bicycle-forum.net
Promoting biking discussion.

Main
Date: 31 May 2007 03:44:52
From:
Subject: Anodized aluminum fractures
This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:

http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf

Jobst Brandt




 
Date: 01 Jun 2007 03:13:12
From: Ozark Bicycle
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
On May 31, 10:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net > wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
> > In article <VJKdnanoBKoEUMPbnZ2dnUVZ_umln...@speakeasy.net>,
> > jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>
> >> jobst.bra...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> >>> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears
> >>> repeating:
>
> >>>http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>
> >>> Jobst Brandt
> >> cracked anodizing can and does initiate fatigue. but since all rim
> >> cracks are observed to be a function of the extruded material's
> >> anisotropy,
>
> > As yet there's no proof of that, it's only your own unsupported claim.
> > Jobst's claim is much better supported by the observed evidence.
>
> there are rocks smarter than you tim. but none as dense.
>
>

Nor as smug.



 
Date: 31 May 2007 06:28:56
From: jim beam
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
>
> http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>
> Jobst Brandt

cracked anodizing can and does initiate fatigue. but since all rim
cracks are observed to be a function of the extruded material's
anisotropy, not actual anodizing cracks, the misattribution of anodizing
to be the cause of cracking in bicycle rims simply demonstrates analysis
failure. as one might expect if the analyst was trying to use a[n
inappropriate] dye penetrant test to make the connection.

your post is simply the desire to deflect from the mistake of excess
spoke tension - a mistake that's cost the industry, manufacturers and
bike shops alike, millions.


  
Date: 31 May 2007 09:19:35
From: Tim McNamara
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
In article <VJKdnanoBKoEUMPbnZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@speakeasy.net >,
jim beam <spamvortex@bad.example.net > wrote:

> jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> > This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears
> > repeating:
> >
> > http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
> >
> > Jobst Brandt
>
> cracked anodizing can and does initiate fatigue. but since all rim
> cracks are observed to be a function of the extruded material's
> anisotropy,

As yet there's no proof of that, it's only your own unsupported claim.
Jobst's claim is much better supported by the observed evidence.

> not actual anodizing cracks, the misattribution of anodizing to be
> the cause of cracking in bicycle rims simply demonstrates analysis
> failure. as one might expect if the analyst was trying to use a[n
> inappropriate] dye penetrant test to make the connection.
>
> your post is simply the desire to deflect from the mistake of excess
> spoke tension - a mistake that's cost the industry, manufacturers and
> bike shops alike, millions.

Hyperbole much?


   
Date: 31 May 2007 20:04:52
From: jim beam
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
Tim McNamara wrote:
> In article <VJKdnanoBKoEUMPbnZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@speakeasy.net>,
> jim beam <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote:
>
>> jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
>>> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears
>>> repeating:
>>>
>>> http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>>>
>>> Jobst Brandt
>> cracked anodizing can and does initiate fatigue. but since all rim
>> cracks are observed to be a function of the extruded material's
>> anisotropy,
>
> As yet there's no proof of that, it's only your own unsupported claim.
> Jobst's claim is much better supported by the observed evidence.

there are rocks smarter than you tim. but none as dense.


>
>> not actual anodizing cracks, the misattribution of anodizing to be
>> the cause of cracking in bicycle rims simply demonstrates analysis
>> failure. as one might expect if the analyst was trying to use a[n
>> inappropriate] dye penetrant test to make the connection.
>>
>> your post is simply the desire to deflect from the mistake of excess
>> spoke tension - a mistake that's cost the industry, manufacturers and
>> bike shops alike, millions.
>
> Hyperbole much?


 
Date: 31 May 2007 06:02:22
From: Thomas Hood
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
On May 31, 4:44 am, jobst.bra...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
>
> http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>
> Jobst Brandt

Am I missing something, or wouldn't this experiment have benefitted
from a unanodized control sample?

Thomas Hood



 
Date: 30 May 2007 22:04:59
From:
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
On May 31, 1:42 am, Troll Report <t...@report.com > wrote:
> On 31 May 2007 03:44:52 GMT, jobst.bra...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
>
> > This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
>
> >http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>
> > Jobst Brandt
>
> I think you've trawled this troll-bait enough.
>
> How about becoming again a relevant RBT contributor? It's not hard to come
> up with fresh good links, and I'll lead by example.
>
> http://www.warpig.com/paintball/technical/anodize.shtml

No, I found it relevant and interesting. I think you want to head over
to rbr and talk with kurigan and amit



  
Date: 01 Jun 2007 01:30:03
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
In article
<1180587899.254123.314210@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com >
,
raamman@gmail.com wrote:

> On May 31, 1:42 am, Troll Report <t...@report.com> wrote:
> > On 31 May 2007 03:44:52 GMT, jobst.bra...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> >
> > > This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
> >
> > >http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
> >
> > > Jobst Brandt
> >
> > I think you've trawled this troll-bait enough.
> >
> > How about becoming again a relevant RBT contributor? It's not hard to come
> > up with fresh good links, and I'll lead by example.
> >
> > http://www.warpig.com/paintball/technical/anodize.shtml
>
> No, I found it relevant and interesting. I think you want to head over
> to rbr and talk with kurigan and amit

... given a liberal definitions of talk. I find rbr a
relief from the petty bickering elsewhere; an island of
calm in an increasingly contentious world.

--
Michael Press


 
Date: 30 May 2007 21:42:42
From: Troll Report
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
On 31 May 2007 03:44:52 GMT, jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:

> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
>
> http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>
> Jobst Brandt

I think you've trawled this troll-bait enough.

How about becoming again a relevant RBT contributor? It's not hard to come
up with fresh good links, and I'll lead by example.

http://www.warpig.com/paintball/technical/anodize.shtml


  
Date: 31 May 2007 07:58:17
From: Peter Cole
Subject: Re: Anodized aluminum fractures
Troll Report wrote:
> On 31 May 2007 03:44:52 GMT, jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
>
>> This study has been mentioned before but it seems it bears repeating:
>>
>> http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~goetz/Goetz_Thesis_SP05.pdf
>>
>> Jobst Brandt
>
> I think you've trawled this troll-bait enough.
>
> How about becoming again a relevant RBT contributor? It's not hard to come
> up with fresh good links, and I'll lead by example.
>
> http://www.warpig.com/paintball/technical/anodize.shtml

Excellent link! I'm indebted, purple ano is getting almost impossible to
find anymore, now I can make my own!