| |
Main
Date: 16 Nov 2007 16:33:37
From:
Subject: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
I searched but did not find much on them in last few years. Im
mountain biking. Sometimes Im on ashphalt.
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Nov 2007 11:26:39
From:
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Nov 18, 12:23 pm, carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Nov 18, 12:07 pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> > In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
> > looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
> > --
> > Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> > Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
> someone else.
>
> When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
> greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
>
> In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
> end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
>
> Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
>
> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>
> Andrew Muzi
> www.yellowjersey.org
>
> Andrew Muzi
>
> www.yellowjersey.org
>
> But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
> while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
> and the extra line.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carl Fogel
See? That's why I put the ugly little space in front of links in my
posts. It leads to extra blank lines, but it prevents Google from
goofing up the links that are practically the only valuable things in
my ravings.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| | |
Date: 18 Nov 2007 14:25:45
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
>> A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>> In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
>>> looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
>>> --
>>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
> carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
>> someone else.
>>
>> When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
>> greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
>>
>> In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
>> end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
>>
>> Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
>>
>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>
>> Andrew Muzi
>> www.yellowjersey.org
>>
>> Andrew Muzi
>>
>> www.yellowjersey.org
>> But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
>> while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
>> and the extra line.
carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> See? That's why I put the ugly little space in front of links in my
> posts. It leads to extra blank lines, but it prevents Google from
> goofing up the links that are practically the only valuable things in
> my ravings.
I added spaces to my sig file.
Why should Google affect this? I never go there.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Nov 2007 00:04:28
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
In article <13k17k3b9n2c887@corp.supernews.com >,
A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> >> A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> >>> In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
> >>> looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
> >>> --
> >>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> >>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
> > carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
> >> Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
> >> someone else.
> >>
> >> When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
> >> greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
> >>
> >> In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
> >> end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
> >>
> >> Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
> >>
> >> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> >>
> >> Andrew Muzi
> >> www.yellowjersey.org
> >>
> >> Andrew Muzi
> >>
> >> www.yellowjersey.org
> >> But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
> >> while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
> >> and the extra line.
>
> carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> > See? That's why I put the ugly little space in front of links in my
> > posts. It leads to extra blank lines, but it prevents Google from
> > goofing up the links that are practically the only valuable things in
> > my ravings.
>
> I added spaces to my sig file.
> Why should Google affect this? I never go there.
Google does many things wrong.
You need not expend effort to
compensate for Google's inadequacies
Your signature separator is well formed.
Google should respect it, and not include
the signature when composing a reply.
--
Michael Press
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Nov 2007 13:29:13
From:
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:25:45 -0600, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org >
wrote:
>>> A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>>> In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
>>>> looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
>> carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
>>> someone else.
>>>
>>> When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
>>> greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
>>>
>>> In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
>>> end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
>>>
>>> Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
>>>
>>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>>
>>> Andrew Muzi
>>> www.yellowjersey.org
>>>
>>> Andrew Muzi
>>>
>>> www.yellowjersey.org
>>> But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
>>> while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
>>> and the extra line.
>
>carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
>> See? That's why I put the ugly little space in front of links in my
>> posts. It leads to extra blank lines, but it prevents Google from
>> goofing up the links that are practically the only valuable things in
>> my ravings.
>
>I added spaces to my sig file.
>Why should Google affect this? I never go there.
Dear Andrew,
It isn't your original non-Google post that gets goofed up.
Things go wrong when someone else using Google replies to your
original post, which Google re-formats with the leading greater-than
signs and other fuss.
It may also get goofed up when going through _other_ sites, not just
Google.
Let's see what happens when Comcast gets its hands on things. Here are
the three versions again, the first one that Google wraps together
onto one line in replies, the second with leading spaces and the third
with a blank line in the middle to foikl Google:
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
I'll reply in a moment through Comcast and Forte Agent again.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Nov 2007 13:34:30
From:
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:29:13 -0700, carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:25:45 -0600, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
>wrote:
>
>>>> A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>>>> In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
>>>>> looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>>>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>>
>>> carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
>>>> Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
>>>> someone else.
>>>>
>>>> When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
>>>> greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
>>>>
>>>> In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
>>>> end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
>>>>
>>>> Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Muzi
>>>> www.yellowjersey.org
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Muzi
>>>>
>>>> www.yellowjersey.org
>>>> But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
>>>> while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
>>>> and the extra line.
>>
>>carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
>>> See? That's why I put the ugly little space in front of links in my
>>> posts. It leads to extra blank lines, but it prevents Google from
>>> goofing up the links that are practically the only valuable things in
>>> my ravings.
>>
>>I added spaces to my sig file.
>>Why should Google affect this? I never go there.
>
>Dear Andrew,
>
>It isn't your original non-Google post that gets goofed up.
>
>Things go wrong when someone else using Google replies to your
>original post, which Google re-formats with the leading greater-than
>signs and other fuss.
>
>It may also get goofed up when going through _other_ sites, not just
>Google.
>
>Let's see what happens when Comcast gets its hands on things. Here are
>the three versions again, the first one that Google wraps together
>onto one line in replies, the second with leading spaces and the third
>with a blank line in the middle to foikl Google:
>
>Andrew Muzi
>www.yellowjersey.org
>
>Andrew Muzi
> www.yellowjersey.org
>
>Andrew Muzi
>
>www.yellowjersey.org
>
>I'll reply in a moment through Comcast and Forte Agent again.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Carl Fogel
Yes, replying through Comcast with Forte avoids the Google line-wrap
reply goof in the first example above.
Given that Google is free and maintains an enormous searchable
archive, it's hard to complain about this bug.
Luckily, no complaints are too hard or too small for RBT.
:-)
It looks as if you need to stick a bridge in there to keep your name
and site separated. Otherwise, the unbraced text can collapse and jam
things together in rare circumstances.
:-)
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| |
Date: 18 Nov 2007 11:23:58
From:
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Nov 18, 12:07 pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> >>> Bill Sornson wrote:
> >>>> gene's SPECIFICALLY NUTS
> >> A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> >>> Isn't that Mike Sinyard's new breakfast cereal?
> >>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> >>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
> > datakoll aka gene daniels wrote:
> >> HOWEVER THERE ARE MOMENTS WHEN BILL LACKS DISCRETION
> Tom Sherman wrote:
> > Why does Google think there is someone named "Andrew Muziwww"?
>
> I've asked that before but, despite a long discussion of your previous
> signature's features, which i didn't understand either, I have no idea.
>
> In my email and replies, it displays normally. Sometimes on r.b.t. it
> looks weird with sketchy line breaks. But not always.
> --
> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Dear Andrew,
Your signature appears normally when you first post or reply to
someone else.
When another poster replies to your post, Google tacks the leading
greater-than sign onto the front of your lines and reformats them.
In the process, it can wrap lines, mistakenly jamming the word at the
end of a line together with the link that begins the next line.
Both of these should appear normally in _this_ post:
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
But when I reply to myself in a moment, the first may be wrapped,
while the other two (I hope) will be protected by the leading spaces
and the extra line.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 09:14:05
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Nov 17, 11:56 am, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> Bill Sornson wrote:
> > gene's SPECIFICALLY NUTS
>
> Isn't the Mike Sinyard's new breakfast cereal?
> --
> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
HOWEVER THERE ARE MOMENTS WHEN BILL LACKS DISCRETION
|
| | |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 16:46:32
From: Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
datakoll aka gene daniels wrote:
> On Nov 17, 11:56 am, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>> Bill Sornson wrote:
>>> gene's SPECIFICALLY NUTS
>> Isn't the Mike Sinyard's new breakfast cereal?
>> --
>> Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
>> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
>
> HOWEVER THERE ARE MOMENTS WHEN BILL LACKS DISCRETION
Why does Google think there is someone named "Andrew Muziwww"?
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"the grinning buddy bear carries a fork." - g.d.
|
| |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 08:30:59
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
bill's the GENERALIZED BASTARD
|
| | |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 16:44:30
From: Tom Sherman
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
datakoll aka gene daniels wrote:
> bill's the GENERALIZED BASTARD
The bastards now have an army with generals?
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"the grinning buddy bear carries a fork." - g.d.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 08:44:58
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
gene's SPECIFICALLY NUTS
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 10:56:12
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
Bill Sornson wrote:
> gene's SPECIFICALLY NUTS
Isn't the Mike Sinyard's new breakfast cereal?
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| |
Date: 16 Nov 2007 17:55:03
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Nov 16, 8:14 pm, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> TRY
>
> http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCEqSuperSection.jsp?ssid=Tube
>
> throneproofs are impenetrabble
> the self sealing thornproofs are de riguer for trans yemen sojourns
> and the occasional goathead minefield
> used here with kevlar belted tires from Conti
> tho 2 big apple Schwalbe are on the horizon
too specialized? try these
http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCEqSection.jsp?sid=EquipTubesMTB
http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCEqSection.jsp?sid=EquipTubesRoad
|
| |
Date: 16 Nov 2007 17:14:45
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
TRY
http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCEqSuperSection.jsp?ssid=Tube
throneproofs are impenetrabble
the self sealing thornproofs are de riguer for trans yemen sojourns
and the occasional goathead minefield
used here with kevlar belted tires from Conti
tho 2 big apple Schwalbe are on the horizon
|
| |
Date: 16 Nov 2007 16:55:51
From: Bill Sornson
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
selfsealing@gmail.com wrote:
> I searched but did not find much on them in last few years. Im
> mountain biking. Sometimes Im on ashphalt.
Your user name is "selfsealing" and you have to ask?!? LOL
|
| | |
Date: 17 Nov 2007 15:32:31
From: still just me
Subject: Re: Are self-sealing tires good?
|
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:55:51 -0800, "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me >
wrote:
>selfsealing@gmail.com wrote:
>> I searched but did not find much on them in last few years. Im
>> mountain biking. Sometimes Im on ashphalt.
>
>Your user name is "selfsealing" and you have to ask?!? LOL
I know, it's like someone wondering why a guy with the initials "BS"
posts so much of it.
|
|
