| |
Main
Date: 28 Sep 2007 04:43:24
From: !Jones
Subject: Bolt hole circle
|
In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc) procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc, he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter. So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!! Jones
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 20:41:33
From: Hank Wirtz
Subject: Re: Bolt hole circle
|
On Sep 27, 9:43 pm, !Jones <p...@off.com > wrote: > In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc) > procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of > holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc, > he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter. > > So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!! > > Jones But cyclists don't talk about BHCs. They talk about BCDs.
|
| |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 04:56:21
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Bolt hole circle
|
In article <241pf3psdgqd58acljhkel84jcknhs5ujt@4ax.com >, !Jones <piss@off.com > wrote: > In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc) > procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of > holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc, > he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter. > > So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!! > > Jones Well, that's fair, but the actual most useful in-the-field measure, as Sheldon points out somewhere, is the distance from bolt to bolt for a given BCD and bolt pattern*. Bolt-bolt centres are an easy thing to measure, while the diameter is hard to directly measure. Also, BCD feels relevant to cyclists because it constrains the smallest number of teeth a ring on that bolt circle can have (about 39 for 130 mm BCD, barring heroic efforts). *bolt pattern being a distinction that was hardly necessary until the advent of 4-bolt MTB cranks -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 22:08:17
From: !Jones
Subject: Re: Bolt hole circle
|
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:56:21 GMT, in rec.bicycles.tech Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote: >Well, that's fair, but the actual most useful in-the-field measure, as >Sheldon points out somewhere, is the distance from bolt to bolt for a >given BCD and bolt pattern*. Oh, I agree. If I ever had to solve a BHC, I'd start with that as the easiest measurement to take; then I count the holes and pull out my calculator. My point is that, mathematically, a circle is defined by a radius. I was cutting a chain ring the other day and I accidentally plugged in 110 is what brought it to mind. I hadn't ever really thought about it, but we're the only bunch I know of to use a diameter. Jones
|
|