| |
Main
Date: 24 Sep 2007 20:17:07
From: Mark
Subject: Building your own bike
|
I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically lived
on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it was
amazing.
I just bought a Schwinn Rocket mountain bike. I am having a blast,
but I am hardly in the shape I once was, but that happens when you are
near 50. From what I am reading here, it is an entry level. Yet it
is the nicest shifting bike I have ever owned.
I am considering building my next bike myself. I don't know if anyone
sells plans, people design their own, no one ever bothers to do this,
or even if there might be common kits out there. I am open to all
types of bikes. Just interested in finding out what options might be
out there from people that have done it.
|
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2007 12:27:14
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
.
then it broke? good grief.
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2007 04:05:52
From: CNN_news
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sep 24, 8:17 pm, Mark <mblackwell1...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically lived
> on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it was
> amazing.
>
>
> I am considering building my next bike myself.
If you want to build your own frame here is a place to start:
http://www.littlefishbicycles.com/framebuilding.html
keep us informed.
|
| | |
Date: 30 Sep 2007 09:43:36
From: Tim McNamara
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <1191125152.109446.119780@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com >,
CNN_news <Nagita.K@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Sep 24, 8:17 pm, Mark <mblackwell1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically
> > lived on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it
> > was amazing.
> >
> >
> > I am considering building my next bike myself.
>
> If you want to build your own frame here is a place to start:
>
> http://www.littlefishbicycles.com/framebuilding.html
>
> keep us informed.
http://www.frostybobs.org/bikebuild.html
http://www.timpaterek.com/
|
| |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 20:51:24
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
there are manuals. search 'world catalog' for "bicycle frame" or
"bicycle frame builder" world cat is at the local library or online
thru the local lib using your lib card number thru the lib's online
service.
search 'united bicycle institute'
frame fabrication is daunting for the first time builder as jigs are
necessary. a rebuild is more entertaining long run unless you're
compulsive.
just start? find the Carmichael-Armstrong training manual, see
EXRX.com online, and a coupla good books on stretch excercises.
|
| | |
Date: 30 Sep 2007 13:38:17
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
datakoll wrote:
>
> there are manuals. search 'world catalog' for "bicycle frame" or
> "bicycle frame builder" world cat is at the local library or online
> thru the local lib using your lib card number thru the lib's online
> service.
> search 'united bicycle institute'
> frame fabrication is daunting for the first time builder as jigs are
> necessary. a rebuild is more entertaining long run unless you're
> compulsive.
> just start? find the Carmichael-Armstrong training manual, see
> EXRX.com online, and a coupla good books on stretch excercises.
Fixtures are not specifically required for a one-off. They speed
construction, but are not inherently 'better' than any other method of
accurate measurement.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 20:52:30
From: Mark
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sep 26, 10:45 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <260920070211495246%No...@address.invalid>,
> Dan Becker <No...@address.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <rcousine-DD662E.22405225092...@news.telus.net>, Ryan
> > Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > > In article <1190754504.644258.178...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Mark <mblackwell1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
> > > > self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
> > > > heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
> > > > how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
> > > > intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
> > > > it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
> > > > bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
> > > > finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
> > > > cared for it could last a long time as well.
>
> > > Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
> > > be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>
> > > Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
> > > scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
> > > specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>
> > The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
> > Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
> > about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
> > to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
> > one training trip to Ghana.
>
> >http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
> > ojectid=598
>
> >http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
>
> >http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
>
> > Dan
>
> Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
> built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
> guessed.
>
> Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
> the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
> said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
> Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
> kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
> about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
> the local market.
>
> But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
> parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
> imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
> could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
> which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
>
> --
> Ryan Cousineau rcous...@sfu.cahttp://www.wiredcola.com/
> "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
> to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
Yea but I don't have to build the rest of the bike with lousy parts.
If I can talk the wife into it, when the time comes I can get what I
need to have an effective bike either from a quality bike that I can
part out locally or with new parts. It would also open up many
options to customize to my riding needs.
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 11:24:40
From: DanKMTB@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sep 26, 2:02 pm, Gary Young <garyyou...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:47:11 -0700, DanK...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 26, 11:39 am, Gary Young <garyyou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:06:40 -0400, Marcus Coles wrote:
> >> > Doug Fattic in Niles, Michigan offers frame building courses, where the
> >> > student gets to make their own frame.
>
> >> > Probably a great way to spend your vacation.
>
> >> > Doug is one of the best frame makers in the US.
>
> >> >http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/fattic_doug.htm
>
> >> > Marcus
>
> >> I just took one of Doug's courses and would recommend it highly. Doug
> >> charges quite a bit less than UBI as well.
>
> > What's the deal with this? How much does he charge? Is there lodging
> > available nearby? Specific dates or days? Groups? That would be a
> > cool vaca!
>
> I don't think Doug's website is up and running at the moment, but he
> usually announces his classes on the framebuilder's mailing list. For
> instance, here's an announcement from earlier this year, which should give
> you an idea of his fees:
>
> http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.asp?Filename=framebuilders.10702.01...
>
> I think he has a class coming up in October, but it may already be full.
> Send him an email. Cheap lodging is available nearby.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Awesome, thanks. I won't make October, but I will have to look into
future classes.
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 13:02:52
From: Gary Young
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:47:11 -0700, DanKMTB@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 26, 11:39 am, Gary Young <garyyou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:06:40 -0400, Marcus Coles wrote:
>> > Doug Fattic in Niles, Michigan offers frame building courses, where the
>> > student gets to make their own frame.
>>
>> > Probably a great way to spend your vacation.
>>
>> > Doug is one of the best frame makers in the US.
>>
>> >http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/fattic_doug.htm
>>
>> > Marcus
>>
>> I just took one of Doug's courses and would recommend it highly. Doug
>> charges quite a bit less than UBI as well.
>
>
> What's the deal with this? How much does he charge? Is there lodging
> available nearby? Specific dates or days? Groups? That would be a
> cool vaca!
I don't think Doug's website is up and running at the moment, but he
usually announces his classes on the framebuilder's mailing list. For
instance, here's an announcement from earlier this year, which should give
you an idea of his fees:
http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.asp?Filename=framebuilders.10702.0163.eml
I think he has a class coming up in October, but it may already be full.
Send him an email. Cheap lodging is available nearby.
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 10:47:11
From: DanKMTB@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sep 26, 11:39 am, Gary Young <garyyou...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:06:40 -0400, Marcus Coles wrote:
> > Doug Fattic in Niles, Michigan offers frame building courses, where the
> > student gets to make their own frame.
>
> > Probably a great way to spend your vacation.
>
> > Doug is one of the best frame makers in the US.
>
> >http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/fattic_doug.htm
>
> > Marcus
>
> I just took one of Doug's courses and would recommend it highly. Doug
> charges quite a bit less than UBI as well.
What's the deal with this? How much does he charge? Is there lodging
available nearby? Specific dates or days? Groups? That would be a
cool vaca!
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 10:39:14
From: Gary Young
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:06:40 -0400, Marcus Coles wrote:
> Doug Fattic in Niles, Michigan offers frame building courses, where the
> student gets to make their own frame.
>
> Probably a great way to spend your vacation.
>
> Doug is one of the best frame makers in the US.
>
> http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/fattic_doug.htm
>
>
> Marcus
I just took one of Doug's courses and would recommend it highly. Doug
charges quite a bit less than UBI as well.
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 09:06:40
From: Marcus Coles
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
Doug Fattic in Niles, Michigan offers frame building courses, where the
student gets to make their own frame.
Probably a great way to spend your vacation.
Doug is one of the best frame makers in the US.
http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/fattic_doug.htm
Marcus
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2007 14:08:24
From: Mark
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sep 24, 11:22 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <1190690227.196726.306...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Mark <mblackwell1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically lived
> > on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it was
> > amazing.
>
> > I just bought a Schwinn Rocket mountain bike. I am having a blast,
> > but I am hardly in the shape I once was, but that happens when you are
> > near 50. From what I am reading here, it is an entry level. Yet it
> > is the nicest shifting bike I have ever owned.
>
> > I am considering building my next bike myself. I don't know if anyone
> > sells plans, people design their own, no one ever bothers to do this,
> > or even if there might be common kits out there. I am open to all
> > types of bikes. Just interested in finding out what options might be
> > out there from people that have done it.
>
> If you know how to weld or braze steel, the parts can be purchased, but
> it is a pretty advanced project. You could also mold your own frame from
> carbon fibre, which is a surprisingly common technique for hobbyists:
>
> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/
>
> Read all the stuff in the "Carbon Fibre" section.
>
> If you're just building up a cruiser or hacked-up bike, you can use
> simpler, heavier steels, which are even easier to weld:
>
> http://dclxvi.org/chunk/meet/index.html
>
> Note that any bike you build yourself, even out of carbon fibre, is
> likely to be so much heavier than commercial offerings, and take so long
> to build, that you would be better off taking a night job at 7-11 and
> buying a nice bike once you had saved up enough of your salary.
>
> --
> Ryan Cousineau rcous...@sfu.cahttp://www.wiredcola.com/
> "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
> to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
cared for it could last a long time as well.
Now welding is new to me, but I have sweated more copper plumbing pipe
than I have ever wanted to do. I soldered a lot of brass musical
instruments many years ago, once building my own.
Thanks for the ideas.
Mark
|
| | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 05:40:53
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com >,
Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com > wrote:
> On Sep 24, 11:22 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> > In article <1190690227.196726.306...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > Mark <mblackwell1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically lived
> > > on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it was
> > > amazing.
> >
> > > I just bought a Schwinn Rocket mountain bike. I am having a blast,
> > > but I am hardly in the shape I once was, but that happens when you are
> > > near 50. From what I am reading here, it is an entry level. Yet it
> > > is the nicest shifting bike I have ever owned.
> >
> > > I am considering building my next bike myself. I don't know if anyone
> > > sells plans, people design their own, no one ever bothers to do this,
> > > or even if there might be common kits out there. I am open to all
> > > types of bikes. Just interested in finding out what options might be
> > > out there from people that have done it.
> >
> > If you know how to weld or braze steel, the parts can be purchased, but
> > it is a pretty advanced project. You could also mold your own frame from
> > carbon fibre, which is a surprisingly common technique for hobbyists:
> >
> > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/
> >
> > Read all the stuff in the "Carbon Fibre" section.
> >
> > If you're just building up a cruiser or hacked-up bike, you can use
> > simpler, heavier steels, which are even easier to weld:
> >
> > http://dclxvi.org/chunk/meet/index.html
> >
> > Note that any bike you build yourself, even out of carbon fibre, is
> > likely to be so much heavier than commercial offerings, and take so long
> > to build, that you would be better off taking a night job at 7-11 and
> > buying a nice bike once you had saved up enough of your salary.
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Cousineau rcous...@sfu.cahttp://www.wiredcola.com/
> > "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
> > to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
>
> It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
> self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
> heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
> how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
> intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
> it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
> bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
> finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
> cared for it could last a long time as well.
Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
Everything else is the hard part,
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 19:57:06
From: Dennis Ferguson
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On 2007-09-26, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
>> self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
>> heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
>> how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
>> intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
>> it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
>> bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
>> finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
>> cared for it could last a long time as well.
>
> Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
> be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>
> Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
> scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
> specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
I don't know, bamboo seems pretty strong for its weight and it grows
like a weed. In Hong Kong pretty much all construction scaffolding I've
noticed is bamboo, I've never seen steel scaffolding, and this includes the
scaffolding on buildings that are well over 50 floors. I assume
the cost of the material is the benefit since it looks like more work
to erect the scaffolding.
Calfee will build you a bamboo frame pretty routinely if you pay for
it, though I don't think cost minimization is the object of their
particular offering.
Dennis Ferguson
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 02:11:49
From: Dan Becker
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <rcousine-DD662E.22405225092007@news.telus.net >, Ryan
Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca > wrote:
> In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
> > self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
> > heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
> > how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
> > intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
> > it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
> > bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
> > finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
> > cared for it could last a long time as well.
>
> Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
> be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>
> Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
> scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
> specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
one training trip to Ghana.
http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
ojectid=598
http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
Dan
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Sep 2007 03:45:32
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <260920070211495246%NoUCE@address.invalid >,
Dan Becker <NoUCE@address.invalid > wrote:
> In article <rcousine-DD662E.22405225092007@news.telus.net>, Ryan
> Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>
> > In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> > Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
> > > self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
> > > heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
> > > how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
> > > intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
> > > it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
> > > bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
> > > finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
> > > cared for it could last a long time as well.
> >
> > Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
> > be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
> >
> > Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
> > scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
> > specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>
> The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
> Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
> about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
> to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
> one training trip to Ghana.
>
> http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
> ojectid=598
>
> http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
>
> http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
>
> Dan
Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
guessed.
Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
the local market.
But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | | |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 21:57:51
From:
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:45:32 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca >
wrote:
>In article <260920070211495246%NoUCE@address.invalid>,
> Dan Becker <NoUCE@address.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In article <rcousine-DD662E.22405225092007@news.telus.net>, Ryan
>> Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
>> > Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
>> > > self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
>> > > heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
>> > > how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
>> > > intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
>> > > it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
>> > > bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
>> > > finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
>> > > cared for it could last a long time as well.
>> >
>> > Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>> > be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>> >
>> > Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
>> > scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
>> > specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>>
>> The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
>> Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
>> about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
>> to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
>> one training trip to Ghana.
>>
>> http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
>> ojectid=598
>>
>> http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
>>
>> http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
>>
>> Dan
>
>Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
>built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
>guessed.
>
>Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
>the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
>said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
>Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
>kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
>about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
>the local market.
>
>But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
>parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
>imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
>could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
>which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
Which could be a broken, bent, or otherwise unuseable frame. Lots of
THEM in Africa. (but then, a lot of them are the flimsy "flying
pigeons" and their ilk from China - and their components may not be
worth scavenging.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 04:36:48
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <76crf31pkq9t841ro8sb6g0brn81qb84hn@4ax.com >,
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:45:32 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <260920070211495246%NoUCE@address.invalid>,
> > Dan Becker <NoUCE@address.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <rcousine-DD662E.22405225092007@news.telus.net>, Ryan
> >> Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> >> > Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
> >> > > self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
> >> > > heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
> >> > > how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
> >> > > intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
> >> > > it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
> >> > > bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
> >> > > finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
> >> > > cared for it could last a long time as well.
> >> >
> >> > Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
> >> > be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
> >> >
> >> > Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
> >> > scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
> >> > specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
> >>
> >> The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
> >> Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
> >> about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
> >> to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
> >> one training trip to Ghana.
> >>
> >> http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
> >> ojectid=598
> >>
> >> http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
> >>
> >> http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
> >>
> >> Dan
> >
> >Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
> >built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
> >guessed.
> >
> >Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
> >the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
> >said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
> >Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
> >kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
> >about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
> >the local market.
> >
> >But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
> >parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
> >imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
> >could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
> >which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
>
> Which could be a broken, bent, or otherwise unuseable frame. Lots of
> THEM in Africa. (but then, a lot of them are the flimsy "flying
> pigeons" and their ilk from China - and their components may not be
> worth scavenging.
Possibly, but I'm pretty sure most of the donor-bikes start with useable
frames. If they didn't, it would be a waste of space to ship them.
Well, maybe not. The article mentions local Ghanian import duties which
cause complete bikes to be cheaper to import than parts. Nonetheless,
that's an artifact of the local tax system, not an inherent problem.
What I'm getting at is there's a large chance that by revolutionizing
the bicycle frame, they're solving the non-problem.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 12:34:09
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
>>>>> Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
>>>>>> self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
>>>>>> heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
>>>>>> how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
>>>>>> intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
>>>>>> it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
>>>>>> bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
>>>>>> finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
>>>>>> cared for it could last a long time as well.
>>>> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>>>> Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>>>>> be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>>>>> Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
>>>>> scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
>>>>> specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>>> Dan Becker <NoUCE@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
>>>> Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
>>>> about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
>>>> to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
>>>> one training trip to Ghana.
>>>> http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
>>>> ojectid=598
>>>> http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
>>>> http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
>> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>> Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
>>> built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
>>> guessed.
>>>
>>> Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
>>> the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
>>> said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
>>> Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
>>> kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
>>> about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
>>> the local market.
>>> But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
>>> parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
>>> imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
>>> could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
>>> which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
> clare at snyder.on.ca wrote:
>> Which could be a broken, bent, or otherwise unuseable frame. Lots of
>> THEM in Africa. (but then, a lot of them are the flimsy "flying
>> pigeons" and their ilk from China - and their components may not be
>> worth scavenging.
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> Possibly, but I'm pretty sure most of the donor-bikes start with useable
> frames. If they didn't, it would be a waste of space to ship them.
>
> Well, maybe not. The article mentions local Ghanian import duties which
> cause complete bikes to be cheaper to import than parts. Nonetheless,
> that's an artifact of the local tax system, not an inherent problem.
>
> What I'm getting at is there's a large chance that by revolutionizing
> the bicycle frame, they're solving the non-problem.
Uh, US duties run about 5.5% for complete bikes, often 14% for parts
(many esoteric exceptions including a duty on tubulars, which are not
made here. Wonder why rings are pricey? Chainrings are 'parts' @14%,
cranksets duty free)
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 12:44:34
From:
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:34:09 -0500, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org >
wrote:
>>>>>> Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> It really isn't about the money. Its about the desire to do it one's
>>>>>>> self and the satisfaction that comes with it. Yeah it likely will be
>>>>>>> heavier. I recently read an article that someone was teaching people
>>>>>>> how to build bikes out of bamboo in 3rd world countries. The idea
>>>>>>> intrigued me. First bamboo is really very strong for its weight but
>>>>>>> it has some flex in it that would give it at least some give for the
>>>>>>> bumps in the road. I already have woodworking experience. I could be
>>>>>>> finished nice to look nice as well and if it was properly sealed and
>>>>>>> cared for it could last a long time as well.
>
>>>>> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>>>>>> be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>>>>>> Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
>>>>>> scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
>>>>>> specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>
>>>> Dan Becker <NoUCE@address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> The referenced article is probably the one in the October 2007
>>>>> Bicycling magazine. It doesn't appear to be on their website yet. It is
>>>>> about Craig Calfee's collaboration with a Columbia University program
>>>>> to show people in Africa how to build cargo bikes from bamboo. Has made
>>>>> one training trip to Ghana.
>>>>> http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayproject.php?pr
>>>>> ojectid=598
>>>>> http://www.bamboobike.org/Home.html
>>>>> http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
>
>>> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>>>> Huh. It's clear I underestimated bamboo. Notably, Calfee says that a
>>>> built frame weighs about 4 pounds, which is lighter than I would have
>>>> guessed.
>>>>
>>>> Reading the bamboobike.org/Blog leads me to believe that my guess about
>>>> the frame not being the problem was not that far off the mark. That
>>>> said, the prototype is a semi-longbike design (basically, a lot like the
>>>> Kona Ute, which is in turn a rendition-as-frame of the BikeXtra longbike
>>>> kit. Kona aren't the only company doing a longbike this year: Surly is
>>>> about to sell the Big Dummy), which seems like a practical design for
>>>> the local market.
>>>> But basically, the blog says that they're looking into the local Ghanian
>>>> parts market, and you can either start with cheap and crappy new
>>>> imported parts (cheap and crappy parts being all that the local market
>>>> could afford, of course), or you can start from complete donor-bikes,
>>>> which generally have a better parts mix, but also, ahem, include a frame.
>
>> clare at snyder.on.ca wrote:
>>> Which could be a broken, bent, or otherwise unuseable frame. Lots of
>>> THEM in Africa. (but then, a lot of them are the flimsy "flying
>>> pigeons" and their ilk from China - and their components may not be
>>> worth scavenging.
>
>Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>> Possibly, but I'm pretty sure most of the donor-bikes start with useable
>> frames. If they didn't, it would be a waste of space to ship them.
>>
>> Well, maybe not. The article mentions local Ghanian import duties which
>> cause complete bikes to be cheaper to import than parts. Nonetheless,
>> that's an artifact of the local tax system, not an inherent problem.
>>
>> What I'm getting at is there's a large chance that by revolutionizing
>> the bicycle frame, they're solving the non-problem.
>
>Uh, US duties run about 5.5% for complete bikes, often 14% for parts
>(many esoteric exceptions including a duty on tubulars, which are not
>made here. Wonder why rings are pricey? Chainrings are 'parts' @14%,
>cranksets duty free)
Dear Andrew,
Because some patriots speculate in Egyptian cranksets?
***
"Why don't you sell your cranksets to the government?"
Milo vetoed the idea brusquely. "It's a matter of principle," he
explained firmly. "The government has no business in business, and I
would be the last person in the world to ever try to involve the
government in a business of mine. But the business of the government
is business," he remembered alertly, and continued with elation.
"Calvin Coolidge said that, and Calvin Coolidge was a President, so it
must be true. And the government does have the responsibility of
buying all the Egyptian cranksets I've got that no one else wants so I
can make a profit, doesn't it? But how will I get the government to do
it?"
"Bribe it."
"Bribe it!" Milo was outraged and almost lost his balance and broke
his neck again. "Shame on you," he scolded severely, breathing
virtuous fire down and upward into his rusty mustache through his
billowing nostrils and prim lips. "Bribery is against the law, and you
know it. But it's not against the law to make a profit, isn't it? So
it can't be against the law for me to bribe someone in order to make a
fair profit, can it? No, of course not! But how would I know who to
bribe?"
"Oh you don't worry about that. You make the bribe big enough and they
will find you. Just make sure you do everything right out in the open.
Let everyone know exactly what you want and how much you're willing to
pay for it. The first time you act guilty or ashamed, you might get
into trouble."
"I wish you'd come with me." Milo remarked. "I won't feel safe among
people who take bribes. They're no better than a bunch of crooks."
"You'll be alright," Yossarian assured him with confidence. "If you
run into trouble, just tell everybody that the security of the country
requires a strong domestic Egyptian-crankset speculating industry."
"It does," Milo informed him solemnly. "A strong Egyptian-crankset
speculating industry means a much stronger America."
"Of course it does. And if that doesn't work, point out the great
number of American families that depend on it for income."
"A great many American families do depend on it for income."
"You see?" said Yossarian. "You're much better at it than I am. You
almost make it sound true."
"It is true."
***
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 00:07:34
From:
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:40:53 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca >
wrote:
>Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>
>Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
>scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
>specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>
>Everything else is the hard part,
Dear Ryan,
"Bamboo frames.--From the discussion on the frame (chap. xxiii.) it
will be seen that when the frame is properly barced, and its members
so arranged that the stresses on them are along their axes, the
maximum tensile or compressive stress on the material is small. If a
steel tube were made as light as possible, with merely sufficient
sectional area to resist these principal stresses, it would be so thin
that it would be unable to resist rough handling, and would speedily
become indented locally. A lighter material with greater thickness,
though of less strength, would resist these local forces better. The
bamboo frame (fig. 262) is an effort in this direction, the bamboo
tubes being stronger locally than steel tubes of equal weight and
external diameter."
--Sharp, "Bicycles & Tricycles," 1896, p.286-7
Wooden and bamboo bicycles were built by several companies and ridden
by ordinary riders, but they offered no real advantages and were
expensive for mass production.
As far as I can tell, wood and bamboo were abandoned except for
novelty items because steel is hard to beat for price and overall
durability.
1897 wood frame lady's bike:
http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike25a.html
Lady's bentwood bicycle:
http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike31a.html
The bamboo bike that Andrew Muzi isn't talking about:
http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/wlhba/articleView.asp?pg=1&id=10367&pn=0
http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/search.asp?id=1130
***
My theory about steel versus bamboo is supported by this page:
"The Bamboo Cycle Company of Holbourne, London, had its works in Petit
Street, off Pountney Street, Wolverhampton. Their machines initially
had frames made of bamboo because it was very strong, lightweight and
free from corrosion. In practice steel proved to be a much better
material for the purpose and so only a few real bamboo bikes were
made."
"Later models were made of steel that was disguised to look like
bamboo. The bicycles were fitted with the patent 'Doolittle' back
pedalling brake and an automatically adjustable handlebar. The
machines were only in production for a few years and it is thought
that only small numbers were made. The company also had premises in
Thomas Street."
http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/Museum/Transport/bicycles/Bamboo.htm
The site above has pictures, but whether the bikes are made of real or
fake bamboo is hard to tell.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| | | | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 22:13:53
From: John Thompson
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
On 2007-09-26, carlfogel@comcast.net <carlfogel@comcast.net > wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:40:53 GMT, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>>be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
> As far as I can tell, wood and bamboo were abandoned except for
> novelty items because steel is hard to beat for price and overall
> durability.
>
> 1897 wood frame lady's bike:
>
> http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike25a.html
>
> Lady's bentwood bicycle:
>
> http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike31a.html
>
> The bamboo bike that Andrew Muzi isn't talking about:
>
> http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/wlhba/articleView.asp?pg=1&id=10367&pn=0
>
> http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/search.asp?id=1130
Her's the modern version:
http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm
--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
|
| | | | |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 13:03:39
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
> Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
>> Bamboo?! Really?!? I've seen bike-show bikes made out of it, but I would
>> be really leery about routinely building frames out of it.
>> Aside from the structural considerations, which may or may not be as
>> scary as I fear, the frame tubes are probably the cheapest, least
>> specialized part of a bicycle, third-world-wise.
>> Everything else is the hard part,
carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> "Bamboo frames.--From the discussion on the frame (chap. xxiii.) it
> will be seen that when the frame is properly barced, and its members
> so arranged that the stresses on them are along their axes, the
> maximum tensile or compressive stress on the material is small. If a
> steel tube were made as light as possible, with merely sufficient
> sectional area to resist these principal stresses, it would be so thin
> that it would be unable to resist rough handling, and would speedily
> become indented locally. A lighter material with greater thickness,
> though of less strength, would resist these local forces better. The
> bamboo frame (fig. 262) is an effort in this direction, the bamboo
> tubes being stronger locally than steel tubes of equal weight and
> external diameter."
>
> --Sharp, "Bicycles & Tricycles," 1896, p.286-7
>
> Wooden and bamboo bicycles were built by several companies and ridden
> by ordinary riders, but they offered no real advantages and were
> expensive for mass production.
>
> As far as I can tell, wood and bamboo were abandoned except for
> novelty items because steel is hard to beat for price and overall
> durability.
>
> 1897 wood frame lady's bike:
>
> http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike25a.html
>
> Lady's bentwood bicycle:
>
> http://www.metzbicyclemuseum.com/Bike31a.html
>
> The bamboo bike that Andrew Muzi isn't talking about:
>
> http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/wlhba/articleView.asp?pg=1&id=10367&pn=0
>
> http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/search.asp?id=1130
>
> ***
>
> My theory about steel versus bamboo is supported by this page:
>
> "The Bamboo Cycle Company of Holbourne, London, had its works in Petit
> Street, off Pountney Street, Wolverhampton. Their machines initially
> had frames made of bamboo because it was very strong, lightweight and
> free from corrosion. In practice steel proved to be a much better
> material for the purpose and so only a few real bamboo bikes were
> made."
>
> "Later models were made of steel that was disguised to look like
> bamboo. The bicycles were fitted with the patent 'Doolittle' back
> pedalling brake and an automatically adjustable handlebar. The
> machines were only in production for a few years and it is thought
> that only small numbers were made. The company also had premises in
> Thomas Street."
>
> http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/Museum/Transport/bicycles/Bamboo.htm
>
> The site above has pictures, but whether the bikes are made of real or
> fake bamboo is hard to tell.
There's a relatively current (?) outfit called Bamboo Bike Co which
paints frame tubes to look like bamboo. Occasional artistic efforts
include wrapping a string on a tube, smearing bondo, then removing the
string before airbrushing to a nice effect.
Our local bike factory 2 blocks up (a hundred or so years ago) used
maple, which like our shop floors, was chosen because they just had a
lot of it.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | |
Date: 25 Sep 2007 21:05:35
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
"Mark" <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1190754504.644258.178390@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 24, 11:22 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> Now welding is new to me, but I have sweated more copper plumbing pipe
> than I have ever wanted to do. I soldered a lot of brass musical
> instruments many years ago, once building my own.
>
> Thanks for the ideas.
>
> Mark
Then look into a brazed-lugged frame. It isn't all that much different from
soldering copper pipe. ...much hotter, of course, but very similar.
...but for a frame of some quality, you will still need specialized reamers
and facers as I mentioned before. ...and someway to hold the frame in
alignment as you work.
...might be able to get away without precisely facing the BB and headtube,
but you'll end up with scale and other junk inside of the seat tube to the
point that you won't be able to insert a seattube without properly cleaning
it out with a quality seat-tube reamer. I bought a used one years ago from
ebay and had a friend who was both a frame-builder and an instructor at a
machine-shop in a community college modify the thing (using a very large CNC
machine) so that it was perfect for a 27.2mm seattube. ...cost me all of $20
when they would normally be well over $100 for that one reamer alone.
tig welding takes much time to learn. I've practiced for days and am plenty
good enought to weld thick pipe, but no where near good enough to work with
thin bike tubing.
j
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| |
Date: 25 Sep 2007 04:22:08
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
In article <1190690227.196726.306500@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com >,
Mark <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com > wrote:
> I just recently got back into biking. As a kid, I practically lived
> on a old beat up 10 speed. How it took the abuse I gave it was
> amazing.
>
> I just bought a Schwinn Rocket mountain bike. I am having a blast,
> but I am hardly in the shape I once was, but that happens when you are
> near 50. From what I am reading here, it is an entry level. Yet it
> is the nicest shifting bike I have ever owned.
>
> I am considering building my next bike myself. I don't know if anyone
> sells plans, people design their own, no one ever bothers to do this,
> or even if there might be common kits out there. I am open to all
> types of bikes. Just interested in finding out what options might be
> out there from people that have done it.
If you know how to weld or braze steel, the parts can be purchased, but
it is a pretty advanced project. You could also mold your own frame from
carbon fibre, which is a surprisingly common technique for hobbyists:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/
Read all the stuff in the "Carbon Fibre" section.
If you're just building up a cruiser or hacked-up bike, you can use
simpler, heavier steels, which are even easier to weld:
http://dclxvi.org/chunk/meet/index.html
Note that any bike you build yourself, even out of carbon fibre, is
likely to be so much heavier than commercial offerings, and take so long
to build, that you would be better off taking a night job at 7-11 and
buying a nice bike once you had saved up enough of your salary.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| |
Date: 24 Sep 2007 22:53:58
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: Building your own bike
|
"Mark" <mblackwell1958@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1190690227.196726.306500@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> I am considering building my next bike myself. I don't know if anyone
> sells plans, people design their own, no one ever bothers to do this,
> or even if there might be common kits out there. I am open to all
> types of bikes. Just interested in finding out what options might be
> out there from people that have done it.
"building" meaning assembling the components on a purchased frame or
attempting to weld a frame yourself?
If the former, not really a big deal with a number of hand tools. If the
latter, you're into some fairly complex matters requiring some fairly heavy
equipment to do this properly. There is (or at least used to be) a
framebuilder's email list, with some fairly good info. ...but you're
speaking about either a lathe or vertical mill and some way to hold tubes to
cut and miter at precise angles. ...or cutting and filing by hand, and that
takes much time and practice. ...and then a tig welder with some specialized
set-ups. ...unless you want to do an older-type brazed joint and then you
will need a torch. ...and an expensive frame jig to hold everything in
place (although I have seen some homemade inexpensive wooden jigs). ...and
then some specialized cycle reamers to face the bottom-bracket and
head-tubes, and some alignment tools for the rear derailleurs and to clean
up the inside of the seat tube after welding. ...figure about 500-$1000 for
the hand tools alone.
...but if you have access to a machine shop and want to custom make some of
your own jigs, you can get tubes and all other necessary supplies from
on-line sources.
I've listed a few sites below. ...and if you're serious, I may have a
number of the high-quality frame building tools that are necessary that I've
considered selling. ...not so sure that I want to part with them, however.
Jeff
http://www.timpaterek.com/
http://www.henryjames.com/
http://www.anvilbikes.com/
http://www.bikeschool.com/store/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
