| |
Main
Date: 07 Jun 2006 14:34:09
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
In article <07v982h9tgiuh3mtrmuvn2vpck92sv1nan@4ax.com >,
Mike Rice <jodymike@gte.net > writes:
> When Mr. Ed [Edward Dolan] posts his inevitable follow up he would
> 'restore' all the
> groups anyway. Nothing is more important to him than the final post to
> any thread in which he is involved. I try to limit my occasional
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> comment regarding him to ARBR, but he 'restores' the cross-posting in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> each follow-up.
Tom Keats wrote:
{\shrill_sam_kinnison_mode
So ... DON'T MAKE OCCAISONAL COMMENTS REGARDING HIM!
}
He contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
[...]
Edward Dolan wrote:
I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up from
someone else's quotations (editing). Once you have kill filed a person, you
no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must read the
original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other way.
There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone else's
post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are sorely
lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he is
reading my original posts.
I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But I
will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me and/or my
posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you cannot get
an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing the
quotations of others.
I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want about
me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they were
written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will know
how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 17 Jun 2006 15:18:47
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1150204375.519701.275430@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1149951676.887644.305830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >> >> Tom Keats wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> >> He [Edward Dolan] contributes nothing worthy of any comment
> >> >> >> anyways.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
> >> >> >> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
> >> >> >> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
> >> >> >> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
> >> >> >> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
> >> >> >> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
> >> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet
> >> >> >> will
> >> >> >> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick
> >> >> >> up
> >> >> >> from
> >> >> >> someone else's quotations (editing).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
> >> >> > which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
> >> >> > kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so
> >> >> > silent
> >> >> > majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
> >> >> > should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
> >> >>
> >> >> Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good
> >> >> riddance.
> >> >
> >> > You've got that all wrong. Those that have kill-filed you have said
> >> > good riddance to you.
> >>
> >> But I will miss nothing because they are idiots and they will miss
> >> everything because I am a genius. Elementary my dear Watson!
> >
> > And, that begs the question. Do you believe even half of the tripe
> > that you write?
>
> It is very important that no one ever know what the Great Ed Dolan actually
> believes. Like God, I remain an eternal mystery.
At least you didn't use Go and Doaln in the same sentence.
> >> >> But
> >> >> once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or
> >> >> my
> >> >> posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of
> >> >> Cletus
> >> >> Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right
> >> >> mind
> >> >> would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about
> >> >> you
> >> >> once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial
> >> >> woodshed
> >> >> where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks.
> >> >
> >> > Not another posterior reference! You are overly fixated on a
> >> > particular part of the anatomy.
> >>
> >> That is only because I have determined that is where their brains are
> >> located.
> >
> > Whatever.
> >
> >> >> He has since
> >> >> left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as
> >> >> him.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to
> >> >> appreciate
> >> >> him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even
> >> >> greater
> >> >> honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such
> >> >> as
> >> >> yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my
> >> >> inferiors.
> >> >
> >> > You really have to get over this nonsense about your alleged
> >> > superiority.
> >>
> >> If and when I see it before me I will be delighted to admit some others
> >> to
> >> my august rank. Many are callled but few are chosen.
> >
> > No one called for your immortal words and many have chosen to killfile
> > you.
>
> No one that matters has ever kill-filed me. That goes without saying.
Right. Your persistent pissing and moaning about it would indicate
otherwise. You just hate to realize that you have a shrinking
audience.
> >> >> It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length
> >> >> as
> >> >> far
> >> >> as these freaking newsgroups are concerned.
> >> >
> >> > An assumption stated as fact. You and I will never be on the same wave
> >> > length.
> >>
> >> Work on your sense of humor and who knows?
> >>
> >> >> It is extremely important never to take Usenet seriously.
> >> >
> >> > Certainly some Usenet newsroups cannot be take seriously when inhabited
> >> > by clowns like you
> >>
> >> Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
> >> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
> >> whatever he wants.
> >
> > So then in assuming the role of moderator (houskeeping as you refer to
> > it), you are trying to elevate discourse to a serious level, but having
> > failed in the task are just another jackass who posts whatever
> > off-topocic crap he wants despite the many protests for you to cease?
>
> Housekeeping is not the same thing as being a moderator. If I were the
> moderator I would eliminate 90% of the posters to these newsgroups on the
> basis of them never saying anything of substance and/or of interest. All a
> housekeeper does is sweep up after the rascals and the scoundrels. The real
> solution would be to eliminate them altogether, but only a moderator could
> do that.
Does this sound at all very differnet to anyone else?
> >> >> Usenet is by and for fools and idiots.
> >>
> >> > Which one best describes you? Pick one!
> >>
> >> I am here slumming to see how the other half lives.
> >
> > Your presence has managed to make it the slum that it has become.
>
> It was an even worse slum before I showed up.
Opinion stated as fact. A major improvement could be realized by your
absence.
> >> >> Once you
> >> >> know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say
> >> >> what
> >> >> you
> >> >> will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive
> >> >> to
> >> >> say nothing but outrageous things.
> >> >
> >> > You simply have no grasp of what a newsgroup is supposed to be used for
> >> > and how it should function. For you a newsgroup is showcase you
> >> > unharnessed, unruly ego run amokit ... a playground for your own
> >> > personal agenda regardelss of the newsgroup's original intended
> >> > purpose.
> >>
> >> "Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
> >> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
> >> whatever he wants." - Ed Dolan
> >
> > Repetition of an assertion does not a fact make.
>
> It is the only way that anything ever sinks into that brain of yours.
Let me break it all down for you. The fact that I recognize much of
what you say as repetitious should be a clue to you that I've heard it
all before and recognize that. Got that now? The operative word was
assertion. The reason why much of what you say does not sink in is
simply because I deliberately chose not to waste cerebral storage space
on unsubstantiated assertions. Just because you say someitning is so
doesn't make it so. I hope that clarifies things for you.
> >> >> If you want to be sensible, then you
> >> >> should stay home and contemplate your navel.
> >> >
> >> > You object to being sensible ... figures! What is there to contemplate
> >> > in a navel? For what it is worth, little did you know that this is
> >> > particularly inapplicable. When very young, I had a cyst at my navel
> >> > and it was surgically remove along with my navel, so I couldn't
> >> > contemplate my navel, regardless.
> >>
> >> Contemplating one's navel is an expression for reflecting philosophically
> >> on
> >> the human dilemma - which essentially consists of most of us having some
> >> intelligence and yet behaving like fools and idiots most of the time.
> >> This
> >> is quite a contradiction if you think about it.
> >
> > Thanks for the unrequired clarification.
> >
> >> I once knew a guy whom I thought to be intelligent on this very newsgroup
> >> who would go and on about nothing at all and when I suggested to him not
> >> be
> >> so longwinded, he told me he did not want to hear it. Imagine that!
> >
> > Don't be so hard on yourself. You really should refrain from admiting
> > in public that you engage yourself in conversation.
>
> It is impossible to talk to anybody else without first talking it over with
> yourself.
Went right over you head ... I see. Regardless, it's good to know
that you have someone besides Mike Vanderman that listens to you.
Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 13 Jun 2006 06:12:55
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1149951676.887644.305830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> >> >> Tom Keats wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> He [Edward Dolan] contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
> >> >>
> >> >> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
> >> >> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
> >> >> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
> >> >> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
> >> >>
> >> >> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
> >> >> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
> >> >> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
> >> >> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up
> >> >> from
> >> >> someone else's quotations (editing).
> >> >
> >> > You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
> >> > which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
> >> > kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so silent
> >> > majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
> >> > should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
> >>
> >> Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good riddance.
> >
> > You've got that all wrong. Those that have kill-filed you have said
> > good riddance to you.
>
> But I will miss nothing because they are idiots and they will miss
> everything because I am a genius. Elementary my dear Watson!
And, that begs the question. Do you believe even half of the tripe
that you write?
> >> But
> >> once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or my
> >> posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of Cletus
> >> Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right mind
> >> would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about
> >> you
> >> once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial
> >> woodshed
> >> where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks.
> >
> > Not another posterior reference! You are overly fixated on a
> > particular part of the anatomy.
>
> That is only because I have determined that is where their brains are
> located.
Whatever.
> >> He has since
> >> left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as him.
> >>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to
> >> appreciate
> >> him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even
> >> greater
> >> honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such as
> >> yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my
> >> inferiors.
> >
> > You really have to get over this nonsense about your alleged
> > superiority.
>
> If and when I see it before me I will be delighted to admit some others to
> my august rank. Many are callled but few are chosen.
No one called for your immortal words and many have chosen to killfile
you.
> >> It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length as
> >> far
> >> as these freaking newsgroups are concerned.
> >
> > An assumption stated as fact. You and I will never be on the same wave
> > length.
>
> Work on your sense of humor and who knows?
>
> >> It is extremely important never to take Usenet seriously.
> >
> > Certainly some Usenet newsroups cannot be take seriously when inhabited
> > by clowns like you
>
> Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
> whatever he wants.
So then in assuming the role of moderator (houskeeping as you refer to
it), you are trying to elevate discourse to a serious level, but having
failed in the task are just another jackass who posts whatever
off-topocic crap he wants despite the many protests for you to cease?
> >> Usenet is by and for fools and idiots.
>
> > Which one best describes you? Pick one!
>
> I am here slumming to see how the other half lives.
Your presence has managed to make it the slum that it has become.
> >> Once you
> >> know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say what
> >> you
> >> will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive to
> >> say nothing but outrageous things.
> >
> > You simply have no grasp of what a newsgroup is supposed to be used for
> > and how it should function. For you a newsgroup is showcase you
> > unharnessed, unruly ego run amokit ... a playground for your own
> > personal agenda regardelss of the newsgroup's original intended
> > purpose.
>
> "Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
> whatever he wants." - Ed Dolan
Repetition of an assertion does not a fact make.
> >> If you want to be sensible, then you
> >> should stay home and contemplate your navel.
> >
> > You object to being sensible ... figures! What is there to contemplate
> > in a navel? For what it is worth, little did you know that this is
> > particularly inapplicable. When very young, I had a cyst at my navel
> > and it was surgically remove along with my navel, so I couldn't
> > contemplate my navel, regardless.
>
> Contemplating one's navel is an expression for reflecting philosophically on
> the human dilemma - which essentially consists of most of us having some
> intelligence and yet behaving like fools and idiots most of the time. This
> is quite a contradiction if you think about it.
Thanks for the unrequired clarification.
> I once knew a guy whom I thought to be intelligent on this very newsgroup
> who would go and on about nothing at all and when I suggested to him not be
> so longwinded, he told me he did not want to hear it. Imagine that!
Don't be so hard on yourself. You realy should refrain from admiting
in public that you engage yourself in conversation.
Jim McNaa
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> >> > Once you have kill filed a person, you
> >> >> no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must
> >> >> read
> >> >> the
> >> >> original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other
> >> >> way.
> >> >>
> >> >> There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone
> >> >> else's
> >> >> post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are
> >> >> sorely
> >> >> lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
> >> >> messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he
> >> >> is
> >> >> reading my original posts.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But
> >> >> I
> >> >> will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me
> >> >> and/or
> >> >> my
> >> >> posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you
> >> >> cannot
> >> >> get
> >> >> an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing
> >> >> the
> >> >> quotations of others.
> >> >>
> >> >> I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want
> >> >> about
> >> >> me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they
> >> >> were
> >> >> written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will
> >> >> know
> >> >> how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
> >
|
| | |
Date: 13 Jun 2006 09:38:35
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1150204375.519701.275430@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1149951676.887644.305830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> Tom Keats wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> >> He [Edward Dolan] contributes nothing worthy of any comment
>> >> >> anyways.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
>> >> >> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
>> >> >> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
>> >> >> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
>> >> >> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
>> >> >> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
>> >> >> [...]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick
>> >> >> up
>> >> >> from
>> >> >> someone else's quotations (editing).
>> >> >
>> >> > You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
>> >> > which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
>> >> > kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so
>> >> > silent
>> >> > majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
>> >> > should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
>> >>
>> >> Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good
>> >> riddance.
>> >
>> > You've got that all wrong. Those that have kill-filed you have said
>> > good riddance to you.
>>
>> But I will miss nothing because they are idiots and they will miss
>> everything because I am a genius. Elementary my dear Watson!
>
> And, that begs the question. Do you believe even half of the tripe
> that you write?
It is very important that no one ever know what the Great Ed Dolan actually
believes. Like God, I remain an eternal mystery.
>> >> But
>> >> once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or
>> >> my
>> >> posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of
>> >> Cletus
>> >> Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right
>> >> mind
>> >> would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about
>> >> you
>> >> once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial
>> >> woodshed
>> >> where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks.
>> >
>> > Not another posterior reference! You are overly fixated on a
>> > particular part of the anatomy.
>>
>> That is only because I have determined that is where their brains are
>> located.
>
> Whatever.
>
>> >> He has since
>> >> left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as
>> >> him.
>> >>
>> >> Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to
>> >> appreciate
>> >> him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even
>> >> greater
>> >> honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such
>> >> as
>> >> yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my
>> >> inferiors.
>> >
>> > You really have to get over this nonsense about your alleged
>> > superiority.
>>
>> If and when I see it before me I will be delighted to admit some others
>> to
>> my august rank. Many are callled but few are chosen.
>
> No one called for your immortal words and many have chosen to killfile
> you.
No one that matters has ever kill-filed me. That goes without saying.
>> >> It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length
>> >> as
>> >> far
>> >> as these freaking newsgroups are concerned.
>> >
>> > An assumption stated as fact. You and I will never be on the same wave
>> > length.
>>
>> Work on your sense of humor and who knows?
>>
>> >> It is extremely important never to take Usenet seriously.
>> >
>> > Certainly some Usenet newsroups cannot be take seriously when inhabited
>> > by clowns like you
>>
>> Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
>> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
>> whatever he wants.
>
> So then in assuming the role of moderator (houskeeping as you refer to
> it), you are trying to elevate discourse to a serious level, but having
> failed in the task are just another jackass who posts whatever
> off-topocic crap he wants despite the many protests for you to cease?
Housekeeping is not the same thing as being a moderator. If I were the
moderator I would eliminate 90% of the posters to these newsgroups on the
basis of them never saying anything of substance and/or of interest. All a
housekeeper does is sweep up after the rascals and the scoundrels. The real
solution would be to eliminate them altogether, but only a moderator could
do that.
>> >> Usenet is by and for fools and idiots.
>>
>> > Which one best describes you? Pick one!
>>
>> I am here slumming to see how the other half lives.
>
> Your presence has managed to make it the slum that it has become.
It was an even worse slum before I showed up.
>> >> Once you
>> >> know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say
>> >> what
>> >> you
>> >> will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive
>> >> to
>> >> say nothing but outrageous things.
>> >
>> > You simply have no grasp of what a newsgroup is supposed to be used for
>> > and how it should function. For you a newsgroup is showcase you
>> > unharnessed, unruly ego run amokit ... a playground for your own
>> > personal agenda regardelss of the newsgroup's original intended
>> > purpose.
>>
>> "Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
>> moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
>> whatever he wants." - Ed Dolan
>
> Repetition of an assertion does not a fact make.
It is the only way that anything ever sinks into that brain of yours.
>> >> If you want to be sensible, then you
>> >> should stay home and contemplate your navel.
>> >
>> > You object to being sensible ... figures! What is there to contemplate
>> > in a navel? For what it is worth, little did you know that this is
>> > particularly inapplicable. When very young, I had a cyst at my navel
>> > and it was surgically remove along with my navel, so I couldn't
>> > contemplate my navel, regardless.
>>
>> Contemplating one's navel is an expression for reflecting philosophically
>> on
>> the human dilemma - which essentially consists of most of us having some
>> intelligence and yet behaving like fools and idiots most of the time.
>> This
>> is quite a contradiction if you think about it.
>
> Thanks for the unrequired clarification.
>
>> I once knew a guy whom I thought to be intelligent on this very newsgroup
>> who would go and on about nothing at all and when I suggested to him not
>> be
>> so longwinded, he told me he did not want to hear it. Imagine that!
>
> Don't be so hard on yourself. You realy should refrain from admiting
> in public that you engage yourself in conversation.
It is impossible to talk to anybody else without first talking it over with
yourself.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 10 Jun 2006 08:01:16
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> In article <07v982h9tgiuh3mtrmuvn2vpck92sv1nan@4ax.com>,
> >> Mike Rice <jodymike@gte.net> writes:
> >>
> >> > When Mr. Ed [Edward Dolan] posts his inevitable follow up he would
> >> > 'restore' all the
> >> > groups anyway. Nothing is more important to him than the final post to
> >> > any thread in which he is involved. I try to limit my occasional
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > comment regarding him to ARBR, but he 'restores' the cross-posting in
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > each follow-up.
> >>
> >> Tom Keats wrote:
> >>
> >> {\shrill_sam_kinnison_mode
> >> So ... DON'T MAKE OCCAISONAL COMMENTS REGARDING HIM!
> >> }
> >>
> >> He contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
> >>
> >> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
> >> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
> >> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
> >> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
> >>
> >> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
> >> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
> >> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
> >>
> >> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
> >> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up
> >> from
> >> someone else's quotations (editing).
> >
> > You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
> > which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
> > kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so silent
> > majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
> > should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
>
> Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good riddance.
You've got that all wrong. Those that have kill-filed you have said
good riddance to you.
> But
> once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or my
> posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of Cletus
> Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right mind
> would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about you
> once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial woodshed
> where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks.
Not another posterior reference! You are overly fixated on a
particular part of the anatomy.
> He has since
> left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as him.
>
> Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to appreciate
> him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even greater
> honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such as
> yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my inferiors.
You really have to get over this nonsense about your alleged
superiority.
> It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length as far
> as these freaking newsgroups are concerned.
An suumption stated as fact. You and I will never be on the same wave
length.
> It is extremely important never to take Usenet seriously.
Certainly some Usenet newsroups cannot be take seriously when inhabited
by clowns like you
> Usenet is by and for fools and idiots.
Which one best describes you? Pick one!
> Once you
> know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say what you
> will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive to
> say nothing but outrageous things.
You simply have no grasp of what a newsgroup is supposed to be used for
and how it should function. For you a newsgroup is showcase you
unharnessed, unruly ego run amokit ... a playground for your own
personal agenda regardelss of the newsgroup's original intended
purpose.
> If you want to be sensible, then you
> should stay home and contemplate your navel.
You object to being sensible ... figures! What is there to contemplate
in a navel? For what it is worth, little did you know that this is
particularly inapplicable. When very young, I had a cyst at my navel
and it was surgically remove along with my navel, so I couldn't
contemplate my navel, regardless.
Jim McNaa
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>
> > Once you have kill filed a person, you
> >> no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must read
> >> the
> >> original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other way.
> >>
> >> There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone else's
> >> post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are sorely
> >> lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
> >> messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he is
> >> reading my original posts.
> >>
> >> I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But I
> >> will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me and/or
> >> my
> >> posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you cannot
> >> get
> >> an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing the
> >> quotations of others.
> >>
> >> I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want
> >> about
> >> me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they were
> >> written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will
> >> know
> >> how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
|
| | |
Date: 12 Jun 2006 04:18:11
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1149951676.887644.305830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
[...]
>> >> Tom Keats wrote:
[...]
>> >> He [Edward Dolan] contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
>> >>
>> >> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
>> >> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
>> >> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
>> >> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
>> >>
>> >> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
>> >> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
>> >> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
>> >> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up
>> >> from
>> >> someone else's quotations (editing).
>> >
>> > You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
>> > which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
>> > kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so silent
>> > majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
>> > should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
>>
>> Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good riddance.
>
> You've got that all wrong. Those that have kill-filed you have said
> good riddance to you.
But I will miss nothing because they are idiots and they will miss
everything because I am a genius. Elementary my dear Watson!
>> But
>> once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or my
>> posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of Cletus
>> Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right mind
>> would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about
>> you
>> once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial
>> woodshed
>> where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks.
>
> Not another posterior reference! You are overly fixated on a
> particular part of the anatomy.
That is only because I have determined that is where their brains are
located.
>> He has since
>> left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as him.
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to
>> appreciate
>> him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even
>> greater
>> honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such as
>> yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my
>> inferiors.
>
> You really have to get over this nonsense about your alleged
> superiority.
If and when I see it before me I will be delighted to admit some others to
my august rank. Many are callled but few are chosen.
>> It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length as
>> far
>> as these freaking newsgroups are concerned.
>
> An suumption stated as fact. You and I will never be on the same wave
> length.
Work on your sense of humor and who knows?
>> It is extremely important never to take Usenet seriously.
>
> Certainly some Usenet newsroups cannot be take seriously when inhabited
> by clowns like you
Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
whatever he wants.
>> Usenet is by and for fools and idiots.
> Which one best describes you? Pick one!
I am here slumming to see how the other half lives.
>> Once you
>> know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say what
>> you
>> will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive to
>> say nothing but outrageous things.
>
> You simply have no grasp of what a newsgroup is supposed to be used for
> and how it should function. For you a newsgroup is showcase you
> unharnessed, unruly ego run amokit ... a playground for your own
> personal agenda regardelss of the newsgroup's original intended
> purpose.
"Nope, none of them can ever be taken seriously. This is due to lack of a
moderator. Without a moderator, just any old jackass at all can post
whatever he wants." - Ed Dolan
>> If you want to be sensible, then you
>> should stay home and contemplate your navel.
>
> You object to being sensible ... figures! What is there to contemplate
> in a navel? For what it is worth, little did you know that this is
> particularly inapplicable. When very young, I had a cyst at my navel
> and it was surgically remove along with my navel, so I couldn't
> contemplate my navel, regardless.
Contemplating one's navel is an expression for reflecting philosophically on
the human dilemma - which essentially consists of most of us having some
intelligence and yet behaving like fools and idiots most of the time. This
is quite a contradiction if you think about it.
I once knew a guy whom I thought to be intelligent on this very newsgroup
who would go and on about nothing at all and when I suggested to him not be
so longwinded, he told me he did not want to hear it. Imagine that!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>> > Once you have kill filed a person, you
>> >> no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must
>> >> read
>> >> the
>> >> original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other
>> >> way.
>> >>
>> >> There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone
>> >> else's
>> >> post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are
>> >> sorely
>> >> lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
>> >> messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he
>> >> is
>> >> reading my original posts.
>> >>
>> >> I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But
>> >> I
>> >> will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me
>> >> and/or
>> >> my
>> >> posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you
>> >> cannot
>> >> get
>> >> an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing
>> >> the
>> >> quotations of others.
>> >>
>> >> I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want
>> >> about
>> >> me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they
>> >> were
>> >> written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will
>> >> know
>> >> how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
>
|
| |
Date: 08 Jun 2006 17:50:30
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
Edward Dolan wrote:
> In article <07v982h9tgiuh3mtrmuvn2vpck92sv1nan@4ax.com>,
> Mike Rice <jodymike@gte.net> writes:
>
> > When Mr. Ed [Edward Dolan] posts his inevitable follow up he would
> > 'restore' all the
> > groups anyway. Nothing is more important to him than the final post to
> > any thread in which he is involved. I try to limit my occasional
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > comment regarding him to ARBR, but he 'restores' the cross-posting in
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > each follow-up.
>
> Tom Keats wrote:
>
> {\shrill_sam_kinnison_mode
> So ... DON'T MAKE OCCAISONAL COMMENTS REGARDING HIM!
> }
>
> He contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
>
> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
>
> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
> [...]
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up from
> someone else's quotations (editing).
You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so silent
majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
Jim McNaa
Once you have kill filed a person, you
> no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must read the
> original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other way.
>
> There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone else's
> post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are sorely
> lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
> messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he is
> reading my original posts.
>
> I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But I
> will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me and/or my
> posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you cannot get
> an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing the
> quotations of others.
>
> I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want about
> me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they were
> written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will know
> how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 09 Jun 2006 04:48:24
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Why Tom Keats is not only an Idiot, but also a Scoundrel!
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1149814230.664907.152700@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> In article <07v982h9tgiuh3mtrmuvn2vpck92sv1nan@4ax.com>,
>> Mike Rice <jodymike@gte.net> writes:
>>
>> > When Mr. Ed [Edward Dolan] posts his inevitable follow up he would
>> > 'restore' all the
>> > groups anyway. Nothing is more important to him than the final post to
>> > any thread in which he is involved. I try to limit my occasional
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > comment regarding him to ARBR, but he 'restores' the cross-posting in
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > each follow-up.
>>
>> Tom Keats wrote:
>>
>> {\shrill_sam_kinnison_mode
>> So ... DON'T MAKE OCCAISONAL COMMENTS REGARDING HIM!
>> }
>>
>> He contributes nothing worthy of any comment anyways.
>>
>> Having destroyed a.r.b.r, he's now set his malevolent sights on
>> r.b.m, and cross-posting MV crap from r.b.s is his latest tactic.
>> It's so bloody obvious that this cretin takes perverse, depraved
>> delight in trying to destroy newsgroups!
>>
>> Killfiles and sending Ed Dolan to Coventry are the answer. Since
>> you are inclined to encourage the perineal feature known as Ed
>> Dolan, I've had to add "Mike Rice" to my own killfile.
>> [...]
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>> I reserve a very special contempt for those who kill file and yet will
>> comment on the person they have kill filed based on what they pick up
>> from
>> someone else's quotations (editing).
>
> You reserve contempt because this is one well-earend statistic for
> which you have no reason to be pround. Surely, you have been
> kill-filed by more members on ARBR than any other. The not so silent
> majority has spoken. You asked for it . You deserved it, and you
> should not be deprived. Kill-file the king!!!
Others can kill file me and all I have to say to them is good riddance. But
once they have kill filed me, they ought to no longer comment on me or my
posts since they are not reading my messages anymore. I got rid of Cletus
Lee for this reason alone. He was such a dullard, who in their right mind
would care if he kill filed you or not, but he would not shut up about you
once he had kill filed you. So I had to take him to the proverbial woodshed
where I administered a good sound whipping about the buttocks. He has since
left ARBR never to return. Like I said, good riddance to all such as him.
Ed Dolan the Great only writes for those who have the wisdom to appreciate
him. It is a high honor to read my immortal words and it is an even greater
honor when I reply to my inferiors who beseech me with a message such as
yours. It is all part of my noblesse oblige which I confer on my inferiors.
It now appears the Jim McNaa is finally getting on my wave length as far
as these freaking newsgroups are concerned. It is extremely important never
to take Usenet seriously. Usenet is by and for fools and idiots. Once you
know and understand this very simple fact, then you are free to say what you
will and let the chips fall where they may. We should all of us strive to
say nothing but outrageous things. If you want to be sensible, then you
should stay home and contemplate your navel.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Once you have kill filed a person, you
>> no longer have any right to be commenting on that person. You must read
>> the
>> original posts of that person or you must shut up. There is no other way.
>>
>> There is not one person in a hundred who knows how to edit someone else's
>> post. It takes brains to do this and as everyone knows brains are sorely
>> lacking on all newsgroups. If Tom Keats wants to comment on me or my
>> messages, he is surely welcome to do that all he pleases PROVIDED he is
>> reading my original posts.
>>
>> I am used to idiots like Tom Keats and don't mind the type at all. But I
>> will not suffer scoundrels quietly. If he wants to comment on me and/or
>> my
>> posts, then he ought NOT to have me in his kill file because you cannot
>> get
>> an accurate transcription of what I am saying by selectively viewing the
>> quotations of others.
>>
>> I can get really nasty when provoked unjustly. Say whatever you want
>> about
>> me and/or my posts, but make damn sure you are reading them as they were
>> written. Otherwise, it is going to be nothing but name calling. I will
>> know
>> how to deal with Tom Keats if he wants to be a scoundrel.
|
|
