| |
Main
Date: 09 Jul 2007 18:54:13
From: jim beam
Subject: spoke lacing question for jobst
|
in your book, and again recently on this forum, you have stated that interleaving spokes when lacing makes for a better wheel. "To make them tough, they must be interleaved when lacing the spokes" you recently said. what is the mechanism for how this works? and is tying and soldering not an extension of this same principle?
|
|
| |
Date: 10 Jul 2007 13:35:47
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: spoke lacing question for jobst
|
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/07/09/us/20070710_BRIDGE_slideshow_1.html
|
| |
Date: 10 Jul 2007 12:21:16
From: datakoll
Subject: Re: spoke lacing question for jobst
|
On Jul 9, 11:01 pm, Richard McBeef <r...@beef.org > wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:54:13 -0700, jim beam wrote: > > in your book, and again recently on this forum, you have stated that > > interleaving spokes when lacing makes for a better wheel. "To make them > > tough, they must be interleaved when lacing the spokes" you recently said. > > > what is the mechanism for how this works? and is tying and soldering > > not an extension of this same principle? > > http://tinyurl.com/5du2w Any construction of triangles or triangles within trusses is stronger with shorter legs and more fixed triangles. But what this does to a hanging torque rod suspension system, in dividing the total function in half. ????
|
| |
Date: 09 Jul 2007 19:01:56
From: Richard McBeef
Subject: Re: spoke lacing question for jobst
|
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:54:13 -0700, jim beam wrote: > in your book, and again recently on this forum, you have stated that > interleaving spokes when lacing makes for a better wheel. "To make them > tough, they must be interleaved when lacing the spokes" you recently said. > > what is the mechanism for how this works? and is tying and soldering > not an extension of this same principle? http://tinyurl.com/5du2w
|
|