| |
Main
Date: 10 Oct 2007 21:23:38
From:
Subject: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
I owe Frank Krygowski for a bare rim that he tested for me in another
thread, which dropped a tenth of an inch under a 10-lb weight, but was
squashed flat under a full Krygowski (roughly 0.5 Chalos):
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/0cc4b7c7cbab674b
***
From the 1934 Columbia catalogue, p. 14-15, right-hand column:
http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/800.htm
I hope that it's safe to say that we're square.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 15:06:17
From:
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Oct 10, 11:23 pm, carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
> I owe Frank Krygowski for a bare rim that he tested for me in another
> thread, which dropped a tenth of an inch under a 10-lb weight, but was
> squashed flat under a full Krygowski (roughly 0.5 Chalos):
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/0cc4b7c7cbab674b
>
> ***
>
> From the 1934 Columbia catalogue, p. 14-15, right-hand column:
>
> http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/800.htm
>
> I hope that it's safe to say that we're square.
>
Deepest thanks, Carl, and nice find! Paid in full!
- Frank Krygowski
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 07:58:08
From: Chalo
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
Michael Warner wrote:
>
> How much is a Chalo in kg, anyway? Judging from his endless rants about
> lycra and CF, I'd say it's well into 3 figures :-)
That's 155kg and 2.03m to you, son. _Way_ too much man for a plastic
bike. You are free to ride your Malibu Barbie Fun Bike as much as you
like, though.
Chalo
|
| | |
Date: 12 Oct 2007 12:16:18
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
In article
<1192089488.203203.322570@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com >
,
Chalo <chalo.colina@gmail.com > wrote:
> Michael Warner wrote:
> >
> > How much is a Chalo in kg, anyway? Judging from his endless rants about
> > lycra and CF, I'd say it's well into 3 figures :-)
>
> That's 155kg and 2.03m to you, son. _Way_ too much man for a plastic
> bike. You are free to ride your Malibu Barbie Fun Bike as much as you
> like, though.
Twenty-four stone, six.
--
Michael Press
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 09:03:59
From: Tim McNamara
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
In article <1192089488.203203.322570@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com >,
Chalo <chalo.colina@gmail.com > wrote:
> Michael Warner wrote:
> >
> > How much is a Chalo in kg, anyway? Judging from his endless rants
> > about lycra and CF, I'd say it's well into 3 figures :-)
>
> That's 155kg and 2.03m to you, son.
Dang, Chalo, and I thought I was a moose on a bike at 95 kg and 1.96 m.
I'd be the runt of the litter compared to you.
|
| | | |
Date: 12 Oct 2007 13:39:53
From: Michael Warner
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:59 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Dang, Chalo, and I thought I was a moose on a bike at 95 kg and 1.96 m.
> I'd be the runt of the litter compared to you.
He's only 15cm taller than me, but weighs over twice as much! Incredible.
Either he's a bodybuilder, doesn't ride much or consumes more food and beer
than a typical third-world country :-)
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 22:12:48
From: Michael Warner
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:58:08 -0000, Chalo wrote:
> That's 155kg and 2.03m to you, son. _Way_ too much man for a plastic
> bike.
Well, there's something we can agree on :-)
> You are free to ride your Malibu Barbie Fun Bike as much as you
> like, though.
Why, thank you. They're particularly good up hills, you know.
|
| |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 15:08:40
From: Michael Warner
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:23:38 -0600, carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> I owe Frank Krygowski for a bare rim that he tested for me in another
> thread, which dropped a tenth of an inch under a 10-lb weight, but was
> squashed flat under a full Krygowski (roughly 0.5 Chalos):
How much is a Chalo in kg, anyway? Judging from his endless rants about
lycra and CF, I'd say it's well into 3 figures :-)
|
| | |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 00:04:27
From:
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:08:40 +0930, Michael Warner
<mvw@westnet.com.au > wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:23:38 -0600, carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> I owe Frank Krygowski for a bare rim that he tested for me in another
>> thread, which dropped a tenth of an inch under a 10-lb weight, but was
>> squashed flat under a full Krygowski (roughly 0.5 Chalos):
>
>How much is a Chalo in kg, anyway? Judging from his endless rants about
>lycra and CF, I'd say it's well into 3 figures :-)
Dear Michael,
The most recent Chalo is a svelte 1.82 standard Fogels, which is in
turn a unit of approximately 1.055 current Krygowskis.*
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
* Units subject to change without notice.
|
| | | |
Date: 11 Oct 2007 22:14:50
From: Michael Warner
Subject: Re: Payment to Frank Krygowski
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:04:27 -0600, carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> The most recent Chalo is a svelte 1.82 standard Fogels
Or 2.04 Michaels before meals, if you're collecting units.
|
|
