothered fiddling with the suspension
at all, aside from greasing the bushes at the back once a year, and it
doesn't seem to have been anything other than superb.
> As with any machine at that sort of price, get a decent test ride.
Absolutely. Recumbents vary a lot in the flesh and what looks perfect
on paper can just not ring the bells when you're on it. And what looks
wrong on paper or at first glance can actually be Just Right when you
get on and try it out. Roos' Nazca Fiero fits that latter category
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
|
| |
Date: 03 Jan 2006 19:21:47
From: Johnny Sunset
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
NYC XYZ wrote:
> How does this look, folks?
>
> It's got full suspension and disc brakes! Only wish the seat was mesh,
> for air flow, and that it was much lighter than 36 lbs.
>
> http://www.bicycleman.com/recumbents/hp_velotechnik/hp_velotechnik_street_machine.htm
>
> Y'all know of anything else like this, but better?
>
> The Street Machine is ~$3K...that's my budget.
Peter Clinch, Medical Physics IT Officer at University of Dundee,
Ninewells Hospital, Dundee Scotland, UK has posted to
alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent in the past about his HP Velotechnik
Streetmachine GT and former alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent regular John
Harper had much to say about his Nils Palm Wind, which was a clone of
the original Streetmachine. This information should provide the
appropriate search parameters for Google Groups.
--
Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
|
| | |
Date: 03 Jan 2006 22:17:39
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: HP Velotechnik Street Machine?
|
"Johnny Sunset" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1136344907.655015.319300@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Peter Clinch, Medical Physics IT Officer at University of Dundee,
> Ninewells Hospital, Dundee Scotland, UK has posted to
> alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent in the past about his HP Velotechnik
> Streetmachine GT and former alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent regular John
> Harper had much to say about his Nils Palm Wind, which was a clone of
> the original Streetmachine. This information should provide the
> appropriate search parameters for Google Groups.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley
Why Peter Clinch won't tell me what a Medical Physics IT Officer is boggles
my mind. I of course am too proud to ever look any of this up. I wonder, is
he too proud also to tell me what it is?
It has been suggested by some that this is nothing but a fancy designation
for a janitor. Damn, what is wrong with the word 'janitor'. I just hate
these euphemisms and high sounding titles that make no sense whatever. Why
not call a spade a spade?
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
PS. I wonder why you don't follow my lead when referring to ARBR. It is much
easier to type ARBR than to type alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent. I think you are
the only one here who does that.
|
|
