| |
Main
Date: 21 Sep 2007 06:29:38
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Where is Tom Sherman?
|
Damn, when Tom Sherman is not here I hardly know who to beat up on. He is
just so right for me - a liberal-socialist-communist pig. No one else can
substitute for him.
Why does he have no consideration for me whatsoever. He knows I am lost on
these freaking cycling newsgroups without him. Well, I am storing up lots of
bile to spew on him the moment he returns. Hells Bells, these cycling
newsgroups are worthless without Tom Sherman here to serve as my foil.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
|
| |
Date: 26 Sep 2007 05:48:39
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Where is Tom Sherman?
|
On Sep 25, 2:35 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1190509085.658363.312370@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > Not another where's Tom Sherman regurgitated post???
>
> > You said it yourself ... Any given individual is irrelevant when
> > viewed from the perspective of the group as whole, so why the
> > incessant lament about Mr. Shermans absence???
>
> Yes, the above is only too true, but I am here mainly for Tom Sherman as he
> is the only one on these freaking-cycling-newsgroups (all one word) who has
> ever proven himself a worthy adversary for me.
>
> > You said it yourself ... I am convinced that no one with any
> > intelligence would be caught dead on these freaking cycling
> > newsgroups, so perhaps Tom is just smarter than the GRATE one???
>
> Again, only too true, but I am here with tongue in cheek only. How about
> you?
So, then you are never to be taken seriously and no one need ever
respond to you again??? You said it yourself ... Hells Bells, I do
not even know what I believe anymore! ... and ... My messages almost
never have anything to do with any topic that is appropriate to any
newsgroup.
> Tom Sherman is a liberal ideologue. Ideologues are NEVER smarter than
> ANYONE!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> PS. It does you no good to edit the newsgroups to which these messages go. I
> will make god damn fucking sure that my messages go to whatever newsgroups I
> want them to go to.
Unlike you, I am not a Usenet spammer who is driven to circulate his
written word to all corners of the cyberspace universe. When I reply,
I get the following message ... "You can only send to a maximum of 5
groups.", so I choose who not to send to and I prefer not have the
folks in Australia and the UK think that we are all a bunch of loons
in this country.
> > On Sep 21, 6:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> Damn, when Tom Sherman is not here I hardly know who to beat up on. He is
> >> just so right for me - a liberal-socialist-communist pig. No one else can
> >> substitute for him.
>
> >> Why does he have no consideration for me whatsoever. He knows I am lost
> >> on
> >> these freaking cycling newsgroups without him. Well, I am storing up lots
> >> of
> >> bile to spew on him the moment he returns. Hells Bells, these cycling
> >> newsgroups are worthless without Tom Sherman here to serve as my foil.
You are lost without Tom ... implore him to show you some
consideration and yet threaten to spew bile upon him the moment he
complies with your invitation to return??? The conundrum continues.
Jim McNamara
|
| | |
Date: 02 Oct 2007 03:41:58
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Where is Tom Sherman?
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1190810919.765741.10970@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 25, 2:35 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190509085.658363.312370@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>>
>> > Not another where's Tom Sherman regurgitated post???
>>
>> > You said it yourself ... Any given individual is irrelevant when
>> > viewed from the perspective of the group as whole, so why the
>> > incessant lament about Mr. Shermans absence???
>>
>> Yes, the above is only too true, but I am here mainly for Tom Sherman as
>> he
>> is the only one on these freaking-cycling-newsgroups (all one word) who
>> has
>> ever proven himself a worthy adversary for me.
>>
>> > You said it yourself ... I am convinced that no one with any
>> > intelligence would be caught dead on these freaking cycling
>> > newsgroups, so perhaps Tom is just smarter than the GRATE one???
>>
>> Again, only too true, but I am here with tongue in cheek only. How about
>> you?
>
> So, then you are never to be taken seriously and no one need ever
> respond to you again??? You said it yourself ... Hells Bells, I do
> not even know what I believe anymore! ... and ... My messages almost
> never have anything to do with any topic that is appropriate to any
> newsgroup.
Nope, I am most definitely never to be taken seriously, at least not as far
as these freaking-cycling-newsgroups (all one word) are concerned.
>> Tom Sherman is a liberal ideologue. Ideologues are NEVER smarter than
>> ANYONE!
>>
>> PS. It does you no good to edit the newsgroups to which these messages
>> go. I
>> will make god damn fucking sure that my messages go to whatever
>> newsgroups I
>> want them to go to.
>
> Unlike you, I am not a Usenet spammer who is driven to circulate his
> written word to all corners of the cyberspace universe. When I reply,
> I get the following message ... "You can only send to a maximum of 5
> groups.", so I choose who not to send to and I prefer not have the
> folks in Australia and the UK think that we are all a bunch of loons
> in this country.
I have no hang-ups whatsoever about the loons in the UK and Aussieland. They
are even dumber than we are. If and when any of my wisdom ever gets to them,
they will only benefit from it.
>> > On Sep 21, 6:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> Damn, when Tom Sherman is not here I hardly know who to beat up on. He
>> >> is
>> >> just so right for me - a liberal-socialist-communist pig. No one else
>> >> can
>> >> substitute for him.
>>
>> >> Why does he have no consideration for me whatsoever. He knows I am
>> >> lost
>> >> on
>> >> these freaking cycling newsgroups without him. Well, I am storing up
>> >> lots
>> >> of
>> >> bile to spew on him the moment he returns. Hells Bells, these cycling
>> >> newsgroups are worthless without Tom Sherman here to serve as my foil.
>
> You are lost without Tom ... implore him to show you some
> consideration and yet threaten to spew bile upon him the moment he
> complies with your invitation to return??? The conundrum continues.
The only way to keep a liberal scofflaw like him at bay is to do to him
before he does it to you. Jeez, I thought everyone in the universe knew at
least that much!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| |
Date: 22 Sep 2007 17:58:05
From: JimmyMac
Subject: Re: Where is Tom Sherman?
|
Not another where's Tom Sherman regurgitated post???
You said it yourself ... Any given individual is irrelevant when
viewed from the perspective of the group as whole, so why the
incessant lament about Mr. Shermans absence???
You said it yourself ... I am convinced that no one with any
intelligence would be caught dead on these freaking cycling
newsgroups, so perhaps Tom is just smarter than the GTATE one???
Tis time to pack it up and take leave of ARBR.
Jim McNamara
On Sep 21, 6:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net > wrote:
> Damn, when Tom Sherman is not here I hardly know who to beat up on. He is
> just so right for me - a liberal-socialist-communist pig. No one else can
> substitute for him.
>
> Why does he have no consideration for me whatsoever. He knows I am lost on
> these freaking cycling newsgroups without him. Well, I am storing up lots of
> bile to spew on him the moment he returns. Hells Bells, these cycling
> newsgroups are worthless without Tom Sherman here to serve as my foil.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
| | |
Date: 25 Sep 2007 02:35:31
From: Edward Dolan
Subject: Re: Where is Tom Sherman?
|
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1190509085.658363.312370@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
> Not another where's Tom Sherman regurgitated post???
>
> You said it yourself ... Any given individual is irrelevant when
> viewed from the perspective of the group as whole, so why the
> incessant lament about Mr. Shermans absence???
Yes, the above is only too true, but I am here mainly for Tom Sherman as he
is the only one on these freaking-cycling-newsgroups (all one word) who has
ever proven himself a worthy adversary for me.
> You said it yourself ... I am convinced that no one with any
> intelligence would be caught dead on these freaking cycling
> newsgroups, so perhaps Tom is just smarter than the GRATE one???
Again, only too true, but I am here with tongue in cheek only. How about
you?
Tom Sherman is a liberal ideologue. Ideologues are NEVER smarter than
ANYONE!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
PS. It does you no good to edit the newsgroups to which these messages go. I
will make god damn fucking sure that my messages go to whatever newsgroups I
want them to go to.
> On Sep 21, 6:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> Damn, when Tom Sherman is not here I hardly know who to beat up on. He is
>> just so right for me - a liberal-socialist-communist pig. No one else can
>> substitute for him.
>>
>> Why does he have no consideration for me whatsoever. He knows I am lost
>> on
>> these freaking cycling newsgroups without him. Well, I am storing up lots
>> of
>> bile to spew on him the moment he returns. Hells Bells, these cycling
>> newsgroups are worthless without Tom Sherman here to serve as my foil.
|
|
