| |
Main
Date: 22 Dec 2004 01:01:54
From: Sam Spade
Subject: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Hey Johnny NoCom,
Ken the Troll is Ken Kolk age 62 of Shelbyville, MI. He lives near the corner of 127th Ave. and 7th St.
You can bike by his place to check out his ASSets.
Yours Truly,
Sam Spade P.I.
|
|
| |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 16:21:39
From: Johnny NoCom
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Once again you are posting lies based on your own ASSumptions and no facts Ken the Troll. There have been NO damages to BROL's operation or relationships with its advertisers based on any of the Johnny NoCom threads.
Either prove it now with facts and post the proof or shut your wrinkled pie hole. You are proof that BROL stands for Bent Rejects On Lithium.
Johnny NoCom
|
| | |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 23:59:52
From: Babboonboy5
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
No,No,No,No
BROL STANDS FOR
BWIAN RUNS ON LARRY
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 19:14:15
From: Larry Varney
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Babboonboy5 wrote:
> No,No,No,No
> BROL STANDS FOR
>
> BWIAN RUNS ON LARRY
Earl, that doesn't even make sense.
--
Larry Varney
Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 19:42:46
From: Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Larry Varney wrote:
> Babboonboy5 wrote:
>
>> No,No,No,No
>> BROL STANDS FOR
>>
>> BWIAN RUNS ON LARRY
>
>
> Earl, that doesn't even make sense.
Think coprophilia.
--
Tom Sherman
|
| | | | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 21:39:46
From: Larry Varney
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Tom Sherman wrote:
> Larry Varney wrote:
>
>> Babboonboy5 wrote:
>>
>>> No,No,No,No
>>> BROL STANDS FOR
>>>
>>> BWIAN RUNS ON LARRY
>>
>>
>>
>> Earl, that doesn't even make sense.
>
>
> Think coprophilia.
>
No, I'd rather not. But you guys go right ahead.
--
Larry Varney
Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
|
| |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 12:54:57
From: Johnny NoCom
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Thanks Sam,
Do you have a phone number you can post for Ken Kolk?
My guess is that Ken Kolk has suggested suing people with frivolous non factual lawsuits more than once. Some of those people may want to give him a call.
Do you have his street address?
Johnny NoCom
[quote: Ken the Troll]
General Discussion
BentRider Online Forums
12-19-2004, 09:29 PM
"Then I would suggest, that since he must have some assets from his business, you sue him for damages and then contact his ISP and have him shut down. That is the best way to warn other would be Johnnys that it is a game they don't want to play. "
"Ken the Troll"
[I live south of the Mighty Mackinaw Bridge]
Riding 2004 V-Rexes
in Western Michigan
|
| |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 12:53:21
From: Johnny NoCom
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Thanks Sam,
Do you have a phone number you can post for Ken Kolk?
My guess is that ken Kolk has suggested suing people wit frivolous non factual lawsuits more than once. Some of those people may want to give him a call.
Do you have is street address?
Johnny NoCom
[quote: Ken the Troll]
General Discussion
BentRider Online Forums
12-19-2004, 09:29 PM
"Then I would suggest, that since he must have some assets from his business, you sue him for damages and then contact his ISP and have him shut down. That is the best way to warn other would be Johnnys that it is a game they don't want to play. "
"Ken the Troll"
[I live south of the Mighty Mackinaw Bridge]
Riding 2004 V-Rexes
in Western Michigan
|
| |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 10:26:15
From: Ken the Troll
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Hey Sam why don't you give us the full name and address of Johnny
NoCom? At least I don't hide behind some alias to fame and bad mouth
anyone who questions my activities.
|
| | |
Date: 22 Dec 2004 13:13:53
From: Ken the Troll
Subject: Re: Johnny, Ken the Troll is......
|
Note: Johnny NoCom's postings effected BROLs operations and may have
damaged BROL's relationships with its advertizers. My suggestion to
Bryan was to check a post made here as to Johnny's ID, which is still
unknown. I suggested that if the post made here was accurate and BROL
had suffered damages that Bryan sue for recovery of damages. That is
hardly friivolous non factual lawsuit. However that post resulted in
JNC's posting the following:
"You have taken the registered tradek Johnny NoCom=AE and posted
false
misleading information on the internet regarding identity of this
registered tradek. The ill informed reks you have made on BROL
regarding Johnny NoCom=AE will no longer be tolerated.
"My legal team suggests that your home, business and retirement assets
will be taken away for compensation of damages you have caused with
your
posts made on BROL. In addition to suing for registered tradek
damages Johnny NoCom=AE will also contact your ISP and shut it down.
"This is the best way to warn other would be Ken the Troll that posting
lies to the public about a registered tradek is a game they do not
want to play."
That is clearly threatening a "frivolous non factual lawsuit" on the
part of Johnny and not on my part. I have never engaged in any lawsuit,
although my wife is totally disabled due to exposure to Agent Orange
when she worked for the manufacturer and we surely could have engaged
in a lawsuit. I find that suing especially when there is no actually
damages is usually a waste of money and make lawyers happy not the
clients.
Oh well. It sure seems funny to get this reaction from Johnny if, as he
maintains the person identifed as actually being him is not actually
him, thus he was not actually effected by the post in question.
|
|
