| |
Main
Date: 12 Mar 2006 04:49:58
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
Why is everyone on these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM, such midgets and dwarfs
intellectually speaking. The posts to these newsgroup just keep getting
dumber and dumber. No one has any shame about this and it is apparently a
bottomless pit as to how deep we can sink. I am in despair at what I see
taking place. Total nitwits and numskulls are expounding on the most trivial
matters. In fact, the more trivial, the better. I believe there is a
conspiracy against me and my Greatness. It may be that Tom Keats is the ring
leader here, but I have many other candidates for consideration if you are
interested.
I would like to know just how small minded we can get. All that is needed to
raise these groups to heights heretofore unknown is to contemplate the
Greatness of Ed Dolan. If you do this with due diligence, you will be
inspired and rise to Greatness yourselves. Then we shall be as Gods on Mount
Olympus.
This is more a matter of the will and courage than anything else. I will
supply the intellect if you will follow along. Yea, all that is necessary is
that you acquiesce to my direction. I will take charge and lead ARBR and RBM
to glories that you have only dreamed about. I shall in effect save you from
yourselves.
My magnanimity and sense of noblesse oblige is very strong and I will lead
you out of the wilderness to salvation. All I ask in return is that you
worship me. Surely, that is not asking too much.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 21:27:57
From: Peter Keller
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
On Sun, 12 2006 04:49:58 -0600, Edward Dolan wrote:
> Why is everyone on these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM, such midgets and dwarfs
> intellectually speaking. The posts to these newsgroup just keep getting
> dumber and dumber. No one has any shame about this and it is apparently a
> bottomless pit as to how deep we can sink. I am in despair at what I see
> taking place. Total nitwits and numskulls are expounding on the most trivial
> matters. In fact, the more trivial, the better. I believe there is a
> conspiracy against me and my Greatness. It may be that Tom Keats is the ring
> leader here, but I have many other candidates for consideration if you are
> interested.
>
> I would like to know just how small minded we can get. All that is needed to
> raise these groups to heights heretofore unknown is to contemplate the
> Greatness of Ed Dolan. If you do this with due diligence, you will be
> inspired and rise to Greatness yourselves. Then we shall be as Gods on Mount
> Olympus.
>
> This is more a matter of the will and courage than anything else. I will
> supply the intellect if you will follow along. Yea, all that is necessary is
> that you acquiesce to my direction. I will take charge and lead ARBR and RBM
> to glories that you have only dreamed about. I shall in effect save you from
> yourselves.
>
> My magnanimity and sense of noblesse oblige is very strong and I will lead
> you out of the wilderness to salvation. All I ask in return is that you
> worship me. Surely, that is not asking too much.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Those who say that the sea squirt is related to the horseshoe crab are
mistaken --
Peter
--
No Microsoft involved. Certified virus free --
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 23:32:03
From: Tom Keats
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
In article <7a-dnQKmaL7ag4jZRVn-tA@prairiewave.com >,
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > writes:
>
> "Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bev2vd.g87.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
>> In article <BOednVQbtfXlS4nZRVn-qw@prairiewave.com>,
>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
>>
>>> No, I have decided that the denizens of RBM need to know what is
>>> happening
>>> here on ARBR. We are a dead newsgroup and I think only they can save us.
>>> Your good/bad buddy Ed Gin destroyed this group last winter and we have
>>> never recovered from it. All off-topic threads originating on ARBR will
>>> henceforth be posted to RBM and vice versa of course. If and when ARBR
>>> ever
>>> recovers, then we can forget about RBM.
>>
>> Translation:
>> Mr. Hed Swollen here has scared everybody off a.r.b.r and
>> now seeks to do the same to r.b.m.
>
> Nope, it was Ed Gin that ruined ARBR.
It was you.
And now you're trying to spread your poison to r.b.m.
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 02:01:18
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
"Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:j573vd.bo7.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
> In article <7a-dnQKmaL7ag4jZRVn-tA@prairiewave.com>,
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
>>
>> "Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:bev2vd.g87.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
>>> In article <BOednVQbtfXlS4nZRVn-qw@prairiewave.com>,
>>> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> No, I have decided that the denizens of RBM need to know what is
>>>> happening
>>>> here on ARBR. We are a dead newsgroup and I think only they can save
>>>> us.
>>>> Your good/bad buddy Ed Gin destroyed this group last winter and we have
>>>> never recovered from it. All off-topic threads originating on ARBR will
>>>> henceforth be posted to RBM and vice versa of course. If and when ARBR
>>>> ever
>>>> recovers, then we can forget about RBM.
>>>
>>> Translation:
>>> Mr. Hed Swollen here has scared everybody off a.r.b.r and
>>> now seeks to do the same to r.b.m.
>>
>> Nope, it was Ed Gin that ruined ARBR.
>
> It was you.
What the f*** do you know about ARBR. I have never seen your name there.
> And now you're trying to spread your poison to r.b.m.
Nonsense, I don't give a damn about RBM. You guys are all a bunch of jerks.
But I do want some more posters here on ARBR. If we can get just few from
RBM it will be good for ARBR.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 20:51:50
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
HEADward the GRATE,
I can't believe that you failed to comprehend that in "BOTTOM POSTING"
I was yanking your chain.
Ed you know preciously little about dialog. You of all people should
not accuse another of engaging in a monologue.
You threaten that you will give me no consideration (as if I care) if I
don't conform to form, but like a moth drawn to a flame, you persist.
Using a word once does not make it a favorite. Fear of being
considered a scumbag (one word by the way) by you is not a deterrent to
the use of any word.
Stating something does not make it FACT. Furthermore stating that I am
threatened by humor doesn't even make sense. How is humor threatening?
Even if it were, I would have to perceive you to be humorous for your
"humor" to be threatening. I simply don't find what you to be
humorous. Like I said. Humor is a matter of perspective.
It would more appropriate to say that you are disgorging your persona,
but regardless, this business about your purpose of castigating
scoundrels and knaves, peer into a mirror and you will find one to
castigate, better yet castrate, since you'll never put it to good use
anyways. As concerns liberals, this is not a political newsgroup and
both conservatives and liberals ride recumbent so why don't you give it
a rest or take your condemnation of the liberal to an appropriate arena
... a political newsgroup. You are out of place, out of step and out
of touch.
Jim McNaa
HEADward Dolan the GRATE babled...
You needed to intersperse your reks paragraph by paragraph rather
post my
whole thing above with your whole thing below. I can't believe you do
not
know how to do this properly. Just look at how others are posting to
get a
clue, why don't you?
But here is what is really going on here for the ignorant. Jim does not
want
any dialogue. He wants only his monologue. Only his reks matter
after
all. It is ever they way of those who fear genuine conversation. Unless
he
begins to post in the correct form, I will not give him any
consideration as
it is just too much work to bother with these formless formats of his.
> Errant assumption (You're particularly adept at that) ... F**K is not
> one of my favorite words.
Then don't use it. It ks you as a scum bag. I only use it in
retaliation
when it has been used on me first.
> The very same person who asked who the hell was I to respond to a post
> That was double-posted and insisted that all post be directed to your
> TROLL residence ... ARBR now justifies his own double posting.
> Contradiction again ... conundrum continues. You don't even know your
> own mind do you? They say that women are entitled to change their
> minds. I submit that you, Ed Dolan, are a woman trapped in a man's
> body.
If the post is about me, it should be posted to ARBR above all other
newsgroups. For instance, if I have something to say about Tom Keats, I
will
make sure it gets posted to RBM because I know that is where he is
mainly
at.
> Humor is a matter of perspective. Granted you are a laughing stock,
> but few find you humorous. Ignorant, inconsiderate, obnoxious, but not
> amusing.
Jim for some reason feels threaten by my humor. I attribute it to his
basic
insecurity. Anyone who is secure in his own person should find my humor
at
least somewhat amusing. I sure do!
> Ed is growing weary of being outwitted. Ed no longer wants to be
> confronted with his shortcomings or at least he doesn't want me to
> point them out to the readership. As Ed would say, he has found an
> adversary that is driving him to distraction. Ed snipped what he could
> not or would not address ... the following:
No, I am doing the same old thing I have been doing for the past 3
years.
Nothing has changed.
> Readers, Ed has both despaired and objected to the direction that posts
> have taken. Having voiced his disdain, it still has not occurred to
> him to take leave of ARBR and RBM even though he has been encouraged by
> the readership to do so countless times. Is this indicative of one
> possessed of superior intelligence?
> Readers, the revelation that Ed Dolan now believes that there is a
> conspiracy against him and his greatness is very telling. Two words
> come to mind ... paranoid schizophrenia. My interpretation is that
> what goes around comes around and the man is merely reaping what he has
> sewn.
[...]
Here is Jim trying to be literary and analytical. Very funny! Trying
to
psychoanalyze me is a waste of time. After all, what is real on Usenet?
I am
into nothing but projecting a persona for the purpose of castigating
scoundrels and knaves - and especially liberals!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 13 Mar 2006 00:06:28
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142225510.558691.224610@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSOTER ARE IDIOTS!
> HEADward the GRATE,
>
> I can't believe that you failed to comprehend that in "BOTTOM POSTING"
> I was yanking your chain.
[...]
You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 19:12:31
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
Readers ... and that includes you too Ed,
Still singing that old song about top posting? See my post at the very
bottom then...
"JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142214200.413289.205470@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> "Head" Dolan,
> Ed, to employ the vernacular, you are extremely fucked up ... a wit
> with a capital "T" (That would be TWIT, imperceptive one). Why do you
> persist in publicly embarrassing yourself?
Careful there JimmyMac or Jon Meinecke will report you to your ISP.
That is
what he likes to do best in all the world. I suggest you write your
favorite
word like so: f***ed up. That way Jon Meinecke will not get his weasel
claws into you and everyone will know what you mean anyway. No point in
getting like Ed Gin unless you are indeed like him.
> Readers, I've said it before. Ed Dolan is a conundrum ... a walking,
> talking contradiction. Ed, you castigated me for responding to (not
> originating) cross-posted posts. Then, you authored and then
> deliberately cross-posted this incoherent stream of consciousness
> drivel. Wasn't one repository more than enough waste of archival
> storage? Readers, I guess Ed, who thinks he makes the rules, also
> feels that he is entitled to break the rules.
No, I have decided that the denizens of RBM need to know what is
happening
here on ARBR. We are a dead newsgroup and I think only they can save
us.
Your good/bad buddy Ed Gin destroyed this group last winter and we have
never recovered from it. All off-topic threads originating on ARBR will
henceforth be posted to RBM and vice versa of course. If and when ARBR
ever
recovers, then we can forget about RBM.
> Ed, why must you always be so condescending? Your notion that ARBR and
> RBM are populated by intellectual midgets and dwarfs is a merely a
> myopic misconception, one that demonstrates that you are afflicted with
> your perceptual difficulties. You assert that you are intelligent and
> that your writing is entertaining. Readers, did any of you find Ed's
> insults to have entertainment value? Ed, I would expect that one who
> is allegedly possessed of superior intellect would be savvy enough to
> realize that it is imprudent to insult the very audience one is
> courting ... DUUUUH!!!!!
It takes a superior intelligence to appreciate my humor. The very
essence of
my humor is my condescension. Why not relax and enjoy it. Surely it
does not
threaten you in any way - does it?
[...]
The rest of Jim's post is his usual long-windiness which I will no
longer
abide. He does not bottom post as he should nor does he include any of
my
message that he is responding to. He deserves to be snipped and so that
is
what I will do.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ATTENTION: This is a BOTTOM POST ;^)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Errant assumpiton (You're particulary adept at that) ... F**K is not
one of my favoriite words.
The bvery same person who asked who the hell was I to repsond to a post
that was double-posted and insited that all post be directed to your
TROLL residence ... ARBR now justifies his own double posting.
Contradiction again ... conundrum continues. You don't even know your
own mind do you? They say that women are entitiled to change their
minds. I submit that you, Ed Dolan, arr a woman trapped in a man's
body.
Humor is a matter of perspective. Granted you are a laughing stock,
but few find you humorous. Ignorant, inconsiderate, obnoxious, but not
amusing.
Ed is growng weary of being outwitted. Ed no longer want to be
confronted with his shortcomings or at least he doesn't want me to
point them out to the readership. As Ed would say, he has found an
adversary that is driving him to distraction. Ed snipped what he could
not or would not address ... the following:
Readers, Ed has both despaired and objected to the direction that posts
have taken. Having voiced his disdain, it still has not occurred to
him to take leave of ARBR and RBM even though he has been encouraged by
the readership to do so countless times. Is this indicative of one
possessed of superior intelligence?
Readers, the revelation that Ed Dolan now believes that there is a
conspiracy against him and his greatness is very telling. Two words
come to mind ... paranoid schizophrenia. My interpretation is that
what goes around comes around and the man is merely reaping what he has
sewn.
Ed Dolan keeps misspelling greatness. He means grateness ... of
course, for he is the GRATE one!
This post was replete with the usual monotonous cut and paste
boilerplate that we have come to expect from the perennial malcontent.
Ed, since you object to wordiness and even BIG words, I tried in
earnest to dumb this down for you.
Per your guidance, I am properly introducing the following link. It is
not in any way shape or form pornographic and you will not find
anything objectionable. In fact, I suspect you will be in wholehearted
agreement with the message presented and will be delighted by its
content. I'd go so far as to say that you will seek out the author so
that you can extend you gratitude for a job well done:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/....
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 22:05:38
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142219550.967161.31490@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> Readers ... and that includes you too Ed,
>
> Still singing that old song about top posting? See my post at the very
> bottom then...
>
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1142214200.413289.205470@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
>> "Head" Dolan,
>
>> Ed, to employ the vernacular, you are extremely fucked up ... a wit
>> with a capital "T" (That would be TWIT, imperceptive one). Why do you
>> persist in publicly embarrassing yourself?
>
> Careful there JimmyMac or Jon Meinecke will report you to your ISP.
> That is
> what he likes to do best in all the world. I suggest you write your
> favorite
> word like so: f***ed up. That way Jon Meinecke will not get his weasel
> claws into you and everyone will know what you mean anyway. No point in
> getting like Ed Gin unless you are indeed like him.
>
>> Readers, I've said it before. Ed Dolan is a conundrum ... a walking,
>> talking contradiction. Ed, you castigated me for responding to (not
>> originating) cross-posted posts. Then, you authored and then
>> deliberately cross-posted this incoherent stream of consciousness
>> drivel. Wasn't one repository more than enough waste of archival
>> storage? Readers, I guess Ed, who thinks he makes the rules, also
>> feels that he is entitled to break the rules.
>
> No, I have decided that the denizens of RBM need to know what is
> happening
> here on ARBR. We are a dead newsgroup and I think only they can save
> us.
> Your good/bad buddy Ed Gin destroyed this group last winter and we have
> never recovered from it. All off-topic threads originating on ARBR will
> henceforth be posted to RBM and vice versa of course. If and when ARBR
> ever
> recovers, then we can forget about RBM.
>
>> Ed, why must you always be so condescending? Your notion that ARBR and
>> RBM are populated by intellectual midgets and dwarfs is a merely a
>> myopic misconception, one that demonstrates that you are afflicted with
>> your perceptual difficulties. You assert that you are intelligent and
>> that your writing is entertaining. Readers, did any of you find Ed's
>> insults to have entertainment value? Ed, I would expect that one who
>> is allegedly possessed of superior intellect would be savvy enough to
>> realize that it is imprudent to insult the very audience one is
>> courting ... DUUUUH!!!!!
>
> It takes a superior intelligence to appreciate my humor. The very
> essence of
> my humor is my condescension. Why not relax and enjoy it. Surely it
> does not
> threaten you in any way - does it?
> [...]
>
> The rest of Jim's post is his usual long-windiness which I will no
> longer
> abide. He does not bottom post as he should nor does he include any of
> my
> message that he is responding to. He deserves to be snipped and so that
> is
> what I will do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ATTENTION: This is a BOTTOM POST ;^)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You needed to intersperse your reks paragraph by paragraph rather post my
whole thing above with your whole thing below. I can't believe you do not
know how to do this properly. Just look at how others are posting to get a
clue, why don't you?
But here is what is really going on here for the ignorant. Jim does not want
any dialogue. He wants only his monologue. Only his reks matter after
all. It is ever they way of those who fear genuine conversation. Unless he
begins to post in the correct form, I will not give him any consideration as
it is just too much work to bother with these formless formats of his.
> Errant assumpiton (You're particulary adept at that) ... F**K is not
> one of my favoriite words.
Then don't use it. It ks you as a scum bag. I only use it in retaliation
when it has been used on me first.
> The bvery same person who asked who the hell was I to repsond to a post
> that was double-posted and insited that all post be directed to your
> TROLL residence ... ARBR now justifies his own double posting.
> Contradiction again ... conundrum continues. You don't even know your
> own mind do you? They say that women are entitiled to change their
> minds. I submit that you, Ed Dolan, arr a woman trapped in a man's
> body.
If the post is about me, it should be posted to ARBR above all other
newsgroups. For instance, if I have something to say about Tom Keats, I will
make sure it gets posted to RBM because I know that is where he is mainly
at.
> Humor is a matter of perspective. Granted you are a laughing stock,
> but few find you humorous. Ignorant, inconsiderate, obnoxious, but not
> amusing.
Jim for some reason feels threaten by my humor. I attribute it to his basic
insecurity. Anyone who is secure in his own person should find my humor at
least somewhat amusing. I sure do!
> Ed is growng weary of being outwitted. Ed no longer want to be
> confronted with his shortcomings or at least he doesn't want me to
> point them out to the readership. As Ed would say, he has found an
> adversary that is driving him to distraction. Ed snipped what he could
> not or would not address ... the following:
No, I am doing the same old thing I have been doing for the past 3 years.
Nothing has changed.
> Readers, Ed has both despaired and objected to the direction that posts
> have taken. Having voiced his disdain, it still has not occurred to
> him to take leave of ARBR and RBM even though he has been encouraged by
> the readership to do so countless times. Is this indicative of one
> possessed of superior intelligence?
>
> Readers, the revelation that Ed Dolan now believes that there is a
> conspiracy against him and his greatness is very telling. Two words
> come to mind ... paranoid schizophrenia. My interpretation is that
> what goes around comes around and the man is merely reaping what he has
> sewn.
[...]
Here is Jim trying to be literary and analytical. Very funny! Trying to
psychoanalyze me is a waste of time. After all, what is real on Usenet? I am
into nothing but projecting a persona for the purpose of castigating
scoundrels and knaves - and especially liberals!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 17:43:20
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
"Head" Dolan,
Ed, to employ the vernacular, you are extremely fucked up ... a wit
with a capital "T" (That would be TWIT, imperceptive one). Why do you
persist in publicly embarrassing yourself?
Readers, I've said it before. Ed Dolan is a conundrum ... a walking,
talking contradiction. Ed, you castigated me for responding to (not
originating) cross-posted posts. Then, you authored and then
deliberately cross-posted this incoherent stream of consciousness
drivel. Wasn't one repository more than enough waste of archival
storage? Readers, I guess Ed, who thinks he makes the rules, also
feels that he is entitled to break the rules.
Ed, why must you always be so condescending? Your notion that ARBR and
RBM are populated by intellectual midgets and dwarfs is a merely a
myopic misconception, one that demonstrates that you are afflicted with
your perceptual difficulties. You assert that you are intelligent and
that your writing is entertaining. Readers, did any of you find Ed's
insults to have entertainment value? Ed, I would expect that one who
is allegedly possessed of superior intellect would be savvy enough to
realize that it is imprudent to insult the very audience one is
courting ... DUUUUH!!!!!
Readers, Ed has both despaired and objected to the direction that posts
have taken. Having voiced his disdain, it still has not occurred to
him to take leave of ARBR and RBM even though he has been encouraged by
the readership to do so countless times. Is this indicative of one
possessed of superior intelligence?
Readers, the revelation that Ed Dolan now believes that there is a
conspiracy against him and his greatness is very telling. Two words
come to mind ... paranoid schizophrenia. My interpretation is that
what goes around comes around and the man is merely reaping what he has
sewn.
Ed Dolan keeps misspelling greatness. He means grateness ... of
course, for he is the GRATE one!
This post was replete with the usual monotonous cut and paste
boilerplate that we have come to expect from the perennial malcontent.
Ed, since you object to wordiness and even BIG words, I tried in
earnest to dumb this down for you.
Per your guidance, I am properly introducing the following link. It is
not in any way shape or form pornographic and you will not find
anything objectionable. In fact, I suspect you will be in wholehearted
agreement with the message presented and will be delighted by its
content. I'd go so far as to say that you will seek out the author so
that you can extend you gratitude for a job well done:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/thread/b0477afabe6c9e34/848f50b7a2713a8e?q=speed&rnum=2#848f50b7a2713a8e.
Jim McNaa
|
| | |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 20:18:25
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1142214200.413289.205470@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> "Head" Dolan,
>
> Ed, to employ the vernacular, you are extremely fucked up ... a wit
> with a capital "T" (That would be TWIT, imperceptive one). Why do you
> persist in publicly embarrassing yourself?
Careful there JimmyMac or Jon Meinecke will report you to your ISP. That is
what he likes to do best in all the world. I suggest you write your favorite
word like so: f***ed up. That way Jon Meinecke will not get his weasel
claws into you and everyone will know what you mean anyway. No point in
getting like Ed Gin unless you are indeed like him.
> Readers, I've said it before. Ed Dolan is a conundrum ... a walking,
> talking contradiction. Ed, you castigated me for responding to (not
> originating) cross-posted posts. Then, you authored and then
> deliberately cross-posted this incoherent stream of consciousness
> drivel. Wasn't one repository more than enough waste of archival
> storage? Readers, I guess Ed, who thinks he makes the rules, also
> feels that he is entitled to break the rules.
No, I have decided that the denizens of RBM need to know what is happening
here on ARBR. We are a dead newsgroup and I think only they can save us.
Your good/bad buddy Ed Gin destroyed this group last winter and we have
never recovered from it. All off-topic threads originating on ARBR will
henceforth be posted to RBM and vice versa of course. If and when ARBR ever
recovers, then we can forget about RBM.
> Ed, why must you always be so condescending? Your notion that ARBR and
> RBM are populated by intellectual midgets and dwarfs is a merely a
> myopic misconception, one that demonstrates that you are afflicted with
> your perceptual difficulties. You assert that you are intelligent and
> that your writing is entertaining. Readers, did any of you find Ed's
> insults to have entertainment value? Ed, I would expect that one who
> is allegedly possessed of superior intellect would be savvy enough to
> realize that it is imprudent to insult the very audience one is
> courting ... DUUUUH!!!!!
It takes a superior intelligence to appreciate my humor. The very essence of
my humor is my condescension. Why not relax and enjoy it. Surely it does not
threaten you in any way - does it?
[...]
The rest of Jim's post is his usual long-windiness which I will no longer
abide. He does not bottom post as he should nor does he include any of my
message that he is responding to. He deserves to be snipped and so that is
what I will do.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 18:11:39
From: Beach Runner
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> Why is everyone on these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM, such midgets and dwarfs
> intellectually speaking. The posts to these newsgroup just keep getting
> dumber and dumber. No one has any shame about this and it is apparently a
> bottomless pit as to how deep we can sink. I am in despair at what I see
> taking place. Total nitwits and numskulls are expounding on the most trivial
> matters. In fact, the more trivial, the better. I believe there is a
> conspiracy against me and my Greatness. It may be that Tom Keats is the ring
> leader here, but I have many other candidates for consideration if you are
> interested.
>
> I would like to know just how small minded we can get. All that is needed to
> raise these groups to heights heretofore unknown is to contemplate the
> Greatness of Ed Dolan. If you do this with due diligence, you will be
> inspired and rise to Greatness yourselves. Then we shall be as Gods on Mount
> Olympus.
>
> This is more a matter of the will and courage than anything else. I will
> supply the intellect if you will follow along. Yea, all that is necessary is
> that you acquiesce to my direction. I will take charge and lead ARBR and RBM
> to glories that you have only dreamed about. I shall in effect save you from
> yourselves.
>
> My magnanimity and sense of noblesse oblige is very strong and I will lead
> you out of the wilderness to salvation. All I ask in return is that you
> worship me. Surely, that is not asking too much.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
Congratulations. You have been awarded the Golden Cheeks award.
Me, I'd rather ride.
>
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 08:54:35
From: landotter
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> [drivelsnip]
flagged as spam via google groups.
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 05:27:56
From:
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
He cant go for a ride.Mommy wont let him play in the road.
|
| |
Date: 12 Mar 2006 06:46:18
From: Ken C. M.
Subject: Re: On the Greatness of Ed Dolan
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> Why is everyone on these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM, such midgets and dwarfs
> intellectually speaking. The posts to these newsgroup just keep getting
> dumber and dumber. No one has any shame about this and it is apparently a
> bottomless pit as to how deep we can sink. I am in despair at what I see
> taking place. Total nitwits and numskulls are expounding on the most trivial
> matters. In fact, the more trivial, the better. I believe there is a
> conspiracy against me and my Greatness. It may be that Tom Keats is the ring
> leader here, but I have many other candidates for consideration if you are
> interested.
>
> I would like to know just how small minded we can get. All that is needed to
> raise these groups to heights heretofore unknown is to contemplate the
> Greatness of Ed Dolan. If you do this with due diligence, you will be
> inspired and rise to Greatness yourselves. Then we shall be as Gods on Mount
> Olympus.
>
> This is more a matter of the will and courage than anything else. I will
> supply the intellect if you will follow along. Yea, all that is necessary is
> that you acquiesce to my direction. I will take charge and lead ARBR and RBM
> to glories that you have only dreamed about. I shall in effect save you from
> yourselves.
>
> My magnanimity and sense of noblesse oblige is very strong and I will lead
> you out of the wilderness to salvation. All I ask in return is that you
> worship me. Surely, that is not asking too much.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
Hey Ed, some advice, if you don't like the topics ignore them, or leave
the groups. Mostly I wouldn't even bother to reply to your post, but all
it is is a complaint. Stop complaining. Go for a ride. Find a hobby.
Whatever.
Ken
--
You never have the wind with you - either it is against you or you're
having a good day. ~Daniel Behrman, The Man Who Loved Bicycles
Homepage: http://www.bikesandmoreonline.com/
|
|
