| |
Main
Date: 28 Sep 2007 21:27:27
From: A Muzi
Subject: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
back from dechroming.
I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
|
| |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 17:45:34
From: dustoyevsky@mac.com
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Oct 2, 1:17 am, carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2007 22:29:47 -0700, gill...@cs.ubc.ca (Donald Gillies)
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
> >bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
> >across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
> >drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>
> >yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
>
> >- Don Gillies
>
> Dear Comrade Don,
>
> Da! In Soviet, grandmothers not ripped off!
>
> No capitalist shipping size-limit rules in People's Republic! All is
> fair and glorious!
>
> Apparatchiks handle shipping! Grandsons pay, not grandmothers!
>
> We invented bicycle! Communist bicycles win Olympics!
>
> Bicyclists of world, unite! Have nothing to lose but chains when you
> go back to highwheelers!*
>
> Cheerski,
>
> Karl--er, Carl Fogel
>
> *Additional charges may apply for highwheeler shipping behind Iron
> Curtain. Grandmothers ship free to Siberia.
Komrade Carl, you have outdone yourself. Thank you. --D-y
|
| | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 21:19:51
From:
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:45:34 -0700, "dustoyevsky@mac.com"
<dustoyevsky@mac.com > wrote:
>On Oct 2, 1:17 am, carlfo...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2007 22:29:47 -0700, gill...@cs.ubc.ca (Donald Gillies)
>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
>> >bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
>> >across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
>> >drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>>
>> >yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
>>
>> >- Don Gillies
>>
>> Dear Comrade Don,
>>
>> Da! In Soviet, grandmothers not ripped off!
>>
>> No capitalist shipping size-limit rules in People's Republic! All is
>> fair and glorious!
>>
>> Apparatchiks handle shipping! Grandsons pay, not grandmothers!
>>
>> We invented bicycle! Communist bicycles win Olympics!
>>
>> Bicyclists of world, unite! Have nothing to lose but chains when you
>> go back to highwheelers!*
>>
>> Cheerski,
>>
>> Karl--er, Carl Fogel
>>
>> *Additional charges may apply for highwheeler shipping behind Iron
>> Curtain. Grandmothers ship free to Siberia.
>
>Komrade Carl, you have outdone yourself. Thank you. --D-y
Dear D,
Remember the old Olympics scoring comedy routine?
"From the U.S. judge, a 9.7! This looks promising!"
[cheers]
"The Italian judge gives the performance a 9.8!"
[louder cheers]
"The Japanese judge holds up a 9.9!"
[pandemonium]
"The crowd is going wild! The Swiss judge agrees, another 9.9!"
[groans]
"And from the Russian judge . . . a three."
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 08:41:29
From: Art Harris
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi
> > A Muzi
> Donald Gillies wrote:
> > Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
> > corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
> > what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
> > So much for capitalism !!!
>
> Capitalism achieves more, and for more
> people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
Yes, but there's much merit in what Donald Gilles says. Read an
interesting discussion of modern-day Capitalism by capitalist John
Bogle:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09282007/transcript1.html
Art Harris
|
| |
Date: 30 Sep 2007 17:09:45
From:
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Sep 29, 12:12 pm, A Muzi <a...@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> (How efficient is package
> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
Well they were able to deliver a shipment of nuclear material to
Syria, according to the Israelis. And then they had no problem
receiving a shipment of oil from us a week or two after that. So, not
too bad...
|
| |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 12:28:38
From: Tim McNamara
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
In article <13frdup638vf471@corp.supernews.com >,
A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame
> came back from dechroming.
>
> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>
> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>
> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the
> sharp square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all
> that.
Triangulation good.
Mystique-y Italian frames from Cinelli and Masi and De Rosa and the like
have a reputation among frame builders for having been built with many
shortcuts and too much heat. The US-built Masis were reportedly better
constructed than the Italian ones.
|
| | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 11:51:38
From: * * Chas
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
"Tim McNamara" <timmcn@bitstream.net > wrote in message
news:timmcn-4A3A22.12283829092007@news.iphouse.com...
> In article <13frdup638vf471@corp.supernews.com>,
> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
> > Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame
> > came back from dechroming.
> >
> > I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> > http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
> >
> > There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> > Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> > plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
> >
> > OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the
> > sharp square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all
> > that.
>
> Triangulation good.
>
> Mystique-y Italian frames from Cinelli and Masi and De Rosa and the like
> have a reputation among frame builders for having been built with many
> shortcuts and too much heat. The US-built Masis were reportedly better
> constructed than the Italian ones.
Back in the day a riding buddy had a very early orange Colnago with
beautiful paint and lugwork. Everyone drooled over it. One problem, it had
a serious rattle in the toptube.
A fellow rider from the local school of medicine used a (new product at
the time) fiber optics scope to look into the toptube through a small hole
in the seat tube. They found a 8" long piece of brazing rod rolling around
in the tube. They fixed the problem with some glue. That had to be
intentional.
As far as other sacred cow cycling products from Italy, we were assembling
an all Campy NR bike at our shop in the mid 70s. The left hand pedal
wouldn't start to thread into the crank arm. On closer examination we
discovered that the pedal had dual lead threads cut into the shaft.
Someone had to do that intentionally because the normal pedal threads were
cut or rolled on a screw machine.
Chas.
|
| |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 09:09:47
From: Donald Gillies
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > writes:
>Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
>back from dechroming.
>There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
>Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
>plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
So much for capitalism !!!
- Don Gillies
San Diego, CA
|
| | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 13:12:49
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:
>> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
>> back from dechroming.
>> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
>> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
>> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
Donald Gillies wrote:
> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
> So much for capitalism !!!
I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Oct 2007 22:29:47
From: Donald Gillies
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > writes:
>Donald Gillies wrote:
>> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
>> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
>> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
>> So much for capitalism !!!
>I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
>UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
>successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
>people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
>delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
Since the IPO, i have tried to use UPS for shipping, but their prices
are normally 2x Fedex and USPostal. Quite frankly, I don't know how
they stay in business. Oh yeah I know, they rip off everyday
consumers and use their booty to subsidize amazon.com ...
Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
- Don Gillies
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 11:41:38
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
>> Donald Gillies wrote:
>>> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
>>> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
>>> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
>>> So much for capitalism !!!
> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:
>> I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
>> UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
>> successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
>> people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
>> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
Donald Gillies wrote:
> Since the IPO, i have tried to use UPS for shipping, but their prices
> are normally 2x Fedex and USPostal. Quite frankly, I don't know how
> they stay in business. Oh yeah I know, they rip off everyday
> consumers and use their booty to subsidize amazon.com ...
>
> Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
> bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
> across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
> drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>
> yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
I've been around the block with UPS, FedEx and DHL. They are tough
negotiators with sharp pencils, I agree. Labor fuel etc have made _all_
delivery services expensive, and strict about size limits and
surcharges, compared to the low rates of our youth.
Be that as it may, service is still relatively cheap, quite reliable
overall. You're welcome to send your small packets by USPS and heavy
freight by motor carrier, as we do. It's a broad and diverse market,
package delivery.
We sometimes do not appreciate the broad and deep societal benefits of
competition where it exists. I give you Ryan Air or Southwest for
example. In 1980, Dave Goodall from Holdsworthy explained they were
opening six new US importers (a company I partly owned imported them
then). We were shocked. He unrolled a US map, noting that more were
needed to "get the lorries around to dealers promptly". Our mouths were
agape. Unlike here, England didn't yet have much FedEx or UPS
penetration and distributors really did deliver to shops in their own
trucks. Wanna pay for _that_??
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | | | | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 19:28:31
From:
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:41:38 -0500, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
>>> Donald Gillies wrote:
>>>> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
>>>> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
>>>> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
>>>> So much for capitalism !!!
>
>> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:
>>> I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
>>> UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
>>> successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
>>> people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
>>> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
>
>Donald Gillies wrote:
>> Since the IPO, i have tried to use UPS for shipping, but their prices
>> are normally 2x Fedex and USPostal. Quite frankly, I don't know how
>> they stay in business. Oh yeah I know, they rip off everyday
>> consumers and use their booty to subsidize amazon.com ...
>>
>> Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
>> bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
>> across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
>> drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>>
>> yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
>
>I've been around the block with UPS, FedEx and DHL. They are tough
>negotiators with sharp pencils, I agree. Labor fuel etc have made _all_
>delivery services expensive, and strict about size limits and
>surcharges, compared to the low rates of our youth.
>
>Be that as it may, service is still relatively cheap, quite reliable
>overall. You're welcome to send your small packets by USPS and heavy
>freight by motor carrier, as we do. It's a broad and diverse market,
>package delivery.
>
>We sometimes do not appreciate the broad and deep societal benefits of
>competition where it exists. I give you Ryan Air or Southwest for
>example. In 1980, Dave Goodall from Holdsworthy explained they were
>opening six new US importers (a company I partly owned imported them
>then). We were shocked. He unrolled a US map, noting that more were
>needed to "get the lorries around to dealers promptly". Our mouths were
>agape. Unlike here, England didn't yet have much FedEx or UPS
>penetration and distributors really did deliver to shops in their own
>trucks. Wanna pay for _that_??
The UPS stores are something special. There is a very severe penalty for being a
private person who cannot handle the entirety of the boxing, labelling,
information transfer yourself. They will mercilessly hose anyone they can.
You and I are okay, but this guy's granma trying to ship a bike is going to get
burned cruelly by those guys. I've had to walk out of one of their locations
myself and heard worse stories from others.
Ron
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 03 Oct 2007 03:37:07
From: Michael Press
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
In article
<jqk5g3d570u20n2ae4avmacmut1l7kv0ki@4ax.com >,
Hobbes@spnb&s.com wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:41:38 -0500, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
> >>> Donald Gillies wrote:
> >>>> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
> >>>> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
> >>>> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
> >>>> So much for capitalism !!!
> >
> >> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:
> >>> I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
> >>> UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
> >>> successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
> >>> people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
> >>> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
> >
> >Donald Gillies wrote:
> >> Since the IPO, i have tried to use UPS for shipping, but their prices
> >> are normally 2x Fedex and USPostal. Quite frankly, I don't know how
> >> they stay in business. Oh yeah I know, they rip off everyday
> >> consumers and use their booty to subsidize amazon.com ...
> >>
> >> Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
> >> bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
> >> across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
> >> drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
> >>
> >> yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
> >
> >I've been around the block with UPS, FedEx and DHL. They are tough
> >negotiators with sharp pencils, I agree. Labor fuel etc have made _all_
> >delivery services expensive, and strict about size limits and
> >surcharges, compared to the low rates of our youth.
> >
> >Be that as it may, service is still relatively cheap, quite reliable
> >overall. You're welcome to send your small packets by USPS and heavy
> >freight by motor carrier, as we do. It's a broad and diverse market,
> >package delivery.
> >
> >We sometimes do not appreciate the broad and deep societal benefits of
> >competition where it exists. I give you Ryan Air or Southwest for
> >example. In 1980, Dave Goodall from Holdsworthy explained they were
> >opening six new US importers (a company I partly owned imported them
> >then). We were shocked. He unrolled a US map, noting that more were
> >needed to "get the lorries around to dealers promptly". Our mouths were
> >agape. Unlike here, England didn't yet have much FedEx or UPS
> >penetration and distributors really did deliver to shops in their own
> >trucks. Wanna pay for _that_??
>
> The UPS stores are something special. There is a very severe penalty for being a
> private person who cannot handle the entirety of the boxing, labelling,
> information transfer yourself. They will mercilessly hose anyone they can.
>
> You and I are okay, but this guy's granma trying to ship a bike is going to get
> burned cruelly by those guys. I've had to walk out of one of their locations
> myself and heard worse stories from others.
I love the stories told about unless you pay double for
express service, the Christmas package will not arrive until
after the New Year (and it's still December 10). The person
listening to this hard sell should be asking herself
"Where is UPS warehousing all these undelivered packages,
and how much does the warehouse cost?"
--
Michael Press
|
| | | | | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 13:55:24
From:
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:41:38 -0500, A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org >
wrote:
>>> Donald Gillies wrote:
>>>> Aint it always true that quality and value takes a nosedive after a
>>>> corporate takeover or stock issuance. That, in my opinion, is exactly
>>>> what people say about Cinelli (and also about UPS here in the USA ...)
>>>> So much for capitalism !!!
>
>> A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:
>>> I do not know of a bicycle manufacturer named "UPS".
>>> UPS package delivery service started 1907 with bicycle deliveries and
>>> successfully went public in 1999. Capitalism achieves more, and for more
>>> people, than any other real or putative format (How efficient is package
>>> delivery in North Korea nowadays?)
>
>Donald Gillies wrote:
>> Since the IPO, i have tried to use UPS for shipping, but their prices
>> are normally 2x Fedex and USPostal. Quite frankly, I don't know how
>> they stay in business. Oh yeah I know, they rip off everyday
>> consumers and use their booty to subsidize amazon.com ...
>>
>> Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
>> bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
>> across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
>> drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>>
>> yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
>
>I've been around the block with UPS, FedEx and DHL. They are tough
>negotiators with sharp pencils, I agree. Labor fuel etc have made _all_
>delivery services expensive, and strict about size limits and
>surcharges, compared to the low rates of our youth.
>
>Be that as it may, service is still relatively cheap, quite reliable
>overall. You're welcome to send your small packets by USPS and heavy
>freight by motor carrier, as we do. It's a broad and diverse market,
>package delivery.
>
>We sometimes do not appreciate the broad and deep societal benefits of
>competition where it exists. I give you Ryan Air or Southwest for
>example. In 1980, Dave Goodall from Holdsworthy explained they were
>opening six new US importers (a company I partly owned imported them
>then). We were shocked. He unrolled a US map, noting that more were
>needed to "get the lorries around to dealers promptly". Our mouths were
>agape. Unlike here, England didn't yet have much FedEx or UPS
>penetration and distributors really did deliver to shops in their own
>trucks. Wanna pay for _that_??
Dear Andrew,
By coincidence, this article caught my eye today:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/173rpdzf.asp
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 00:17:54
From:
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On 1 Oct 2007 22:29:47 -0700, gillies@cs.ubc.ca (Donald Gillies)
wrote:
[snip]
>Also, they're the only place ever to charge me $112.00 to ship a
>bicycle across the USA. Most places only charge $35 to ship that bike
>across country. The box bulged by 1/2", i had to go home before the
>drop-off, and they ripped off my 79-yr old grandmother.
>
>yeah, capitalism works real, real well ...
>
>- Don Gillies
Dear Comrade Don,
Da! In Soviet, grandmothers not ripped off!
No capitalist shipping size-limit rules in People's Republic! All is
fair and glorious!
Apparatchiks handle shipping! Grandsons pay, not grandmothers!
We invented bicycle! Communist bicycles win Olympics!
Bicyclists of world, unite! Have nothing to lose but chains when you
go back to highwheelers!*
Cheerski,
Karl--er, Carl Fogel
*Additional charges may apply for highwheeler shipping behind Iron
Curtain. Grandmothers ship free to Siberia.
|
| |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 08:50:44
From: M-gineering
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi wrote:
> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
> back from dechroming.
>
> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>
> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>
> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
> square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
I find frames with cracked chainstays often have cracked dropouts as
well. Guess it was the other way round with this one
--
/Marten
info(apestaartje)m-gineering(punt)nl
|
| |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 05:25:01
From: Ryan Cousineau
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
In article <13frdup638vf471@corp.supernews.com >,
A Muzi <am@yellowjersey.org > wrote:
> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
> back from dechroming.
>
> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>
> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>
> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
> square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
The clear conclusion is that the other bikes, with full brazings, were
overbuilt.
-RjC.
--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos
|
| |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 21:39:40
From: A Muzi
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi wrote:
> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
> back from dechroming.
>
> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>
> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>
> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
> square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
More:
http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CIN2.JPG
Some days were better than others at Cinelli, apparently.
--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
|
| | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 11:06:57
From: _
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:39:40 -0500, A Muzi wrote:
> A Muzi wrote:
>> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame came
>> back from dechroming.
>>
>> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
>> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>>
>> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
>> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
>> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>>
>> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
>> square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
>
> More:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CIN2.JPG
>
> Some days were better than others at Cinelli, apparently.
One of my first bikes was a Cinelli. The brake bolt hole was not square to
the crown (this has since been corrected). This was from a bike with a
serial number just over 100, but still that's not an excuse.
|
| | |
Date: 29 Sep 2007 01:46:14
From: * * Chas
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
"A Muzi" <am@yellowjersey.org > wrote in message
news:13frelk3vq59m82@corp.supernews.com...
> A Muzi wrote:
> > Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame
came
> > back from dechroming.
> >
> > I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
> > http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
> >
> > There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
> > Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
> > plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
> >
> > OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
> > square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
>
> More:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CIN2.JPG
>
> Some days were better than others at Cinelli, apparently.
> --
> Andrew Muzi
> www.yellowjersey.org
> Open every day since 1 April, 1971
I cut open a late 1960s 52 cm Cinelli frame that had run into the back of
a car. I was going to replace the top and down tubes. The original tubes
were never mitered, just shoved into the lugs and brazed. There was at
least a 1/4" (6mm) gap between the tubes in the lugs and the head tube.
The Cinelli lugs were very thick and looked like they were cast. They
survived a crash that 90 degreed the Columbus SP top and down tubes. The
owner decided that it was going to cost too much to fix and abandoned the
project.
On your repair, were the lugs 1010Bs? Some of those came with a heavy
black surface scale that needed to be cleaned off before brazing. That's
pretty amazing that the joint lasted so long.
Chas.
|
| | |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 21:08:25
From: jim beam
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
A Muzi wrote:
> A Muzi wrote:
>> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame
>> came back from dechroming.
>>
>> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
>> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>>
>> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
>> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
>> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>>
>> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the sharp
>> square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
>
> More:
> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CIN2.JPG
the squared ends create much more of a stress riser than the normal
round tube bridge. cinelli should have known this.
>
> Some days were better than others at Cinelli, apparently.
clearly there's a q.c issue regarding the dropout. the broken chainstay
may be just that squared design, and/or q.c. [excessive brazing heat].
the latter to be determined by metallography.
bottom line, iirc, dedacciai specifically recommend chain stay bridges
for their steel tube sets and cite fatigue mitigation for explanation.
provided the tube hasn't been butted too thin in that region, and the
bridge isn't square ended, i see no reason why they shouldn't be right.
|
| | | |
Date: 28 Sep 2007 21:26:37
From: jim beam
Subject: Re: Steel Frame Breakage Redux
|
jim beam wrote:
> A Muzi wrote:
>> A Muzi wrote:
>>> Tonight, I started a cracked chainstay replacement after the frame
>>> came back from dechroming.
>>>
>>> I lifted the broken piece end and easily peeled off the chainstay:
>>> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CINL.JPG
>>>
>>> There was a small contact of brass for 3-4mm of area (top, inside).
>>> Otherwise, this 1983(?) Cinelli passed inspection, polishing and
>>> plating, then got past the assemblers, without actually being brazed.
>>>
>>> OTOH it was ridden for many years before finally breaking at the
>>> sharp square cast bridge. Draw what conclusions you will from all that.
>>
>> More:
>> http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CS83CIN2.JPG
>
> the squared ends create much more of a stress riser than the normal
> round tube bridge. cinelli should have known this.
here is an example of a text-book perfect bridge:
http://www.prodigalchild.net/FrameHolesBW.jpg
from:
http://www.prodigalchild.net/Bicycle6.htm
the pad between the bridge and the chainstay helps distribute stress.
>
>
>>
>> Some days were better than others at Cinelli, apparently.
>
> clearly there's a q.c issue regarding the dropout. the broken chainstay
> may be just that squared design, and/or q.c. [excessive brazing heat].
> the latter to be determined by metallography.
>
> bottom line, iirc, dedacciai specifically recommend chain stay bridges
> for their steel tube sets and cite fatigue mitigation for explanation.
> provided the tube hasn't been butted too thin in that region, and the
> bridge isn't square ended, i see no reason why they shouldn't be right.
|
|
