| |
Main
Date: 30 Sep 2007 17:07:29
From: blisterlester
Subject: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
|
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2007 05:52:44
From: Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dyad
|
On Oct 6, 6:03 am, Reid <rra...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Slight off-topic. I'm building wheels with these rims, and there are
> lots of burrs created when the rim was drilled inside the rim. Do these
> need to come out? Also, the rims seem to have a slight flat spot under
> the label - at the joint. Are these things normal with these rims?
>
> blisterlester wrote:
> > Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
Pretty normal for Velocity. Ensure the tension around the joint, on
either side, is proper and you won't notice the joint.
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2007 05:51:30
From: Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
On Oct 5, 3:59 pm, Mark <m...@blackesthole.com > wrote:
> Nate Knutson wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 4:07 pm, blisterlester <wwill...@attbi.com> wrote:
> >> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
>
> > you can call velocity and ask them... pretty sure their answer is 110
> > max.
>
> Here's what velocity told me by e-mail. Nice that they responded:
>
> "We build all of our wheels at the same spoke tension. Spoke tension is
> measured in Kilograms of Force (KGF). We build the front wheel between
> 105 -115 KGF, and the rear between 110 - 120 KGF."
Except their single eyelet ones, like Razor, which they told me to
build at a maximum of 100 kgf..
|
| |
Date: 06 Oct 2007 06:03:39
From: Reid
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dyad
|
Slight off-topic. I'm building wheels with these rims, and there are
lots of burrs created when the rim was drilled inside the rim. Do these
need to come out? Also, the rims seem to have a slight flat spot under
the label - at the joint. Are these things normal with these rims?
blisterlester wrote:
> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Oct 2007 01:44:19
From: daveornee
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
Reid Wrote:
> Slight off-topic. I'm building wheels with these rims, and there are
> lots of burrs created when the rim was drilled inside the rim. D
> these
> need to come out? Also, the rims seem to have a slight flat spo
> under
> the label - at the joint. Are these things normal with these rims?
>
> blisterlester wrote:
> > Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
Burrs seem to be there in varying degrees on different rims. I use
deburring tool to remove them and suggest you do the same to protec
against "inside" flats. Joints usually have a small amount o
"flatness", but can easily be "rounded" out when buidling to prope
tension level and tension balance. There are often small burrs on th
rim jointed ends. These burrs can also be smoothed out after the whee
build is completed with a fine flat stone
--
daveornee
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Oct 2007 13:16:09
From: Reid
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
daveornee wrote:
> Reid Wrote:
>> Slight off-topic. I'm building wheels with these rims, and there are
>> lots of burrs created when the rim was drilled inside the rim. Do
>> these
>> need to come out? Also, the rims seem to have a slight flat spot
>> under
>> the label - at the joint. Are these things normal with these rims?
>>
>> blisterlester wrote:
>>> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
> Burrs seem to be there in varying degrees on different rims. I use a
> deburring tool to remove them and suggest you do the same to protect
> against "inside" flats. Joints usually have a small amount of
> "flatness", but can easily be "rounded" out when buidling to proper
> tension level and tension balance. There are often small burrs on the
> rim jointed ends. These burrs can also be smoothed out after the wheel
> build is completed with a fine flat stone.
I think I used the wrong word when I said "burrs." What I am talking
about are little, separate pieces of aluminum - circles or spirals -
that are between the walls of the rim. Some simply fall out but I
needed to hook some of them and pull them out. I missed one until it
turned up poking out around a nipple.
|
| |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 16:55:23
From: Dane Buson
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
blisterlester <wwilliam@attbi.com > wrote:
> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
When did they start making wooden rims?
--
Dane Buson - sigdane@unixbigots.org
The only real advantage to punk music is that nobody can whistle it.
|
| |
Date: 01 Oct 2007 05:42:27
From: Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
On Sep 30, 5:07 pm, blisterlester <wwill...@attbi.com > wrote:
> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
I think 110 max is a better idea. I use 100-105(just built a Dyad
Tandem wheelset with those numbers..100-105)
|
| | |
Date: 01 Oct 2007 11:37:29
From: blisterlester
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:07 pm, blisterlester <wwill...@attbi.com> wrote:
>> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
>
> I think 110 max is a better idea. I use 100-105(just built a Dyad
> Tandem wheelset with those numbers..100-105)
>
115 to 100 is about an eighth of a turn! Thanks.
|
| |
Date: 01 Oct 2007 02:07:35
From: Nate Knutson
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
On Sep 30, 4:07 pm, blisterlester <wwill...@attbi.com > wrote:
> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
you can call velocity and ask them... pretty sure their answer is 110
max.
|
| | |
Date: 05 Oct 2007 15:59:39
From: Mark
Subject: Re: Spoke Tension for Velocity Dryad
|
Nate Knutson wrote:
> On Sep 30, 4:07 pm, blisterlester <wwill...@attbi.com> wrote:
>> Is 115 kgf drive side too high? Thanks.
>
> you can call velocity and ask them... pretty sure their answer is 110
> max.
>
Here's what velocity told me by e-mail. Nice that they responded:
"We build all of our wheels at the same spoke tension. Spoke tension is
measured in Kilograms of Force (KGF). We build the front wheel between
105 -115 KGF, and the rear between 110 - 120 KGF."
|
|
