| |
Main
Date: 13 Sep 2006 21:26:15
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to be
a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with brainless
repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a nice
guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former clubbiness.
The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be if we would
all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort and encourage all
of you to look to your better natures. After all, there is no one here but
us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would agree.
I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men and
therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was like when
we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because we all have
one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery cusses all the
time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get some women involved
in this group as they have altogether gentler and kinder natures. Yea, that
is the problem all right - nothing but crusty old men who hate one another
and mostly just hate themselves.
I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live up
to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they are
just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Sep 2006 15:32:09
From:
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Joao wrote:
> I like the BROL boards, but I also like the idea of an unmoderated
> forum. Sometimes I may want to speak my mind in ways that would sure
> cause trouble over there. There have been cases where Bryan received
> legal threats for stuff others posted to the board, and I don't want to
> contribute to that. There is also the whole issue of decentralization.
> Back in the pre-dolan days, most people knew that this was the place
> to discuss all matters of related to recumbency. Now we have BROL which
> for obvious reasons must be moderated, and we also have different web
> forums for different manufacturers and even models. Easy Racers,
> Bacchetta, RANS, and many other manufacturers used to hold their
> discussions right here, but they now all have their own little
> discussion boards. One had a better interaction with owners of
> different bikes back when all the discussion was centralized.
I agree that an unmoderated forum is preferred, but we have a
father/son duo that pretty much ruined this place. In addition we have
some other babies who seem to like to agitate the father/son combo and
that has helped cause the destruction of ARBR.
In the few recumbent posts here since the father/son duo took over I
really haven't seen a recumbent post that would have been censured on
BROL.
> Additionally, there is the issue of accessibility. If you go to Google
> Groups and type "recumbent" or "recumbents", this is the group that
> shows up. For new people, or people just not too familiar with BROL,
> this group is a lot easier to find.
That is why every so often when I come here I mention BROL (
www.bentrideronline.com/messageboard ). Because of the degradation of
this board most will find more complete answers to their problems
there.
> Another advantage is that USENET is based on a protocol rather than
> located in a server. If for any reason the BROL server goes down,
> either due to a technical or financial or natural disaster or even legal
> issue, the board is gone. This cannot happen with
> alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent. As long as the internet as a whole
> continues to support the NNTP protocol, this group will continue to exist.
>
> I'm sure Ed Dolan must feel really proud for being such an incredible
> asshole that nobody wants to deal with him. He is like the drunken guy
> who walks into a bar and starts screaming and yelling at everyone's
> face, and then wonders why everybody left, without ever realizing that
> his behavior is what needs fixing, not the rest of the world.
Sure have to agree with the above!
Enjoy,
Perry B
|
| | |
Date: 19 Sep 2006 04:50:50
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
<perryb67@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158618729.429816.130880@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> I agree that an unmoderated forum is preferred, but we have a
> father/son duo that pretty much ruined this place. In addition we have
> some other babies who seem to like to agitate the father/son combo and
> that has helped cause the destruction of ARBR.
>
> In the few recumbent posts here since the father/son duo took over I
> really haven't seen a recumbent post that would have been censured on
> BROL.
[...]
Before Perry Butler of Alexandria, Minnesota left this group for greener
pastures, he proved himself a complete asshole. That is why I say good
riddance to him. But if he wants to show up here on occasion and advise
others to get over to BROL I am all for it. We do not want those types here.
They are like infants and need someone to baby sit them. The rough and
tumble world of Usenet is not for them.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Oct 2006 09:31:15
From: Tex
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net > wrote in message
<snip >
Welcome to the killfile.....
|
| | | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2006 18:50:36
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com > wrote in message
news:452b6862$1@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
> <snip>
Too cowardly to even post my message!
> Welcome to the killfile.....
It is an honor to be in the killfile of a nonentity like you (Tex?). Why on
earth would I ever want to communicate with idiots. Nay, My Greatness will
not permit it!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 08:44:55
From: Captain
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158361696.496099.320750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> [newsgroups restored]
>
> > perryb67@yahoo.com aka Perry Butler wrote:
> >> Joao,
> >>
> >> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
> >
> > If you like being babysat by a net nanny.
> >
> >> The only people constantly posting here are closet Ed/Tom lovers.
> >
> > People on other groups (e.g. rec.bicycles.tech) don't run away because
> > [of]
> > a few flame wars. Sheesh!
>
> Yes, Tom is quite right about this. Hell Bells, flame wars are often the
> only thing that engages my interest. There is nothing finer in this world
> than throwing a few good insults back and forth.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
"An occasional bomb thrown at the King is good for him."- Salvador Dali
|
| |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 07:03:43
From: Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
> ...
> By the way, Mr. Byron Ball of BROL...
Who is Byron (sic) Ball?
--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 17:55:55
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158501823.247796.220290@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate wrote:
>> ...
>> By the way, Mr. Byron Ball of BROL...
>
> Who is Byron (sic) Ball?
I always have Lord Byron on the brain as a result of having read his
complete works when I was a teenager. You never recover from something like
that.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 16:08:16
From: Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
perryb67@yahoo.com aka Perry Butler wrote:
> Joao,
>
> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
If you like being babysat by a net nanny.
> The only people constantly posting here are closet Ed/Tom lovers.
People on other groups (e.g. rec.bicycles.tech) don't run away because
a few flame wars. Sheesh!
--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.
I am supporting cannibalism by eating more nuts.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 04:55:54
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158361696.496099.320750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[newsgroups restored]
> perryb67@yahoo.com aka Perry Butler wrote:
>> Joao,
>>
>> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
>
> If you like being babysat by a net nanny.
>
>> The only people constantly posting here are closet Ed/Tom lovers.
>
> People on other groups (e.g. rec.bicycles.tech) don't run away because
> [of]
> a few flame wars. Sheesh!
Yes, Tom is quite right about this. Hell Bells, flame wars are often the
only thing that engages my interest. There is nothing finer in this world
than throwing a few good insults back and forth.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 14:56:42
From:
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Joao,
Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
The only people constantly posting here are closet Ed/Tom lovers.
Enjoy,
Perry B
Fergus Falls
Joao wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >
> > Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>
> Yes, the days when we used to discuss recumbent bikes are gone. The
> days when we could put aside our differences and discuss our common
> interest in a civil manner are gone. The days where we could meet our
> fellow riders, and setup rides together with other members of the group
> are gone. The days when we could discuss recumbent cycling directly
> with many of the leading manufacturers and top people in the industry
> are gone. All thanks to you.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 04:29:10
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
<perryb67@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1158357402.561653.74770@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
[newsgroups restored]
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Joao,
>
> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
>
> The only people constantly posting here are closet Ed/Tom lovers.
>
> Enjoy,
>
> Perry B
> Fergus Falls
It was indeed a joyous day for ARBR when Perry Butler of Alexandria,
Minnesota finally found a home on BROL. He was always one of the dullest
clods ever to infest ARBR. Good riddance to him! Prior to his leaving this
group he had become nothing but a blood sucking leech and a stalker, the
most pitiful of all Usenet creatures.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Joao wrote:
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >
>> > Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>>
>> Yes, the days when we used to discuss recumbent bikes are gone. The
>> days when we could put aside our differences and discuss our common
>> interest in a civil manner are gone. The days where we could meet our
>> fellow riders, and setup rides together with other members of the group
>> are gone. The days when we could discuss recumbent cycling directly
>> with many of the leading manufacturers and top people in the industry
>> are gone. All thanks to you.
>
|
| | |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 18:40:25
From: Joao
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
perryb67@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
Yes and no.
I like the BROL boards, but I also like the idea of an unmoderated
forum. Sometimes I may want to speak my mind in ways that would sure
cause trouble over there. There have been cases where Bryan received
legal threats for stuff others posted to the board, and I don't want to
contribute to that. There is also the whole issue of decentralization.
Back in the pre-dolan days, most people knew that this was the place
to discuss all matters of related to recumbency. Now we have BROL which
for obvious reasons must be moderated, and we also have different web
forums for different manufacturers and even models. Easy Racers,
Bacchetta, RANS, and many other manufacturers used to hold their
discussions right here, but they now all have their own little
discussion boards. One had a better interaction with owners of
different bikes back when all the discussion was centralized.
Additionally, there is the issue of accessibility. If you go to Google
Groups and type "recumbent" or "recumbents", this is the group that
shows up. For new people, or people just not too familiar with BROL,
this group is a lot easier to find.
Another advantage is that USENET is based on a protocol rather than
located in a server. If for any reason the BROL server goes down,
either due to a technical or financial or natural disaster or even legal
issue, the board is gone. This cannot happen with
alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent. As long as the internet as a whole
continues to support the NNTP protocol, this group will continue to exist.
I'm sure Ed Dolan must feel really proud for being such an incredible
asshole that nobody wants to deal with him. He is like the drunken guy
who walks into a bar and starts screaming and yelling at everyone's
face, and then wonders why everybody left, without ever realizing that
his behavior is what needs fixing, not the rest of the world.
Cheers.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 04:49:22
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Joao"
<this_email_address_was_harvested_from_usenet_for_spamming@allgoodnamesrtaken.com >
wrote in message news:12gmbcjiabdqa36@news.supernews.com...
[newsgroups restored]
> perryb67@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> Actually those days are still here, they're just over at BROL.
>
> Yes and no.
>
> I like the BROL boards, but I also like the idea of an unmoderated forum.
> Sometimes I may want to speak my mind in ways that would sure cause
> trouble over there. There have been cases where Bryan received legal
> threats for stuff others posted to the board, and I don't want to
> contribute to that. There is also the whole issue of decentralization.
> Back in the pre-dolan [pre-Dolan] days, most people knew that this was the
> place to discuss all matters of related to recumbency. Now we have BROL
> which for obvious reasons must be moderated, and we also have different
> web forums for different manufacturers and even models. Easy Racers,
> Bacchetta, RANS, and many other manufacturers used to hold their
> discussions right here, but they now all have their own little discussion
> boards. One had a better interaction with owners of different bikes back
> when all the discussion was centralized.
I can't stand website forum boards. My God, why bother to say anything at
all if you have to guard everything you say. The thought of someone having
any say-so over what I say is repugnant to me in the extreme. For Christ's
sakes, why doesn't everyone just grow up!
> Additionally, there is the issue of accessibility. If you go to Google
> Groups and type "recumbent" or "recumbents", this is the group that shows
> up. For new people, or people just not too familiar with BROL, this group
> is a lot easier to find.
>
> Another advantage is that USENET is based on a protocol rather than
> located in a server. If for any reason the BROL server goes down, either
> due to a technical or financial or natural disaster or even legal issue,
> the board is gone. This cannot happen with alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent.
> As long as the internet as a whole continues to support the NNTP protocol,
> this group will continue to exist.
>
> I'm sure Ed Dolan must feel really proud for being such an incredible
> asshole that nobody wants to deal with him. He is like the drunken guy
> who walks into a bar and starts screaming and yelling at everyone's face,
> and then wonders why everybody left, without ever realizing that his
> behavior is what needs fixing, not the rest of the world.
I NEVER interfere with on-topic messages and I note that Mr. Sherman does
not either. The main thing that others need to realize is that both Mr.
Sherman and I are the quintessential gentlemen. If you can't get along with
us, that means you can't get along with anyone unless you demand that others
agree with you 100% of the time about everything.
Anyone who can't take disagreement, however expressed, should not be on
Usenet in the first place.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2006 10:05:00
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Ed,
The TOP POSTED, terse 3 word answer is ..... YOU ARE HERE!!!
Jim McNaa
Edward Dolan wrote:
> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
> newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to be
> a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with brainless
> repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>
> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a nice
> guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former clubbiness.
> The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be if we would
> all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort and encourage all
> of you to look to your better natures. After all, there is no one here but
> us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would agree.
>
> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men and
> therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was like when
> we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because we all have
> one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery cusses all the
> time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get some women involved
> in this group as they have altogether gentler and kinder natures. Yea, that
> is the problem all right - nothing but crusty old men who hate one another
> and mostly just hate themselves.
>
> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live up
> to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they are
> just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 12:07:09
From: Joao
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
Yes, the days when we used to discuss recumbent bikes are gone. The
days when we could put aside our differences and discuss our common
interest in a civil manner are gone. The days where we could meet our
fellow riders, and setup rides together with other members of the group
are gone. The days when we could discuss recumbent cycling directly
with many of the leading manufacturers and top people in the industry
are gone. All thanks to you.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 04:20:07
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Joao"
<this_email_address_was_harvested_from_usenet_for_spamming@allgoodnamesrtaken.com >
wrote in message news:12givv87sqf4pd2@news.supernews.com...
[newsgroups restored]
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>> Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>
> Yes, the days when we used to discuss recumbent bikes are gone. The days
> when we could put aside our differences and discuss our common interest in
> a civil manner are gone. The days where we could meet our fellow riders,
> and setup rides together with other members of the group are gone. The
> days when we could discuss recumbent cycling directly with many of the
> leading manufacturers and top people in the industry are gone. All thanks
> to you.
All anyone ever had to do to avoid me was to keep their freaking liberal
political views off the newsgroup, but that they were never able to do that
and so I had to take them on. I insist on balance if nothing else.
However, I don't think Joao was ever guilty of any misdeeds on ARBR so I do
feel some empathy for him.
By the way, Mr. Byron Ball of BROL was one of the chief offenders and it was
my delight to take him to the woodshed for a good sound thrashing.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 03:27:01
From: Bill Baka
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
> newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to be
> a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with brainless
> repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>
> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a nice
> guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former clubbiness.
> The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be if we would
> all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort and encourage all
> of you to look to your better natures. After all, there is no one here but
> us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would agree.
I try not to be an ass except in response to 'one' now plonked who was
trying to make a career out of harassing me. Some politics we may
diverge into, but for the most part this should be bike oriented. I
didn't go out today only because by the time I could it was already 80
and headed to 98, not what I want to ride in, especially now when it is
supposed to be cooling down.
>
> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men and
> therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was like when
> we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because we all have
> one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery cusses all the
> time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get some women involved
> in this group as they have altogether gentler and kinder natures. Yea, that
> is the problem all right - nothing but crusty old men who hate one another
> and mostly just hate themselves.
I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back
by all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
>
> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live up
> to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they are
> just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
I would be perfectly happy to have a wife who enjoyed cycling as I do,
but she drives, not rides, cars or motorcycles.
<sigh >
Bill (solo rider) Baka
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 05:12:31
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Bill Baka" <bbaka@syix.com > wrote in message
news:9_3Og.658$Ij.481@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
>> newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to
>> be a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with
>> brainless repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>>
>> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
>> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a
>> nice guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former
>> clubbiness. The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be
>> if we would all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort
>> and encourage all of you to look to your better natures. After all, there
>> is no one here but us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would
>> agree.
>
> I try not to be an ass except in response to 'one' now plonked who was
> trying to make a career out of harassing me. Some politics we may diverge
> into, but for the most part this should be bike oriented. I didn't go out
> today only because by the time I could it was already 80 and headed to 98,
> not what I want to ride in, especially now when it is supposed to be
> cooling down.
Bill, you are a crusty old bastard just the same as I am.
A newsgroup should be at least 75% on-topic and the rest can be in a
psychiatric ward for all I care.
>> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men
>> and therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was
>> like when we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because
>> we all have one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery
>> cusses all the time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get
>> some women involved in this group as they have altogether gentler and
>> kinder natures. Yea, that is the problem all right - nothing but crusty
>> old men who hate one another and mostly just hate themselves.
>
> I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
> somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back by
> all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
If you are over the age of 40, you are old not to say ancient. Did you know
that the average age of the occupants of the Roman catacombs was 23.
>> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
>> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live
>> up to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they
>> are just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
>
> I would be perfectly happy to have a wife who enjoyed cycling as I do, but
> she drives, not rides, cars or motorcycles.
We need some women who will post to these cycling groups so as to moderate
our hatred of one another.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:21:13
From: Bill Baka
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Bill Baka" <bbaka@syix.com> wrote in message
>>> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men
>>> and therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was
>>> like when we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because
>>> we all have one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery
>>> cusses all the time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get
>>> some women involved in this group as they have altogether gentler and
>>> kinder natures. Yea, that is the problem all right - nothing but crusty
>>> old men who hate one another and mostly just hate themselves.
>> I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
>> somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back by
>> all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
>
> If you are over the age of 40, you are old not to say ancient. Did you know
> that the average age of the occupants of the Roman catacombs was 23.
Well then 58 in 2 weeks makes me an antique, but I still love to run at
sprint speed and to stand and attack hills up to a few hundred feet.
That makes me more of an anomaly than an antique. I still have
black/brown hair where my friends even ten years younger have Grey or white.
>
>>> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
>>> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live
>>> up to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they
>>> are just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
>>
Virgin Who? Oh, yeah, that religious thing the wacko believe in. Some of
the women here could care less about what anyone says, so they are not
going to get scared off. My 5 year old grand son has picked up some
trash talk from the other kids he hangs with. It's going downhill when
he gets to say the F word and his mother thinks it's 'cute', I don't.
Bill Baka
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
|
| | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 02:16:35
From: n5hsr
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"Bill Baka" <bbaka@syix.com > wrote in message
news:9_3Og.658$Ij.481@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
>> newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to
>> be a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with
>> brainless repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>>
>> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
>> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a
>> nice guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former
>> clubbiness. The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be
>> if we would all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort
>> and encourage all of you to look to your better natures. After all, there
>> is no one here but us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would
>> agree.
>
> I try not to be an ass except in response to 'one' now plonked who was
> trying to make a career out of harassing me. Some politics we may diverge
> into, but for the most part this should be bike oriented. I didn't go out
> today only because by the time I could it was already 80 and headed to 98,
> not what I want to ride in, especially now when it is supposed to be
> cooling down.
>>
>> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men
>> and therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was
>> like when we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because
>> we all have one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery
>> cusses all the time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get
>> some women involved in this group as they have altogether gentler and
>> kinder natures. Yea, that is the problem all right - nothing but crusty
>> old men who hate one another and mostly just hate themselves.
>
> I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
> somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back by
> all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
>>
>> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
>> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live
>> up to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they
>> are just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
>
> I would be perfectly happy to have a wife who enjoyed cycling as I do, but
> she drives, not rides, cars or motorcycles.
> <sigh>
> Bill (solo rider) Baka
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>
And Ed wonders why I have him on my permanent block list.
Charles of Schaumburg
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 05:16:26
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net > wrote in message
news:uuydnV3RoIHznJTYnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Bill Baka" <bbaka@syix.com> wrote in message
> news:9_3Og.658$Ij.481@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes
>>> this newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It
>>> used to be a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another
>>> with brainless repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>>>
>>> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
>>> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a
>>> nice guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former
>>> clubbiness. The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could
>>> be if we would all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I
>>> exhort and encourage all of you to look to your better natures. After
>>> all, there is no one here but us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you
>>> would agree.
>>
>> I try not to be an ass except in response to 'one' now plonked who was
>> trying to make a career out of harassing me. Some politics we may diverge
>> into, but for the most part this should be bike oriented. I didn't go out
>> today only because by the time I could it was already 80 and headed to
>> 98, not what I want to ride in, especially now when it is supposed to be
>> cooling down.
>>>
>>> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men
>>> and therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was
>>> like when we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because
>>> we all have one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such
>>> ornery cusses all the time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could
>>> get some women involved in this group as they have altogether gentler
>>> and kinder natures. Yea, that is the problem all right - nothing but
>>> crusty old men who hate one another and mostly just hate themselves.
>>
>> I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
>> somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back by
>> all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
>>>
>>> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
>>> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not
>>> live up to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that
>>> they are just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin
>>> y.
>>
>> I would be perfectly happy to have a wife who enjoyed cycling as I do,
>> but she drives, not rides, cars or motorcycles.
>> <sigh>
>> Bill (solo rider) Baka
>
> And Ed wonders why I have him on my permanent block list.
>
> Charles of Schaumburg
Poor Charles of Schaumburg will never know what he is missing!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 07:23:52
From: Bill Baka
Subject: Re: What is wrong with ARBR?
|
n5hsr wrote:
> "Bill Baka" <bbaka@syix.com> wrote in message
> news:9_3Og.658$Ij.481@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> A review of the Google archives on ARBR will reveal the vicissitudes this
>>> newsgroup has gone through since its inception long, long ago. It used to
>>> be a very clubby place where everyone was greeting one another with
>>> brainless repartee. Those days are long gone, I have seen to that.
>>>
>>> Still, it would not be such a bad thing if we were all friendlier to one
>>> another. Frankly, it is easy to be a bastard; it is not so easy to be a
>>> nice guy. I would like to see this group get back some of its former
>>> clubbiness. The posts of Bill Baka remind me how good this group could be
>>> if we would all stop trying to be such assholes all the time. I exhort
>>> and encourage all of you to look to your better natures. After all, there
>>> is no one here but us cyclists, a fairly innocent pastime you would
>>> agree.
>> I try not to be an ass except in response to 'one' now plonked who was
>> trying to make a career out of harassing me. Some politics we may diverge
>> into, but for the most part this should be bike oriented. I didn't go out
>> today only because by the time I could it was already 80 and headed to 98,
>> not what I want to ride in, especially now when it is supposed to be
>> cooling down.
>>> I think the main trouble springs from the fact that we are all older men
>>> and therefore contrary as all hell. Let us try to remember what it was
>>> like when we were younger and full of hope for the future. Just because
>>> we all have one foot in the grave does not mean we have to be such ornery
>>> cusses all the time. It would not be such a bad thing if we could get
>>> some women involved in this group as they have altogether gentler and
>>> kinder natures. Yea, that is the problem all right - nothing but crusty
>>> old men who hate one another and mostly just hate themselves.
>> I am older but hardly have one foot in the grave, and there are 20
>> somethings that come on here looking for advice who may be turned back by
>> all the dissent and excessively long qoute x 10 posted arguments.
>>> I am afraid I have scared off most of the women who used to be on this
>>> group. That is because I put them on a pedestal and when they do not live
>>> up to my expectations of them I go berserk. I need to remember that they
>>> are just human after all and not replicas of the Blessed Virgin y.
>> I would be perfectly happy to have a wife who enjoyed cycling as I do, but
>> she drives, not rides, cars or motorcycles.
>> <sigh>
>> Bill (solo rider) Baka
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>>> aka
>>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>>
>
> And Ed wonders why I have him on my permanent block list.
>
> Charles of Schaumburg
>
>
I banter with Ed but plonked Brickston, permanently. He made me want to
go back to my pre-riage days and look him up. I don't need that.
Bill Baka
|
|
