| |
Main
Date: 21 Jun 2006 00:42:04
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not
Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman
does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other
threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I
think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others
who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we
are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my
intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do
about it?
I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will stay on
our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with other
threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than I am
and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I make it a point
not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both ARBR and
RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for others not
to be posting to these two newsgroups.
RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large newsgroup and
every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any one
person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is large or small
should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I repeat, I do
not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither does
Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's content on
ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up for it in
quality.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 20:38:07
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151452807.615088.74070@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> >> >> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
> >> >> It
> >> >> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> >> >> entertainment.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> >> > little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> >> > Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> >> > prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> >> > newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> >> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
> >> > opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> >> > newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
> >> > What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
> >> > quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
> >> > Dolan.
> >> >
> >> > Jim McNaa
> >>
> >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It
> >> is
> >> really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
> >> oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with
> >> others
> >> by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never
> >> get
> >> out of their teens.
> >>
> >
> > Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not
> > ... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission
> > that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were
> > once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNaa
>
> You may be addressing me, but I am addressing a universe of unknown readers.
> You merely serve as a vehicle for what I want so say. Keep those messages
> coming to me personally and I will keep my messages going to a universe of
> readers.
But you do address individuals. The very focus and context of what you
write defines specifically to whom your response is directed. As for
the universe of unknown readers, well I don't share in your delusion
the I am writing for a universe of unknown readers. Have you forgotten
to exclud the universe of known readers who have kill-filed you?.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:27:02
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151598084.139911.64160@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda
> >> >> and
> >> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> >> >> interesting as myself.
> >> >
> >> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
> >>
> >> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.
> >
> > It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
> > has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
> > and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNaa
>
> Nope, not true. Usenet is nothing to me except a joke! The minute I am no
> longer having any fun here, I will leave.
Bullshit. You'll never leave then because you are a joke. - Jim
McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> >> Sherman and
> >> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I
> >> meet
> >> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
> >> course.
> >>
> >> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but
> >> I
> >> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
> >> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he
> >> was
> >> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
> >> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because
> >> he
> >> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more
> >> about
> >> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:25:23
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151598084.139911.64160@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda
> >> >> and
> >> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> >> >> interesting as myself.
> >> >
> >> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
> >>
> >> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.
> >
> > It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
> > has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
> > and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNaa
>
> Nope, not true. Usenet is nothing to me except a joke! The minute I am no
> longer having any fun here, I will leave.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> >> Sherman and
> >> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I
> >> meet
> >> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
> >> course.
> >>
> >> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but
> >> I
> >> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
> >> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he
> >> was
> >> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
> >> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because
> >> he
> >> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more
> >> about
> >> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:13:14
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:bJQog.3910$H32.2183@trndny06...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> >A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
> >stirs up crap.
> > Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled
> > with
> > interminably long messages since he never snips.
>>
> I am actually the world's best editor and know how to snip better than
> anyone, but Usenet is full of idiots who do not know how to do anything much
> except mouth off. Since that is the case, I feel it is better to do no
> editing than to do too much editing - which is the priy mistake of almost
> all Usenet users.
>
> For instance, you have made several mistakes in your present post, but I
> will let them stand so as not to confuse anyone further than you already
> have.
>
> > These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently
> > his
> > shriveled sense of self esteem.
> > Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await
> > retirement.
>
> I retired at the ripe old age of 30,
No need to clarify. We presume that you meant life rather than career.
- Jim McNaa
> but I don't expect you would know
> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>
> > The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his
> > drivel.
> >
> > Oh well, it's an open usenet.
>
> Many thanks for the kind words JP. Ed Dolan the Great is always appreciative
> of those who appreciate him like you do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 09:21:24
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151555733.446392.321840@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:OYOdnXj6i-RQhj_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
> >> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of
> >> >>>>>> them
> >> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want
> >> >>>>>> intelligence,
> >> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
> >> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
> >> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >> >>> To who...?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> >> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
> >> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
> >> >>
> >> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is
> >> >> being
> >> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet,
> >> >> he
> >> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
> >> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because
> >> >> he
> >> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like
> >> >> Saint
> >> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because
> >> >> he
> >> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a
> >> >> man
> >> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
> >> >
> >> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> > "impact"
> >> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> > reaction.
> >> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> > effects
> >> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
> >> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
> >> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can
> >> > not
> >> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
> >> > charge
> >> > of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a
> >> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
> >> posts.
> >>
> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which
> >> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
> >> and
> >> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker
> >> is
> >> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNaa
> >> for
> >> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
> >>
> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> >> interesting as myself.
> >
> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
>
> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.
It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNaa
> Sherman and
> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
> course.
>
> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I
> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was
> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he
> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about
> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 17:01:47
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151598084.139911.64160@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda
>> >> and
>> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
>> >> interesting as myself.
>> >
>> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
>>
>> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.
>
> It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
> has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
> and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNaa
Nope, not true. Usenet is nothing to me except a joke! The minute I am no
longer having any fun here, I will leave.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>> Sherman and
>> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I
>> meet
>> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
>> course.
>>
>> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but
>> I
>> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
>> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he
>> was
>> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
>> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because
>> he
>> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more
>> about
>> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 09:15:33
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151556485.516323.53340@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> >>> "impact"
> >> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> >>> reaction.
> >> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
> >> >>> could
> >> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >> >>
> >> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
> >> >> is
> >> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
> >> >> respond
> >> >> to his posts.
> >> >>
> >> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
> >> > from
> >> > reading or responding to any other post.
> >> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
> >>
> >> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> >> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> >> is
> >> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> >> is
> >> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> >> You
> >> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> >> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
> >
> > Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >
> >> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
> >> >> be
> >> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
> >> >> at
> >> >> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> >> stalker too.
> >> >
> >> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
> >> > I
> >> > am Greater than I really am.
> >>
> >> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
> >> and a
> >> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> >> charging you something for my services.
> >
> > Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> > claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> > only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> > adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> > up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> > I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNaa
>
> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
> jerks and assholes.
Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage.
What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim
McNaa.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 16:53:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151597733.713903.225690@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
>> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom
>> Sherman.
>> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
>> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one
>> worthy
>> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by
>> idiots,
>> jerks and assholes.
>
> Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage.
> What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim
> McNaa.
I have known several persons who could speak many foreign languages
fluently, but could never say anything sensible in any of them. In other
words, there is verbiage and then there is intellect. One requires a certain
facility, the other requires that you think. It may be that you are an idiot
savant, which is a person who has only one outstanding, almost freakish,
ability and is lacking in everything else. I always advise folks who can't
think to rely on the common sense they were born with.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 09:13:05
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151556485.516323.53340@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> >>> "impact"
> >> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> >>> reaction.
> >> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
> >> >>> could
> >> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >> >>
> >> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
> >> >> is
> >> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
> >> >> respond
> >> >> to his posts.
> >> >>
> >> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
> >> > from
> >> > reading or responding to any other post.
> >> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
> >>
> >> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> >> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> >> is
> >> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> >> is
> >> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> >> You
> >> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> >> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
> >
> > Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >
> >> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
> >> >> be
> >> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
> >> >> at
> >> >> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> >> stalker too.
> >> >
> >> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
> >> > I
> >> > am Greater than I really am.
> >>
> >> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
> >> and a
> >> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> >> charging you something for my services.
> >
> > Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> > claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> > only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> > adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> > up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> > I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNaa
>
> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
> jerks and assholes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 21:48:14
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
> >> to his posts.
> >>
> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
> > reading or responding to any other post.
> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
> >> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> stalker too.
> >
> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
> > am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.
Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNaa
> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 21:48:05
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
> >> to his posts.
> >>
> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
> > reading or responding to any other post.
> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
> >> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> stalker too.
> >
> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
> > am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.
Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNaa
> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 00:01:16
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151556485.516323.53340@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
>> >
>> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> > news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>> >>> "impact"
>> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>> >>> reaction.
>> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
>> >>> is
>> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
>> >>> is
>> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
>> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
>> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
>> >>> could
>> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
>> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
>> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
>> >>
>> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
>> >> is
>> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
>> >> respond
>> >> to his posts.
>> >>
>> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>> > from
>> > reading or responding to any other post.
>> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>>
>> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
>> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
>> is
>> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
>> is
>> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
>> You
>> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
>> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
>
> Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
>
>> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
>> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
>> >> be
>> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
>> >> at
>> >> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
>> >> stalker too.
>> >
>> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
>> > I
>> > am Greater than I really am.
>>
>> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
>> and a
>> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
>> charging you something for my services.
>
> Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNaa
Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
jerks and assholes.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 13:38:15
From: JP
Subject: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
stirs up crap.
Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled
with
interminably long messages since he never snips.
These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently his
shriveled sense of self esteem.
Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await
retirement.
The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his
drivel.
Oh well, it's an open usenet.
|
| | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 16:43:30
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
"JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net > wrote in message
news:bJQog.3910$H32.2183@trndny06...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
>stirs up crap.
> Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled
> with
> interminably long messages since he never snips.
I am actually the world's best editor and know how to snip better than
anyone, but Usenet is full of idiots who do not know how to do anything much
except mouth off. Since that is the case, I feel it is better to do no
editing than to do too much editing - which is the priy mistake of almost
all Usenet users.
For instance, you have made several mistakes in your present post, but I
will let them stand so as not to confuse anyone further than you already
have.
> These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently
> his
> shriveled sense of self esteem.
> Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await
> retirement.
I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
anything at all about how the other half lives.
> The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his
> drivel.
>
> Oh well, it's an open usenet.
Many thanks for the kind words JP. Ed Dolan the Great is always appreciative
of those who appreciate him like you do.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 00:08:31
From: JP
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C69BB7.C91513C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message =
news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>=20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>=20
> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know =
> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>=20
Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
and that's why they let you online? =20
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C69BB7.C91513C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" >
<HTML ><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1" >
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2912" name=3DGENERATOR >
<STYLE ></STYLE>
</HEAD >
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff >
<DIV ><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV>
<DIV >"Edward Dolan" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:edolan@iw.net" >edolan@iw.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com" >news:SK6dn=
aE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com</A >...</DIV>
<DIV >>=20
<BR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&=
gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g=
t; >>>>>>>>>>>>><BR>>=20
<BR >> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you =
would know=20
<BR >> anything at all about how the other half lives.<BR>> <BR>Is =
that=20
what you call it when you were institutionalized?</DIV >
<DIV >I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.</DIV>
<DIV >The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" =
mentality</DIV >
<DIV >and that's why they let you online? </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV>
<DIV ><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV>
<DIV > </DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C69BB7.C91513C0--
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:27:01
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
"JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net > wrote in message
news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
> anything at all about how the other half lives.
Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
and that's why they let you online?
Edward Dolan wrote:
Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
are idiots, jerks and assholes.
Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life when you
really don't have to. Just don't get ried, don't procreate, don't buy a
house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men are fools
and live lives of quiet desperation.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 04:38:21
From: JP
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:haGdna40dbh_8jnZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...
>
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
>> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>
> Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
> I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
> The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
> and that's why they let you online?
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
> are idiots, jerks and assholes.
>
> Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life when
> you really don't have to. Just don't get ried, don't procreate, don't
> buy a house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men
> are fools and live lives of quiet desperation.
>
Gee Eddie, who's said virtuous?
It's not called virtuous, it's called rewarding.
I got ried, had three sons, bought a house, have new cars, new bikes,
big ass TV,
big ass computer, and other stuff you don't care about, oh yeah, and stuff
for the kids as well.
Started my own business, run my own show, wife started her own business,
runs her own show, make our own lives, ran races, studied tial arts,
teach tai chi,
write, ride bikes. Oh and by the way, we started with zero, no family
money or connections,
no outside help, no special talents except the brains with which we were
born.
It's nice to feel plugged into the world, productive, active and successful.
Saves me having to call myself "the great" and hide my lack of self esteem
by trolling
in newsgroups and calling people names like a preadolescent.
People are generally surrounded by those like themselves and if you find
yourself surrounded
by " characters who are idiots, jerks and assholes" chances are you qualify
for inclusion in that
very same group. Of course since you have imposed yourself on this group
rather than the other
way around those in alt.bike.whatever don't meet that description.
She and I lived in Minneapolis for a few years and the people there tend to
be very nice;
generous, polite and kind. I guess they've been too nice to straighten you
out or is it that
you only share the obnoxious part of your psyche from the secure anonymity
of usenet?
I'm glad though that you've chosen not to ry or procreate, it would
bother me a bit to
know that you'd inflicted yourself on human beings. This is really a better
spot for you
since you are always just a mouseclick away from oblivion.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 21:58:52
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
"JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net > wrote in message
news:1V1pg.17695$pv2.10136@trndny05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:haGdna40dbh_8jnZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...
>>
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
>>> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>>
>> Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
>> I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
>> The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
>> and that's why they let you online?
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>> Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters
>> who are idiots, jerks and assholes.
>>
>> Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life when
>> you really don't have to. Just don't get ried, don't procreate, don't
>> buy a house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men
>> are fools and live lives of quiet desperation.
>>
>
> Gee Eddie, who's said virtuous?
> It's not called virtuous, it's called rewarding.
>
> I got ried, had three sons, bought a house, have new cars, new bikes,
> big ass TV,
> big ass computer, and other stuff you don't care about, oh yeah, and stuff
> for the kids as well.
> Started my own business, run my own show, wife started her own business,
> runs her own show, make our own lives, ran races, studied tial arts,
> teach tai chi,
> write, ride bikes. Oh and by the way, we started with zero, no family
> money or connections,
> no outside help, no special talents except the brains with which we were
> born.
> It's nice to feel plugged into the world, productive, active and
> successful.
> Saves me having to call myself "the great" and hide my lack of self esteem
> by trolling
> in newsgroups and calling people names like a preadolescent.
JP is the upwardly mobile idiot who thinks himself successful because he did
not starve to death like the savages in Africa regularly do. I have nothing
but contempt for him and all his so-called accomplishments. His piffling
"production" would not be "rewarding" to me in the slightest. He is the
quintessential materialist. I feel sorry for the poor slob.
"Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
are idiots, jerks and assholes." - Ed Dolan
> People are generally surrounded by those like themselves and if you find
> yourself surrounded
> by " characters who are idiots, jerks and assholes" chances are you
> qualify for inclusion in that
> very same group. Of course since you have imposed yourself on this group
> rather than the other
> way around those in alt.bike.whatever don't meet that description.
Anyone who is on Usenet is an idiot, a jerk and an asshole. No exceptions!
Thus spake Zarathustra!
"Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
are idiots, jerks and assholes." - Ed Dolan
> She and I lived in Minneapolis for a few years and the people there tend
> to be very nice;
> generous, polite and kind. I guess they've been too nice to straighten
> you out or is it that
> you only share the obnoxious part of your psyche from the secure anonymity
> of usenet?
> I'm glad though that you've chosen not to ry or procreate, it would
> bother me a bit to
> know that you'd inflicted yourself on human beings. This is really a
> better spot for you
> since you are always just a mouseclick away from oblivion.
Minnesotans are the biggest jerks in the world bar none! Most of the time I
am ashamed to be from such a fouled up state. The one thing I would like
most to do in his world is to get my hands around the throat of Garrison
Keillor and choke that stupid son of a bitch to death. To hell with him and
his prairie home companion. And most especially to hell with any who think
like him.
"Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
are idiots, jerks and assholes." - Ed Dolan
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 01 Jul 2006 17:26:03
From: JP
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
Eddie Dolan, who has turned a minor psychiatric disability into a monthly
stipend, probably for life,
or maybe a spurious claim of whiplash into a feast for a social parasite.
Eddie Dolan, whose mommy still does his laundry.
Eddie Dolan, whose winning personality explains his overwhelming
popularity.
Eddie Dolan, who desperately needs recognition, of ANY kind, even stranger's
responses on usenet.
Eddie Dolan whose lonely little chubby face reflected the flickers of light
off the monitor,
alone in his sad little room, posting his schoolboy wit while the rest of
the world had fun on a Friday night.
Eddie Dolan, who hates GK but plagiarizes his "order of perpetual sorrow."
Are you allowed to have a pet? Maybe that would help.
Anyhow you're boring.
Bye.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 16:47:16
From: ZeMascouflatte
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
In article <SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com >,
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote:
> I am actually the world's best editor
don't know what you smoke or drink, but you may want to consider putting
it on the ket.
--
Save the Planet! Kill yourself!
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
| |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 21:35:33
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:OYOdnXj6i-RQhj_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >>
> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
> >>>
> >>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >> [...]
> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >>> To who...?
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
> >>
> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he
> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint
> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he
> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a man
> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
> >
> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge
> > of the picture books?
>
> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a
> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
> posts.
>
> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and
> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is
> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNaa for
> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
>
> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> interesting as myself.
Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 00:15:14
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151555733.446392.321840@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
>> >
>> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> > news:OYOdnXj6i-RQhj_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> >>
>> >> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
>> >>>
>> >>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> >>> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> >> [...]
>> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
>> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of
>> >>>>>> them
>> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want
>> >>>>>> intelligence,
>> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
>> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thus proving my point!
>> >>> To who...?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thus proving my point!
>> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole
>> >>> and
>> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
>> >>
>> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is
>> >> being
>> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet,
>> >> he
>> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
>> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because
>> >> he
>> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like
>> >> Saint
>> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because
>> >> he
>> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a
>> >> man
>> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
>> >
>> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>> > "impact"
>> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>> > reaction.
>> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
>> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
>> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
>> > effects
>> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
>> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
>> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can
>> > not
>> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
>> > charge
>> > of the picture books?
>>
>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
>> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>> said a
>> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
>> posts.
>>
>> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>> which
>> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
>> and
>> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker
>> is
>> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNaa
>> for
>> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
>>
>> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
>> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
>> interesting as myself.
>
> Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and
Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
course.
I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I
grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was
posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he
steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about
recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 21:30:15
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151452807.615088.74070@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> >> >> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
> >> >> It
> >> >> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> >> >> entertainment.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> >> > little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> >> > Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> >> > prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> >> > newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> >> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
> >> > opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> >> > newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
> >> > What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
> >> > quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
> >> > Dolan.
> >> >
> >> > Jim McNaa
> >>
> >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It
> >> is
> >> really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
> >> oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with
> >> others
> >> by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never
> >> get
> >> out of their teens.
> >>
> >
> > Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not
> > ... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission
> > that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were
> > once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNaa
>
> You may be addressing me, but I am addressing a universe of unknown readers.
> You merely serve as a vehicle for what I want so say. Keep those messages
> coming to me personally and I will keep my messages going to a universe of
> readers.
A universe of deaf ears does not an audience make - Jim McNaa.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 21:25:59
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151467742.599454.52600@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns97EE84D6735CEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> [...]
> >> > To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to
> >> > deny
> >> > it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that
> >> > is
> >> > simply too childish for me.
> >>
> >> Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see it on the
> >> newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the
> >> newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is
> >> to
> >> discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from
> >> my
> >> real life. Elementary, my dear Watson!
> >> [...]
> >
> > C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear [here]
> > knows
> > that. - Jim McNaa
>
> Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes and jerks - positively no
> exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the biggest idiot, asshole and
> jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and all. I believe I can state
> with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest Idiot, the Greatest Asshole
> and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known in its' long and dishonored
> history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every time I post. Can't any of you
> poor bastards read?
I dare say that all who read what you have had to say here will mosat
assuredly agree that you have painted a rekably true to life
self-portrait. - Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 27 Jun 2006 21:37:46
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
JimmyMac wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns97EE857EAEE06johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> > > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> > > news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>
> > >>> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > >>>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >>>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> > >>>> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure
> > >>>> >> it was not
> > >>>> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
> > >>>> >> Vandeman
> > >>>> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not
> > >>>> >> step on other
> > >>>> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go
> > >>>> >> away and
> > >>>> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
> > >>>> >> Vandeman. I
> > >>>> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a
> > >>>> >> few others
> > >>>> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
> > >>>> >> finally
> > >>>> >> we
> > >>>> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is
> > >>>> >> certainly not
> > >>>> >> my
> > >>>> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But
> > >>>> >> what to
> > >>>> >> do
> > >>>> >> about it?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Tis a simple problem with a simple solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
> > >>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
> > >>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
> > >>>> expecting some entertainment.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> > >>> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> > >>> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> > >>> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> > >>> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> > >>> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of
> > >>> his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> > >>> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is
> > >>> nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous,
> > >>> misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head
> > >>> swollen ... HEAD Dolan.
> > >>>
> > >>> Jim McNaa
> > >>
> > >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself.
> > >> It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan
> > >> the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my
> > >> credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but
> > >> apparently some guys just never get out of their teens.
> > >
> > > There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy
> >
> > Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is
> > good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim).
>
> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to
> advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion
> that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in
> reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying
> it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish.
>
> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
> of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
> sick is that???
Oops ... forgot to include S Curtiss. Didn't mean to slight anyone
;^) - Jim
> Jim McNaa
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 01:31:03
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151469466.594573.236260@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> > Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But
>> > it is
>> > good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim).
>>
>> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
>> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
>> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
>> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to
>> advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion
>> that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in
>> reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying
>> it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish.
>>
>> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
>> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
>> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
>> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
>> of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
>> sick is that???
>
> Oops ... forgot to include S Curtiss. Didn't mean to slight anyone
> ;^) - Jim
>
>> Jim McNaa
Curtiss is a one note Johnny and should always be slighted. His only
function in life is to stalk Vandeman.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 27 Jun 2006 21:33:11
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EE857EAEE06johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> > news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> >
> >>
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >>>
> >>> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >>>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >>>> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure
> >>>> >> it was not
> >>>> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
> >>>> >> Vandeman
> >>>> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not
> >>>> >> step on other
> >>>> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go
> >>>> >> away and
> >>>> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
> >>>> >> Vandeman. I
> >>>> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a
> >>>> >> few others
> >>>> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
> >>>> >> finally
> >>>> >> we
> >>>> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is
> >>>> >> certainly not
> >>>> >> my
> >>>> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But
> >>>> >> what to
> >>>> >> do
> >>>> >> about it?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Tis a simple problem with a simple solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
> >>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
> >>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
> >>>> expecting some entertainment.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> >>> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> >>> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> >>> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> >>> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> >>> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of
> >>> his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> >>> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is
> >>> nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous,
> >>> misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head
> >>> swollen ... HEAD Dolan.
> >>>
> >>> Jim McNaa
> >>
> >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself.
> >> It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan
> >> the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my
> >> credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but
> >> apparently some guys just never get out of their teens.
> >
> > There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy
>
> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is
> good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim).
What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
(read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to
advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion
that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in
reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying
it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish.
Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
sick is that???
Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 12:37:03
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
>> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way.
>> But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey
>> (Jim).
>
> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric
> to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken
> notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle
> whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is the
> man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous
> gibberish.
>
> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
> of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
> sick is that???
>
> Jim McNaa
>
Well said !!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 17:07:17
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97F04CF897DD2johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way.
>>> But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey
>>> (Jim).
>>
>> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
>> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
>> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
>> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric
>> to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken
>> notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle
>> whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is the
>> man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous
>> gibberish.
>>
>> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
>> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
>> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
>> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
>> of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
>> sick is that???
>>
>> Jim McNaa
>
> Well said !!
All the world hates a piling on kind of message. I cannot believe you were
ever a ine. Your present character says you have never been anything but
a scoundrel. Are all ines bullies like you?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 12:17:55
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:FK6dnRQiUpQEYD_ZnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97F04CF897DD2johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>>>> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way.
>>>> But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey
>>>> (Jim).
>>>
>>> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
>>> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
>>> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
>>> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric
>>> to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken
>>> notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle
>>> whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is
>>> the man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own
>>> vacuous gibberish.
>>>
>>> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
>>> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
>>> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
>>> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take
>>> leave of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your
>>> life. How sick is that???
>>>
>>> Jim McNaa
>>
>> Well said !!
>
> All the world hates a piling on kind of message. I cannot believe you
> were ever a ine. Your present character says you have never been
> anything but a scoundrel. Are all ines bullies like you?
>
Pathetic, simply pathetic.
Your feeble attempt at character assassination is duly noted
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 01:26:56
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151469191.091250.200270@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[...]
>> >>> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
>> >>> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
>> >>> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
>> >>> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
>> >>> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
>> >>> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of
>> >>> his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
>> >>> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is
>> >>> nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous,
>> >>> misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head
>> >>> swollen ... HEAD Dolan.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself.
>> >> It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan
>> >> the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my
>> >> credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but
>> >> apparently some guys just never get out of their teens.
[...]
>> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it
>> is
>> good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim).
>
> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric to
> advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken notion
> that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle whereas in
> reality the only person who values what the man says is the man saying
> it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own vacuous gibberish.
>
> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take leave
> of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your life. How
> sick is that???
It appears the Jim may soon approach my own high standards of literary
accomplishment. But he will have to drop some of the superfluous verbiage
which goes nowhere and is highly redundant. What is really required is more
thought.
Jim, in case you do not know it, Bill Baka is what I think of as a turnip.
In short, he is a peasant. GaryG is a very funny fellow indeed. He is just
another fornicator who would like to justify his fornications. But that sort
of thing does not fly with Saint Edward the Great. CC is also into nothing
but sexual innuendo and is therefore scarcely human.
Chris Foster is a former ine and has Ph.D. in electrical engineering from
the University of Illinois. He is a very sad case as he can't decide whether
to revert to being a ine grunt or to strive to behave like a scholar and
a gentleman. You will note that he does not know whether he is coming or
going. But it seems I have that effect on almost everyone on these
confounded newsgroups, ever the province of idiots, assholes and jerks.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 27 Jun 2006 21:09:02
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EE84D6735CEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> [...]
> > Nice try Conan, I have the e-mail you initially sent me. You started
> > the e-mail exchange. I just got you so pissed that you just had to do
> > it, didnt you. You can deny it, but I got the proof. And here it is:
> >
> > See where is states:
> >
> > "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns97E84E752A8F5johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> >
> > That means I wrote my message in the news server.
> > All the rest of the header is a e-mail header.
> >
> > To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny
> > it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is
> > simply too childish for me.
>
> Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see in on the
> newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the
> newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is to
> discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from my
> real life. Elementary, my dear Watson!
> [...]
C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear knows
that. - Jim McNaa
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 00:47:31
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151467742.599454.52600@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97EE84D6735CEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
[...]
>> > To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to
>> > deny
>> > it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that
>> > is
>> > simply too childish for me.
>>
>> Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see it on the
>> newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the
>> newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is
>> to
>> discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from
>> my
>> real life. Elementary, my dear Watson!
>> [...]
>
> C O R R E C T I O N ..... Usenet is your life and everyone hear [here]
> knows
> that. - Jim McNaa
Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes and jerks - positively no
exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the biggest idiot, asshole and
jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and all. I believe I can state
with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest Idiot, the Greatest Asshole
and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known in its' long and dishonored
history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every time I post. Can't any of you
poor bastards read?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 27 Jun 2006 17:00:07
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
> >> >> not
> >> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
> >> >> Vandeman
> >> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
> >> >> other
> >> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away
> >> >> and
> >> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman.
> >> >> I
> >> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
> >> >> others
> >> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
> >> >> finally
> >> >> we
> >> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly
> >> >> not
> >> >> my
> >> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what
> >> >> to
> >> >> do
> >> >> about it?
> >> >
> >> > Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
> >>
> >> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> >> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
> >> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> >> entertainment.
> >
> > Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> > little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> > Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> > prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> > newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
> > opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> > newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
> > What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
> > quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
> > Dolan.
> >
> > Jim McNaa
>
> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is
> really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
> oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others
> by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get
> out of their teens.
>
> Regards,
Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not
... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission
that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were
once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNaa
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 01:37:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151452807.615088.74070@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> >> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>> >> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
>> >> It
>> >> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>> >> entertainment.
>> >
>> > Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
>> > little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
>> > Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
>> > prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
>> > newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
>> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
>> > opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
>> > newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
>> > What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
>> > quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
>> > Dolan.
>> >
>> > Jim McNaa
>>
>> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It
>> is
>> really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
>> oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with
>> others
>> by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never
>> get
>> out of their teens.
>>
>
> Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not
> ... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission
> that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were
> once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNaa
You may be addressing me, but I am addressing a universe of unknown readers.
You merely serve as a vehicle for what I want so say. Keep those messages
coming to me personally and I will keep my messages going to a universe of
readers.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 08:19:50
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EA856ED70AEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> > news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> [...]
> >>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
> >>
> >> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of Illinois
> >> in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not reserve
> >> unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are jerks no
> >> matter what!
> >>
> >> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
> >> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups.
> >> Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
> >
> > I was just wondering how easy it was to [get] under your skin.
> >
> > Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought [.]
>
> It is not possible for anyone in cyberspace to get under my skin. Everything
> is tit for tat with me. That is all it is and all it can ever be. After all,
> there is real life and then there is Usenet. Only a fool would confuse and
> conflate the two.
WARNING ... GaryG-like sexual innuendo comin' atcha. I've got your
"tat", but I doubt you'll erver figure out what to do with a "tit" ;^)
- Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. By the way, you might want to learn how to edit your posts. Others on
> these newsgroups have me in their kill file and that is where you will soon
> be yourself if you continue to quote me in full in your every message.
> Unlike you, many others simply cannot stand a little contention. They want
> all to be peace and light in their universe.
>
> PS2. I am the best editor Usenet has ever known. It comes from my
> professional training as a librarian. Follow my example and you will never
> go far from wrong.
|
| |
Date: 25 Jun 2006 18:42:16
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
> >> not
> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman
> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
> >> other
> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I
> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
> >> others
> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally
> >> we
> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not
> >> my
> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to
> >> do
> >> about it?
> >
> > Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>
> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> entertainment.
Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
Dolan.
Jim McNaa
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> >> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will stay
> >> on
> >> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with
> >> other
> >> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than I am
> >> and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I make it a
> >> point
> >> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both ARBR
> >> and
> >> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for others
> >> not
> >> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
> >>
> >> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large newsgroup
> >> and
> >> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any one
> >> person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is large or
> >> small
> >> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I repeat, I
> >> do
> >> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither does
> >> Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's content
> >> on
> >> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up for it
> >> in
> >> quality.
|
| | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 12:54:24
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
>> >> not
>> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>> >> Vandeman
>> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
>> >> other
>> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away
>> >> and
>> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman.
>> >> I
>> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
>> >> others
>> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>> >> finally
>> >> we
>> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly
>> >> not
>> >> my
>> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what
>> >> to
>> >> do
>> >> about it?
>> >
>> > Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>
>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
>> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>> entertainment.
>
> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
> opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
> What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
> quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
> Dolan.
>
> Jim McNaa
Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It is
really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with others
by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never get
out of their teens.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 18:10:25
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>> >
>>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure
>>> >> it was not
>>> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>> >> Vandeman
>>> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not
>>> >> step on other
>>> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go
>>> >> away and
>>> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
>>> >> Vandeman. I
>>> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a
>>> >> few others
>>> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>> >> finally
>>> >> we
>>> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is
>>> >> certainly not
>>> >> my
>>> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But
>>> >> what to
>>> >> do
>>> >> about it?
>>> >
>>> > Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>>
>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>
>> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
>> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
>> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
>> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
>> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
>> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of
>> his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
>> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is
>> nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous,
>> misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head
>> swollen ... HEAD Dolan.
>>
>> Jim McNaa
>
> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself.
> It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan
> the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my
> credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but
> apparently some guys just never get out of their teens.
>
There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 14:48:46
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EE857EAEE06johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:krWdnV3LP5fMgj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>>
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1151286136.179803.49860@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>> >
>>>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> >> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure
>>>> >> it was not
>>>> >> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>>> >> Vandeman
>>>> >> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not
>>>> >> step on other
>>>> >> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go
>>>> >> away and
>>>> >> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
>>>> >> Vandeman. I
>>>> >> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a
>>>> >> few others
>>>> >> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>>> >> finally
>>>> >> we
>>>> >> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is
>>>> >> certainly not
>>>> >> my
>>>> >> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But
>>>> >> what to
>>>> >> do
>>>> >> about it?
>>>> >
>>>> > Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>>
>>> Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
>>> little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
>>> Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
>>> prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
>>> newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
>>> garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of
>>> his opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
>>> newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is
>>> nothing. What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous,
>>> misguided, quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head
>>> swollen ... HEAD Dolan.
>>>
>>> Jim McNaa
>>
>> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself.
>> It is really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan
>> the Great, oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my
>> credentials with others by the time I was out of my teens, but
>> apparently some guys just never get out of their teens.
>
> There is nothing more to say here, Jim said it all with blazing accuracy
Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way. But it is
good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey (Jim).
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 21 Jun 2006 07:28:48
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not
> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman
> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on other
> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I
> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few others
> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally we
> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not my
> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to do
> about it?
Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will stay on
> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with other
> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than I am
> and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I make it a point
> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both ARBR and
> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for others not
> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
>
> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large newsgroup and
> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any one
> person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is large or small
> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I repeat, I do
> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither does
> Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's content on
> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up for it in
> quality.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 12:48:32
From: SMS
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
JimmyMac wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was not
>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman
>> does dominate RBS.
As many of us have kill-filed both of them, I don't see how they
dominate the groups. They are non-existent, except when others
follow-up. If people would stop following up, they'd get tired of lying
and go away.
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 17:11:12
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com > wrote in message
news:44a2dd12$0$96931$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> JimmyMac wrote:
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
>>> not
>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>> Vandeman
>>> does dominate RBS.
>
> As many of us have kill-filed both of them, I don't see how they dominate
> the groups. They are non-existent, except when others follow-up. If people
> would stop following up, they'd get tired of lying and go away.
That will never happen SMS because Vandeman and I both say interesting
things that require a response. Not everyone who comes to Usenet is brain
dead like you are.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 21 Jun 2006 14:43:28
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
>> not
>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and Vandeman
>> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
>> other
>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
>> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman. I
>> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
>> others
>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally
>> we
>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not
>> my
>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to
>> do
>> about it?
>
> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
entertainment.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will stay
>> on
>> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with
>> other
>> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than I am
>> and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I make it a
>> point
>> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both ARBR
>> and
>> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for others
>> not
>> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
>>
>> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large newsgroup
>> and
>> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any one
>> person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is large or
>> small
>> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I repeat, I
>> do
>> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither does
>> Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's content
>> on
>> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up for it
>> in
>> quality.
|
| | | |
Date: 03 Jul 2006 23:28:34
From:
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
JP wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:haGdna40dbh_8jnZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> > "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...
> >
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> >> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
> >> anything at all about how the other half lives.
> >
> > Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
> > I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
> > The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
> > and that's why they let you online?
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >
> > Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
> > are idiots, jerks and assholes.
> >
> > Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life when
> > you really don't have to. Just don't get ried, don't procreate, don't
> > buy a house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men
> > are fools and live lives of quiet desperation.
> >
>
> Gee Eddie, who's said virtuous?
> It's not called virtuous, it's called rewarding.
>
> I got ried, had three sons, bought a house, have new cars, new bikes,
> big ass TV,
> big ass computer, and other stuff you don't care about, oh yeah, and stuff
> for the kids as well.
> Started my own business, run my own show, wife started her own business,
> runs her own show, make our own lives, ran races, studied tial arts,
> teach tai chi,
> write, ride bikes. Oh and by the way, we started with zero, no family
> money or connections,
> no outside help, no special talents except the brains with which we were
> born.
> It's nice to feel plugged into the world, productive, active and successful.
> Saves me having to call myself "the great" and hide my lack of self esteem
> by trolling
> in newsgroups and calling people names like a preadolescent.
>
> People are generally surrounded by those like themselves and if you find
> yourself surrounded
> by " characters who are idiots, jerks and assholes" chances are you qualify
> for inclusion in that
> very same group. Of course since you have imposed yourself on this group
> rather than the other
> way around those in alt.bike.whatever don't meet that description.
>
> She and I lived in Minneapolis for a few years and the people there tend to
> be very nice;
> generous, polite and kind. I guess they've been too nice to straighten you
> out or is it that
> you only share the obnoxious part of your psyche from the secure anonymity
> of usenet?
> I'm glad though that you've chosen not to ry or procreate, it would
> bother me a bit to
> know that you'd inflicted yourself on human beings. This is really a better
> spot for you
> since you are always just a mouseclick away from oblivion.
Well said JP. - Jim McNaa
|
| | | | |
Date: 06 Jul 2006 14:39:14
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan became a legend in his own mind
|
<jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151994514.270343.296990@a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> JP wrote:
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:haGdna40dbh_8jnZnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> > "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> > news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...
>> >
>> >
>> > "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> > news:SK6dnaE-UKcW1DnZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> >>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
>> >> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>> >
>> > Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
>> > I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
>> > The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
>> > and that's why they let you online?
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >
>> > Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters
>> > who
>> > are idiots, jerks and assholes.
>> >
>> > Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life
>> > when
>> > you really don't have to. Just don't get ried, don't procreate,
>> > don't
>> > buy a house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men
>> > are fools and live lives of quiet desperation.
>> >
>>
>> Gee Eddie, who's said virtuous?
>> It's not called virtuous, it's called rewarding.
>>
>> I got ried, had three sons, bought a house, have new cars, new
>> bikes,
>> big ass TV,
>> big ass computer, and other stuff you don't care about, oh yeah, and
>> stuff
>> for the kids as well.
>> Started my own business, run my own show, wife started her own business,
>> runs her own show, make our own lives, ran races, studied tial arts,
>> teach tai chi,
>> write, ride bikes. Oh and by the way, we started with zero, no family
>> money or connections,
>> no outside help, no special talents except the brains with which we were
>> born.
>> It's nice to feel plugged into the world, productive, active and
>> successful.
>> Saves me having to call myself "the great" and hide my lack of self
>> esteem
>> by trolling
>> in newsgroups and calling people names like a preadolescent.
>>
>> People are generally surrounded by those like themselves and if you find
>> yourself surrounded
>> by " characters who are idiots, jerks and assholes" chances are you
>> qualify
>> for inclusion in that
>> very same group. Of course since you have imposed yourself on this group
>> rather than the other
>> way around those in alt.bike.whatever don't meet that description.
>>
>> She and I lived in Minneapolis for a few years and the people there tend
>> to
>> be very nice;
>> generous, polite and kind. I guess they've been too nice to straighten
>> you
>> out or is it that
>> you only share the obnoxious part of your psyche from the secure
>> anonymity
>> of usenet?
>> I'm glad though that you've chosen not to ry or procreate, it would
>> bother me a bit to
>> know that you'd inflicted yourself on human beings. This is really a
>> better
>> spot for you
>> since you are always just a mouseclick away from oblivion.
>
> Well said JP. - Jim McNaa
I could not respond to the jerk above because the newsgroup headers were all
messed up. I think he might have been using some kind of cell phone. There
were definitely some incompatibilities involved that I could not resolve.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:23:59
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151597733.713903.225690@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
> >> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom
> >> Sherman.
> >> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
> >> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one
> >> worthy
> >> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by
> >> idiots,
> >> jerks and assholes.
> >
> > Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage.
> > What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim
> > McNaa.
>
> I have known several persons who could speak many foreign languages
> fluently, but could never say anything sensible in any of them. In other
> words, there is verbiage and then there is intellect. One requires a certain
> facility, the other requires that you think. It may be that you are an idiot
> savant, which is a person who has only one outstanding, almost freakish,
> ability and is lacking in everything else. I always advise folks who can't
> think to rely on the common sense they were born with.
Verbiage requires facility and intellect requries that you think???
You make no sense. One cannot think without intellect. Since you
obviously don't realize that, you must be devoid of intellect. Perhaps
that is why you verbiage make no sense. Lie I said before. Intellect
is requirement for intelligible vervbiage. Your replies just get worse
and worse.
How many times must you be told that no one has asked for, wants or
values you worthless advice before it sinks into that thick skull of
your??? - Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:33:19
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:QaCdncFXmoL6PATZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
>>> not
>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>> Vandeman
>>> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
>>> other
>>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
>>> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman.
>>> I
>>> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
>>> others
>>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and finally
>>> we
>>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not
>>> my
>>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to
>>> do
>>> about it?
>>
>> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>
> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> entertainment.
>
Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is
EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment". Why
read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual when I
want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue Ridge
Parkway?
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:29:24
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:GvAmg.10320$FR1.7755@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:QaCdncFXmoL6PATZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it was
>>>> not
>>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>>> Vandeman
>>>> does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do not step on
>>>> other
>>>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away and
>>>> before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and Vandeman.
>>>> I
>>>> think both of us in our separate ways serve as a catalyst for a few
>>>> others
>>>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>>> finally we
>>>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly not
>>>> my
>>>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what to
>>>> do
>>>> about it?
>>>
>>> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>
>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
>> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>> entertainment.
>>
> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is
> EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment".
> Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual
> when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue
> Ridge Parkway?
Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they would
limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human being or be
gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | |
Date: 23 Jun 2006 14:40:28
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:UMOdnVtmLswQfAfZnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group. It
>>> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>>> entertainment.
>>>
>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is
>> EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment".
>> Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed individual
>> when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting the Blue
>> Ridge Parkway?
>
> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they
> would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human
> being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated to
entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st enough to find
entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and
share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a
psychiatric throwaway does'nt cut it.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 12:47:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:EAWmg.13605$FR1.1839@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:UMOdnVtmLswQfAfZnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>>>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
>>>> It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>>>> entertainment.
>>>>
>>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is
>>> EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for "entertainment".
>>> Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a self-absorbed
>>> individual when I want to know what gearing I should have when visiting
>>> the Blue Ridge Parkway?
>>
>> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they
>> would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human
>> being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
>
> Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated to
> entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st enough to find
> entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and
> share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a
> psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it.
ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots.
Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only
idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a
moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their idiotic
messages.
I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except assholes
and jerks! What else do you need to know?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 19:25:48
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:KYGdndjJpYIjgD3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>>>>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
>>>>> It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>>>>> entertainment.
>>>>>
>>>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such is
>>>> EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for
>>>> "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a
>>>> self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should have
>>>> when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway?
>>>
>>> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they
>>> would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human
>>> being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
>>
>> Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated
>> to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st enough to find
>> entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and
>> share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a
>> psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it.
>
> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots.
> Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only
> idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a
> moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their
> idiotic messages.
Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>
> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 19:30:32
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:32_ng.25195$FR1.14697@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:KYGdndjJpYIjgD3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>>>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>>>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>>>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>>>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such
>>>>> is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for
>>>>> "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a
>>>>> self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should
>>>>> have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway?
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they
>>>> would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human
>>>> being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
>>>
>>> Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated
>>> to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st enough to find
>>> entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can use and
>>> share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings of a
>>> psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it.
>>
>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots.
>> Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only
>> idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a
>> moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their
>> idiotic messages.
> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
Thus proving my point!
>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
Thus proving my point!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 27 Jun 2006 13:04:28
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:32_ng.25195$FR1.14697@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:KYGdndjJpYIjgD3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>>
>>>>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>>>>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>>>>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>>>>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and such
>>>>>> is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for
>>>>>> "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a
>>>>>> self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should
>>>>>> have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that they
>>>>> would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a complete human
>>>>> being or be gone! I know better than you what is good for you!
>>>>
>>>> Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs) dedicated
>>>> to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st enough to
>>>> find entertainment on our own. Here is a place for information we can
>>>> use and share to enhance our cycling experience. Reading the ramblings
>>>> of a psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't] cut it.
>>>
>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots.
>>> Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since only
>>> idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go to a
>>> moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and their
>>> idiotic messages.
>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>
> Thus proving my point!
To who...?
>
>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>
> Thus proving my point!
You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and jerk.
We've known that for quite some time.
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 01:03:53
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for idiots.
>>>> Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them since
>>>> only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence, then go
>>>> to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the idiots and
>>>> their idiotic messages.
>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>>
>> Thus proving my point!
> To who...?
>>
>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>>
>> Thus proving my point!
> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
does nothing but regurgitate boiler plate nonsense about how mountain biking
does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is evil
through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint Edward the
Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he is a man of
the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a man of the holy
spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
PS. Curtiss has never yet learned how to edit a post. Editing does require
some minimum thought and effort, but Curtiss is incurably lazy. All he
really knows how to do is to stalk Vandeman. He is the most pitiful piece of
human scum I have ever come across on Usenet. He should flush himself down a
toilet and give the honorable members of these newsgroups a rest from his
shit.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 17:08:31
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:OYOdnXj6i-RQhj_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>>>
>>> Thus proving my point!
>> To who...?
>>>
>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>>>
>>> Thus proving my point!
>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
>
> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
> does nothing but regurgitate boiler plate nonsense about how mountain
> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he is
> evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint
> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he
> is a man of the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a man of
> the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is not.
I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on progress
in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not grasp that
simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge of the
picture books?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. Curtiss has never yet learned how to edit a post. Editing does require
> some minimum thought and effort, but Curtiss is incurably lazy. All he
> really knows how to do is to stalk Vandeman. He is the most pitiful piece
> of human scum I have ever come across on Usenet. He should flush himself
> down a toilet and give the honorable members of these newsgroups a rest
> from his shit.
>
>
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 17:02:17
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:OYOdnXj6i-RQhj_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>>> news:L8adnfdKsbG34T3ZnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>> [...]
>>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
>>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
>>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
>>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
>>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>>>>
>>>> Thus proving my point!
>>> To who...?
>>>>
>>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>>>>
>>>> Thus proving my point!
>>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
>>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
>>
>> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
>> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
>> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
>> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he
>> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint
>> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he
>> is a man of the groin preoccupied with piss, shit and sex and not a man
>> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
>
> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
> are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
> Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
> progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
> grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge
> of the picture books?
Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a
thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
posts.
You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and
would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is
the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNaa for
instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
interesting as myself.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 20:03:42
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>>
>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
>> are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
>> Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
>> progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
>> grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
>> charge of the picture books?
>
> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said
> a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
> posts.
>
Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
> and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a
> stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim
> McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker
> too.
Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I am
Greater than I really am.
>
> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> interesting as myself.
>
pathetic
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2006 20:02:38
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:oP6dnXs8uZLwYT_ZnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>
>>>
>>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
>>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
>>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
>>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
>>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
>>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
>>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
>>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
>>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
>>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
>>
>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
>> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
>> to his posts.
>>
> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
> reading or responding to any other post.
> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
>> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
>> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
>> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
>> Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
>> stalker too.
>
> Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
> am Greater than I really am.
I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 12:53:16
From: S Curtiss
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
news:GL-dnabpsLkvuz7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>
>>>>
>>>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>>>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>>>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>>>> "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>>>> reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence
>>>> shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife
>>>> and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning
>>>> any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and
>>>> all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
>>>> could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas.
>>>> Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of
>>>> "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books?
>>>
>>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
>>> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>>> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
>>> to his posts.
>>>
>> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>> from reading or responding to any other post.
>> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the
Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the
topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away
from your cross-posting disaster.
You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions
of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in
several spots. Beyond meaningless.
Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.
>
>>> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>>> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
>>> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
>>> be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
>>> at Jim McNaa for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
>>> stalker too.
>>
>> Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
>> am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and
> a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.
> [...]
I don't have any monopoly money.
This thread is dead. The same "argument" in several spots. Beyond
meaningless.
Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2006 16:57:47
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net > wrote in message
news:6ATog.26044$FR1.4962@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> news:GL-dnabpsLkvuz7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
[...]
>>>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
>>>> is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not
>>>> already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity
>>>> to respond to his posts.
>>>>
>>> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>>> from reading or responding to any other post.
>>> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>>
>> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
>> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
>> is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way.
>> Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or
>> two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are
>> both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note
>> Johnny.
>
> Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the
> Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the
> topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away
> from your cross-posting disaster.
"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan
> You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
> someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions
> of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in
> several spots. Beyond meaningless.
"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan
> Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that
> best describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
> sorrowfully miniscule.
"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 13:03:04
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:9budnf950Oh50TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:6ATog.26044$FR1.4962@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:GL-dnabpsLkvuz7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
> [...]
>>>>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman.
>>>>> There is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have
>>>>> not already said a thousand times before. Give some others an
>>>>> opportunity to respond to his posts.
>>>>>
>>>> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single
>>>> person from reading or responding to any other post.
>>>> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to
>>>> burst.
>>>
>>> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain
>>> about my posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account
>>> for the fact it is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like
>>> RBS that way. Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all
>>> about just one or two persons. You desperately need to stop
>>> responding to Vandeman. You are both one note Johnnys and you have
>>> ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
>>
>> Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread
>> the Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have
>> continued the topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to
>> draw attention away from your cross-posting disaster.
>
> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one
> note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny."
> - Ed Dolan
>
>> You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
>> someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the
>> opinions of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same
>> "argument" in several spots. Beyond meaningless.
>
> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one
> note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny."
> - Ed Dolan
>
>> Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as
>> that best describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st
>> edward the sorrowfully miniscule.
>
> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one
> note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny."
> - Ed Dolan [...]
>
These guys can do anything they damn well please, as you can too.
It is you, who needs to desperately stop defending Vandy, he is capible
of doing this by him self.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2006 22:08:38
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97F251606D7EBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:9budnf950Oh50TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
[...]
>> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one
>> note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny."
>
> These guys can do anything they damn well please, as you can too.
>
> It is you, who needs to desperately stop defending Vandy, he is capible
> of doing this by him self.
I am not so much defending Vandeman as I am attacking Curtiss for being such
an all-around jackass. You are right on the edge of falling into that
category yourself. Please put your brain into gear before you post.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 05 Jul 2006 13:25:23
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:N8WdnZHZRYigejjZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97F251606D7EBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>> news:9budnf950Oh50TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> [...]
>>> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both
>>> one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note
>>> Johnny."
>>
>> These guys can do anything they damn well please, as you can too.
>>
>> It is you, who needs to desperately stop defending Vandy, he is
>> capible of doing this by him self.
>
> I am not so much defending Vandeman as I am attacking Curtiss for
> being such an all-around jackass. You are right on the edge of falling
> into that category yourself. Please put your brain into gear before
> you post.
>
You are a self-admitted asshole and jackass. Why would you need to attack
anyone for those same traits?
I don't not care which 'category' you put me in, I do not care about you
and your silly opinion
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 06 Jul 2006 14:48:43
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97F75525319CBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:N8WdnZHZRYigejjZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>>
>> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97F251606D7EBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>>> news:9budnf950Oh50TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>> [...]
>>>> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both
>>>> one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note
>>>> Johnny."
>>>
>>> These guys can do anything they damn well please, as you can too.
>>>
>>> It is you, who needs to desperately stop defending Vandy, he is
>>> capible of doing this by him self.
>>
>> I am not so much defending Vandeman as I am attacking Curtiss for
>> being such an all-around jackass. You are right on the edge of falling
>> into that category yourself. Please put your brain into gear before
>> you post.
>>
>
> You are a self-admitted asshole and jackass. Why would you need to attack
> anyone for those same traits?
>
> I don't not care which 'category' you put me in, I do not care about you
> and your silly opinion
That is good that you do not care because I certainly don't either, not
about you and not about these freaking newsgroups. I have decided you are
not capable of putting whatever little brain you have into gear and so I
shall henceforth lump you in with Curtiss - who as has ever proven himself
an asshole of the first magnitude when he gets off his boilerplate nonsense.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 07 Jul 2006 11:26:50
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:fs6dnb-A-oO99DDZnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97F75525319CBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>> news:N8WdnZHZRYigejjZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns97F251606D7EBjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>>>> news:9budnf950Oh50TnZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>> [...]
>>>>> "You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both
>>>>> one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note
>>>>> Johnny."
>>>>
>>>> These guys can do anything they damn well please, as you can too.
>>>>
>>>> It is you, who needs to desperately stop defending Vandy, he is
>>>> capible of doing this by him self.
>>>
>>> I am not so much defending Vandeman as I am attacking Curtiss for
>>> being such an all-around jackass. You are right on the edge of
>>> falling into that category yourself. Please put your brain into gear
>>> before you post.
>>>
>>
>> You are a self-admitted asshole and jackass. Why would you need to
>> attack anyone for those same traits?
>>
>> I don't not care which 'category' you put me in, I do not care about
>> you and your silly opinion
>
> That is good that you do not care because I certainly don't either,
> not about you and not about these freaking newsgroups. I have decided
> you are not capable of putting whatever little brain you have into
> gear and so I shall henceforth lump you in with Curtiss - who as has
> ever proven himself an asshole of the first magnitude when he gets off
> his boilerplate nonsense.
>
If you don't care about the newsgroups, why do you continue to post to
them? Why is that bright boy?? We don't want you here, and you don't
care about them. Please go away.
Thank you for putting me in the same category as Curtiss, I can see from
his posts, he is a highly intelligent man with a sense on self.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 07 Jul 2006 22:24:25
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97F9410B35FB4johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:fs6dnb-A-oO99DDZnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
[...]
>> That is good that you do not care because I certainly don't either,
>> not about you and not about these freaking newsgroups. I have decided
>> you are not capable of putting whatever little brain you have into
>> gear and so I shall henceforth lump you in with Curtiss - who has
>> ever proven himself an asshole of the first magnitude when he gets off
>> his boilerplate nonsense.
>
> If you don't care about the newsgroups, why do you continue to post to
> them? Why is that bright boy?? We don't want you here, and you don't
> care about them. Please go away.
Yes, I am going back to ARBR where the idiots, assholes and morons to be
found there are not down to your low level.
> Thank you for putting me in the same category as Curtiss, I can see from
> his posts, he is a highly intelligent man with a sense on self.
You and Curtiss are both one note Johnnies who do nothing but leech off of
Vandeman like the blood sucking parasites that you are. I have never
encountered two bigger dummies on Usenet.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 18:08:43
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:KYGdndjJpYIjgD3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "S Curtiss" <stevecurtiss@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:EAWmg.13605$FR1.1839@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
>> news:UMOdnVtmLswQfAfZnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@prairiewave.com...
>>>
>>>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>>>>
>>>> Perhaps discussions of gearing, frame types, cycling routes and
>>>> such is EXACTLY what people post for. There a million sites for
>>>> "entertainment". Why read about the non-sexual proclamations of a
>>>> self-absorbed individual when I want to know what gearing I should
>>>> have when visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway?
>>>
>>> Nope, I cannot believe there are any humans who are so dead that
>>> they would limit themselves to what you propose. Either be a
>>> complete human being or be gone! I know better than you what is good
>>> for you!
>>
>> Who is being limited? With a million websites (and other NGs)
>> dedicated to entertainment, who needs you to post junk? We're st
>> enough to find entertainment on our own. Here is a place for
>> information we can use and share to enhance our cycling experience.
>> Reading the ramblings of a psychiatric throwaway does'nt [doesn't]
>> cut it.
>
> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>
> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
You are, of course, including yourself in that group of asshoes and
jerks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 14:29:03
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EE8534D749Fjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:KYGdndjJpYIjgD3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
[...]
>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>>
>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>
> You are, of course, including yourself in that group of assholes and
> jerks.
Yes, I am, but only for the purposes of Usenet. Mainly I am slumming on
these newsgroups to see how the other half lives and thinks. My every
expectation has been fulfilled in spades. Like I said, nothing but assholes
and jerks!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 11:45:24
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:QaCdncFXmoL6PATZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it
>>> was not
>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>> Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do
>>> not step on other
>>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away
>>> and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
>>> Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a
>>> catalyst for a few others
>>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>> finally we
>>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly
>>> not my
>>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what
>>> to do
>>> about it?
>>
>> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>
> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
> It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> entertainment.
>
Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
>>> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will
>>> stay on
>>> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with
>>> other
>>> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than
>>> I am and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I
>>> make it a point
>>> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both
>>> ARBR and
>>> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for
>>> others not
>>> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
>>>
>>> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large
>>> newsgroup and
>>> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any
>>> one person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is
>>> large or small
>>> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I
>>> repeat, I do
>>> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither
>>> does Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's
>>> content on
>>> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up
>>> for it in
>>> quality.
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:38:48
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EA443B0F15Fjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:QaCdncFXmoL6PATZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>>
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it
>>>> was not
>>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>>> Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do
>>>> not step on other
>>>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go away
>>>> and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan and
>>>> Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a
>>>> catalyst for a few others
>>>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>>> finally we
>>>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is certainly
>>>> not my
>>>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But what
>>>> to do
>>>> about it?
>>>
>>> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>
>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
>> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
>> It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
>> entertainment.
>>
>
> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of Illinois in
electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not reserve unqualified
respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are jerks no matter what!
He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of person he
has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups. Once a grunt,
always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>>> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I will
>>>> stay on
>>>> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere with
>>>> other
>>>> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused than
>>>> I am and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging but I
>>>> make it a point
>>>> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both
>>>> ARBR and
>>>> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for
>>>> others not
>>>> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
>>>>
>>>> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large
>>>> newsgroup and
>>>> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for any
>>>> one person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup is
>>>> large or small
>>>> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I
>>>> repeat, I do
>>>> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and neither
>>>> does Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to their heart's
>>>> content on
>>>> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up
>>>> for it in
>>>> quality.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 18:10:00
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EA443B0F15Fjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>> news:QaCdncFXmoL6PATZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1150900128.041185.77680@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>> It was never my intention to dominate a newsgroup and I am sure it
>>>>> was not
>>>>> Mike Vandeman's intention either, but yet I do dominate ARBR and
>>>>> Vandeman does dominate RBS. We both stay on our own threads and do
>>>>> not step on other
>>>>> threads, but it seems that it doesn't matter. Others simply go
>>>>> away and before you know it all there is on these groups is Dolan
>>>>> and Vandeman. I think both of us in our separate ways serve as a
>>>>> catalyst for a few others
>>>>> who take us on. Our messages become increasingly contentious and
>>>>> finally we
>>>>> are preventing others from coming onto the group. That is
>>>>> certainly not my
>>>>> intention and I know it is not Vandeman's intention either. But
>>>>> what to do
>>>>> about it?
>>>>
>>>> Tis a simple problem with a simpl solution ... L E A V E !!!!!
>>>
>>> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to
>>> do. Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull
>>> group. It would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS
>>> expecting some entertainment.
>>>
>>
>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
>
> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of Illinois
> in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not reserve
> unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are jerks no
> matter what!
>
> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups.
> Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
>
I was just wondering how easy it was to under your skin.
Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
>>>>> I encourage others to post to these newsgroups. Vandeman and I
>>>>> will stay on
>>>>> our own threads as we have always done. Neither of us interfere
>>>>> with other
>>>>> threads that are not up our alley. Vandeman is far more focused
>>>>> than I am and is almost a one-note Johnny. I am more far ranging
>>>>> but I make it a point
>>>>> not to interfere with on topic messages. I would like to see both
>>>>> ARBR and
>>>>> RBS realize their full potential. There is simply no reason for
>>>>> others not
>>>>> to be posting to these two newsgroups.
>>>>>
>>>>> RBM is the standard we should be going by. It is a very large
>>>>> newsgroup and
>>>>> every idiot in the world is posting to it. It is impossible for
>>>>> any one person to dominate that newsgroup. But whether a newsgroup
>>>>> is large or small
>>>>> should not matter as long as everyone respects the threads. I
>>>>> repeat, I do
>>>>> not step on other's threads unless they are up my alley and
>>>>> neither does Vandeman. Others should feel free to post away to
>>>>> their heart's content on
>>>>> ARBR and RBS. We can never be like RBM in size, but we can make up
>>>>> for it in
>>>>> quality.
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 22 Jun 2006 15:16:00
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EA856ED70AEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
[...]
>>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
>>
>> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of Illinois
>> in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not reserve
>> unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are jerks no
>> matter what!
>>
>> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
>> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups.
>> Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
>
> I was just wondering how easy it was to [get] under your skin.
>
> Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought [.]
It is not possible for anyone in cyberspace to get under my skin. Everything
is tit for tat with me. That is all it is and all it can ever be. After all,
there is real life and then there is Usenet. Only a fool would confuse and
conflate the two.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
PS. By the way, you might want to learn how to edit your posts. Others on
these newsgroups have me in their kill file and that is where you will soon
be yourself if you continue to quote me in full in your every message.
Unlike you, many others simply cannot stand a little contention. They want
all to be peace and light in their universe.
PS2. I am the best editor Usenet has ever known. It comes from my
professional training as a librarian. Follow my example and you will never
go far from wrong.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 23 Jun 2006 11:40:20
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:S5mdnQfZj8MUZwfZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EA856ED70AEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>> news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
> [...]
>>>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
>>>
>>> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of
>>> Illinois in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not
>>> reserve unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are
>>> jerks no matter what!
>>>
>>> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
>>> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups.
>>> Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
>>
>> I was just wondering how easy it was to [get] under your skin.
>>
>> Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought [.]
>
> It is not possible for anyone in cyberspace to get under my skin.
> Everything is tit for tat with me. That is all it is and all it can
> ever be. After all, there is real life and then there is Usenet. Only
> a fool would confuse and conflate the two.
Conan,
You got so upset are my reks that YOU sent a e-mail to me, here it
is:
> "Edward Dolan" wrote in
> news:ccqdnVmFSNiu0xXZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>
> Ahhhhh Blow Me
[...]
Fuck you too Chris Foster!
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Then I replied, And once again, you had a hiss fit, here it is:
John,
Do not be sending any messages to me at my email address. Whatever it is
we have to say to one another can be done on Usenet where all the world
can see it and can draw their own conclusions.
You resorted to an obscenity without any reason for doing so. Like you I
spent quite a bit of time in the military and so I know EXACTLY how to
respond to such reks. When I get a 'fuck you', then you get back a
'fuck you too'! It is hard to believe you have any higher degrees as you
still seem to be acting like a ine grunt.
Regards,
Ed
PS. It is OK if you want to post the above message to Usenet - and we can
carry on from there.
So, I think I did a GREAT job of getting under you skin.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. By the way, you might want to learn how to edit your posts.
> Others on these newsgroups have me in their kill file and that is
> where you will soon be yourself if you continue to quote me in full in
> your every message. Unlike you, many others simply cannot stand a
> little contention. They want all to be peace and light in their
> universe.
>
> PS2. I am the best editor Usenet has ever known. It comes from my
> professional training as a librarian. Follow my example and you will
> never go far from wrong.
>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 12:38:51
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EB435DFE7C2johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:S5mdnQfZj8MUZwfZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>>
>> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97EA856ED70AEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>>> news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>> [...]
>>>>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
>>>>
>>>> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of
>>>> Illinois in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not
>>>> reserve unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks are
>>>> jerks no matter what!
>>>>
>>>> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
>>>> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these newsgroups.
>>>> Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar head!
>>>
>>> I was just wondering how easy it was to [get] under your skin.
>>>
>>> Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought [.]
>>
>> It is not possible for anyone in cyberspace to get under my skin.
>> Everything is tit for tat with me. That is all it is and all it can
>> ever be. After all, there is real life and then there is Usenet. Only
>> a fool would confuse and conflate the two.
>
>
>
> Conan,
>
> You got so upset are my reks that YOU sent a e-mail to me, here it
> is:
>
>
>> "Edward Dolan" wrote in
>> news:ccqdnVmFSNiu0xXZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>
>>
>> Ahhhhh Blow Me
> [...]
>
> Fuck you too Chris Foster!
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Nope, the above was NOT an email but was posted on the newsgroups for all to
see.
> Then I replied, And once again, you had a hiss fit, here it is:
>
>
> John,
>
> Do not be sending any messages to me at my email address. Whatever it is
> we have to say to one another can be done on Usenet where all the world
> can see it and can draw their own conclusions.
>
> You resorted to an obscenity without any reason for doing so. Like you I
> spent quite a bit of time in the military and so I know EXACTLY how to
> respond to such reks. When I get a 'fuck you', then you get back a
> 'fuck you too'! It is hard to believe you have any higher degrees as you
> still seem to be acting like a ine grunt.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed
>
> PS. It is OK if you want to post the above message to Usenet - and we can
> carry on from there.
[...]
>> PS. By the way, you might want to learn how to edit your posts.
>> Others on these newsgroups have me in their kill file and that is
>> where you will soon be yourself if you continue to quote me in full in
>> your every message. Unlike you, many others simply cannot stand a
>> little contention. They want all to be peace and light in their
>> universe.
>>
>> PS2. I am the best editor Usenet has ever known. It comes from my
>> professional training as a librarian. Follow my example and you will
>> never go far from wrong.
Nope, no way I would ever send you an email first. I did send you an email
but that was in response to your email and to tell you not be sending me any
emails. Email is for family and friends and you clearly are neither. Any
more emails I get from you will be posted to the newsgroups as I want all
the world to see what a jerk you are.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 18:06:32
From: Chris Foster
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in
news:tuydnfLdxNYxhj3ZnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97EB435DFE7C2johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>> news:S5mdnQfZj8MUZwfZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns97EA856ED70AEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
>>>> news:WbmdnaKzb8RdfgfZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>> [...]
>>>>>> Ahhhhhhhh Blow Me.
>>>>>
>>>>> This guy supposedly has a Ph.D. degree from the University of
>>>>> Illinois in electrical engineering. Now you know why I do not
>>>>> reserve unqualified respect for those with higher degrees. Jerks
>>>>> are jerks no matter what!
>>>>>
>>>>> He was also a former ine and that now is apparently the kind of
>>>>> person he has chosen to revert to for purposes of these
>>>>> newsgroups. Once a grunt, always a grunt! "Semper Fi" you jar
>>>>> head!
>>>>
>>>> I was just wondering how easy it was to [get] under your skin.
>>>>
>>>> Hardly a challenge, it was easier that I thought [.]
>>>
>>> It is not possible for anyone in cyberspace to get under my skin.
>>> Everything is tit for tat with me. That is all it is and all it can
>>> ever be. After all, there is real life and then there is Usenet.
>>> Only a fool would confuse and conflate the two.
>>
>>
>>
>> Conan,
>>
>> You got so upset are my reks that YOU sent a e-mail to me, here
>> it
>> is:
>>
>>
>>> "Edward Dolan" wrote in
>>> news:ccqdnVmFSNiu0xXZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ahhhhh Blow Me
>> [...]
>>
>> Fuck you too Chris Foster!
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> Nope, the above was NOT an email but was posted on the newsgroups for
> all to see.
>
>> Then I replied, And once again, you had a hiss fit, here it is:
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Do not be sending any messages to me at my email address. Whatever it
>> is we have to say to one another can be done on Usenet where all the
>> world can see it and can draw their own conclusions.
>>
>> You resorted to an obscenity without any reason for doing so. Like
>> you I spent quite a bit of time in the military and so I know EXACTLY
>> how to respond to such reks. When I get a 'fuck you', then you get
>> back a 'fuck you too'! It is hard to believe you have any higher
>> degrees as you still seem to be acting like a ine grunt.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> PS. It is OK if you want to post the above message to Usenet - and we
>> can carry on from there.
> [...]
>
>>> PS. By the way, you might want to learn how to edit your posts.
>>> Others on these newsgroups have me in their kill file and that is
>>> where you will soon be yourself if you continue to quote me in full
>>> in your every message. Unlike you, many others simply cannot stand a
>>> little contention. They want all to be peace and light in their
>>> universe.
>>>
>>> PS2. I am the best editor Usenet has ever known. It comes from my
>>> professional training as a librarian. Follow my example and you will
>>> never go far from wrong.
>
> Nope, no way I would ever send you an email first. I did send you an
> email but that was in response to your email and to tell you not be
> sending me any emails. Email is for family and friends and you clearly
> are neither. Any more emails I get from you will be posted to the
> newsgroups as I want all the world to see what a jerk you are.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
Nice try Conan, I have the e-mail you initially sent me. You started
the e-mail exchange. I just got you so pissed that you just had to do
it, didnt you. You can deny it, but I got the proof. And here it is:
See where is states:
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97E84E752A8F5johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
That means I wrote my message in the news server.
All the rest of the header is a e-mail header.
To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny
it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is
simply too childish for me.
john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com via 206.190.39.72; Tue, 20 Jun 2006
11:40:30 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [216.16.0.22]
Return-Path: <edolan@iw.net >
Authentication-Results: mta322.mail.scd.yahoo.com from=iw.net;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 216.16.0.22 (EHLO iw.net) (216.16.0.22) by
mta322.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:40:30 -0700
Received: from [216.16.85.62] (unverified [216.16.85.62]) by iw.net
(SurgeMail 3.0c2) with ESMTP id 11280892 for
<john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com >; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:40:19 -0600
Return-Path: <edolan@iw.net >
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.394 [268.9.2/370]); Tue, 20 Jun
2006 13:40:13 -0500
Message-ID: <005401c69498$f78339b0$3e5510d8@dolan >
From: "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > Add to Address Book Add Mobile
Alert
To: "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com >
Subject: Re: Why are we getting posts on Mtn Biking on rec.bicycles.misc?
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:40:11 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-3, 06/20/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com
X-Authenticated-User: edolan@iw.net
Content-Length: 386
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97E84E752A8F5johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in
> news:ccqdnVmFSNiu0xXZnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@prairiewave.com:
>
>
> Ahhhhh Blow Me
[...]
Fuck you too Chris Foster!
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 26 Jun 2006 14:22:19
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups
|
"Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:Xns97EE84D6735CEjohnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
[...]
> Nice try Conan, I have the e-mail you initially sent me. You started
> the e-mail exchange. I just got you so pissed that you just had to do
> it, didnt you. You can deny it, but I got the proof. And here it is:
>
> See where is states:
>
> "Chris Foster" <john_foster_in_erie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97E84E752A8F5johnfosterineroeyaho@66.150.105.47...
>
> That means I wrote my message in the news server.
> All the rest of the header is a e-mail header.
>
> To sum it up. You stated the e-mail exchange, now you are tring to deny
> it, Vandy, would of course, type the word liar in all caps, but that is
> simply too childish for me.
Nope, I got your message in my email box and I did not see in on the
newsgroup. I NEVER send anyone an email message that is connected to the
newsgroups unless I get an email from them first. My standard policy is to
discourage all such communication as I like to keep Usenet separate from my
real life. Elementary, my dear Watson!
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
