| |
Main
Date: 26 Mar 2007 20:53:17
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
Anyone on this group still think Tom Sherman counts for anything? If you do,
you badly need to read any of his recent posts. He has trivialized himself
to the point where we can now disregard him entirely and treat him with the
contempt he has so richly earned. At least, that is what I will do from now
on.
Tom Sherman lived for years off of this newsgroup based on some very
elementary knowledge of recumbents and their history. An half-wit could have
done that. It is time we stop humoring this altogether humorless jerk. I
will now ride herd on his every post and show him up for the nerd that he
is. The days when I could say anyting good about him are now gone forever.
Assholes like him only deserve assholes like me. He will now learn what it
is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 21 Apr 2007 06:27:29
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On Apr 17, 3:26 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1176644209.240123.272710@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > Ed Dolan needs to work on a much more difficult problem to
> > resolve ...his denial. In the greater scheme of things, his opinion
> > matters not because he matters not. He is insignificant, irrelevant
> > and has yet to come to grips with this realization. It must be
> > comforting for him to live in a world unhampered and unrestricted by
> > reality.
>
> Others enjoy my messages. Jim McNaa does not because I have offended his
> delicate ego one too many times. His world revolves around himself - ever
> the problem of those who are not able to take the big view of things.
> [...]
Thanks for the denial confirmation. As concerns your second errant
observation, it would appear that introspection is at work here and
you are in denial of that as well. Ensconced in your socially
detached hermetic environs, yours is pathetic, shallow existence.
What ever would you do if someone were to take from you your computer
and your wine. There would be nothing more to live for.
> > No matter how many times it is repeated that we need hear nothing more
> > from you and no matter how many times it is repeated that you should
> > depart, you fail to get the message. Since repetition is the key to
> > all learning, I can only conclude that you have a learning disorder.
> > What we have all learned from you is that we are in need of no more of
> > your monotonous, regurgitated, repetitious drivel. With each post you
> > replenish your identity as ARBR's quintessential TROLL in residence!
>
> Ed Dolan the Great is not only all-knowing but also all-wise. Too bad a
> pip-squeak like Jim McNaa will never be able to appreciate One so Great
> as Myself!
This god-like claim of omniscience is reminiscent of that made in the
past by another troll that Ed often castigates as ARBR's criminal
vandal who destroyed this newsgroup. These two have another thing in
common, besides their first name ... their undeterred, inconsiderate
disruption of public forums. No matter how old Dolan becomes, he will
never grow up. Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 25 Apr 2007 03:11:06
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1177162049.712446.315410@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 17, 3:26 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1176644209.240123.272710@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> [...]
>>
>> > Ed Dolan needs to work on a much more difficult problem to
>> > resolve ...his denial. In the greater scheme of things, his opinion
>> > matters not because he matters not. He is insignificant, irrelevant
>> > and has yet to come to grips with this realization. It must be
>> > comforting for him to live in a world unhampered and unrestricted by
>> > reality.
>>
>> Others enjoy my messages. Jim McNaa does not because I have offended
>> his
>> delicate ego one too many times. His world revolves around himself -
>> ever
>> the problem of those who are not able to take the big view of things.
>> [...]
>
> Thanks for the denial confirmation. As concerns your second errant
> observation, it would appear that introspection is at work here and
> you are in denial of that as well. Ensconced in your socially
> detached hermetic environs, yours is pathetic, shallow existence.
> What ever would you do if someone were to take from you your computer
> and your wine. There would be nothing more to live for.
I have given up the vino. Way too many calories in it and I need to lose
about 20 lb. this summer.
By the way, I like my hermetic existence. If I didn't, I would do something
about it. After all, I am not only Great and a Great Saint, but I am also
infinitely lovable.
>> > No matter how many times it is repeated that we need hear nothing more
>> > from you and no matter how many times it is repeated that you should
>> > depart, you fail to get the message. Since repetition is the key to
>> > all learning, I can only conclude that you have a learning disorder.
>> > What we have all learned from you is that we are in need of no more of
>> > your monotonous, regurgitated, repetitious drivel. With each post you
>> > replenish your identity as ARBR's quintessential TROLL in residence!
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great is not only all-knowing but also all-wise. Too bad a
>> pip-squeak like Jim McNaa will never be able to appreciate One so
>> Great
>> as Myself!
>
> This god-like claim of omniscience is reminiscent of that made in the
> past by another troll that Ed often castigates as ARBR's criminal
> vandal who destroyed this newsgroup. These two have another thing in
> common, besides their first name ... their undeterred, inconsiderate
> disruption of public forums. No matter how old Dolan becomes, he will
> never grow up. Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Ed Gin, beside being a criminal vandal who destroyed this newsgroup, was
also a spamming troll whose mindless brain was permanently anchored in the
gutter. Why a Chinaman like him would have Ed for a first name is a complete
mystery. I think if I were a Chinaman, I would want a Chinese name.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 15 Apr 2007 06:36:49
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On Apr 13, 5:22 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1176049016.874235.257680@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Apr 7, 6:40 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175559104.280740.178760@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 1,
> >> 12:18 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> >> What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of
> >> >> taking
> >> >> instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through
> >> >> life
> >> >> with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel
> >> >> sorry
> >> >> for
> >> >> him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
> >> >> computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human
> >> >> wisdom,
> >> >> ever
> >> >> the downfall of lesser intellects.
>
> >> > Raw innate intelligence is not measure of accumulated knowledge.
> >> > Consequently, unlike Dolan, I realize that I can learn from others
> >> > regardless of intellectual capacity. As concerns Dolan being a
> >> > superior intellect, this is just another example of an opinion stated
> >> > as fact ... a stigma and eark of the lesser intellect. Actually, I
> >> > have learned much from Mr. Dolan. I have learned that he is what he
> >> > is and he is something I would never want to become.
>
> >> McNaa has learned from my instructions to him to stop being so prolix
> >> in
> >> his messages, He has now got them down to where a normal person can read
> >> them and not be bamboozled by them. Don't believe me? Go back on this
> >> newsgroup and read his messages where he takes Ed Gin to task by going on
> >> and on to such an extent that no one in their right mind could ever read
> >> them. He did this to Tom Sherman and myself too, but I think he has
> >> finally
> >> come to realize that overkill is far worse than underkill.
>
> >> Now he needs to work on his content more since he has finally gotten his
> >> form into shape. All that is required for content is that you think
> >> before
> >> you write.
>
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> > This is interesting since in another thread (Curt Russel of yland -
> > Asshole Supreme!, Ed writes ... "The trick in writing in order to be
> > understood is to run it past an idiot. If the idiot understands what
> > you have written, then you have written well. If the idiot does
> > understand what you have written, then it is back to the old drawing
> > " Then in this post he uses the rather uncommon word prolix. He
> > could just as well have just the term he often used in the past ...
> > long-winded. Ed can't seem to make up his mind about my writing
> > skills, not that it matters, but, in the thread referred to above,
> > here is what I wrote in this regard. Much like a politician, Ed Dolan
> > contradicts himself constantly, changing his mind with the change in
> > prevailing winds. Here is what Ed wrote of my writing talents in the
> > past ... "Jim, I am saving your post to My Documents. It is a
> > masterpiece! I admire your style enormously. I am taking notes and
> > hope someday to be able to emulate you." Please also note that Ede
> > addressed me directly something for which e has castigated me over
> > and over stating that one should not write directly to another since
> > the world can read what is written here. Obviously Ed doesn't even
> > play by his "own set of rules". The man is a walking talking
> > contradiction. The conundrum continues.
>
> There is no conundrum except in your mind. Anyone can occasionally write
> something good, The trick is to write something good consistently. You are a
> far better writer now then you were in the past. Trust me on this, long-
> windedness is not appreciated by anyone on Usenet.
>
> Jim McNaa now needs to work more on paragraph construction as he has a
> tendency to run everything together.
Ed Dolan needs to work on a much more difficult problem to
resolve ...his denial. In the greater scheme of things, his opinion
matters not because he matters not. He is insignificant, irrelevant
and has yet to come to grips with this realization. It must be
comforting for him to live in a world unhampered and unrestricted by
reality.
> It is OK to address someone personally if what you write also makes sense to
> other readers. Never confuse Usenet with email.
>
> > P.S. Ed is pleonastic in his writing. In providing an explanation,
> > I'll not give Ed the opportunity to bitch. Pleonastic is defined as
> > tediously prolonged reiteration of the same concept in different
> > words. Dolan's picture ought to be next to that word in the
> > dictionary..
>
> Repetition is the key to all learning. But in any event, leave the looking
> up of new words to the juvenile set. We are both too old for that kind of
> nonsense.
No matter how many times it is repeated that we need hear nothing more
from you and no matter how many times it is repeated that you should
depart, you fail to get the message. Since repetition is the key to
all learning, I can only conclude that you have a learning disorder.
What we have all learned from you is that we are in need of no more of
your monotonous, regurgitated, repetitious drivel. With each post you
replenish your identity as ARBR's quintessential TROLL in residence!
Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 17 Apr 2007 03:26:31
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1176644209.240123.272710@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Ed Dolan needs to work on a much more difficult problem to
> resolve ...his denial. In the greater scheme of things, his opinion
> matters not because he matters not. He is insignificant, irrelevant
> and has yet to come to grips with this realization. It must be
> comforting for him to live in a world unhampered and unrestricted by
> reality.
Others enjoy my messages. Jim McNaa does not because I have offended his
delicate ego one too many times. His world revolves around himself - ever
the problem of those who are not able to take the big view of things.
[...]
> No matter how many times it is repeated that we need hear nothing more
> from you and no matter how many times it is repeated that you should
> depart, you fail to get the message. Since repetition is the key to
> all learning, I can only conclude that you have a learning disorder.
> What we have all learned from you is that we are in need of no more of
> your monotonous, regurgitated, repetitious drivel. With each post you
> replenish your identity as ARBR's quintessential TROLL in residence!
Ed Dolan the Great is not only all-knowing but also all-wise. Too bad a
pip-squeak like Jim McNaa will never be able to appreciate One so Great
as Myself!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 08 Apr 2007 09:16:56
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On Apr 7, 6:40 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175559104.280740.178760@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 1, 12:18 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of taking
> >> instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through life
> >> with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel sorry
> >> for
> >> him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
> >> computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human wisdom,
> >> ever
> >> the downfall of lesser intellects.
>
> > Raw innate intelligence is not measure of accumulated knowledge.
> > Consequently, unlike Dolan, I realize that I can learn from others
> > regardless of intellectual capacity. As concerns Dolan being a
> > superior intellect, this is just another example of an opinion stated
> > as fact ... a stigma and eark of the lesser intellect. Actually, I
> > have learned much from Mr. Dolan. I have learned that he is what he
> > is and he is something I would never want to become.
>
> McNaa has learned from my instructions to him to stop being so prolix in
> his messages, He has now got them down to where a normal person can read
> them and not be bamboozled by them. Don't believe me? Go back on this
> newsgroup and read his messages where he takes Ed Gin to task by going on
> and on to such an extent that no one in their right mind could ever read
> them. He did this to Tom Sherman and myself too, but I think he has finally
> come to realize that overkill is far worse than underkill.
>
> Now he needs to work on his content more since he has finally gotten his
> form into shape. All that is required for content is that you think before
> you write.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
This is interesting since in another thread (Curt Russel of yland -
Asshole Supreme!, Ed writes ... "The trick in writing in order to be
understood is to run it past an idiot. If the idiot understands what
you have written, then you have written well. If the idiot does
understand what you have written, then it is back to the old drawing
" Then in this post he uses the rather uncommon word prolix. He
could just as well have just the term he often used in the past ...
long-winded. Ed can't seem to make up his mind about my writing
skills, not that it matters, but, in the thread referred to above,
here is what I wrote in this regard. Much like a politician, Ed Dolan
contradicts himself constantly, changing his mind with the change in
prevailing winds. Here is what Ed wrote of my writing talents in the
past ... "Jim, I am saving your post to My Documents. It is a
masterpiece! I admire your style enormously. I am taking notes and
hope someday to be able to emulate you." Please also note that Ede
addressed me directly something for which e has castigated me over
and over stating that one should not write directly to another since
the world can read what is written here. Obviously Ed doesn't even
play by his "own set of rules". The man is a walking talking
contradiction. The conundrum continues.
Jim McNaa
P.S. Ed is pleonastic in his writing. In providing an explanation,
I'll not give Ed the opportunity to bitch. Pleonastic is defined as
tediously prolonged reiteration of the same concept in different
words. Dolan's picture ought to be next to that word in the
dictionary..
|
| | |
Date: 13 Apr 2007 05:22:56
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1176049016.874235.257680@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 7, 6:40 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1175559104.280740.178760@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 1,
>> 12:18 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>
>> >> What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of
>> >> taking
>> >> instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through
>> >> life
>> >> with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel
>> >> sorry
>> >> for
>> >> him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
>> >> computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human
>> >> wisdom,
>> >> ever
>> >> the downfall of lesser intellects.
>>
>> > Raw innate intelligence is not measure of accumulated knowledge.
>> > Consequently, unlike Dolan, I realize that I can learn from others
>> > regardless of intellectual capacity. As concerns Dolan being a
>> > superior intellect, this is just another example of an opinion stated
>> > as fact ... a stigma and eark of the lesser intellect. Actually, I
>> > have learned much from Mr. Dolan. I have learned that he is what he
>> > is and he is something I would never want to become.
>>
>> McNaa has learned from my instructions to him to stop being so prolix
>> in
>> his messages, He has now got them down to where a normal person can read
>> them and not be bamboozled by them. Don't believe me? Go back on this
>> newsgroup and read his messages where he takes Ed Gin to task by going on
>> and on to such an extent that no one in their right mind could ever read
>> them. He did this to Tom Sherman and myself too, but I think he has
>> finally
>> come to realize that overkill is far worse than underkill.
>>
>> Now he needs to work on his content more since he has finally gotten his
>> form into shape. All that is required for content is that you think
>> before
>> you write.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> This is interesting since in another thread (Curt Russel of yland -
> Asshole Supreme!, Ed writes ... "The trick in writing in order to be
> understood is to run it past an idiot. If the idiot understands what
> you have written, then you have written well. If the idiot does
> understand what you have written, then it is back to the old drawing
> " Then in this post he uses the rather uncommon word prolix. He
> could just as well have just the term he often used in the past ...
> long-winded. Ed can't seem to make up his mind about my writing
> skills, not that it matters, but, in the thread referred to above,
> here is what I wrote in this regard. Much like a politician, Ed Dolan
> contradicts himself constantly, changing his mind with the change in
> prevailing winds. Here is what Ed wrote of my writing talents in the
> past ... "Jim, I am saving your post to My Documents. It is a
> masterpiece! I admire your style enormously. I am taking notes and
> hope someday to be able to emulate you." Please also note that Ede
> addressed me directly something for which e has castigated me over
> and over stating that one should not write directly to another since
> the world can read what is written here. Obviously Ed doesn't even
> play by his "own set of rules". The man is a walking talking
> contradiction. The conundrum continues.
There is no conundrum except in your mind. Anyone can occasionally write
something good, The trick is to write something good consistently. You are a
far better writer now then you were in the past. Trust me on this, long-
windedness is not appreciated by anyone on Usenet.
Jim McNaa now needs to work more on paragraph construction as he has a
tendency to run everything together.
It is OK to address someone personally if what you write also makes sense to
other readers. Never confuse Usenet with email.
> P.S. Ed is pleonastic in his writing. In providing an explanation,
> I'll not give Ed the opportunity to bitch. Pleonastic is defined as
> tediously prolonged reiteration of the same concept in different
> words. Dolan's picture ought to be next to that word in the
> dictionary..
Repetition is the key to all learning. But in any event, leave the looking
up of new words to the juvenile set. We are both too old for that kind of
nonsense.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 02 Apr 2007 17:11:44
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On Apr 1, 12:18 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175400834.029617.270040@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 30, 11:09 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175308763.165259.69390@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> >> > Ed,
>
> >> Not necessary to address me personally since the whole world can read
> >> this.
> >> Usenet is not email.
>
> >> > Your name isn't "Hoyle" and you neither make nor enforce the rules
>
> >> > here.
>
> >> > Jim McNaa
>
> >> > P.S. One man's condemnation is another man's whining. Go ahead whine
> >> > about top posting and addressing you personally when allegedly the
> >> > whole world reads this. Who gives a shit?!?!?!
>
> >> Jim McNaa has clearly lost it. But then I often have this effect on
> >> those
> >> who dare to take me on. I am not known as Ed Dolan the Great for nothing
> >> and
> >> I am also a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
>
> > As predicted in my P.S., Ed Dolan whined about top posting and
> > addressing him personally when the whole world reads this, but I
> > forgot to add that he would also make a comment about Usenet not being
> > email, but that's a given anyways. The man is so predictable as to be
> > monotonous. There's no creativity left in the geriatric grumbler.
>
> What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of taking
> instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through life
> with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel sorry for
> him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
> computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human wisdom, ever
> the downfall of lesser intellects.
Raw innate intelligence is not measure of accumulated knowledge.
Consequently, unlike Dolan, I realize that I can learn from others
regardless of intellectual capacity. As concerns Dolan being a
superior intellect, this is just another example of an opinion stated
as fact ... a stigma and eark of the lesser intellect. Actually, I
have learned much from Mr. Dolan. I have learned that he is what he
is and he is something I would never want to become.
Jim
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> >> > On 29, 8:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >> >>news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> >> >> >> > Tom,
>
> >> >> >> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa
> >> >> >> has
> >> >> >> never
> >> >> >> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>
> >> >> > Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the
> >> >> > entire
> >> >> > world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all
> >> >> > who
> >> >> > are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
> >> >> > delusional fool.
>
> >> >> ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
> >> >> Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will
> >> >> know
> >> >> English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
>
> >> >> Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
>
> >> >> > difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
> >> >> > individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
> >> >> > restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
> >> >> > differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
> >> >> > acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
> >> >> > others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
> >> >> > will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
>
> >> >> It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one
> >> >> person.
> >> >> Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in
> >> >> mind
> >> >> and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>
> >> >> >> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many
> >> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
> >> >> >> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here
> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> > in
> >> >> >> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been
> >> >> >> > reclassified
> >> >> >> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent
> >> >> >> > expert
> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since
> >> >> >> > you've
> >> >> >> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you
> >> >> >> > sounds
> >> >> >> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless
> >> >> >> > others
> >> >> >> > ...
> >> >> >> > countless others who could care less because in the greater
> >> >> >> > scheme
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself
> >> >> >> > matters
> >> >> >> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will
> >> >> >> > be
> >> >> >> > no
> >> >> >> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>
> >> >> >> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity)
> >> >> >> by
> >> >> >> his
> >> >> >> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said
> >> >> >> anything
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very
> >> >> >> unfunny
> >> >> >> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and
> >> >> >> forgotten
> >> >> >> about.
> >> >> >> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all
> >> >> >> but
> >> >> >> himself.
>
> >> >> > I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
> >> >> > opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
> >> >> > from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed
> >> >> > simply
> >> >> > matters not in the least.
>
> >> >> Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and
> >> >> I
> >> >> doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have
> >> >> always
> >> >> been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of
> >> >> this
> >> >> newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>
> >> >> >> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old
> >> >> >> shit
> >> >> >> over
> >> >> >> and over.
>
> >> >> > Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
> >> >> > without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
> >> >> > old tired crap.
>
> >> >> But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>
> >> >> >> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
> >> >> >> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither
> >> >> >> one
> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>
> >> >> > Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on
> >> >> > Usenet.
>
> >> >> I never whine - I just condemn.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Apr 2007 18:40:28
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1175559104.280740.178760@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 1, 12:18 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of taking
>> instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through life
>> with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel sorry
>> for
>> him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
>> computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human wisdom,
>> ever
>> the downfall of lesser intellects.
>
> Raw innate intelligence is not measure of accumulated knowledge.
> Consequently, unlike Dolan, I realize that I can learn from others
> regardless of intellectual capacity. As concerns Dolan being a
> superior intellect, this is just another example of an opinion stated
> as fact ... a stigma and eark of the lesser intellect. Actually, I
> have learned much from Mr. Dolan. I have learned that he is what he
> is and he is something I would never want to become.
McNaa has learned from my instructions to him to stop being so prolix in
his messages, He has now got them down to where a normal person can read
them and not be bamboozled by them. Don't believe me? Go back on this
newsgroup and read his messages where he takes Ed Gin to task by going on
and on to such an extent that no one in their right mind could ever read
them. He did this to Tom Sherman and myself too, but I think he has finally
come to realize that overkill is far worse than underkill.
Now he needs to work on his content more since he has finally gotten his
form into shape. All that is required for content is that you think before
you write.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 31 Mar 2007 21:13:54
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On 30, 11:09 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175308763.165259.69390@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > Ed,
>
> Not necessary to address me personally since the whole world can read this.
> Usenet is not email.
>
> > Your name isn't "Hoyle" and you neither make nor enforce the rules
>
> > here.
>
> > Jim McNaa
>
> > P.S. One man's condemnation is another man's whining. Go ahead whine
> > about top posting and addressing you personally when allegedly the
> > whole world reads this. Who gives a shit?!?!?!
>
> Jim McNaa has clearly lost it. But then I often have this effect on those
> who dare to take me on. I am not known as Ed Dolan the Great for nothing and
> I am also a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
As predicted in my P.S., Ed Dolan whined about top posting and
addressing him personally when the whole world reads this, but I
forgot to add that he would also make a comment about Usenet not being
email, but that's a given anyways. The man is so predictable as to be
monotonous. There's no creativity left in the geriatric grumbler.
Jim McNaa
> > On 29, 8:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> >> >> > Tom,
>
> >> >> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has
> >> >> never
> >> >> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>
> >> > Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the entire
> >> > world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all who
> >> > are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
> >> > delusional fool.
>
> >> ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
> >> Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will know
> >> English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
>
> >> Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
>
> >> > difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
> >> > individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so is
> >> > acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
> >> > restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
> >> > differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
> >> > acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
> >> > others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
> >> > will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
>
> >> It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one
> >> person.
> >> Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in
> >> mind
> >> and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>
> >> >> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
> >> >> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
> >> >> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and
> >> >> > in
> >> >> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
> >> >> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
> >> >> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since
> >> >> > you've
> >> >> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you
> >> >> > sounds
> >> >> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others
> >> >> > ...
> >> >> > countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
> >> >> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be
> >> >> > no
> >> >> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>
> >> >> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by
> >> >> his
> >> >> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything
> >> >> that
> >> >> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very
> >> >> unfunny
> >> >> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten
> >> >> about.
> >> >> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
> >> >> himself.
>
> >> > I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
> >> > opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
> >> > from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed simply
> >> > matters not in the least.
>
> >> Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and I
> >> doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have
> >> always
> >> been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of
> >> this
> >> newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>
> >> >> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit
> >> >> over
> >> >> and over.
>
> >> > Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
> >> > without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
> >> > old tired crap.
>
> >> But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>
> >> >> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
> >> >> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither
> >> >> one
> >> >> of
> >> >> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>
> >> > Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on Usenet.
>
> >> I never whine - I just condemn.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Apr 2007 00:18:21
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1175400834.029617.270040@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 30, 11:09 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1175308763.165259.69390@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>>
>> > Ed,
>>
>> Not necessary to address me personally since the whole world can read
>> this.
>> Usenet is not email.
>>
>> > Your name isn't "Hoyle" and you neither make nor enforce the rules
>>
>> > here.
>>
>> > Jim McNaa
>>
>> > P.S. One man's condemnation is another man's whining. Go ahead whine
>> > about top posting and addressing you personally when allegedly the
>> > whole world reads this. Who gives a shit?!?!?!
>>
>> Jim McNaa has clearly lost it. But then I often have this effect on
>> those
>> who dare to take me on. I am not known as Ed Dolan the Great for nothing
>> and
>> I am also a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
>
> As predicted in my P.S., Ed Dolan whined about top posting and
> addressing him personally when the whole world reads this, but I
> forgot to add that he would also make a comment about Usenet not being
> email, but that's a given anyways. The man is so predictable as to be
> monotonous. There's no creativity left in the geriatric grumbler.
What is totally predictable is that Jim McNaa is incapable of taking
instruction from his superiors. It must be god awful to go through life
with a chip on your shoulder the size of a concrete block. I feel sorry for
him. He could learn much from me just as I learned much from him about
computers. Jim McNaa confuses technical knowledge with human wisdom, ever
the downfall of lesser intellects.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>> > On 29, 8:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>>
>> >> >> > Tom,
>>
>> >> >> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa
>> >> >> has
>> >> >> never
>> >> >> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>>
>> >> > Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the
>> >> > entire
>> >> > world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all
>> >> > who
>> >> > are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
>> >> > delusional fool.
>>
>> >> ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
>> >> Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will
>> >> know
>> >> English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
>>
>> >> Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
>>
>> >> > difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
>> >> > individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so
>> >> > is
>> >> > acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
>> >> > restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
>> >> > differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
>> >> > acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
>> >> > others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
>> >> > will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
>>
>> >> It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one
>> >> person.
>> >> Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in
>> >> mind
>> >> and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>>
>> >> >> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
>> >> >> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been
>> >> >> > reclassified
>> >> >> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent
>> >> >> > expert
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since
>> >> >> > you've
>> >> >> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you
>> >> >> > sounds
>> >> >> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless
>> >> >> > others
>> >> >> > ...
>> >> >> > countless others who could care less because in the greater
>> >> >> > scheme
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself
>> >> >> > matters
>> >> >> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will
>> >> >> > be
>> >> >> > no
>> >> >> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>>
>> >> >> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity)
>> >> >> by
>> >> >> his
>> >> >> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said
>> >> >> anything
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very
>> >> >> unfunny
>> >> >> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and
>> >> >> forgotten
>> >> >> about.
>> >> >> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all
>> >> >> but
>> >> >> himself.
>>
>> >> > I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
>> >> > opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
>> >> > from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed
>> >> > simply
>> >> > matters not in the least.
>>
>> >> Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and
>> >> I
>> >> doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have
>> >> always
>> >> been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of
>> >> this
>> >> newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>>
>> >> >> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old
>> >> >> shit
>> >> >> over
>> >> >> and over.
>>
>> >> > Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
>> >> > without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
>> >> > old tired crap.
>>
>> >> But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>>
>> >> >> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
>> >> >> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither
>> >> >> one
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>>
>> >> > Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on
>> >> > Usenet.
>>
>> >> I never whine - I just condemn.
>
>
|
| |
Date: 30 Mar 2007 19:39:23
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
Ed,
Your name isn't "Hoyle" and you neither make nor enforce the rules
here.
Jim McNaa
P.S. One man's condemnation is another man's whining. Go ahead whine
about top posting and addressing yoy personally when allegedly the
whole world reads this. Who gives a shit?!?!?!
On 29, 8:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> >> > Tom,
>
> >> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has
> >> never
> >> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>
> > Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the entire
> > world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all who
> > are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
> > delusional fool.
>
> ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
> Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will know
> English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
>
> Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
>
> > difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
> > individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so is
> > acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
> > restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
> > differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
> > acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
> > others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
> > will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
>
> It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one person.
> Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in mind
> and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>
>
>
> >> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many that
> >> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
> >> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
> >> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and in
> >> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
> >> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
> >> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert and
> >> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since you've
> >> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you sounds
> >> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others ...
> >> > countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme of
> >> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
> >> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be no
> >> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>
> >> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by
> >> his
> >> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything
> >> that
> >> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very unfunny
> >> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten
> >> about.
> >> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
> >> himself.
>
> > I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
> > opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
> > from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed simply
> > matters not in the least.
>
> Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and I
> doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have always
> been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of this
> newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>
> >> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit
> >> over
> >> and over.
>
> > Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
> > without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
> > old tired crap.
>
> But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>
> >> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
> >> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither one
> >> of
> >> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>
> > Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on Usenet.
>
> I never whine - I just condemn.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 30 Mar 2007 23:09:04
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1175308763.165259.69390@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Ed,
Not necessary to address me personally since the whole world can read this.
Usenet is not email.
> Your name isn't "Hoyle" and you neither make nor enforce the rules
> here.
>
> Jim McNaa
>
> P.S. One man's condemnation is another man's whining. Go ahead whine
> about top posting and addressing yoy personally when allegedly the
> whole world reads this. Who gives a shit?!?!?!
Jim McNaa has clearly lost it. But then I often have this effect on those
who dare to take me on. I am not known as Ed Dolan the Great for nothing and
I am also a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> On 29, 8:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>>
>> >> > Tom,
>>
>> >> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has
>> >> never
>> >> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>>
>> > Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the entire
>> > world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all who
>> > are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
>> > delusional fool.
>>
>> ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
>> Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will know
>> English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
>>
>> Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
>>
>> > difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
>> > individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so is
>> > acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
>> > restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
>> > differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
>> > acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
>> > others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
>> > will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
>>
>> It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one
>> person.
>> Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in
>> mind
>> and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many
>> >> > that
>> >> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
>> >> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
>> >> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and
>> >> > in
>> >> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
>> >> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
>> >> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert
>> >> > and
>> >> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since
>> >> > you've
>> >> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you
>> >> > sounds
>> >> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others
>> >> > ...
>> >> > countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme
>> >> > of
>> >> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
>> >> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be
>> >> > no
>> >> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>>
>> >> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by
>> >> his
>> >> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything
>> >> that
>> >> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very
>> >> unfunny
>> >> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten
>> >> about.
>> >> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
>> >> himself.
>>
>> > I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
>> > opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
>> > from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed simply
>> > matters not in the least.
>>
>> Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and I
>> doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have
>> always
>> been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of
>> this
>> newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>>
>> >> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit
>> >> over
>> >> and over.
>>
>> > Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
>> > without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
>> > old tired crap.
>>
>> But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>>
>> >> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
>> >> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither
>> >> one
>> >> of
>> >> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>>
>> > Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on Usenet.
>>
>> I never whine - I just condemn.
>
|
| |
Date: 29 Mar 2007 18:24:23
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > Tom,
>
> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has never
> learned how Usenet differs from email.
Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the entire
world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all who
are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
delusional fool. Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so is
acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many that
> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and in
> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert and
> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since you've
> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you sounds
> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others ...
> > countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme of
> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be no
> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>
> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by his
> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything that
> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very unfunny
> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten about.
> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
> himself.
I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed simply
matters not in the least.
> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit over
> and over.
Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
old tired crap.
> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither one of
> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on Usenet.
> I leave the both of them in the dust like the barking dogs that they are. Ed
> Dolan the Great moves on like Don Quixote, the knight of the doleful
> countenance, to ever great glory and redound.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> > On 26, 10:13 pm, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
> > <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On 26, 8:53 pm, Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
>
> >> > ...He will now learn what it
> >> > is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>
> >> Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
> >> player.
|
| | |
Date: 29 Mar 2007 20:45:19
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1175217863.411108.230650@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 28, 5:04 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>>
>> > Tom,
>>
>> All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has
>> never
>> learned how Usenet differs from email.
>
> Opinion stated as fact. Ed still mistakenly believes that the entire
> world reads ARBR as though English were the only language and all who
> are fluent in English are interested in what goes on here ... what a
> delusional fool.
ARBR is only read by a few hundred English language folks at best. Any
Europeans not English and any others in the world on this group will know
English at least as well as Jim McNaa.
Ed has never accepted the fact that I comprehend the
> difference between Usenet and email. It is not uncommon for
> individuals to address one another in a newsgroup forum an doing so is
> acceptable to all but the dunderhead Dolan whose constraining,
> restrictive definition of what constitutes, delineates and
> differentiates Usenet from email precludes what is generally
> acceptable, that is ... addressing an individual directly. Sure
> others (though not the whole world) will read this and none but one
> will object, the one whose objection carries the least weight.
It is never acceptable to write a message to a newsgroup to just one person.
Others will read what is written and therefore one should keep this in mind
and be inclusive, not exclusive.
>> > Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many that
>> > preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
>> > revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
>> > embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and in
>> > the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
>> > garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
>> > from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert and
>> > Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since you've
>> > read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you sounds
>> > so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others ...
>> > countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme of
>> > things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
>> > not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be no
>> > meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
>>
>> Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by
>> his
>> incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything
>> that
>> anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very unfunny
>> clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten
>> about.
>> Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
>> himself.
>
> I doubt that Tom Sherman could care any less with regard to Ed's
> opinion of him. People value opinions of people that they value and
> from what Tom has recently written, it is quite obvious that Ed simply
> matters not in the least.
Actually, Tom Sherman has cared in the past what I thought of him and I
doubt that anything has changed. After all, I am the same as I have always
been. But Tom Sherman has changed. He has become the resident fool of this
newsgroup. He has become a trivial nonentity.
>> Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit
>> over
>> and over.
>
> Well this is an interesting observation coming from the one who is
> without peers when it comes to recycling and regurgitating the same
> old tired crap.
But I do it with intelligence and you do it with dumbness!
>> But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
>> Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither one
>> of
>> them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
>
> Yep ... great for sure ... the greatest whiner of all time on Usenet.
I never whine - I just condemn.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 06:36:51
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
Tom,
Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many that
preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and in
the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert and
Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since you've
read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you sounds
so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others ...
countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme of
things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be no
meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
Jim
On 26, 10:13 pm, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
<sunsetss0...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> On 26, 8:53 pm, Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
>
> > ...He will now learn what it
> > is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>
> Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
> player.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> "I warned you, but did you listen to me? Oh, no, you knew it all,
> didn't you? Oh, it's just a harmless little bunny, isn't it? Well,
> it's always the same. I always tell them..." - Tim the Enchanter
|
| | |
Date: 28 Mar 2007 17:04:41
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1175089011.221779.82570@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Tom,
All the world will read this, not just Tom. But poor Jim McNaa has never
learned how Usenet differs from email.
> Tis about time that Dolan admitted you into the ranks of the many that
> preceded you. Welcome. It appears now that Ed has no one else to
> revere except himself, but that should come as no surprise. The
> embittered old curmudgeon is driven to insult all who post here and in
> the process he alienates the very audience from whom he expects to
> garner attention and recognition. Tom, you have been reclassified
> from your previous stature as Mr. ARBR himself, a recumbent expert and
> Ed's only worthy cerebral adversary to ... well you know since you've
> read all of Dolan's crap yourself. Much of what Ed said of you sounds
> so familiar since it has also been said of me and countless others ...
> countless others who could care less because in the greater scheme of
> things, what Dolan says matters simply because Dolan himself matters
> not. If and when he ever comes to this realization, there will be no
> meaning left in his otherwise meaningless life.
Tom Sherman has reduced himself to his present status (a nonentity) by his
incredibly stupid and trivial posts. In fact, he has not said anything that
anyone would want to read in the past year. He is now only a very unfunny
clown. In short, a sad case that had best to filed away and forgotten about.
Why he continues to hang around this newsgroup is a mystery to all but
himself.
Jim McNaa is nothing but a broken phonograph record - same old shit over
and over. But the one thing he can never overcome is his whininess. Tom
Sherman is an asshole but Jim McNaa is a whinny asshole. Neither one of
them is worthy of so Great a personage as Myself.
I leave the both of them in the dust like the barking dogs that they are. Ed
Dolan the Great moves on like Don Quixote, the knight of the doleful
countenance, to ever great glory and redound.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> On 26, 10:13 pm, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
> <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 26, 8:53 pm, Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
>>
>> > ...He will now learn what it
>> > is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>>
>> Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
>> player.
|
| |
Date: 26 Mar 2007 20:13:59
From: Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On 26, 8:53 pm, Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
> ...He will now learn what it
> is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
player.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"I warned you, but did you listen to me? Oh, no, you knew it all,
didn't you? Oh, it's just a harmless little bunny, isn't it? Well,
it's always the same. I always tell them..." - Tim the Enchanter
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 15:35:44
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1174965238.983519.18300@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> On 26, 8:53 pm, Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
>> ...He will now learn what it
>> is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>
> Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
> player.
It means I am going to treat you with the contempt you have earned for
yourself with your trivial, meaningless reks to this newsgroup. You show
nothing but contempt for the group when you so post. What you sow, so shall
you reap.
I will now step on your posts regardless of subject so that you will learn
what it is like to be treated the way your good buddy Johnny NoCom (Ed Gin)
treated everyone else here on ARBR some time ago. Enjoy!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 10:10:39
From: Curtis L. Russell
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
On 26 2007 20:13:59 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
<sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote:
>> ...He will now learn what it
>> is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>
>Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
>player.
We are seeing Ed Dolan at his highest point. After a life of being a
pissant that everyone about him ignored, he has found a 'life' that he
can imagine as larger than it is. Any sane person would have a fantasy
life that included someone on the spectrum from Ann gret to
Catherine Zeta Jones, but ED has only himself as the unmasked avenger.
He wasted his life and now he wastes his fantasy life. No one tell him
that it is pretty hard to worry about a foul mouthed pissant.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Mar 2007 15:45:19
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Tom Sherman - Nonentity Par Excellence!
|
"Curtis L. Russell" <curtis@md-bicycling.org > wrote in message
news:159i03tl3c3tfkgglik989ad3r8eghsm43@4ax.com...
> On 26 2007 20:13:59 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
> <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> ...He will now learn what it
>>> is to have an unrelenting enemy on this group who gives no quarter.
>>
>>Mr. Ed giving no quarter must mean he is tired of being a two-bit
>>player.
>
> We are seeing Ed Dolan at his highest point. After a life of being a
> pissant that everyone about him ignored, he has found a 'life' that he
> can imagine as larger than it is. Any sane person would have a fantasy
> life that included someone on the spectrum from Ann gret to
> Catherine Zeta Jones, but ED has only himself as the unmasked avenger.
Anyone want to take Curtis Russell as an arbiter on pop culture, let alone
sex objects?
> He wasted his life and now he wastes his fantasy life. No one tell him
> that it is pretty hard to worry about a foul mouthed pissant.
Tom Sherman is foul mouthed is his way; I shall be foul mouthed in my way.
Previously posted, but more applicable than ever:
"Curtis Russell has kill-filed me and does not read any of my messages in
the
original. Yet, he sees fit to make comments about me. Just how reprehensible
can one get? He is nothing but another Cletus Lee.
But Curtis knows no bounds. He likes to speculate on my death as if he is
not going to die himself. I assure him that he is going to die and as far as
I am concerned, the sooner the better. I simply can't stand those who want
to comment on messages yet never read the original messages nor quote them.
Just how big a scoundrel is it possible to be!
Scoundrels like Curtis Russell are beneath contempt. He kill-files and so he
does
not know what is going on in the group and yet he wants to comment himself.
Just how
despicable can you get?" - Ed Dolan
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
